A climate report gone missing – power mechanisms in Swedish national transport planning

References

• Åkerman, J., and M. Höjer. 2006. “How Much Transport Can the Climate Stand?—Sweden on a Sustainable Path in 2050.” Energy Policy 34 (14): 1944–1957. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2005.02.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banister, D. 2008. “The Sustainability Paradigm.” Transport Policy 15: 73–80. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banister, D. 2011. “Cities, Mobility and Climate Change.” Journal of Transport Geography 19: 1538–1546. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.03.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banister, D., and R. Hickman. 2013. “Transport Futures: Thinking the Unthinkable.” Transport Policy 29: 283–293. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cashmore, M., and T. Richardson. 2013. “Power and Environmental Assessment: Introduction to the Special Issue.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 39: 1–4. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2012.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cashmore, M., T. Richardson, and A. Axelsson. 2014. “Seeing Power in International Development Cooperation: Environmental Policy Integration and the World Bank.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 39 (1): 155–168. doi:10.1111/tran.12011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clegg, S. 1989. Frameworks of Power. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, S. 2014. “Circuits of Power/Knowledge.” Journal of Political Power 7 (3): 383–392. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2014.965538.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, C., ed. 2020. Handbook of Sustainable Transport. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, C., and J. Scheurer. 2010. “Planning for Sustainable Accessibility: Developing Tools to Aid Discussion and Decision-Making.” Progress in Planning 74 (2): 53–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2010.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, M. 2010. Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Finnveden, G., and J. Åkerman. 2014. “Not Planning a Sustainable Transport System.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 46: 53–57. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2014.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 1998. Rationality and Power: Democracy in Practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. “Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 12 (2): 219–245. doi:10.1177/1077800405284363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B., and T. Richardson. 2002. “Planning and Foucault: In Search of the Dark Side of Planning Theory.” In Planning Futures: New Directions for Planning Theory, edited by P. Allmendinger and M. Tewdwr-Jones, 44–62. London and New York: Routledge. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2278389.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1991. “Governmentality.” In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, edited by G. Burchell, C. Gordon, and P. Miller, 87–104. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• George, A., and A. Bennett. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• GOI. 2013. Fossil Freedom on the Way (Fossilfrihet på väg). The Government’s Official Investigations 2013:84.
   Google Scholar
• Government Bill. 2008. 2008/09:93. Mål för framtidens resor och transporter.
   Google Scholar
• Government Bill. 2012. 2012/13:25. Investeringar för ett starkt och hållbart transportsystem.
   Google Scholar
• Government Directive. 2015. N2015/4305/TIF. Uppdrag om att ta fram inriktningsunderlag för transportinfrastrukturplanering för perioden 2018–2029.
   Google Scholar
• Grønmo, S., and T. Winqvist. 2006. Metoder i samhällsvetenskap. Malmö: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Hickman, R., P. Austin, and D. Banister. 2014. “Hyperautomobility and Governmentality in Auckland.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 16 (3): 419–435. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2014.954074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hrelja, R., M. Hjerpe, and S. Storbjörk. 2015. “Creating Transformative Force? The Role of Spatial Planning in Climate Change Transitions Towards Sustainable Transportation.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 17 (5): 617–635. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2014.1003535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hultén, J. 2012. “Ny väg till nya Vägar och Järnvägar: Finanseringspragmatism och Planeringsrationalism vid Beslut om Infrastrukturinvesteringar” [New Road to New Roads and Railways: Financial Pragmatism and Planning Rationalism in Decision-making on Infrastructure Investments]. Doctoral thesis, Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksson, K., H. Antonsson, and L. Eriksson. 2017. “Layering and Parallel Policy Making – Complementary Concepts for Understanding Implementation Challenges Related to Sustainable Mobility.” Transport Policy 53: 50–57. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.08.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ITF. 2021. Travel Transitions: How Transport Planners and Policy Makers Can Respond to Shifting Mobility Trends. ITF Research Reports. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, H. 2019. Planering för städer och transportinfrastruktur med hållbara trafikmängder. Stockholm: PLAN.
   Google Scholar
• Kloo, H., M. Larsson, M. Mårtensson, A. Nilsson, E. Lund, and L. Styhre. 2019. Hantering av miljömål i nationell plan för transportinfrastruktur. IVL Rapport C467.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S., and S. Brinkmann. 2009. Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lapsley, I., A. Midwinter, T. Nambiar, and I. Steccolini. 2011. “Government Budgeting, Power and Negotiated Order.” Management Accounting Research 22 (1): 16–25. doi:10.1016/j.mar.2010.10.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundin, P. 2008. “Bilsamhället: Ideologi, expertis och regelskapande i efterkrigstidens Sverige.” Diss., Stockholmia förlag, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, G., and C. Davidson. 2016. “Guidance for Transport Planning and Policymaking in the Face of an Uncertain Future.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 88: 104–116. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2016.03.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, G., and G. Marsden. 2019. “Opening Out and Closing Down: The Treatment of Uncertainty in Transport Planning’s Forecasting Paradigm.” Transportation 48 (2): 595–616. doi:10.1007/s11116-019-10067-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsden, G., and L. Reardon. 2017. “Questions of Governance: Rethinking the Study of Transportation Policy.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 101 (C): 238–251. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2017.05.008.
   Google Scholar
• Öberg, S., and H. Wockelberg. 2021. “Agency Control or Autonomy? Government Steering of Swedish Government Agencies 2003–2017.” International Public Management Journal 24 (3): 330–349. doi:10.1080/10967494.2020.1799889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersson, F. 2014. “Swedish Infrastructure Policy and Planning: Conditions for Sustainability.” Diss., Lund: Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Pettersson-Löfstedt, F., E. Lund, C. Dymén, Å. Hult, and J. Sanne. 2020. Infrastruktur, planering och miljömål – en analys av synen på ansvar, roller och möjligheter att använda transportplanering för att uppnå miljömålen. Forskningsprojektet Stafetten. Delrapport arbetspaket 3. IVL, Trivector och Lunds Universitet. Trivector Rapport 2020:55, IVL rapport C519, ISBN 978-91-7883-176-0.
   Google Scholar
• Russo, F., and C. Rindone. 2023. “Logical Framework Approach in Transportation Planning: The Passenger Services in the Messina Strait.” Transportation Research Procedia 69: 855–862. doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2023.02.245.
   Google Scholar
• Schwanen, T., D. Banister, and J. Anable. 2011. “Scientific Research About Climate Change Mitigation in Transport: A Critical Review.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 45 (10): 993–1006. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2011.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, L., and J. Backhouse. 2003. “The Circuits-of-Power Framework for Studying Power in Institutionalization of Information Systems.” Journal of the Association for Information Systems 4 (1): 14. doi:10.17705/1jais.00041.
   Google Scholar
• STA. 2015. Inriktningsunderlag inför transportplaneringen för perioden 2018–2029. Report 2015:180. Trafikverket.
   Google Scholar
• STA. 2016a. Styrmedel och åtgärder för att minska transportsystemets utsläpp av växthusgaser – med fokus på transportinfrastrukturen. Report 2016:043. Trafikverket.
   Google Scholar
• STA. 2016b. Åtgärder för att minska transportsektorns utsläpp av växthusgaser – ett regeringsuppdrag. Report 2016:111. Trafikverket.
   Google Scholar
• STA. 2023. “Trafik- och transportprognoser.” Accessed July 7, 2023. https://bransch.trafikverket.se/for-dig-i-branschen/Planera-och-utreda/Planerings--och-analysmetoder/Samhallsekonomisk-analys-och-trafikanalys/Kort-om-trafikprognoser/
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Radio. 2015. The Swedish Transport Administration Stopped Climate Report. Accessed November 20, 2018. https://sverigesradio.se/artikel/6323588
   Google Scholar
• Thoresson, K. 2011. “Att beräkna det goda samhället: Samhällsekonomiska analyser och gränslandet expertis–politik inom transportområdet.” Doctoral diss., Linköping University Electronic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Witzell, J. 2020. “Assessment Tensions: How Climate Mitigation Futures are Marginalized in Long-Term Transport Planning.” Transportation Research Part D 87: 102503. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2020.102503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witzell, J. 2021. “Approaching Transformative Futures: Discourse and Practice in Swedish National Transport Policy and Planning.” Diss., KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar