“I didn’t have a chance”: perceptions of the attitudes and roles of legal professionals for women involved in Hague international child abduction cases

References

• Alexander, R. (2015) Family violence in parenting cases in Australia under The family Law Act 1975 (Cth): the journey So Far—where are we now and are we there Yet?, International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 29(3), pp. 313–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Law Reform Commission. (2019) Family Law For The Future—An Inquiry Into The Family Law System: Final Report, Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, S. & Edwards, R. (2012) How many qualitative interviews is enough? Expert voices and early career reflections on sampling and cases in qualitative research, National Centre for Research Methods. https://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/id/eprint/2273/.
   Google Scholar
• Batagol, B. (2008) Fomenters of strife, gladiatorial champions or something else entirely? Lawyers and family dispute resolution:, QUT Law and Justice Journal, 8, pp. 24–47. doi:10.5204/qutlr.v8i1.61.
   Google Scholar
• Blumberg, A. (1967) The practice of Law as a confidence game: organizational cooptation of a profession, Law & Society Review, 1(2), pp. 15–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogoch, B. & Danet, B. (1984) Challenge and control in lawyer–client interaction: A case study in an Israeli legal Aid office, Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 4(1–3), pp. 249–275.
   Google Scholar
• Bruch, C. (1994) The central authority’s role under The Hague child abduction convention: A friend in deed, Family Law Quarterly, 28(1), pp. 35–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, K. (2016) Judges, “common sense” and judicial cognition, Griffith Law Review, 25(3), pp. 319–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlin, J. (2011) Lawyers on Their Own: The Solo Practitioner in an Urban Setting (New Orleans, Quid Pro.
   Google Scholar
• Chisholm, R. (2009) Family courts violence review, Attorney-General’s Department (Australia).
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, C. (2013) What do clients want from their lawyers?, Journal of Dispute Resolution, 1, pp. 143–157.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, G. & Bevan, G. (2000) Monitoring Publicly Funded Family Mediation: Report to the Legal Services Commission (London, Legal Services Commission).
   Google Scholar
• Dodek, A. (2011) Lawyering at the intersection of public Law and legal ethics: government lawyers as custodians of the rule of Law, Dalhousie Law Journal, 33(1), pp. 1–53.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, H. (2021) Women, Intimate Partner Violence, and the Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, H. & Stark, T. (2010) Stories from Survivors: Domestic Violence and Criminal Justice Interventions. T.C. Beirne School of Law, University of Queensland. https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/data/UQ_344147/stories_douglas_stark_2010.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Easteal, P. & Grey, D. (2013) Risk of harm to children from exposure to family violence: looking at How it is understood and considered by the judiciary, Australian Journal of Family Law, 27(1), pp. 59–77.
   Google Scholar
• Edleson, J., Lindhorst, T., Mehrotra, G., Vesneski, W., Lopez, L. & Shetty, S. (2010) Multiple Perspectives on Battered Mothers and their Children Fleeing to the United States for Safety: A Study of Hague Convention Cases. United States Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice. https://www.ojp.gov/library/publications/multiple-perspectives-battered-mothers-and-their-children-fleeing-united.
   Google Scholar
• Eekelaar, J., Maclean, M. & Beinart, S. (2000) Family Lawyers: The Divorce Work of Solicitors (Oxford, Hart Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Emery, R. (2011) Renegotiating Family Relationships: Divorce, Child Custody, and Mediation, 2nd ed (New York, The Guilford Press).
   Google Scholar
• Estin, A. (2011) Global child welfare: The challenges for family Law, Oklahoma Law Review, 63, pp. 691–722.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia. (2022) ‘Judgements’ https://www.fcfcoa.gov.au/judgments.
   Google Scholar
• Feeley, M. (1979) The Process is the Punishment: Handling Cases in a Lower Criminal Court(New York, Russell Sage Foundation).
   Google Scholar
• Fernando, M. (2022) Children’s objections in hague child abduction convention proceedings in Australia and the “strength of feeling” requirement, The International Journal of Children's Rights, 30(3), pp. 729–754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flemming, R. B. (1986) Client games: defense attorney perspectives on their relations with criminal clients, Law & Social Inquiry, 11(2), pp. 253–277.
   Google Scholar
• Flood, J. (1991) Doing business: The management of uncertainty in lawyers’ work, Law & Society Review, 25(1), pp. 41–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flowers, R. (2000) An unholy alliance: The Ex parte relationship between the judge and the prosecutor, Nebraska Law Review, 79(2), pp. 251–292.
   Google Scholar
• Francia, L., Millear, P. & Sharman, R. (2019) Addressing family violence post separation: mothers and fathers experiences from Australia, Journal of Child Custody, 16(3), pp. 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman, M. (2011) Henry lord brougham and resolute lawyering, The Advocate’s Quarterly, 37(4), pp. 403–407.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, M. & Taylor, N. (2020) Domestic violence and child participation: contemporary challenges for the 1980 hague child abduction convention, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 42(2), pp. 154–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galanter, M. (1974) Why the “haves” come Out ahead: speculations on the limits of legal change, Law & Society Review, 9, pp. 95–160.
   Google Scholar
• Genn, H. (2010) Judging Civil Justice (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1961) Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates (New Brunswick, Aldine Transaction).
   Google Scholar
• Goriely, T. (1994) Debating the quality of legal services: differing models of the good lawyer, International Journal of the Legal Profession, 1(2), pp. 159–171.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, A. & Kaye, M. (2023) “Redressing the balance”: how Australia’s approach under The Hague abduction convention is still endangering victims of domestic violence, International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 37(1), pp. ebac021. doi:10.1093/lawfam/ebac021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hague Convention of 25 October. (1980) On the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, opened for signature 25 October 1980, T.I.A.S. 11,670, 1343 U.N.T.S. 89 (entered into force 1 December 1983).
   Google Scholar
• Hague Explanatory Report on the. (1980) HCCH child abduction convention, Elisa Perez-Vera (April 1981).
   Google Scholar
• Handler, J. (1978) Social Movements and the Legal System: A Theory of Law Reform and Social Change (San Diego, Academic Press).
   Google Scholar
• Harden, I. (1992) The Contracting State (Buckingham, Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heinz, J. & Laumann, E. (1982) Chicago Lawyers: The Social Structure of the Bar (New York, Russell Sage Foundation).
   Google Scholar
• Hosticka, C. (1979) We don't care what happened, We only care about what Is going to happen: lawyer–client negotiations of reality, Social Problems, 26(5), pp. 599–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howieson, J. (2011) The professional culture of Australian family lawyers: pathways To constructive change. international journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 25(1), pp. 71–99.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, R. (2003) Adversarial mythologies: policy assumptions and research evidence in family Law, Journal of Law and Society, 30 (1), pp. 156–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, R. (2008) Domestic Violence Law Reform and Women’s Experience in Court (Amherst, NY, Cambria Press).
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, R., Burton, M. & Trinder, L. (2020) Assessing Risk of Harm to Children and Parents in Private Law Children Cases: Final Report. Project report. Ministry of Justice, London, UK, https://kar.kent.ac.uk/81894/1/assessing-risk-harm-children-parents-pl-childrens-cases-report_.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, R., Genoese, A., Melville, A. & Chrzanowski, A. (2000) Legal Services in Family Law (Sydney, Justice Research Centre).
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, A. (2008) In the public interest: The responsibilities and rights of government lawyers, Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 46(1), pp. 105–129.
   Google Scholar
• James, C. & Ross, N. (2016) Did He ever Hit You? exploring the attitudes of lawyers in the assessment of the seriousness of threats and violent histories in domestic violence cases, Australian Journal of Family Law, 30(3), pp. 205–239.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, T. (2016 [1972]) Professions and Power (Abingdon, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Josephson, W. & Pearce, R. (1986) To whom does the government lawyer Owe the duty of loyalty when clients Are in conflict?, Howard Law Journal, 29(4), pp. 539–569.
   Google Scholar
• Keating, A. & Fleming, V. (2009) Midwives’ experiences of facilitating normal birth in an obstetric-led unit: A feminist perspective, Midwifery, 25(5), pp. 518–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, A. (2018) The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of Child Abduction, Opinion [Australian Lawyers Alliance], 8 March.
   Google Scholar
• Kirby, M. (2010) Children caught in conflict—The child abduction convention and Australia, International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 24(1), pp. 95–114.
   Google Scholar
• Kozin, A. (2007) Standing for the client: On the interactional becoming of the criminal defense attorney, International Journal of the Legal Profession, 14(2), pp. 173–193.
   Google Scholar
• Laing, L. (2017) Secondary victimization: domestic violence survivors navigating the family Law system, Violence Against Women, 23(11), pp. 1314–1335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavie, S. (2018) Wrapped in the Flag of Israel: Mizrahi Single Mothers and Bureaucratic Torture(Lincoln, University of Nebraska Press (revised ed).
   Google Scholar
• Liska, V. (2012) “Before the Law stands a doorkeeper. To this doorkeeper comes a Man … ”: kafka, narrative, and the Law, Naharaim, 6(2), pp. 175–194.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, N., Setright, H. & Bentley, D. (2013) Abductors Keepers’: Is the International Law on Child Abduction Working? International Law Discussion Group Summary, Chatham House, https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/public/Research/International%20Law/310113summary.pdf [Accessed 21 March 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Masterton, G., Rathus, Z., Flood, J. & Tranter, K. (2022) Dislocated lives: the experience of women survivors of family and domestic violence after being ‘Hagued’, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 44(3), pp. 369–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mather, L. (2003) What Do clients want? what Do lawyers Do?, Emory Law Journal, 52, pp. 1065–1086.
   Google Scholar
• Mather, L., McEwen, C. & Maiman, R. (2001) Divorce Lawyers at Work: Varieties of Professionalism in Practice (New York, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McConville, M. & Mirsky, C. (1995) Guilty plea courts: A social disciplinary model of criminal justice, Social Problems, 42(2), pp. 216–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melville, A. & Laing, K. (2008) Personal action plans: evaluating self-management initiatives in family Law, International Journal of Law in Context, 4(2), pp. 149–167.
   Google Scholar
• Melville, A. & Laing, K. (2010) Closing the gate: family lawyers as gatekeepers to a holistic service, International Journal of Law in Context, 6(2), pp. 167–189.
   Google Scholar
• Melville, A., Stephen, F. & Krause, T. (2014) “He did everything he possibly could for me”: medical malpractice claimants’ experiences of lawyer–client relations, International Journal of the Legal Profession, 21(2), pp. 171–193.
   Google Scholar
• Michelson, E. (2006) The practice of Law as an obstacle to justice: Chinese lawyers at work, Law & Society Review, 40(1), pp. 1–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosten, F. (2004) Institutionalization of mediation, Family Court Review, 42 (2), pp. 292–303.
   Google Scholar
• National Association of Community Legal Centres. (2012) Unaffordable and Out of Reach: The Problem of Access to the Australian Legal System (Sydney, Community Law Australia).
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. ([1988] 2022) Partners with Power: The Social Transformation of the Large Law Firm (Berkeley, University of California Press).
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, Ann. (1981) Interviewing women: a contradiction in terms, in Helen Roberts (ed) Doing Feminist Research pp. 30–62, London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, C. & Evans, A. (2018) Inside Lawyers’ Ethics 3rd ed. (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Pepper, S. (1995) Counseling at the limits of the Law: An exercise in the jurisprudence and ethics of lawyering, Yale Law Journal, 104, pp. 1545–1610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ptacek, J. (1999) Battered Women in the Courtroom: The Power of Judicial Responses (Boston, Massachusetts, Northeastern University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Ravid, I. (2014) Sleeping with the enemy? On government lawyers and their role in promoting social change: The Israeli example, Stanford Journal of International Law, 50(1), pp. 185–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhoades, H. (2011) The “helping court”: exploring the therapeutic justice origins of the family court of Australia, Family Law Review, 2 (1), pp. 17–29.
   Google Scholar
• Rix, M. (2007) Legal Aid, the community legal sector and access to justice: what has been the record of the Australian Government? paper presented at the International Symposium: Public Governance and Leadership: Managing Governance Changes Drivers for Re-Constituting Leadership, University of Plymouth, 24–25 May.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, D., Chamberlain, P. & Delfabbro, P. (2015) Women's experiences of the processes associated with the family court of Australia in the context of domestic violence: A thematic analysis, Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 22(4), pp. 599–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, D. (1974) Lawyer and Client: Who’s in Charge? (New York, Russell Sage Foundation).
   Google Scholar
• Sarat, A. & Felstiner, W. L. F. (1995) Divorce Lawyers and Their Clients: Power and Meaning in the Legal Process (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Schliehe, A. (2016) Rediscovering goffman: contemporary carceral geography, the “total” institution and notes on heterotopia, Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 98(1), pp. 19–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seuffert, N. (1996) Lawyering for women survivors of domestic violence, Waikato Law Review, 4(1), pp. 1–57.
   Google Scholar
• Sherr, A., Moorhead, R. & Paterson, A. (1994) Assessing the quality of legal work: measuring process, International Journal of the Legal Profession, 1(2), pp. 135–158.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, W. (1988) Ethical discretion in lawyering, Harvard Law Review, 101(6), pp. 1083–1145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smigel, E. (1964) Wall Street Lawyer: Professional Organization Man? (Glencoe, Free Press).
   Google Scholar
• Sommerlad, H. & Wall, D. (1999) Legally Aided Clients and Their Solicitors: Qualitative Perspectives on Quality and Legal Aid (London, The Law Society, Research Study No. 34.
   Google Scholar
• Southworth, A. (1995) Lawyer–Client decision making in civil rights and poverty practice: An empirical study of lawyers’ norms, Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, 9(4), pp. 1101–1156.
   Google Scholar
• Tesler, P. (2004) Collaborative family Law, Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Journal, 4(3), pp. 317–336.
   Google Scholar
• Tesler, P. (2008) Collaborative family Law, the New lawyer, and deep resolution of divorce-related conflicts, Journal of Dispute Resolution, 69(1), pp. 83–130.
   Google Scholar
• Wendel, B. (2009) Government lawyers, democracy, and the rule of law, Fordham Law Review, 77(4), pp. 1333–1363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendel, B. (2017) Government lawyers in the Trump administration, Hastings Law Journal, 1, pp. 275–352.
   Google Scholar
• Westmarland, N. (2001) The quantitative/qualitative debate and feminist research: a subjective view of objectivity, Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2(1), Art 13
   Google Scholar
• Wexler, S. (1970) Practicing Law for poor people, Yale Law Journal, 79, pp. 1049–1067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheelahan, E. (2016) Model litigant obligations: what are they and how are they enforced? Federal Court Ethics Seminar Series. (https://www.fedcourt.gov.au/__data/assets/rtf_file/0011/31142/20160315-Eugene-Wheelahan.rtf).
   Google Scholar