Mixtures of 2,4-D and dicamba with other pesticides and their influence on application parameters

References

• ABNT. 2014. Brazilian Association of Technical Standards - ABNT. NBR 13875: 2014. Pesticides and the like - Evaluation of physical-chemical compatibility (Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas - ABNT. NBR 13875:2014. Agrotóxicos e afins - Avaliação de compatibilidade físico-química). Rio De Janeiro. 12. p.
   Google Scholar
• Agrofit. 2020. Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Supply - General Coordination of Pesticides and Related Products/DFIA/DAS (Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento–Coordenação-Geral de Agrotóxicos e Afins/DFIA/DAS). http://agrofit.agricultura.gov.br/agrofit_cons/principal_agrofit_cons. [accessed 24 April 2020]
   Google Scholar
• Alves GS, Kruger GR, Cunha JP. 2018. Spray drift and droplet spectrum from dicamba sprayed alone or mixed with adjuvants using air-induction nozzles. Pesq Agropec Bras. 53(6):693–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASABE S572. 2009. 1. Spray Nozzle Classification By Droplet Spectra.: https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hub/95784/file-32015844-pdf/docs/asabe_s572.1_droplet_size_classification.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Basi S, Hunsche M, Noga G. 2013. Effects of surfactants and the kinetic energy of monodroplets on the deposit structure of glyphosate at the micro scale and their relevance to herbicide bio ‐ efficacy on selected weed species. Weed Res. 53(1):1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckie HJ. 2011. Herbicide-resistant weed management: focus on glyphosate. Pest Manag Sci. 67(9):1037–1048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botha GM, Burgos NR, Gbur EE, Alcober EA, Salas RA, Scott RC. 2014. Interaction of glufosinate with 2,4-D, dicamba, and tembotrione on glyphosate-resistant Amaranthus palmeri. J Exp Agric Int. 4:427–442.
   Google Scholar
• Butts TR, Samples CA, Franca LX, Dodds DM, Reynolds DB, Adams JW, Kruger GR. 2018. Spray droplet size and carrier volume effect on dicamba and glufosinate efficacy. Pest Manag Sci. 74:2020–2029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbonari CA, Costa RN, Bevilaqua NC, Pereira VGC, Giovanelli BF, Lopez Ovejero RF, Palhano M, Barbosa H, Velini ED. 2020. Volatilization of standalone dicamba and dicamba plus glyphosate as function of volatility reducer and different surfaces. Agriculture. 10(11):495.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho F, Chechetto R, Mota AB, Antuniassi U. 2017. Characteristics and Challenges of Pesticide Spray Applications in Mato Grosso, Brazil. Outlook Pest Man. 28(1):4–6. doi:10.1564/v28_feb_02.
   Google Scholar
• Chechetto RG, Mota AAB, Antuniassi UR, Carvalho FK, Vilela CM, Arruda AC. 2017. Characterization of the application rate and spray nozzles used in the State of Mato Grosso (Caracterização da taxa de aplicação e pontas de pulverização utilizadas no Estado de Mato Grosso). Magistra. 26:89–97.
   Google Scholar
• Creech CF, Henry RS, Fritz BK, Kruger GR. 2015. Influence of herbicide active ingredient, nozzle type, orifice size, spray pressure, and carrier volume rate on spray droplet size characteristics. Weed Technol. 29(2):298–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Oliveira GM, Gandolfo MA, Oliveira RB, de Oliveira SM, Martins VA. 2019. Potential drift and injury of herbicides sprayed in a wind tunnel. Eng Agríc. 39(1):75–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devkota P, Johnson WG. 2016. Glufosinate efficacy as influenced by carrier water pH, hardness, foliar fertilizer, and ammonium sulfate. Weed Technol. 30(4):848–859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devkota P, Johnson WG. 2019. Influence of carrier water pH, foliar fertilizer, and ammonium sulfate on 2,4-D and 2, 4-D plus glyphosate efficacy. Weed Technol. 33(4):562–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devkota P, Johnson WG. 2020. Efficacy of dicamba and glyphosate as influenced by carrier water pH and hardness. Weed Technol. 34(1):101–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan JF, Mortensen DA. 2012. Quantifying vapor drift of dicamba herbicides applied to soybean. Environ Toxicol Chem. 31(5):1023–1031. doi:10.1002/etc.1778. 22362509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishel FM. 2020. Tank mixing pesticides without Disasters. EDIS. 2020(2) [accessed 24 April 2020]. https://journals.flvc.org/edis/article/view/117653
   Google Scholar
• Gazziero D. 2015. Mixtures of pesticides in tank, in Brazilian farms. Planta Daninha. 33(1):83–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossmann K. 2010. Auxin herbicides: current status of mechanism and mode of action. Pest Manag Sci. 66(2):113–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilz E, Vermeer AW. 2013. Spray drift review: the extent to which a formulation can contribute to spray drift reduction. Crop Prot. 44:75–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaczmarek DK, Rzemieniecki T, Gwiazdowska D, Kleiber T, Praczyk T, Pernak J. 2021. Choline-based ionic liquids as adjuvants in pesticide formulation. J Mol Liq. 327:114792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maciel CD, Guerra N, Oliveira Neto AM, Poletine JP, Bastos S, Dias NM. 2010. Static superficial tension of glyphosate and chlorimuron-ethyl tank mixtures with or without adjuvants. Planta Daninha. 28(3):673–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melo AA, Usano-Alemany J, Guedes J, Hunsche M. 2015. Impact of tank-mix adjuvants on deposit formation, cuticular penetration and rain-induced removal of chlorantraniliprole. Crop Prot. 78:253–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer CJ, Norsworthy JK, Kruger GR, Barber TL. 2016. Effect of nozzle selection and spray volume on droplet size and efficacy of Engenia tank-mix combinations. Weed Technol. 30(2):377–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller TC, Steckel LE. 2019. Dicamba volatility in humidomes as affected by temperature and herbicide treatment. Weed Technol. 33(4):541–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller TC, Steckel LE. 2019. Spray mixture pH as affected by dicamba, glyphosate, and spray additives. Weed Technol. 33(4):547–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petter FA, Segate D, de Almeida FA, Neto FA, Pacheco LP. 2013. Physical incompatibility of mixing of insecticides and fungicides. Comun Sci. 4:129–138.
   Google Scholar
• Petter FA, Segate D, Pacheco LP, Almeida FA, Alcântara Neto F. 2012. Physical incompatibility of herbicide and insecticide mixtures. Planta Daninha. 30(2):449–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prado EP, Araújo DD, Raetano CG, Pogetto MH, Aguiar-Júnior HO, Christovam RD. 2011. Effects of water hardness and pH in acaricide spray solutions on the control of Brevipalpus phoenicis on sweet orange fruit. Bragantia. 70(2):389–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva-Matte SC, Costa NV, Pauly T, Coltro-Roncato S, Oliveira AC, Castagnara DD. 2014. Variability of breaking the surface tension of the droplet adjuvant (Aureo®) as a function of local water catchment. Agrarian. 7:264–270.
   Google Scholar
• Sosnoskie LM, Culpepper AS, Braxton LB, Richburg JS. 2015. Evaluating the volatility of three formulations of 2,4-D when applied in the field. Weed Technol. 29(2):177–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stauffer CE. 1965. The measurement of surface tension by the pendant drop technique. J Phys Chem. 69(6):1933–1938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefen DL, Souza CA, Coelho CM. 2018. pH of water and tank mixture comprising growth regulator and agrochemicals in wheat. JEAI. 19(4):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Witten T. 2019. Understanding spray solution pH with Xtendimax with VaporGrip Technology. [accessed 23 April 2020]. https://monsanto.com/app/uploads/2019/03/UnderstandingSpray-Solution-pH-with-XtendiMax.pdf.
   Google Scholar