Comparing city practitioners’ and residents’ perceptions of a liveable neighbourhood in Finland

References

• Alfonzo, M. 2005. “To Walk or Not to Walk? The Hierarchy of Walking Needs.” Environment and Behavior 37 (6): 808–836. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916504274016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bantayan, N., and I. Bishop. 1998. “Linking Objective and Subjective Modelling for Landuse Decision-Making.” Landscape and Urban Planning 43 (1): 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00101-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BDR. 2020. Building and Dwelling Register. Digital and population data services agency. https://dvv.fi/en/real-estate-building-and-spatial-information
   Google Scholar
• Bird, E., J. Ige, P. Pilkington, A. Pinto, C. Petrokofsky, and J. Burgess-Allen. 2018. “Built and Natural Environment Planning Principles for Promoting Health: An Umbrella Review.” BMC Public Health 18 (1): 930. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5870-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boone, C., and A. Modarres. 2006. City and Environment. New Delhi: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyko, C., and R. Cooper. 2011. “Clarifying and re-Conceptualising Density.” Clarifying and Re-Conceptualising Density 76 (1): 1–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2011.07.001.
   Google Scholar
• Braçe, O., M. Garrido-Cumbrera, and J. Correa-Fernández. 2021. “Gender Differences in the Perceptions of Green Spaces Characteristics.” Social Science Quarterly 102 (6): 2640–2648. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braubach, M., and J. Fairburn. 2010. “Social Inequities in Environmental Risks Associated with Housing and Residential Location—A Review of Evidence.” European Journal of Public Health 20 (1): 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckp221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., and H. Glanz. 2018. “Identifying Potential NIMBY and YIMBY Effects in General Land use Planning and Zoning.” Applied Geography 99: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.07.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brueckner, J., and A. Largey. 2008. “Social Interaction and Urban Sprawl.” Journal of Urban Economics 64 (1): 18–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2007.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmichael, A., D. Gleason, R. Lehrmitt, and C. Luppino. 2007. City of Westminster Livability Index. London: Worcester Polytechnic Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Castelli, C., B. d’Hombres, L. Dominicis, L. Dijkstra, V. Montalto, and N. Pontarollo. 2023. “What Makes Cities Happy? Factors Contributing to Life Satisfaction in European Cities.” European Urban and Regional Studies, 09697764231155335. https://doi.org/10.1177/09697764231155335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• City of Helsinki. 2021. Register of Public Areas in the City of Helsinki. https://hri.fi/data/en_GB/dataset/helsingin-kaupungin-yleisten-alueiden-rekisteri
   Google Scholar
• City of Vaasa. 2022. Ristinummen asumisen, turvallisuuden, esteettömyyden ja viihtyisyyden kehittäminen (in Finnish). Maptionnaire-kyselyn raportti. Vaasa: Ministry of the Environment (Lähiöohjelma 2020-2022) and Ristinummen lähiöhanke.
   Google Scholar
• City of Vantaa. 2021. Green areas of detailed plans. Dataset.
   Google Scholar
• CLC. 2018. Corine Land Cover dataset. Finnish Environment Institute SYKE (partly LUKE, MAVI, LIVI, DVV, EU, NLS Topographic database 01/2017).
   Google Scholar
• Deniz, D. 2016. “Improving Perceived Safety for Public Health through Sustainable Development.” Urban Planning and Architectural Design for Sustainable Development (UPADSD) 216: 632–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.12.044.
   Google Scholar
• Di Marino, M., M. Tiitu, K. Lapintie, A. Viinikka, and L. Kopperoinen. 2019. “Integrating Green Infrastructure and Ecosystem Services in Land use Planning. Results from two Finnish Case Studies.” Land Use Policy 82: 643–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farnum, J., T. Hall, and L. E. Kruger. 2005. Sense of place in natural resource recreation and tourism: An evaluation and assessment of research findings. Recreation and Tourism Initiative, Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-660. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, USA, 59 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, S., B. Giles-Corti, and M. Knuiman. 2014. “Does Fear of Crime Discourage Walkers? A Social-Ecological Exploration of Fear As a Deterrent to Walking.” Environment and Behavior 46 (6): 698–717. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916512465176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frehlich, L., C. Christie, P. Ronksley, T. Turin, P. Doyle-Baker, and G. McCormack. 2022. “The Neighbourhood Built Environment and Health-Related Fitness: A Narrative Systematic Review.” The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 19 (1): 124. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-022-01359-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehl, J. 2010. Cities for People. Washington, DC: Island press.
   Google Scholar
• Godschalk, D. 2004. “Land Use Planning Challenges: Coping with Conflicts in Visions of Sustainable Development and Livable Communities.” Journal of the American Planning Association 70 (1): 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360408976334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haaland, C., and C. van den Bosch. 2015. “Challenges and Strategies for Urban Green-Space Planning in Cities Undergoing Densification: A Review.” Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 14 (4): 760–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.07.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasanzadeh, K., M. Kyttä, and G. Brown. 2019. “Beyond Housing Preferences: Urban Structure and Actualisation of Residential Area Preferences.” Urban Science 3 (1), https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci3010021.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, S. 2013. “Why is Housing Always Satisfactory? A Study into the Impact of Preference and Experience on Housing Appreciation.” Social Indicators Research 113 (3): 785–805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0114-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jomehpour, M. 2015. “Assessing the Livability of the New and Old Parts of Tehran, Municipality Districts 22 and 10 of Tehran.” OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development 8 (9): 87–96.
   Google Scholar
• Kyttä, M., A. Broberg, T. Tzoulas, and K. Snabb. 2013. “Towards Contextually Sensitive Urban Densification: Location-Based softGIS Knowledge Revealing Perceived Residential Environmental Quality.” Landscape and Urban Planning 113: 30–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, K., S. Fullagar, and S. Reid. 2016. “Where is the ‘Social’ in Constructions of ‘Liveability’? Exploring Community, Social Interaction and Social Cohesion in Changing Urban Environments.” Urban Policy and Research 34 (4): 343–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2015.1118374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittal, S., J. Chadchan, and S. Mishra. 2020. “Review of Concepts, Tools and Indices for the Assessment of Urban Quality of Life.” Social Indicators Research 149 (1): 187–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-019-02232-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarrete-Hernandez, P., A. Vetro, and P. Concha. 2021. “Building Safer Public Spaces: Exploring Gender Difference in the Perception of Safety in Public Space Through Urban Design Interventions.” Landscape and Urban Planning 214: 104180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neal, Z. 2021. “Does the Neighbourhood Matter for Neighbourhood Satisfaction? A Meta-Analysis.” Urban Studies 58 (9): 1775–1791. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020926091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascual, U., P. Balvanera, C. Anderson, R. Chaplin-Kramer, M. Christie, D. González-Jiménez, A. Martin, … E. Zent. 2023. “Diverse Values of Nature for Sustainability.” Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06406-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, A., and J. Sen. 2020. “A Critical Review of Liveability Approaches and Their Dimensions.” Geoforum 117: 90–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.09.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer, D., and S. Cloutier. 2016. “Planning for Happy Neighborhoods.” Journal of the American Planning Association 82 (3): 267–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2016.1166347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwanen, T., and P. Mokhtarian. 2004. “The Extent and Determinants of Dissonance Between Actual and Preferred Residential Neighborhood Type.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 31 (5): 759–784. https://doi.org/10.1068/b3039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stal, G., and D. Zuberi. 2010. “Ending the Cycle of Poverty Through Socio-Economic Integration: A Comparison of Moving to Opportunity (MTO) in the United States and the Bijlmermeer Revival Project in the Netherlands.” Cities 27 (1): 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2009.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanislav, A., and J. Chin. 2019. “Evaluating Livability and Perceived Values of Sustainable Neighborhood Design: New Urbanism and Original Urban Suburbs.” Sustainable Cities and Society 47: 101517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stjernberg, M. 2019. Concrete Suburbia: Suburban housing estates and socio-spatial differentiation in Finland. URN:ISBN:978-951-51-4920-6; http://hdl.handle.net/10138/301865
   Google Scholar
• Strandell, A. 2017. Asukasbarometri 2016 – Kysely kaupunkimaisista asuinympäristöistä. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/193009
   Google Scholar
• Sui, Y., D. Ettema, and M. Helbich. 2022. “Longitudinal Associations Between the Neighborhood Social, Natural, and Built Environment and Mental Health: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analyses.” Health & Place 77: 102893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2022.102893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SYKE, & Statistics Finland. 2019. YKR database.
   Google Scholar
• Tiitu, M., P. Naess, and M. Ristimäki. 2021. “The Urban Density in two Nordic Capitals – Comparing the Development of Oslo and Helsinki Metropolitan Regions.” European Planning Studies 29 (6): 1092–1112. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1817865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiitu, M., A. Viinikka, L. Kopperoinen, and D. Geneletti. 2018. “Balancing Urban Green Space and Residential Infill Development: A Spatial Multi-Criteria Approach Based on Practitioner Engagement.” Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 20 (03): 1840004. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333218400045.
   Google Scholar
• Tiitu, M., A. Viinikka, M. Ojanen, and H. Saarikoski. 2021. “Transcending Sectoral Boundaries? Discovering Built-Environment Indicators Through Knowledge co-Production for Enhanced Planning for Well-Being in Finnish Cities.” Environmental Science & Policy 126: 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.09.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twohig-Bennett, C., and A. Jones. 2018. “The Health Benefits of the Great Outdoors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Greenspace Exposure and Health Outcomes.” Environmental Research 166: 628–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.06.030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vierikko, K., and J. Niemelä. 2016. “Bottom-up Thinking—Identifying Socio-Cultural Values of Ecosystem Services in Local Blue–Green Infrastructure Planning in Helsinki, Finland.” Land Use Policy 50: 537–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.09.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, J., and J. Li. 2007. “Latent Lifestyle Preferences and Household Location Decisions.” Journal of Geographical Systems 9 (1): 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-006-0030-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, B., T. Zhao, L. Hu, M. Browning, J. Heinrich, S. Dharmage, B. Jalaludin, et al. 2021. “Greenspace and Human Health: An Umbrella Review.” The Innovation 2 (4): 100164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100164.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar