Correlating fluency theory-based visual aesthetic liking of landscape with landscape types and features

References

• Amirshahi, S. A., M. Koch, J. Denzler, and C. Redies. 2012. ”PHOG Analysis of Self-Similarity in Aesthetic Images.” In Human Vision and Electronic Imaging XVII, Vol. 8291:82911J. International Society for Optics and Photonics. doi:10.1117/12.911973.
   Google Scholar
• Assandri, G., G. Bogliani, P. Pedrini, and M. Brambilla. 2018. “Beautiful Agricultural Landscapes Promote Cultural Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity Conservation.” Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 256 (March): 200–210. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2018.01.012.
   Google Scholar
• Atik, M., R. Canay Işikli, V. Ortaçeşme, and E. Yildirim. 2015. “Definition of Landscape Character Areas and Types in Side Region, Antalya-Turkey with Regard to Land Use Planning.” Land Use Policy 44 (March): 90–100. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.11.019.
   Google Scholar
• Atik, M., R. Canay Işıklı, V. Ortaçeşme, and E. Yıldırım. 2017. “Exploring a Combination of Objective and Subjective Assessment in Landscape Classification: Side Case from Turkey.” Applied Geography 83 (June): 130–140. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.04.004.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, B. F., and M. S. Barton. 1987. “Simplicity in Visual Representation: A Semiotic Approach.” Iowa State Journal of Business and Technical Communication 1 (1): 9–26. doi:10.1177/105065198700100103.
   Google Scholar
• Benliay, A., and A. Altuntaş. 2019. “Visual Landscape Assessment with the Use of Cloud Vision API: Antalya Case.” Uluslararası Peyzaj Mimarlığı Araştırmaları Dergisi (IJLAR) E-ISSN:2602-4322 3 (1): 07–14.
   Google Scholar
• Bertamini, M., and A. D. J. Makin. 2014. “Brain Activity in Response to Visual Symmetry.” Symmetry 6 (4): 975–996. doi:10.3390/sym6040975.
   Google Scholar
• BirdLife International. 2001. Important Bird Areas and Potential Ramsar Sites in Europe. Wageningen, The Netherlands: BirdLife International.
   Google Scholar
• Boeing, G. 2016. “Visual Analysis of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems: Chaos, Fractals, Self-Similarity and the Limits of Prediction.” Systems 4 (4): 37. doi:10.3390/systems4040037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callau, A. À., M. Yolanda Pérez Albert, J. Jurado Rota, and D. Serrano Giné. 2019. “Landscape Characterization Using Photographs from Crowdsourced Platforms: Content Analysis of Social Media Photographs.” Open Geosciences 11 (1): 558–571. doi:10.1515/geo-2019-0046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, X., S. Van Damme, L. Li, and P. Uyttenhove. 2019. “Evaluation of Cultural Ecosystem Services: A Review of Methods.” Ecosystem Services 37 (June): 100925. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100925.
   Google Scholar
• Chesnokova, O., J. E. Taylor, I. N. Gregory, and R. S. Purves. 2019. “Hearing the Silence: Finding the Middle Ground in the Spatial Humanities? Extracting and Comparing Perceived Silence and Tranquillity in the English Lake District.” International Journal of Geographical Information Science 33 (12): 2430–2454. doi:10.1080/13658816.2018.1552789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel, T. C. 2001. “Whither Scenic Beauty? Visual Landscape Quality Assessment in the 21st Century.” Landscape and Urban Planning, Our Visual Landscape: Analysis, Modeling, Visualization and Protection 54 (1): 267–281. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00141-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, H. 1967. “Evaluations of Subjective Complexity, Pleasingness and Interestingness for a Series of Random Polygons Varying in Complexity.” Perception & Psychophysics 2 (7): 281–286. doi:10.3758/BF03211042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dearden, P. 1987. ”Consensus and a Theoretical Framework for Landscape Evaluation.” Journal of Environmental Management 24 (January): 267–278.
   Google Scholar
• de la Fuente de Val, G., J. A. Atauri, and J. V. de Lucio. 2006. “Relationship Between Landscape Visual Attributes and Spatial Pattern Indices: A Test Study in Mediterranean-Climate Landscapes.” Landscape and Urban Planning 77 (4): 393–407. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deniz, B., Ç. Kılıçaslan, B. Kara, T. Hilal Göktuğ, and E. Kutsal. 2011. “Evaluation of the Tourism Potential of Besparmak Mountains in the Respect of Protection – Use Balance.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, the 2nd International Geography Symposium-Mediterranean Environment 2010 19 (January): 250–257. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.05.130.
   Google Scholar
• DKMP. 2021. “Directorate General of Nature Conservation and National Park ‘Korunan Alanlar - Bafa Gölü Tabiat Parkı’.” http://bafagolu.tabiat.gov.tr/
   Google Scholar
• Dold, J., and J. Groopman. 2017. “The Future of Geospatial Intelligence.” Geo-Spatial Information Science 20 (2): 151–162. doi:10.1080/10095020.2017.1337318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Do, Y., and J. Yoon Kim. 2020. “An Assessment of the Aesthetic Value of Protected Wetlands Based on a Photo Content and Its Metadata.” Ecological Engineering 150 (May): 105816. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.105816.
   Google Scholar
• Dramstad, W. E., M. Sundli Tveit, W. J. Fjellstad, and G. L. A. Fry. 2006. “Relationships Between Visual Landscape Preferences and Map-Based Indicators of Landscape Structure.” Landscape and Urban Planning 78 (4): 465–474. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueroa-Alfaro, R. W., and Z. Tang. 2017. “Evaluating the Aesthetic Value of Cultural Ecosystem Services by Mapping Geo-Tagged Photographs from Social Media Data on Panoramio and Flickr.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 60 (2): 266–281. doi:10.1080/09640568.2016.1151772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, N., T. August, F. Mancini, K. E. Parks, F. Eigenbrod, J. M. Bullock, L. Sutter, and L. J. Graham. 2020. “‘Photosearcher’ Package in R: An Accessible and Reproducible Method for Harvesting Large Datasets from Flickr.” SoftwareX 12 (July): 100624. doi:10.1016/j.softx.2020.100624.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, S., C. Fürst, L. Koschke, A. Witt, and F. Makeschin. 2013. “Assessment of Landscape Aesthetics—Validation of a Landscape Metrics-Based Assessment by Visual Estimation of the Scenic Beauty.” Ecological Indicators 32 (September): 222–231. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.03.026.
   Google Scholar
• Google Cloud Vision. 2017. “Documentation for the Google Cloud Vision API.” www.cloud.google.com/vision/
   Google Scholar
• Gosal, A. S., I. R. Geijzendorffer, T. Václavík, B. Poulin, and G. Ziv. 2019. “Using Social Media, Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing to Map Multiple Recreational Beneficiaries.” Ecosystem Services 38 (August): 100958. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100958.
   Google Scholar
• Gosal, A. S., and G. Ziv. 2020. “Landscape Aesthetics: Spatial Modelling and Mapping Using Social Media Images and Machine Learning.” Ecological Indicators 117 (October): 106638. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106638.
   Google Scholar
• Graf, L. K. M., S. Mayer, and J. R. Landwehr. 2018. “Measuring Processing Fluency: One versus Five Items.” Journal of Consumer Psychology 28 (3): 393–411. doi:10.1002/jcpy.1021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gül, M., K. Zorlu, and M. Gül. 2019. “Assessment of Mining Impacts on Environment in Muğla-Aydın (SW Turkey) Using Landsat and Google Earth Imagery.” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 191 (11): 655. doi:10.1007/s10661-019-7807-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzmán, A. I. 2017. “Geographical Aesthetics: Imagining Space, Staging Encounters Edited by Harriet Hawkins and Elizabeth Straughan.” Visual Studies 32 (2): 185–186. doi:10.1080/1472586X.2016.1274190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslam, S. M., and P. Anne Wolseley. 1981. “River Vegetation: Its Identification, Assessment and Management.” A Field Guide to the Macrophytic Vegetation of British Watercourses. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ha, S., and Z. Yang. 2019. “Evaluation for Landscape Aesthetic Value of the Natural World Heritage Site.” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 191 (8): 483. doi:10.1007/s10661-019-7607-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heikinheimo, V., E. Di Minin, H. Tenkanen, A. Hausmann, J. Erkkonen, and T. Toivonen. 2017. “User-Generated Geographic Information for Visitor Monitoring in a National Park: A Comparison of Social Media Data and Visitor Survey.” ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 6 (3): 85. doi:10.3390/ijgi6030085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herda, A., H. Brückner, M. Müllenhoff, and M. Knipping. 2019. “From the Gulf of Latmos to Lake Bafa: On the History, Geoarchaeology, and Palynology of the Lower Maeander Valley at the Foot of the Latmos Mountains.” Hesperia: The Journal of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens 88 (1): 1–86. doi:10.2972/hesperia.88.1.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Hetemoğlu, M. A. 2019. “Interpretation and Presentation of the Byzantine Heritage at Herakleia Ad Latmos.” MSc.Ankara: Middle East Technical University.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, S. W., S.-Y. Lee, and J. Seung Lee. 2016. “Incongruent Aesthetic Preferences in Design Collaboration: An Enabler or Barrier for Novelty and Appropriateness?” Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering 15 (1): 81–88. doi:10.3130/jaabe.15.81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Y., S. Gao, K. Janowicz, B. Yu, W. Li, and S. Prasad. 2015. “Extracting and Understanding Urban Areas of Interest Using Geotagged Photos.” Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 54 (November): 240–254. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2015.09.001.
   Google Scholar
• Hur, S., H. J. Lim, and J. Lyu. 2020. “‘I’ or ‘She/he’? The Effects of Visual Perspective on Consumers’ Evaluation of Brands’ Social Media Marketing: From Imagery Fluency Perspective.” Journal of Global Fashion Marketing 11 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1080/20932685.2019.1675526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahani, A. 2019. “Forest Landscape Aesthetic Quality Model (FLAQM): A Comparative Study on Landscape Modelling Using Regression Analysis and Artificial Neural Networks.” Journal of Forest Science 65 (2): 61–69. doi:10.17221/86/2018-JFS.
   Google Scholar
• Jahani, A., S. Allahverdi, M. Saffariha, A. Alitavoli, and S. Ghiyasi. January 2021. ”Environmental Modeling of Landscape Aesthetic Value in Natural Urban Parks Using Artificial Neural Network Technique.” Modeling Earth Systems and Environment doi:10.1007/s40808-020-01068-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahani, A., S. Kalantary, and A. Alitavoli. 2021. “An Application of Artificial Intelligence Techniques in Prediction of Birds Soundscape Impact on Tourists’ Mental Restoration in Natural Urban Areas.” Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 61 (June): 127088. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127088.
   Google Scholar
• Jorgensen, A. 2011. “Beyond the View: Future Directions in Landscape Aesthetics Research.” Landscape and Urban Planning 100 (4): 353–355. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalivoda, O., J. Vojar, Z. Skřivanová, and D. Zahradník. 2014. “Consensus in Landscape Preference Judgments: The Effects of Landscape Visual Aesthetic Quality and Respondents’ Characteristics.” Journal of Environmental Management 137 (May): 36–44. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.02.009.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaplan, R., and S. Kaplan. 1989. The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karasov, O., A. Avelino Batista Vieira, M. Külvik, and I. Chervanyov. 2020. “Landscape Coherence Revisited: GIS-Based Mapping in Relation to Scenic Values and Preferences Estimated with Geolocated Social Media Data.” Ecological Indicators 111 (April): 105973. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105973.
   Google Scholar
• Kerebel, A., N. Gélinas, S. Déry, B. Voigt, and A. Munson. 2019. “Landscape Aesthetic Modelling Using Bayesian Networks: Conceptual Framework and Participatory Indicator Weighting.” Landscape and Urban Planning 185 (May): 258–271. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.02.001.
   Google Scholar
• Keshtkaran, R., A. Habibi, and H. Sharif. 2017. “Aesthetic Preferences for Visual Quality of Urban Landscape in Derak High-Rise Buildings (Shiraz).” Journal of Sustainable Development 10 (5): 94. doi:10.5539/jsd.v10n5p94.
   Google Scholar
• Khachatryan, H., A. Rihn, G. Hansen, and T. Clem. 2020. “Landscape Aesthetics and Maintenance Perceptions: Assessing the Relationship Between Homeowners’ Visual Attention and Landscape Care Knowledge.” Land Use Policy 95 (June): 104645. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104645.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, C. L. 2001. “Our Visual Landscape: Managing the Landscape Under Special Consideration of Visual Aspects.” Landscape and Urban Planning 54 (1): 239–254. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00139-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindemann-Matthies, P., X. Junge, and D. Matthies. 2010. “The Influence of Plant Diversity on People’s Perception and Aesthetic Appreciation of Grassland Vegetation.” Biological Conservation 143 (1): 195–202. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lock, O., and C. Pettit. 2020. “Social Media as Passive Geo-Participation in Transportation Planning – How Effective are Topic Modeling & Sentiment Analysis in Comparison with Citizen Surveys?” Geo-Spatial Information Science 23 (4): 275–292. doi:10.1080/10095020.2020.1815596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lothian, A. 1999. “Landscape and the Philosophy of Aesthetics: Is Landscape Quality Inherent in the Landscape or in the Eye of the Beholder?” Landscape and Urban Planning 44 (4): 177–198. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00019-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makin, A. D. J., A. Pecchinenda, and M. Bertamini. 2012. “Implicit Affective Evaluation of Visual Symmetry.” Emotion 12 (5): 1021–1030. doi:10.1037/a0026924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín, B., E. Ortega, I. Otero, and R. M. Arce. 2016. “Landscape Character Assessment with GIS Using Map-Based Indicators and Photographs in the Relationship Between Landscape and Roads.” Journal of Environmental Management 180 (September): 324–334. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.05.044.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mayer, S., and J. R. Landwehr. 2018. ”Quantifying Visual Aesthetics Based on Processing Fluency Theory: Four Algorithmic Measures for Antecedents of Aesthetic Preferences.” In Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. US: Educational Publishing Foundation. doi:10.1037/aca0000187.
   Google Scholar
• Microsoft Computer Vision. 2017. “Documentation for the Microsoft Computer Vision API.” www.microsoft.com/cognitive-services/enus/computer-vision-api
   Google Scholar
• Müllenhoff, M., M. Handl, M. Knipping, and H. Brückner. 2004. “The Evolution of Lake Bafa (Western Turkey) – Sedimentological, Microfaunal and Palynological Results.” Coastline Reports 1 (2004): 55–66.
   Google Scholar
• Nadal, M., E. Munar, G. Marty, and C. José Cela-Conde. 2010. “Visual Complexity and Beauty Appreciation: Explaining the Divergence of Results.” Empirical Studies of the Arts 28 (2): 173–191. doi:10.2190/EM.28.2.d.
   Google Scholar
• Ode, Å., C. M. Hagerhall, and N. Sang. 2010. “Analysing Visual Landscape Complexity: Theory and Application.” Landscape Research 35 (1): 111–131. doi:10.1080/01426390903414935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ode, Å., and D. Miller. 2011. “Analysing the Relationship Between Indicators of Landscape Complexity and Preference.” Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design 38 (1): 24–40. doi:10.1068/b35084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ode, Å., M. S. Tveit, and G. Fry. 2008. “Capturing Landscape Visual Character Using Indicators: Touching Base with Landscape Aesthetic Theory.” Landscape Research 33 (1): 89–117. doi:10.1080/01426390701773854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oteros-Rozas, E., B. Martín-López, N. Fagerholm, C. Bieling, and T. Plieninger. 2018. “Using Social Media Photos to Explore the Relation Between Cultural Ecosystem Services and Landscape Features Across Five European Sites.” Ecological Indicators, Landscape Indicators – Monitoring of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services at Landscape Level 94 (November): 74–86. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.02.009.
   Google Scholar
• Peschlow-Bindokat, A., and C. Gerber. 2012. “The Latmos-Beşparmak Mountains Sites with Early Rock Paintings in Western Anatolia.” In Neolithic in Turkey: New Excavations and New Research, edited by M. Özdoğan, N. Başgelen, and P. Kuniholm, 67–115. Western Turkey, İstanbul: Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Philipps, A., S. Zerr, and E. Herder. 2017. “The Representation of Street Art on Flickr. Studying Reception with Visual Content Analysis.” Visual Studies 32 (4): 382–393. doi:10.1080/1472586X.2017.1396193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponomarenko, N., O. Ieremeiev, V. Lukin, K. Egiazarian, and M. Carli. 2011. “Modified Image Visual Quality Metrics for Contrast Change and Mean Shift Accounting.” 2011 11th International Conference The Experience of Designing and Application of CAD Systems in Microelectronics (CADSM), 305–311. Zakarpattya, Ukraine.
   Google Scholar
• Qi, Y., S. Chodron Drolma, X. Zhang, J. Liang, H. Jiang, J. Xu, and T. Ni. 2020. “An Investigation of the Visual Features of Urban Street Vitality Using a Convolutional Neural Network.” Geo-Spatial Information Science 23 (4): 341–351. doi:10.1080/10095020.2020.1847002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos, C. D. L., I. K. Y. U. Lim, Y. C. Inoue, J. Andrew Santiago, and N. Marcus Tan. ”An Integration of Image Processing Solutions for Social Media Listening.” In Computational Science and Technology, Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, edited by R. Alfred, Y. Lim, H. Haviluddin, and C. K. On, 565–574. Singapore: Springer. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2020. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Redies, C., J. Hasenstein, and J. Denzler. 2007. “Fractal-Like Image Statistics in Visual Art: Similarity to Natural Scenes.” Spatial Vision 21: 137–148. doi:10.1163/156856808782713825.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Richards, D. R., and D. A. Friess. 2015. “A Rapid Indicator of Cultural Ecosystem Service Usage at a Fine Spatial Scale: Content Analysis of Social Media Photographs.” Ecological Indicators 53: 187–195. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.01.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, D. R., and B. Tunçer. 2018. “Using Image Recognition to Automate Assessment of Cultural Ecosystem Services from Social Media Photographs.” Ecosystem Services 31: 318–325. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeidi, S., M. Mohammadzadeh, A. Salmanmahiny, and S. Hamed Mirkarimi. 2017. “Performance Evaluation of Multiple Methods for Landscape Aesthetic Suitability Mapping: A Comparative Study Between Multi-Criteria Evaluation, Logistic Regression and Multi-Layer Perceptron Neural Network.” Land Use Policy 67 (September): 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.05.014.
   Google Scholar
• Sevenant, M., and M. Antrop. 2009. “Cognitive Attributes and Aesthetic Preferences in Assessment and Differentiation of Landscapes.” Journal of Environmental Management, Environmental and Landscape Change: Addressing an Interdisciplinary Agenda 90 (9): 2889–2899. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.10.016.
   Google Scholar
• Shao, Z., N. S. Sumari, A. Portnov, F. Ujoh, W. Musakwa, and P. J. Mandela. 2021. “Urban Sprawl and Its Impact on Sustainable Urban Development: A Combination of Remote Sensing and Social Media Data.” Geo-Spatial Information Science 24 (2): 241–255. doi:10.1080/10095020.2020.1787800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheikh, H. R., and A. C. Bovik. 2006. “Image Information and Visual Quality.” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 15 (2): 430–444. doi:10.1109/TIP.2005.859378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simoncelli, E. P., and B. A. Olshausen. 2001. “Natural Image Statistics and Neural Representation.” Annual Review of Neuroscience 24 (1): 1193–1216. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.1193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skřivanová, Z., and O. Kalivoda. 2010. “Perception and Assessment of Landscape Aesthetic Values in the Czech Republic – A Literature Review.” Journal of Landscape Studies 3 (December): 211–220.
   Google Scholar
• Smardon, R. C. 1988. ”Perception and Aesthetics of the Urban Environment: Review of the Role of Vegetation.” Landscape and Urban Planning, Special Issue: Urban Forest Ecology 15 (1): 85–106. doi:10.1016/0169-2046(88)90018-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugimoto, K. 2018. “Use of GIS-Based Analysis to Explore the Characteristics of Preferred Viewing Spots Indicated by the Visual Interest of Visitors.” Landscape Research 43 (3): 345–359. doi:10.1080/01426397.2017.1316835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaffield, S. R., and W. J. McWilliam. 2014. “Landscape Aesthetic Experience and Ecosystem Services.” In Ecosystem Services in New Zealand — Conditions and Trends, edited by J. R. Dymond. Lincoln, New Zealand: Manaaki Whenua Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swanwick, C. 2002. “Landscape Character Assessment: Guidance for England and Scotland. Making Sense of Place.” Countryside Agency, and Scottish Natural Heritage.
   Google Scholar
• Tenerelli, P., C. Püffel, and S. Luque. 2017. “Spatial Assessment of Aesthetic Services in a Complex Mountain Region: Combining Visual Landscape Properties with Crowdsourced Geographic Information.” Landscape Ecology 32 (5): 1097–1115. doi:10.1007/s10980-017-0498-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thonemann, P. 2011. The Maeander Valley: A Historical Geography from Antiquity to Byzantium. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tieskens, K. F., B. T. Van Zanten, C. J. E. Schulp, and P. H. Verburg. 2018. “Aesthetic Appreciation of the Cultural Landscape Through Social Media: An Analysis of Revealed Preference in the Dutch River Landscape.” Landscape and Urban Planning 177 (September): 128–137. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.05.002.
   Google Scholar
• Tribot, A.-S., J. Deter, and N. Mouquet. 2018. “Integrating the Aesthetic Value of Landscapes and Biological Diversity.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 285 (1886): 20180971. doi:10.1098/rspb.2018.0971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tveit, M. S., Å. Ode Sang, and C. M. Hagerhall. 2018. “Scenic Beauty.” In Environmental Psychology, 45–54. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. doi:10.1002/9781119241072.ch5.
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich, R. 1979. “Visual Landscapes and Psychological Well-Being.” Landscape Research 4 (March): 17–23. doi:10.1080/01426397908705892.
   Google Scholar
• USGS. 2020. “Earth Explorer.” Earth Resources Observation and Science Center. http://earthexplorer.usgs.gov
   Google Scholar
• van Berkel, D. B., and P. H. Verburg. 2014. “Spatial Quantification and Valuation of Cultural Ecosystem Services in an Agricultural Landscape.” Ecological Indicators 37 (February): 163–174. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.06.025.
   Google Scholar
• van der Helm, P. 2000. “Simplicity versus Likelihood in Visual Perception: From Surprisals to Precisals.” Psychological Bulletin 126 (October): 770–800. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.5.770.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vivek, S., V. C. Griess, and M. A. Keena. 2020. “Assessing the Potential Distribution of Asian Gypsy Moth in Canada: A Comparison of Two Methodological Approaches.” Scientific Reports 10 (1): 22. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-57020-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, R., J. Zhao, and Z. Liu. 2016. “Consensus in Visual Preferences: The Effects of Aesthetic Quality and Landscape Types.” Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 20 (December): 210–217. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2016.09.005.
   Google Scholar
• Wartmann, F. M., K. F. Tieskens, B. T. van Zanten, and P. H. Verburg. 2019. “Exploring Tranquillity Experienced in Landscapes Based on Social Media.” Applied Geography 113 (December): 102112. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.102112.
   Google Scholar
• Whittle, P. 1994. “The Psychophysics of Contrast Brightness.” In Alan L. Gilchrist (Ed.). Lightness, Brightness, and Transparency, 35–110. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, Y., M. Schultz, and A. Zipf. 2019. “An Exploratory Analysis of Usability of Flickr Tags for Land Use/land Cover Attribution.” Geo-Spatial Information Science 22 (1): 12–22. doi:10.1080/10095020.2018.1560044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, Y., Z. Liang, Z. Yuan, P. Liu, Y. Bie, J. Zhang, R. Wang, J. Wang, and Q. Guan. 2019. “A Human-Machine Adversarial Scoring Framework for Urban Perception Assessment Using Street-View Images.” International Journal of Geographical Information Science 33 (12): 2363–2384. doi:10.1080/13658816.2019.1643024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zerdoumi, S., A. Qalid Md Sabri, A. Kamsin, I. Abaker Targio Hashem, A. Gani, S. Hakak, M. Ali Al-Garadi, and V. Chang. 2018. “Image Pattern Recognition in Big Data: Taxonomy and Open Challenges: Survey.” Multimedia Tools and Applications 77 (8): 10091–10121. doi:10.1007/s11042-017-5045-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, F., B. Zhou, L. Liu, Y. Liu, H. H. Fung, H. Lin, and C. Ratti. 2018. “Measuring Human Perceptions of a Large-Scale Urban Region Using Machine Learning.” Landscape and Urban Planning 180 (December): 148–160. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.020.
   Google Scholar
• Zube, E. H., J. L. Sell, and J. G. Taylor. 1982. “Landscape Perception: Research, Application and Theory.” Landscape Planning 9 (1): 1–33. doi:10.1016/0304-3924(82)90009-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar