Design of titanium uncemented femoral stems for hip prosthesis suitable for the Colombian young adult population

References

• Abdelaal O, Darwish S, El-Hofy H, Saito Y. 2019. Patient-specific design process and evaluation of a hip prosthesis femoral stem. Int J Artif Organs. 42(6):271–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altair Engineering. 2021. Practical Aspects of Structural Optimization with Altair OptiStruct TM.
   Google Scholar
• Arabnejad S, Johnston B, Tanzer M, Pasini D. 2017. Fully porous 3D printed titanium femoral stem to reduce stress-shielding following total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 35(8):1774–1783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASM 2012. Handbook, Volume 23: Materials for Medical Devices.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM 2020. F 2996-20 Standard Practice for Finite Element Analysis (FEA) of Non-Modular Metallic Orthopaedic Hip Femoral Stems. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, www.astm.org, p. 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM 2021a. E 8/E 8M-21 standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, www.astm.org. 03.01(C):1–30.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM 2021b. E 466-21 Standard Practice for Conducting Force Controlled Constant Amplitude Axial Fatigue Tests of Metallic Materials. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, www.astm.org. 0301:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Budynas R, Nisbett K. 2011. Shigleys mechanical engineering design. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Huiskes R. 1993. Stress shielding and bone resorption in THA: clinical versus computer-simulation studies. Acta Orthop Belg. 59(Suppl 1):118–129. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8116386.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ISO 2016. 7206-4:2010 Implants for surgery—Partial and total hip joint prostheses Part 4: determination of endurance properties and performance of stemmed femoral components. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Jetté B, Brailovski V, Dumas M, Simoneau C, Terriault P. 2018. Femoral stem incorporating a diamond cubic lattice structure: design, manufacture and testing. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 77:58–72. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S175161611730382X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jetté B, Brailovski V, Simoneau C, Dumas M, Terriault P. 2018. Development and in vitro validation of a simplified numerical model for the design of a biomimetic femoral stem. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 77:539–550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi T, Gupta G. 2021. Effect of dynamic loading on hip implant using finite element method. Mater Today Proc. 46:10211–10216. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2214785320389963.
   Google Scholar
• Joshi T, Sharma R, Kumar Mittal V, Gupta V. 2021. Comparative investigation and analysis of hip prosthesis for different bio-compatible alloys. Mater Today Proc. 43:105–111. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2214785320388301.
   Google Scholar
• Joshi T, Sharma R, Mittal V, Gupta V. 2022a. Finite element modeling and comparative analysis of multiple biocompatible titanium alloys for hip prosthesis. In Advances in transdisciplinary engineering. vol. 27. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press BV. p. 181–186.
   Google Scholar
• Joshi T, Sharma R, Mittal VK, Gupta V. 2022b. Biomechanical analysis of multi-material hip implant assembly. ECS Trans. 107(1):899–913.
   Google Scholar
• Joshi T, Sharma R, Mittal VK, Gupta V, Krishan G. 2022a. Dynamic fatigue behavior of hip joint under patient specific loadings. Int J Automot Mech Eng. 19(3):10014–10027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi T, Sharma R, Mittal VK, Gupta V, Krishan G. 2022b. Dynamic analysis of hip prosthesis using different biocompatible alloys. ASME Open J Eng. 1:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• K N C, Zuber M, Bhat N S, Shenoy B S. 2020. Optimized trapezoidal-shaped hip implant for total hip arthroplasty using finite element analysis. Cogent Eng. 7(1):1719575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kladovasilakis N, Tsongas K, Tzetzis D. 2020. Finite element analysis of orthopedic hip implant with functionally graded bioinspired lattice structures. Biomimetics. 5(3):44. https://www.mdpi.com/2313-7673/5/3/44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López Galiano IC, Juha M, Ortiz JG, Echeverry-Mejia J. 2022. Selection methodology of femoral stems according to the cross section and the maximum stresses. J Biomech Eng. 144(5):1–7. https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/biomechanical/article/144/5/054502/1127986/Selection-Methodology-of-Femoral-Stems-According.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López I, Echeverry-Mejía J, Ortiz JG, Juha M. 2022. Selection methodology of femoral stems under fatigue loading conditions. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social. 2022. Registro Individual de Prestaciones de Servicios de Salud, Database CUBO, [cited 2022-05-12].
   Google Scholar
• Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social. 2022. Registro Individual de Prestaciones de Servicios de Salud. [accessed 2022b Aug 4]. Registro Individual de Prestaciones de Servicios de Salud.
   Google Scholar
• Nakano T. 2019. Physical and mechanical properties of metallic biomaterials. In Metals for biomedical devices. 2nd ed. Sawston, UK: Elsevier. p. 97–129.
   Google Scholar
• Niinomi M. 2007. Recent research and development in metallic materials for biomedical, dental and healthcare products applications. MSF. 539–543(PART 1):193–200.
   Google Scholar
• Pruitt LA, Chakravartula AM. 2011. Mechanics of biomaterials fundamental principles for implant design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511977923.
   Google Scholar
• Ravikant, Mittal VK, Gupta, V. 2023. Homogeneous and heterogeneous modeling of patient-specific hip implant under static and dynamic loading condition using finite element analysis. J Inst Eng India Ser D. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40033-023-00447-0
   Google Scholar
• Ridzwan MIZ, Shuib S, Hassan AY, Shokri AA, Mohamad Ib MN. 2007. Problem of stress shielding and improvement to the hip implant designs: a review. J Med Sci. 7(3):460–467.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatini AL, Goswami T. 2008. Hip implants VII: finite element analysis and optimization of cross-sections. Mater Des. 29(7):1438–1446. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0261306907002099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simoneau C, Terriault P, Jetté B, Dumas M, Brailovski V. 2017. Development of a porous metallic femoral stem: design, manufacturing, simulation and mechanical testing. Mater Des. 114:546–556. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0264127516313636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun C, Wang L, Kang J, Li D, Jin Z. 2018. Biomechanical optimization of elastic modulus distribution in porous femoral stem for artificial hip joints. J Bionic Eng. 15(4):693–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Arabnejad S, Tanzer M, Pasini D. 2018. Hip implant design with three-dimensional porous architecture of optimized graded density. J Mech Design. 140(11):111406. http://mechanicaldesign.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertli MM, Schlapbach JM, Haynes AG, Scheuter C, Jegerlehner SN, Panczak R, Chiolero A, Rodondi N, Aujesky D. 2020. Regional variation in hip and knee arthroplasty rates in Switzerland: a population-based small area analysis. Shah TI, editor. PLoS One. 15(9):e0238287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar