References
- Architects, Tas. 2020. Design and Access Statement: Land off Astrope Lane, Long Marston [online]. Available from: https://planning.dacorum.gov.uk [Accessed: 24th October 2023].
- Baker, M., J. Coaffee, and G. Sherriff. 2007. “Achieving Successful Participation in the New UK Spatial Planning System.” Planning, Practice and Research 22 (1): 79–93.
- Bradley, Q. 2015. The political identities of neighbourhood planning in England, Beyond Globalisation: Remaking Housing Policy in a Complex World, European Network for Housing Research, Edinburgh, 1-4 July 2014. Leeds Beckett Repository [online]. Available from: http://eprints.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/247/1/ENHR2014_Neighbourhood%20planning%20and%20post%20politics_v2.pdf [Accessed 15 May 2020].
- Bradshaw, K. 2008. “The Post-Place Community: Contributions to the Debate About the Definition of Community.” Community Development 39 (1): 5–16.
- Brookfield, K. 2017. “Getting Involved in Plan-Making: Participation in Neighbourhood Planning in England.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 35 (3): 397–416.
- Carpenter, J., and S. Brownill. 2008. “Approaches to Democratic Involvement: Widening Community Engagement in the English Planning System.” Planning Theory and Practice 9 (2): 227–248.
- Corburn, J. 2003. “Bringing Local Knowledge Into Environmental Decision-Making. Improving Urban Planning for Communities at Risk.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 22: 420–433.
- Dacorum Borough Council. n.d. Community Review Panel [online]. Available from: http://www.dacorum.gov.uk/home/planning-development/community-review-panel [Accessed: 15 February 2021].
- Dacorum Borough Council/Frame Projects. 2020. Community Review Panel Handbook 2020 [online]. Available from: https://4303e7c3-2b11-427f-9f43-8bddf8a3c093.filesusr.com/ugd/7abc0e_4ccc7a21554543f9aa4433441718aa7b.pdf [Accessed 10 February 2021].
- Design Council. 2013. Design Review: Principles and Practice. London: Design Council.
- Durmaz-Drinkwater, B., and B. Platt. 2019. “Better Quality Built Environments: Design Review Panels as Applied in Cambridge, England.” Journal of Urban Design 24 (4): 575–596.
- Fendler, L. 2006. “Others and the Problem of Community.” Curriculum Enquiry 36 (3): 303–326.
- Frame Projects. 2020a. Report of review meeting: shortlisted proposals for PC World and B&M Supermarket [online]. Available from: https://oldkentroad.org.uk/crp/[Accessed 23 March 2022].
- Frame Projects. 2020b. Report of review meeting: Parks and Recreation Strategy [online]. Available from: https://oldkentroad.org.uk/crp/ [Accessed 25 March 2022].
- Frame Projects. 2021a. Community Review Panel Briefing Note [online]. Available from: https://www.frame-projects.co.uk/_files/ugd/7abc0e_ea215c465d00489ca886c80251b81f95.pdf [Accessed 23 March 2022].
- Frame Projects. 2021b. Report of Review Meeting: Hatcham Road Design Code [online]. Available from: https://oldkentroad.org.uk/crp/ [Accessed 23 March 2022].
- Frame Projects. 2021c. Governance meeting of the Old Kent Road Community Review Panel [online]. Available from: https://oldkentroad.org.uk/crp/ [Accessed 23 March 2022].
- Frame Projects. 2022. Governance meeting of the Old Kent Road Community Development Panel. Available from: https://oldkentroad.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/220516__OKR_CDP-governance-meeting_report.pdf [Accessed 25 November 2023].
- Frame Projects. n.d. Profile [online]. Available from: https://www.frame-projects.co.uk/profile [Accessed 10 February 2021].
- GLA. 2021. OPDC Community Review Group for Old Oak & Park Royal [online]. Available from: https://www.london.gov.uk/about-us/organisations-we-work/old-oak-and-park-royal-development-corporation-opdc/planning/design-review-groups/opdc-community-review-group-old-oak-park-royal [Accessed 10 February 2021].
- GLA. 2022. Old Oak and Park Royal Development Corporation (OPDC) [online]. Available from: https://www.london.gov.uk/about-us/organisations-we-work/old-oak-and-park-royal-development-corporation-opdc [Accessed 28 March 2022].
- Guijt, I., and M. Shah. 1998. The Myth of Community. Gender Issues in Participatory Development. Rugby: Practical Action Publishing.
- Healey, P. 1996. “The Communicative Turn in Planning Theory and Its Implications for Spatial Strategy Formation.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 23: 217–234.
- Holman, N., and Y. Rydin. 2013. “What Can Social Capital Tell Us About Planning Under Localism?” Local Government Studies 39 (1): 71–88.
- Inch, A. 2015. “Ordinary Citizens and the Political Cultures of Planning: In Search of the Subject of a New Democratic Ethos.” Planning Theory 14 (4): 404–424.
- Kathlene, L., and J. Martin. 1991. “Enhancing Citizen Participation: Panel Designs, Perspectives, and Policy Formation.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 10 (1): 46–63.
- Mace, A., and M. Tewdwr-Jones. 2019. “Neighbourhood Planning, Participation, and Rational Choice.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 39 (2): 184–193.
- Marshall, T. 2017. “Learning from France: Using Public Deliberation to Tackle Infrastructure Planning Issues.” International Planning Studies 21 (4): 329–347.
- Mellier, C., and R. Wilson. 2020. Getting Climate Citizens’ Assemblies Right [online]. Carnegie Europe. Available from: https://carnegieeurope.eu/2020/11/05/getting-climate-citizens-assemblies-right-pub-83133 Accessed 14th April 2023.
- MHCLG. 2019. National Planning Policy Framework. London: Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government.
- MHCLG. 2020. Guidance on plan-making [online]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/plan-making [Accessed 28 September 2020].
- Natarajan, L. 2017. “Socio-spatial Learning: A Case Study of Community Knowledge in Participatory Spatial Planning.” Progress in Planning 111: 1–23.
- Norton, P., and M. Hughes. 2018. Public Consultation and Community Involvement in Planning. A Twenty-First Century Guide. Oxford: Routledge.
- OPDC/Frame Projects. 2021. Old Oak & Park Royal Development Corporation Community Review Group Handbook 2021 [online]. Available from: https://4303e7c3-2b11-427f-9f43-8bddf8a3c093.filesusr.com/ugd/7abc0e_b09dc82b7b374cc89bf65b7b8842fd87.pdf [Accessed 10 February 2021].
- Parker, G., and C. Murray. 2012. “Beyond Tokenism? Community-led Planning and Rational Choices: Findings from Participants in Local Agenda-Setting at the Neighbourhood Scale in England.” Town Planning Review 83 (1): 1–28.
- Parker, G., and K. Salter. 2017. “Taking Stock of Neighbourhood Planning in England 2011–2016.” Planning Practice & Research 32 (4): 478–490.
- Parker, C., S. Scott, and A. Geddes. 2019. Snowball Sampling. SAGE Research Methods Foundations. Available from: https://methods.sagepub.com/foundations/snowball-sampling [Accessed 4th April 2022].
- Paterson, E. 2011. “Design Review in the UK: Its Role in Town Planning Decision-Making.” Urban Design International 16 (2): 94–104.
- Rydin, Y. 2007. “Re-Examining the Role of Knowledge Within Planning Theory.” Planning Theory 6 (1): 52–68.
- Rydin, Y. 2011. The Purpose of Planning: Creating Sustainable Towns and Cities. Bristol: The Policy Press.
- Shaw, D., and A. Lord. 2009. “From Land-Use to ‘Spatial Planning': Reflections on the Reform of the English Planning System.” The Town Planning Review 80 (4-5): 415–435.
- Southwark Council. 2020. Old Kent Road Area Action Plan [online]. Available from: https://www.southwark.gov.uk/assets/attach/31641/Old-Kent-Road-AAP-December-2020-Draft.pdf [Accessed 23 March 2022].
- Southwark Council. 2021. Community Review Panel [online]. Available from: https://oldkentroad.org.uk/crp [Accessed 12 February 2021].
- Southwark Council/Frame Projects. 2021. Old Kent Road Community Review Group Handbook 2021 [online]. Available from: https://4303e7c3-2b11-427f-9f43-8bddf8a3c093.filesusr.com/ugd/7abc0e_b40571ae2bfa43b897788c8f3f2f5ba6.pdf [Accessed 5 October 2020].
- Storper, M. 2014. “Governing the Large Metropolis.” Territory, Politics, Governance 2 (1): 115–134.
- Thorpe, A. 2017. “Rethinking Participation, Rethinking Planning.” Planning Theory & Practice 18 (4): 566–582.
- Tooley and Foster Partnerships. 2020. Design and Access Statement: Heart of Maylands Phase 2 [online]. Available from: https://planning.dacorum.gov.uk [Accessed 24th October 2023].
- Townsend, A., and J. Tully. 2004. Modernising planning: public participation in the UK planning system. European Regional Science Association Conference [online]. Porto, 25-29 August 2004. Available from: https://ideas.repec.org/p/wiw/wiwrsa/ersa04p51.html [Accessed 5 October 2020].
- Vigor, G., S. Gunn, and E. Brooks. 2017. “Governing Our Neighbours: Participation and Conflict in Neighbourhood Planning.” Town Planning Review 88 (4): 423–442.
- Wargent, M., and G. Parker. 2018. “Re-imagining Neighbourhood Governance: The Future of Neighbourhood Planning in England.” Town Planning Review 89 (4): 379–402.
- White, J. T., and H. Chapple. 2019. “Beyond Design Review: Collaborating to Create Well-Designed Places in Scotland.” Journal of Urban Design 24 (4): 597–604.
- Wills, J. 2016. “Emerging Geographies of English Localism: The Case of Neighbourhood Planning.” Political Geography 53: 43–53.
- Wynne, B. 1996. “May the Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive View of the Expert-Lay Knowledge Divide.” In Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology, edited by S. Lash. London: Sage.