Conflicts in the inter-municipal management of commercial areas – a case study using cognitive-affective mapping

References

• Achterkamp, M., and J. Vos. 2007. “Critically Identifying Stakeholders.” Systems Research and Behavioral Science 24 (1): 3–14. doi:10.1002/sres.760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartolini, S., and P. Mair. 1990. Identity, Competition, and Electoral Availability. The Stabilisation of European Electorates 1885–-1985. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bel, G., and M. Sebő. 2021. “Does Inter-Municipal Cooperation Really Reduce Delivery Costs? An Empirical Evaluation of the Role of Scale Economies, Transaction Costs, and Governance Arrangements.” Urban Affairs Review 57 (3): 153–188. doi:10.1177/1078087419839492.
   Google Scholar
• Bickerstaff, K., and G. Walker. 2001. “Participatory Local Governance and Transport Planning.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 33: 431–451. doi:10.1068/a33173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bischoff, I., and R. Kosfeld. 2021. “Does Inter-Local Cooperation Reduce the Intensity of Tax Competition?.” In Evidence on Inter-Local Industrial Parks in Germany, MAGKS Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics, No. 37-2021. Marburg: Philipps-University Marburg, School of Business and Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Blecken, L., and M. Melzer. 2009. Stadt-Umland-Kooperation: Stellschrauben zur Stärkung der Regionalen Zukunftsgestaltung. Ein Leitfaden für die Kommunale Praxis. Wedel: Raum & Energie.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G., and C. Raymond. 2014. “Methods for Identifying Land Use Conflict Potential Using Participatory Mapping.” Landscape and Urban Planning 122: 196–208. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.11.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of Europe, UNDP, LGI. 2010. Toolkit manual. Inter-municipal cooperation. Available online: https://rm.coe.int/imc-intermunicipal-co-operation/1680746ec3 (accessed on 09.09.2022).
   Google Scholar
• Dang, T. K. P., I. J. Visseren-Hamakers, and B. Arts. 2016. “A Framework for Assessing Governance Capacity: An Illustration from Vietnam's Forestry Reforms.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 34 (6): 1154–1174. doi:10.1177/0263774X15598325.
   Google Scholar
• De Peuter, B., and E. Wayenberg. 2007. “Belgium: Flemish Inter-Municipal Cooperation Under Reform.” In Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Europe, edited by J. R. Hulst, and A. van Montfort, 23–38. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• de Vries, M. S. 2002. “Interactive Policy-Making in Local Governance.” In Developing Local Governance Networks in Europe, edited by T. Bovaird, E. Löffler, and S. Parrado-Díez, 91–106. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Deutscher Städtetag. 2005. Neue Formen der Zusammenarbeit in der Region - Thesen. Beschlossen auf der Vollversammlung am 1.6.2005.
   Google Scholar
• Dikopoulou, Z. 2021. “Fuzzy Cognitive Maps.” In Modeling and Simulating Complex Business Perceptions. Fuzzy Management Methods, edited by Z. Dikopoulou, 27–42. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-81496-0_3
   Google Scholar
• Domingo, I., and R. Beunen. 2013. “Regional Planning in the Catalan Pyrenees: Strategies to Deal with Actors' Expectations, Perceived Uncertainties and Conflicts.” European Planning Studies 21 (2): 187–203. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.722916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlwein, S., J. Meister, C. Wamsler, and S. Pauleit. 2023. “Governance of Densification and Climate Change Adaptation: How Can Conflicting Demands for Housing and Greening in Cities be Reconciled?” Land Use Policy 128: 106593. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fienitz, M., and R. Siebert. 2021. “Urban Versus Rural? Conflict Lines in Land Use Disputes in the Urban–Rural Fringe Region of Schwerin, Germany.” Land 10: 726. doi:10.3390/land10070726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, S., D. I. Abdi, J. Ludin, R. Smith, S. Williams, and S. Williams. 2000. Working with Conflict: Skills and Strategies for Action. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Franzke, J. 2018. “Traditions, Problems and Challenges of Inter-Municipal Cooperation in the German Federal State of Brandenburg.” In Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Europe. Institutions and Governance, edited by F. Teles, and P. Swianiewicz, 189–207. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Grădinaru, S., C. Iojă, I. Pătru-Stupariu, and A. Hersperger. 2017. “Are Spatial Planning Objectives Reflected in the Evolution of Urban Landscape Patterns? A Framework for the Evaluation of Spatial Planning Outcomes.” Sustainability 9 (8): 1279–1217. doi:10.3390/su9081279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haffert, L. 2022. Stadt, Land, Frust. Eine Politische Vermessung. C.H. Beck.
   Google Scholar
• Hamelink, C. J. 2008. “Urban Conflict and Communication.” International Communication Gazette 70: 291–301. doi:10.1177/1748048508089953.
   Google Scholar
• Haupt, W., P. Eckersley, J. Irmisch, and K. Kern. 2022. “How do Local Factors Shape Transformation Pathways Towards Climate-Neutral and Resilient Cities?” In European Planning Studies. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2022.2147394
   Google Scholar
• Heinz, W. 2007. “Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Germany: The Mismatch Between Existing Necessities and Suboptimal Solutions.” In Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Europe, edited by J. R. Hulst, and A. van Montfort, 91–116. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Henn, S., T. Zimmermann, and B. Braunschweig, eds. 2022. Stadtregionales Flächenmanagement. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Spektrum. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-63295-6.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, I., and S. Monk. 2004. “The Economic Diversity of Rural England: Stylised Fallacies and Uncertain Evidence.” Journal of Rural Studies 20: 263–272. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2003.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homer-Dixon, T., J. L. Maynard, M. Mildenberger, M. Milkoreit, S. Mock, S. Quilley, T. Schröder, and P. Thagard. 2013. “A Complex Systems Approach to the Study of Ideology: Cognitive-Affective Structures and the Dynamics of Belief Systems.” Journal of Social and Political Psychology 1 (1): 337–363. doi:10.5964/jspp.v1i1.36.
   Google Scholar
• Homer-Dixon, T., M. Milkoreit, S. J. Mock, T. Schröder, and P. Thagard. 2014. “The Conceptual Structure of Social Disputes.” SAGE Open 4 (1), doi:10.1177/2158244014526210.
   Google Scholar
• Hulst, J. R., and A. van Montfort. (2007). Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Europe. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hulst, J. R., and A. van Montfort. 2012. “Institutional Features of Inter-Municipal Cooperation: Cooperative Arrangements and Their National Contexts.” Public Policy and Administration 27 (2): 121–144. doi:10.1177/0952076711403026.
   Google Scholar
• Kearney, A. R., and S. Kaplan. 1997. “Toward a Methodology for the Measurement of Knowledge Structures of Ordinary People.” Environment and Behavior 29 (5): 579–617. doi:10.1177/0013916597295001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keil, R., P. Hamel, J.-A. Boudreau, and S. Kipfer. 2016. Governing Cities Through Regions. Canadian and European Perspectives. Waterloo, CA: WLU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly-Reif, K., and S. Wing. 2016. “Urban-rural Exploitation: An Underappreciated Dimension of Environmental Injustice.” Journal of Rural Studies 47: 350–358. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.03.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiessling, N., and M. Pütz. 2020. “Assessing the Regional Governance Capacities of Spatial Planning: The Case of the Canton of Zurich.” Regional Studies, Regional Science 7 (1): 183–205. doi:10.1080/21681376.2020.1776631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosow, H., S. Wassermann, S. Bartke, P. Goede, I. Imbert, D. Grimski, T. Jenssen, et al. 2022. “Addressing Goal Conflicts: New Policy Mixes for Commercial Land use Management.” Land 11: 795. doi:10.3390/land11060795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liddo, Di, G. Giuranno, and M. G. 2016. “Asymmetric Yardstick Competition and Municipal Cooperation.” Economics Letters 141: 64–66. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2016.01.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Küpper, P. (2016). Abgrenzung und Typisierung Ländlicher Räume. Braunschweig: Thünen Working Paper 68.
   Google Scholar
• Lipset, S. M., and S. Rokkan. 1967. “Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction.” In Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives, edited by S. M. Lipset, and S. Rokkan, 1–64. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luthardt, J., J. H. Morgan, I. Bormann, and T. Schröder. 2022. “Quantifying Emotionally Grounded Discursive Knowledge with Cognitive-Affective Maps.” Quality & Quantity 56 (3), doi:10.1007/s11135-021-01195-7.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, W., G. Jiang, Y. Chen, Y. Qu, T. Zhou, and W. Li. 2020. “How Feasible is Regional Integration for Reconciling Land use Conflicts Across the Urban–Rural Interface? Evidence from Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Metropolitan Region in China.” Land Use Policy 92: 104433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald, S., J. Monstadt, and Abigail F. Friendly. 2021. “From the Frankfurt Greenbelt to the Regionalpark RheinMain: An Institutional Perspective on Regional Greenbelt Governance.” European Planning Studies 29 (1): 142–162. doi:10.1080/09654313.2020.1724268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. 2003. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken. Vol. 8. Auflage. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz UTB.
   Google Scholar
• Möller, M., P. Höfele, F. J. Tauber, L. Reuter, and R. Grießhammer. 2021. “How to Assess Technological Developments in Basic Research?” TATuP – Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis 30 (1): 56–62. doi:10.14512/tatup.30.1.56.
   Google Scholar
• Müller-Christ, G. 2012. “Vom Industrial Ecology Management zur Entwicklung Nachhaltiger Gewerbegebiete.” In Industrial Ecology Management, edited by M. von Hauff, R. Isenmann, and G. Müller-Christ. Gabler Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-3-8349-6638-4_4
   Google Scholar
• Newman, P. 2008. “Strategic Spatial Planning: Collective Action and Moments of Opportunity.” European Planning Studies 16 (10): 1371–1383. doi:10.1080/09654310802420078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niewöhner, J., A. Bruns, H. Haberl, P. Hostert, T. Krueger, C. Lauk, J. Lutz, D. Müller, and J. Nielsen. 2016. “Land Use Competition: Ecological, Economic and Social Perspectives.” In Land Use Competition, edited by J. Niewöhner, A. Bruns, P. Hostert, T. Kruerg, J. Nielsen, H. Haberl, C. Lauk, J. Lutz, and D. Müller, 1–17. Basel, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Oseland, S. E., and H. Haarstad. 2022. “Displacing Conflicting Goals in Planning for Sustainability? Insights from Three Norwegian Cities.” Planning Theory & Practice 23 (0): 233–247. doi:10.1080/14649357.2022.2034924.
   Google Scholar
• Purkarthofer, E., A. Humer, and R. Mäntysalo. 2021. “Regional Planning: An Arena of Interests, Institutions and Relations.” Regional Studies 55 (5): 773–777. doi:10.1080/00343404.2021.1875128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razin, E. 2016. “Inter-municipal Cooperation in the Development of Industrial Parks and tax Redistribution: The Road to Hell is Paved with Good Intentions.” Quaestiones Geographicae Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań 35 (2): 83–90. doi:10.1515/quageo-2016-0017.
   Google Scholar
• Regionalverband Nordschwarzwald. 2005. Regionalplan 2015 Nordschwarzwald. URL::// www.nordschwarzwald-region.de/fileadmin/filemounts/redaktion/Bilder/2_Regionalplan/Regionalplan2015_satzung.pdf (accessed on 14.03.2023).
   Google Scholar
• Renn, O. 2013. “Technikkonflikte.” In Handbuch Technikethik. Unter Mitarbeit von Melanie Simonidis-Puschmann, edited by A. Grunwald, 72–75. Stuttgart, Weimar: Verlag J. B. Metzler.
   Google Scholar
• Repp, A., and T. Weith. 2015. “Building Bridges Across Sectors and Scales: Exploring Systemic Solutions Towards A Sustainable Management of Land —Experiences from 4th Year Status Conference on Research for Sustainable Land Management.” Land 4: 325–336. doi:10.3390/land4020325.
   Google Scholar
• Rhea, C., Reuter, L., & Piereder, J. (2020). Valence software release. OSF. https://scholar.google.ca/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&cluster=6439129348560699890
   Google Scholar
• Ruano de la Fuente, J. M., and L. Schaap. 2007. “Democratic Legitimacy of Inter-Municipal and Regional Governance.” In Governance and the Democratic Deficit, edited by V. Bekkers, G. Dijkstra, A. Edwards, and M. Fenger, 203–222. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Salet, W. G. M., A. Thornley, and A. Kreukels. 2003. “Institutional and Spatial Coordination in European Metropolitan Regions.” In Metropolitan Governance and Spatial Planning: Comparative Case Studies of European City-Regions/Edited by Willem Salet, Andy Thornley and Anton Kreukels, edited by W. G. M. Salet, A. Thornley, and A. Kreukels, 3–19. Spon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schaeffer, P. V., M. S. Kahsai, and W. J. Randall. 2013. “Beyond the Rural–Urban Dichotomy.” International Regional Science Review 36: 81–96. doi:10.1177/0160017612449981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffer Boudet, H. 2011. “From NIMBY to NIABY: Regional Mobilization Against Liquefied Natural Gas in the United States.” Environmental Politics 20 (6): 786–806. doi:10.1080/09644016.2011.617166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz, M., D. Scheer, and S. Wassermann. 2010. “New Technology on Well-Trodden Paths? The Acceptance of CO2 Storage in Germany Neue Technik, Alte Pfade? Zur Akzeptanz der CO2-Speicherung in Deutschland.” GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 19 (4): 287–296. doi:10.14512/gaia.19.4.11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seto, K. C., A. Reenberg, C. G. Boone, M. Fragkias, D. Haase, T. Langanke, P. Marcotullio, D. K. Munroe, B. Olah, and D. Simon. 2012. “Urban Land Teleconnections and Sustainability.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109: 7687–7692. doi:10.1073/pnas.1117622109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, P., F. Teles, and J. Ferreira. 2018. “Intermunicipal Cooperation: The Quest for Governance Capacity?” International Review of Administrative Sciences 84 (4): 619–638. doi:10.1177/0020852317740411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinhäußer, R., R. Siebert, A. Steinführer, and M. Hellmich. 2015. “National and Regional Land-Use Conflicts in Germany from the Perspective of Stakeholders.” Land Use Policy 49: 183–194. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.08.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thagard, P. 2012. “Values in Science: Cognitive-Affective Maps.” In The Cognitive Science of Science: Explanation, Discovery, and Conceptual Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tosun, J., S. Schaub, and C. Marek. 2023. “Europeans’ Attitudes Toward the Goals of Agricultural Policy: A Case of Rural–Urban Divide?” Political Studies Review 0 (0), doi:10.1177/14789299221149505.
   Google Scholar
• Turok, I. 2009. “Limits to the Mega-City Region: Conflicting Local and Regional Needs.” Regional Studies 43 (6): 845–862. doi:10.1080/00343400903095261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UBA - Umweltbundesamt. 2018. Instrumente zur Reduzierung der Flächeninanspruchnahme. Dessau-Roßlau: UBA.
   Google Scholar
• UN (United Nations). 2019. Urban-Rural Linkages: Guiding Principles to Advance Integrated Territorial Development. Nairobi. https://urbanrurallinkages.files.wordpress.com/2019/04/url-gp.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• von der Dunk, A., A. Grêt-Regamey, and A. Hersperger. 2015. “Land-use Conflicts in a Swiss Peri-Urban Landscape: Which Socio-Demographic and Environmental Variables are Associated with Their Presence and Absence?” Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences 10: 39–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von der Dunk, A., A. Grêt-Regamey, T. Dalang, and A. M. Hersperger. 2011. “Defining a Typology of Peri-Urban Land-Use Conflicts – A Case Study from Switzerland.” Landscape and Urban Planning 101: 149–156. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wassermann, S., H. Kosow, J. Kopfmüller, and U. Wagner. 2022. “Interkommunale Kooperation im Gewerbeflächenmanagement.” In Stadtregionales Flächenmanagement, edited by S. Henn, T. Zimmermann, and B. Braunschweig. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Spektrum. https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007978-3-662-63295-6_31-2.
   Google Scholar
• Weith, T., T. Barkmann, N. Gaasch, S. Rogga, C. Strauß, and J. Zscheischler. 2021. “A Knowledge-Based European Perspective on Sustainable Land Management: Conceptual Approach and Overview of Chapters.” In Sustainable Land Management in a European Context. A Co-Design Approach, 1–13. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Willi, Y., M. Pütz, and J. Jongerden. 2020. “Unpacking Legitimacy in Regional Development: Asymmetric Justification and the Functioning of Regional Development Agencies.” Territory, Politics, Governance 47 (1): 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, S. E. 2012. “Water Cognition and Cognitive Affective Mapping: Identifying Priority Clusters Within a Canadian Water Efficiency Community.” Water Resources Management 26: 2991–3004. doi:10.1007/s11269-012-0061-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfschütz, E. 2020. “The Effect of Inter-Municipal Cooperation on Local Business Development in German Municipalities.” In MAGKS Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics, No. 05-2020. Marburg: Philipps-University Marburg, School of Business and Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Wolsink, M. 2006. “Invalid Theory Impedes our Understanding: A Critique on the Persistence of the Language of NIMBY.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 31 (1): 85–91. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2006.00191.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuschansky, B., and K. König. 2011. Interkommunale Gewerbegebiete in Deutschland. Grundlagen und Empfehlungen zur Planung, Förderung und Finanzierung, Organisation, Vermarktung – 146 Projektbeschreibungen und Abgeleitete Erkenntnisse. Dortmund, Germany: ILS NRW.
   Google Scholar
• Zografos, C., and J. Martinez-Alier. 2009. “The Politics of Landscape Value: A Case Study of Wind Farm Conflict in Rural Catalonia.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 41: 1726–1744. doi:10.1068/a41208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar