References
- Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D. L., Simpson, G. B., & Treiman, R. (2007). The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 445–459. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193014
- Boustani, S., & Shanks, D. R. (2022). Heterogeneity and publication bias in research on test-potentiated new learning. Collabra: Psychology, 8(1), 319–396. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.31996
- Brady, T. F., Robinson, M. M., Williams, J. R., & Wixted, J. T. (2023). Measuring memory is harder than you think: How to avoid problematic measurement practices in memory research. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 30(2), 421–449. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02179-w
- Carpenter, S. K. (2011). Semantic information activated during retrieval contributes to later retention: Support for the mediator effectiveness hypothesis of the testing effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 15471552. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024140
- Carrier, M., & Pashler, H. (1992). The influence of retrieval on retention. Memory & Cognition, 20, 633–642. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202713
- Chan, J. C. K., Meissner, C. A., & Davis, S. D. (2018). Retrieval potentiates new learning: A theoretical and meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 144(11), 1111–1146. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000166
- Cyr, A. A., & Anderson, N. D. (2018). Learning from your mistakes: Does it matter if you’re out in left foot, I mean field? Memory, 26, 1281–1290. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2018.1464189
- Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
- Grimaldi, P. J., & Karpicke, J. D. (2012). When and why do retrieval attempts enhance subsequent encoding? Memory & Cognition, 40, 505–513. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-011-0174-0
- Halamish, V., & Bjork, R. A. (2011). When does testing enhance retention? A distribution-based interpretation of retrieval as a memory modifier. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(4), 801–812. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023219
- Karpicke, J. D. (2017). Retrieval-based learning: A decade of progress. In J. H. Byrne (Ed.), Cognitive psychology of memory, Vol. 2 of learning and memory: A comprehensive reference (pp. 1–26). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.21055-9
- Karpicke, J. D., Roediger, L.H., III. (2007). Repeated retrieval during learning is the key to long-term retention. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(2), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.09.004
- Kliegl, O., Bartl, J., & Bäuml, K.-H. T. (2023). The pretesting effect thrives in the presence of competing information. Memory, 31(5), 705–714. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2023.2190568
- Kliegl, O., Bartl, J., & Bäuml, K.-H. T. (in press a). The pretesting effect comes to full fruition after prolonged retention interval. Journal of Applied Research in Memory And Cognition, https://doi.org/10.1037/mac0000085
- Kliegl, O., Bartl, J., & Bäuml, K. H. T. (in press b). Repeated guessing attempts during acquisition can promote subsequent recall performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037xap0000493.
- Knight, J. B., Ball, B. H., Brewer, G. A., DeWitt, M. R., & Marsh, R. L. (2012). Testing unsuccessfully: A specification of the underlying mechanisms supporting its influence on retention. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(4), 731–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.12.008
- Kornell, N., Hays, M. J., & Bjork, R. A. (2009). Unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance subsequent learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(4), 989–998. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015729
- Kornell, N., & Vaughn, K. E. (2016). How retrieval attempts affect learning: A review and synthesis. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 65, 183–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.plm.2016.03.003
- Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2004). Detection theory: A user’s guide (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Inc.
- McClelland, J. L., Rumelhart, D. E., & Hinton, G. E. (1986). The appeal of parallel distributed processing. In J. L. McClelland, D. E. Rumelhart, & T. P. R. Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Volume 1: Foundations (pp. 365–422). MIT Press.
- Metcalfe, J., & Huelser, B. J. (2020). Learning from errors is attributable to episodic recollection rather than semantic mediation. Neuropsychologia, 138, 107296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107296
- Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1998). The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. http://w3.usf.edu/FreeAssociation/.
- Overman, A. A., Stephens, J. D., & Bernhardt, M. F. (2021). Enhanced memory for context associated with corrective feedback: Evidence for episodic processes in errorful learning. Memory, 29(8), 1017–1042. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2021.1957937
- Potts, R., Davies, G., & Shanks, D. R. (2019). The benefit of generating errors during learning: What is the locus of the effect? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(6), 1023–1041. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000637
- Potts, R., & Shanks, D. R. (2012). Can testing immunize memories against interference? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(6), 1780–1785. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028218
- Potts, R., & Shanks, D. R. (2014). The benefit of generating errors during learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 644–667. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033194
- Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (2000). Standard progressive matrices. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0735
- Roediger, H. L., III, & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17(3), 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x
- Rowland, C. A. (2014). The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: A meta-analytic review of the testing effect. Psychological Bulletin, 140(6), 1432–1463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037559
- Seabrooke, T., Mitchell, C. J., Wills, A. J., & Hollins, T. J. (2021). Pretesting boosts recognition, but not cued recall, of targets from unrelated word pairs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28(1), 268–273. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01810-y
- Seabrooke, T., Mitchell, C. J., Wills, A. J., Inkster, A. B., & Hollins, T. J. (2022). The benefits of impossible tests: Assessing the role of error-correction in the pretesting effect. Memory & Cognition, 50(2), 296–311. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-021-01218-6
- Spitzer, B., & Bäuml, K. H. (2009). Retrieval-induced forgetting in a category recognition task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(1), 286–291. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014363
- Wixted, J. T. (2007). Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. Psychological Review, 114(1), 152–176. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.152
- Zawadzka, K., & Hanczakowski, M. (2019). Two routes to memory benefits of guessing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(10), 1748–1760. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000676