Central arterial pressure estimation based on two peripheral pressure measurements using one-dimensional blood flow simulation

References

• Alastruey J, Khir AW, Matthys KS, Segers P, Sherwin SJ, Verdonck PR, Parker KH, Peiró J. 2011. Pulse wave propagation in a model human arterial network: assessment of 1-D visco-elastic simulations against in vitro measurements. J Biomech. 44(12):2250–2258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alastruey J, Parker KH, Peiró J, Byrd SM, Sherwin SJ. 2007. Modelling the circle of Willis to assess the effects of anatomical variations and occlusions on cerebral flows. J Biomech. 40(8):1794–1805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avolio AP. 1980. Multi-branched model of the human arterial system. Med Biol Eng Comput. 18(6):709–718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banga PV, Varga A, Csobay-Novák C, Kolossváry M, Szántó E, Oderich GS, Entz L, Sótonyi P. 2018. Incomplete circle of Willis is associated with a higher incidence of neurologic events during carotid eversion endarterectomy without shunting. J Vasc Surg. 68(6):1764–1771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bárdossy G, Halász G. 2011. Modeling blood flow in the arterial system. Per Pol Mech Eng. 55(1):49–55.
   Google Scholar
• Bárdossy G, Halász G. 2013. A “backward” calculation method for the estimation of central aortic pressure wave in a 1D arterial model network. Comput Fluids. 73:134–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanco PJ, Watanabe SM, Passos MARF, Lemos PA, Feijóo RA. 2015. An anatomically detailed arterial network model for one-dimensional computational hemodynamics. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 62(2):736–753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. 1986. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 327(8476):307–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai TY, Qasem A, Ayer JG, Butlin M, O'Meagher S, Melki C, Marks GB, Avolio A, Celermajer DS, Skilton MR. 2017. Central blood pressure in children and adolescents: non-invasive development and testing of novel transfer functions. J Hum Hypertens. 31(12):831–837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen CH, Nevo E, Fetics B, Pak PH, Yin FCP, Maughan WL, Kass DA. 1997. Estimation of central aortic pressure waveform by mathematical transformation of radial tonometry pressure. AHA. 95(7):1827–1836.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng HM, Chuang SY, Sung SH, Yu WC, Pearson A, Lakatta EG, Pan WH, Chen CH. 2013. Derivation and validation of diagnostic thresholds for central blood pressure measurements based on long-term cardiovascular risks. J Am Coll Cardiol. 62(19):1780–1787.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng HM, Park S, Huang Q, Hoshide S, Wang JG, Kario K, Park CG, Chen CH. 2017. Vascular aging and hypertension: implications for the clinical application of central blood pressure. Int J Cardiol. 230:209–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein S, Willemet M, Chowienczyk PJ, Alastruey J. 2015. Reducing the number of parameters in 1D arterial blood flow modeling: less is more for patient-specific simulations. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 309(1):H222–H234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fetics B, Nevo E, Chen CH, Kass DA. 1999. Parametric model derivation of transfer function for noninvasive estimation of aortic pressure by radial tonometry. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 46(6):698–706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Formaggia L, Lamponi D, Tuveri M, Veneziani A. 2006. Numerical modeling of 1D arterial networks coupled with a lumped parameters description of the heart. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 9(5):273–288.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gotzmann M, Hogeweg M, Bauer F, Seibert FS, Rohn BJ, Mügge A, Babel N, Westhoff TH. 2020. The impact of calibration approaches on the accuracy of oscillometric central aortic blood pressure measurement. J Hypertens. 38(11):2154–2160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyürki D, Horváth T, Till S, Egri A, Celeng C, Paál G, Merkely B, Maurovich-Horvat P, Halász G. 2022. Central arterial pressure and patient-specific model parameter estimation based on radial pressure measurements. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 25:1–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Herbert A, Cruickshank JK, Laurent S, Boutouyrie P, Shimada K, Kario K, Miyashita H, Eguchi K, Kohara K, Tabara Y. 2014. Establishing reference values for central blood pressure and its amplification in a general healthy population and according to cardiovascular risk factors. Eur Heart J. 35(44):3122–3133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope SA, Meredith IT, Cameron JD. 2008. Arterial transfer functions and the reconstruction of central aortic waveforms: myths, controversies and misconceptions. J Hypertens. 26(1):4–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope SA, Meredith IT, Tay D, Cameron JD. 2007. ‘Generalizability’ of a radial-aortic transfer function for the derivation of central aortic waveform parameters. J Hypertens. 25(9):1812–1820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang CM, Wang KL, Cheng HM, Chuang SY, Sung SH, Yu WC, Ting CT, Lakatta EG, Yin FCP, Chou P, et al. 2011. Central versus ambulatory blood pressure in the prediction of all-cause and cardiovascular mortalities. J Hypertens. 29(3):454–459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang GP, Yu H, Yang Z, Schwieterman R, Ludwig B. 2018. 1D simulation of blood flow characteristics in the circle of Willis using THINkS. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 21(4):389–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itu L, Sharma P, Suciu C, Moldoveanu F, Comaniciu D. 2017. Personalized blood flow computations: a hierarchical parameter estimation framework for tuning boundary conditions. Int J Numer Meth Biomed Eng. 33(3):e02803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karamanoglu M, O'Rourke MF, Avolio AP, Kelly RP. 1993. An analysis of the relationship between central aortic and peripheral upper limb pressure waves in man. Eur Heart J. 14(2):160–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassila T, Manzoni A, Quarteroni A, Rozza G. 2013. A reduced computational and geometrical framework for inverse problems in hemodynamics. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 29(7):741–776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombardi D. 2014. Inverse problems in 1D hemodynamics on systemic networks: a sequential approach. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 30(2):160–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin V, Clément F, Decoene A, Gerbeau JF. 2005. Parameter identification for a one-dimensional blood flow model. ESAIM: Proc. 14:174–200.
   Google Scholar
• Montisci R, Sanfilippo R, Bura R, Branca C, Piga M, Saba L. 2013. Status of the circle of willis and intolerance to carotid cross-clamping during carotid endarterectomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 45(2):107–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mynard JP, Nithiarasu P. 2008. A 1D arterial blood flow model incorporating ventricular pressure, aortic valve and regional coronary flow using the locally conservative Galerkin (LCG) method. Commun Numer Methods Eng. 24(5):367–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelder JA, Mead R. 1965. A simplex method for function minimization. Comput J. 7(4):308–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols WW, O’Rourke MF. 2005. McDonald’s blood flow in arteries. Theoretical, experimental and clinical principle. 2nd ed. London (UK): Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Papaioannou TG, Karageorgopoulou TD, Sergentanis TN, Protogerou AD, Psaltopoulou T, Sharman JE, Weber T, Blacher J, Daskalopoulou SS, Wassertheurer S, et al. 2016. Accuracy of commercial devices and methods for noninvasive estimation of aortic systolic blood pressure a systematic review and meta-analysis of invasive validation studies. J Hypertens. 34(7):1237–1248.,.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papaioannou TG, Protogerou AD, Stamatelopoulos KS, Vavuranakis M, Stefanadis C. 2009. Non-invasive methods and techniques for central blood pressure estimation: procedures, validation, reproducibility and limitations. Curr Pharm Des. 15(3):245–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quarteroni A, Manzoni A, Vergara C. 2017. The cardiovascular system: mathematical modelling, numerical algorithms and clinical applications. Acta Numer. 26:365–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quick CM, Berger DS, Stewart RH, Laine GA, Hartley CJ, Noordergraaf A. 2006. Resolving the hemodynamic inverse problem. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 53(3):361–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reymond P, Bohraus Y, Perren F, Lazeyras F, Stergiopulos N. 2011. Validation of a patient-specific one-dimensional model of the systemic arterial tree. Am J Physiol - Hear Circ Physiol. 301(3):H1173–H1182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reymond P, Merenda F, Perren F, Rüfenacht D, Stergiopulos N. 2009. Validation of a one-dimensional model of the systemic arterial tree. Am J Physiol - Hear Circ Physiol. 297(1):H208–H222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sausen G, Vieceli T, Rodrigues CG, Kipper D, Stein AT, Grezzana GB. 2018. Central hemodynamic parameters to predict cardiovascular outcomes and mortality among the elderly: protocol for a systematic review. Sao Paulo Med J. 136(6):501–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segers P, Carlier S, Pasquet A, Rabben SI, Hellevik LR, Remme E, De Backer T, De Sutter J, Thomas JD, Verdonck P. 2000. Individualizing the orto-radial pressure transfer function: feasibility of a model-based approach. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 279(2):H542–H549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharman JE, Lim R, Qasem AM, Coombes JS, Burgess MI, Franco J, Garrahy P, Wilkinson IB, Marwick TH. 2006. Validation of a generalized transfer function to noninvasively derive central blood pressure during exercise. Hypertension. 47(6):1203–1208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spilker RL, Taylor CA. 2010. Tuning multidomain hemodynamic simulations to match physiological measurements. Ann Biomed Eng. 38(8):2635–2648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szabó V, Halász G. 2017. 1-D blood flow modelling in a running human body. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 20(9):941–948.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trudeau L. 2014. Central blood pressure as an index of antihypertensive control: determinants and potential value. Can J Cardiol. 30(5 Suppl):S23–S28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlachopoulos C, Aznaouridis K, O'Rourke MF, Safar ME, Baou K, Stefanadis C. 2010. Prediction of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality with central haemodynamics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 31(15):1865–1871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang JJ, Parker KH. 2004. Wave propagation in a model of the arterial circulation. J Biomech. 37(4):457–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams B, Lacy PS. 2010. Central haemodynamics and clinical outcomes: going beyond brachial blood pressure? Eur Heart J. 31(15):1819–1822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams B, Lacy PS, Yan P, Hwee CN, Liang C, Ting CM. 2011. Development and validation of a novel method to derive central aortic systolic pressure from the radial pressure waveform using an N-point moving average method. J Am Coll Cardiol. 57(8):951–961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao H, Butlin M, Qasem A, Tan I, Li D, Avolio AP. 2018. N-point moving average: a special generalized transfer function method for estimation of central aortic blood pressure. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 65(6):1226–1234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Fujiwara N, Kobayashi M, Yamada S, Liang F, Takagi S, Oshima M. 2016. Development of a numerical method for patient-specific cerebral circulation using 1D–0D simulation of the entire cardiovascular system with SPECT data. Ann Biomed Eng. 44(8):2351–2363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar