Order Reduction of Large-Scale Linear Dynamic Systems Using Balanced Truncation with Modified Cauer Continued Fraction

References

• B. C. Moore, “Principal component analysis in linear systems: controllability, observability and model reduction,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Contr., Vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 17–32, Feb 1981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Pernebo, L. Silverman, “Model reduction via balanced state space representations,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, Vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 382–387, 1982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Sreeram, P. Agathoklis, “Model reduction using balanced realizations with improved low frequency behaviour,” Sys. Contl. Lets., Vol. 12, pp. 33–38, 1989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. C. Antoulas, Approximation of large-scale dynamical systems. Philadelphia: SIAM, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• S. Lall, J. E. Marsden, S. Glavaski, “A subspace approach to balanced truncation for model reduction of nonlinear control systems,” Int. J. Rob. Non Con., Vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 519–535, 2002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. K. Prajapati, R. Prasad, “Order reduction in linear dynamical systems by using improved balanced realization technique,” Cir. Sys. Sig. Pro., Vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 5289–5303, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. K. Prajapati, R. Prasad, “Model order reduction by using the balanced truncation and factor division methods,” IETE. J. Res., Vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 827–842, 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Parthasarathy, S. John, “Cauer continued fraction method for model reduction,” Electron. Lett., Vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 792–793, Oct 1981.
   Google Scholar
• K. Glover, “All optimal Hankel-norm approximations of linear multivariable systems and their L,∞- error bounds,” Int. J. Cont., Vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 1115–1193, 1984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Bai, “Krylov subspace techniques for reduced-order modeling of large-scale dynamical systems,” Appl. Numer. Math., Vol. 43, no. 1–2, pp. 9–44, 2002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. G. Chaung, “Application of continued fraction methods for modeling transfer function to give more accurate initial transient response,” Electron. Lett., Vol. 6, pp. 861–863, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• C. F. Chen, L. S. Shieh, “A novel approach to linear model simplification,” Int. J. Cont., Vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 561–570, 1968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Parthasarathy, S. John, “System reduction using Cauer continued fraction expansion about S = 0 and S = ∞ alternately,” Elec. Let., Vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 261–262, 1978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. John, R. Parthasarathy, “System reduction by Routh approximation and modified Cauer continued fraction,” Elec. Let., Vol. 15, no. 21, pp. 691–692, 1979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Parmar, R. Prasad, S. Mukherjee, “A mixed method for large-scale systems modelling using Eigen spectrum analysis and Cauer second form,” IETE J. Res., Vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 93–102, 2007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. K. Kranthi, S. K. Nagar, J. P. Tiwari, “A new algorithm for model order reduction of interval systems,” Bonfring Int. J. Data Min., Vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 6–11, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• A. Kumari, C. B. Vishwakarma, “Order abatement of linear dynamic systems using renovated pole clustering and Cauer second form techniques,” Circ. Syst. Sig. Pro., Vol. 40, pp. 4212–4229, 2021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Sikander, R. Prasad, “Linear time-invariant system reduction using a mixed methods approach,” Appl. Math. Model., Vol. 39, no. 16, pp. 4848–4858, 2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Bala Bhaskar, “Multivariable system reduction using stability equation method and SRAM,” World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol., Int. J. Math. Comput. Sci., Vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 242–246, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• A. K. Prajapati, R. Prasad, “Reduced order modelling of LTI systems by Routh approximation and factor division methods,” Cir. Sys. Sig. Pro., Vol. 38, pp. 3340–3355, Jan 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. C. Chen, C. Y. Chang, K. W. Han, “Reduction of transfer functions by the stability-equation method,” J. Frankl. Inst., Vol. 308, no. 4, pp. 389–404, 1979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Singh, C. B. Vishwakarma, K. Chatterjee, “Biased reduction method by combining improved modified pole clustering and improved Padé approxima-tions,” Appl. Math. Model., Vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 1418–1426, Jan 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Mukherjee, R. C. Mittal, “Model order reduction using response matching technique,” J. Frank. Inst., Vol. 342, no. 5, pp. 503–519, Aug 2005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Fortuna, G. Nunnari, A. Gallo, Model Order Reduction Techniques with Applications in Electrical Engineering. London: Springer-Verlag, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• A. K. Sinha, J. Pal, “Simulation based reduced order modelling using a clustering technique,” Comput. Electr. Eng., Vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 159–169, 1990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Singh, “Non-uniqueness of model reduction using the Routh approach,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Contr., Vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 650–651, Aug. 1979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Singh, R. Prasad, H. O. Gupta, “Reduction of linear dynamic systems Routh Hurwitz array and factor division method,” IETE J. Educ., Vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 25–29, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• S. K. Tiwari, G. Kaur, “Improved reduced-order modeling using clustering method with dominant pole retention,” IETE J. Res., Vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 42–52, 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. C. Chen, C. Y. Chang, K. W. Han, “Model reduction using the stability-equation method and the continued-fraction method,” Int. J. Contr., Vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 81–94, 1980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. K. Prajapati, R. Prasad, “Reduction of linear dynamic systems using a generalized approach of pole clustering method,” Tran. Inst. Meas. Con., Vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 1755–1769, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• M. Hutton, B. Friedland, “Routh approximation-ns for reducing order of linear, time-invariant systems,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Contr., Vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 329–333, 1975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Jain, Y. V. Hote, “Order diminution of LTI systems using modified big bang big crunch algorithm and pade approximation with fractional order controller design,” Int. J. Contr. Autom. Syst., Vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 2105–2121, 2021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Gu, “All optimal Hankel-norm approximations and their L∞ error bounds in discrete-time,” Int. J. Contr., Vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 408–423, 2005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. K. Prajapati, R. Prasad, “Model reduction using the balanced truncation method and the Padé approximation method,” IETE Tech. Rev., Vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 257–269, Nov 2020. doi:10.1080/02564602.2020.1842257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Shamash, “Stable reduced order models using Pade type approximation,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Contr., Vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 615–616, Oct. 1974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar