An empirical study of lawyers’ capability to adapt to disruption in Queensland, Australia

References

• Bayamlıoğlu, E. & Leenes, R. (2018) The “rule of law” implications of data-driven decision-making: a techno-regulatory perspective, Law, innovation and technology, 10(2), pp. 295–313. doi:10.1080/17579961.2018.1527475.
   Google Scholar
• Blackwood, N. J., Bentall, R. P., ffytche, D. H., Simmons, A., Murray, R. M. & Howard, R. J. (2003) Self-responsibility and the self-serving bias: an fMRI investigation of causal attributions, NeuroImage, 20(2), pp. 1076–1085. doi:10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00331-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrick, D. & Kesteven, S. (2023) “Use with caution”: how ChatGPT landed this US lawyer and his firm in hot water, ABC News, 24 June. Available at: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-06-24/us-lawyer-uses-chatgpt-to-research-case-with-embarrassing-result/102490068, accessed 26 June 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Caserta, S. (2022) The sociology of the legal profession in the digital age, International Journal of the Legal Profession, 29(3), pp. 319–334. doi:10.1080/09695958.2021.1920417.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, C. M. (1997) The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail (Boston, MA, Harvard Business School Press (The management of innovation and change series).
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, C. M., Raynor, M. E. & McDonald, R. (2015) What is disruptive innovation? Harvard Business Review, 1 December. Available at: https://hbr.org/2015/12/what-is-disruptive-innovation, accessed 16 March 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Fortney, S. (2014) The role of ethics audits in improving management systems and practices: an empirical examination of management-based regulation of law firms, St. Mary’s Journal on Legal Malpractice and Ethics, 4(1), pp. 112–148.
   Google Scholar
• Given, L. M. (2008) The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods (London, Sage Publications (Encyclopedia of qualitative research methods).
   Google Scholar
• Hart, C. (2011) Sustainable regional legal practice: the importance of alliances and the use of innovative information technology by legal practices in regional, rural and remote Queensland, Deakin Law Review, 16(1), pp. 225–263.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, C. (2014) The Prevalence and Nature of Sustainable Regional, Rural and Remote Legal Practice. PhD Thesis (University of Southern Queensland).
   Google Scholar
• Hart, C. (2017) “Better justice?” or “shambolic justice?”: governments’ use of information technology for access to law and justice, and the impact on regional and rural legal practitioners, International Journal of Rural Law and Policy, 1, pp. 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Hearsay (2023) Magic circle firm rolls out “Gamechanger” ChatGPT-type platform, 7 March. Available at: https://www.hearsay.org.au/magic-circle-firm-rolls-out-gamechanger-chatgpt-type-platform/, accessed 16 March 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, D. (2020) The death of the legal profession and the future of law, University of New South Wales Law Journal, 43(4), pp. 1199–1225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, J. W., Davis, A. E., Chester, S. & Hart, C. (2017) Reforming lawyer mobility—protecting turf or serving clients? The Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, 30(1), pp. 125–193.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, J. W. & Regan, M. C. Jr (2022) Report on the State of the Legal Market: A Challenging Road to Recovery (Washington, Georgetown University Law Center on Ethics and the Legal Profession).
   Google Scholar
• Law Council of Australia (1994) Blueprint for the Structure of the Legal Profession: A National Market for Legal Services, Final Report (Hobart, LCA Law Practice Management Section).
   Google Scholar
• Law Council of Australia (2017) The Justice Project: RRR Australians. Consultation Paper. Available at: https://www.lawcouncil.asn.au/files/webpdf/Justice%20Project/Consultation%20Papers/RRR%20Australians.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Law Society of England and Wales (2020) Written Evidence Submitted by the Law Society of England and Wales, United Kingdom Parliament. Available at: https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/17603/html/, accessed 3 July 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Law Society of New South Wales (2017) The Future of Law and Innovation in the Profession. Commission of Inquiry (Sydney, Law Society of New South Wales). Available at: https://www.lawsociety.com.au/sites/default/files/2018-03/1272952.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Legal Profession Act (2007) Qld.
   Google Scholar
• Legal Services Commission (2022) Annual Report 2021–2022 (Queensland, Legal Services Commission).
   Google Scholar
• Matheson, J. H. & Favorite, P. D. (2001) Multidisciplinary practice and the future of the legal profession: considering a role for independent directors, Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, 32(3 (Spring)), p. 577.
   Google Scholar
• Melville, A., Caines, V. & Walker, M. (2021) The grey zone: the implications of the ageing legal profession in Australia, Legal Ethics, 24(2), pp. 141–170. doi:10.1080/1460728x.2022.2027118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michalakopoulou, K., Bamford, D., Reid, I. & Nikitas, A. (2023) Barriers and opportunities to innovation for legal service firms: a thematic analysis-based contextualization, Production Planning & Control, 34(7), pp. 604–622. doi:10.1080/09537287.2021.1946329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Law Singapore (2020) The Road to 2030: Legal Industry Technology & Innovation Roadmap Report, Final Report. Available at: https://www.mlaw.gov.sg/files/news/press-releases/2020/10/Minlaw_Tech_and_innovation_Roadmap_Report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mitigo (2022) Why Your Cybersecurity Measures May No Longer be Enough, The Law Society. Available at: https://www.lawsociety.org.uk/topics/small-firms/cybersecurity-trends-for-small-firms-in-2021, accessed 14 July 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, C., Gordon, T. & Mark, S. (2010) Regulating law firm ethics management: an empirical assessment of an innovation in regulation of the legal profession in New South Wales, Journal of Law and Society, 37(3), pp. 466–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pistone, M. R. & Horn, M. B. (2016) Disrupting Law School: How Disruptive Innovation will Revolutionize the Legal World, White Paper (Clayton Christensen Institute for Disruptive Innovation). Available at: https://www.christenseninstitute.org/publications/disrupting-law-school/.
   Google Scholar
• Queensland Law Society (2022) Annual Report 2021–22, Annual Report.
   Google Scholar
• Queensland Law Society (2023) Practice Management Course Handbook (Brisbane, Draft).
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team (2023) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (Vienna, Austria, R Foundation for Statistical Computing). Available at: https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Sako, M., Parnham, R., Armour, J., Rodgers, I. & Qian, M. (2021) Technology and Innovation in Legal Services, Final Report (Solicitors Regulation Authority, July 2021). Available at: https://www.sra.org.uk/sra/research-publications/technology-innovation-in-legal-services/.
   Google Scholar
• Sam, S. & Pearson, A. (2019) Community legal centres in the digital era: the use of digital technologies in Queensland Community Legal Centres, Law, Technology and Humans, 1(2019), pp. 64–79. doi:10.5204/lthj.v1i0.1305.
   Google Scholar
• Senate Legal and Constitutional References Committee (2004) Legal Aid and Access to Justice (Parliament of Australia). Available at: http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Legal_and_Constitutional_Affairs/Completed_inquiries/2002-04/legalaidjustice/report/contents.
   Google Scholar
• Shankar, A. & Forbes Technology Council (2021) The Pandemic Might be the Tech Disruptor The Legal Industry Needs, Forbes. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2021/02/08/the-pandemic-might-be-the-tech-disruptor-the-legal-industry-needs/, accessed 16 August 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard, B. (2015) Incomplete innovation and the premature disruption of legal services, Michigan State Law Review, 2015(5), pp. 1797–1910.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson Reuters Institute (2021) Stellar Performance: Skills and Progression Mid-Year Survey. Available at: https://insight.thomsonreuters.com.au/legal/resources/resource/2021-australia-state-of-the-legal-market-report.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, M. (2021) Legal professionalism in a context of Uberisation, International Journal of the Legal Profession, 28(3), pp. 243–263. doi:10.1080/09695958.2021.1901715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• URBIS (2021) 2020 national profile of solicitors (Sydney, Law Society of New South Wales).
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, A. (2008) “Virtual justice in the bush”: the use of court technology in remote and Regional Australia, Journal of Law, Information and Science, 19, pp. 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Waye, V., Verreynne, M. & Knowler, J. (2018) Innovation in the Australian legal profession, International Journal of the Legal Profession, 25(2), pp. 213–242. doi:10.1080/09695958.2017.1359614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, J. (2022) Legal technology: the great disruption? in: R.L. Abel, H. Sommerlad, O. Hammerslev & U. Schultz (Eds) Lawyers in 21st Century Socities: Vol 2 – Comparisons and Theories (Oxford, Hart Publishing), pp. 515–540.
   Google Scholar
• Webley, L., Flood, J., Webb, J., Bartlett, F., Galloway, K. & Tranter, K. (2019) The profession(s)’ engagements with LawTech: narratives and archetypes of future law, Law, Technology and Humans, 1(1), pp. 6–26. doi:10.5204/lthj.v1i0.1314.
   Google Scholar