Authenticity of cultural heritage vis-à-vis heritage reproducibility and intangibility: from conservation philosophy to practice

References

• Akagawa, N. 2016. “Rethinking the Global Heritage Discourse – Overcoming ‘East’ and ‘West’?” International Journal of Heritage Studies 22 (1): 14–25. doi:10.1080/13527258.2015.1068213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberts, H. C., and H. D. Hazen. 2010. “Maintaining Authenticity and Integrity at Cultural World Heritage Sites.” Geographical Review 100 (1): 56–73. doi:10.1111/j.1931-0846.2010.00006.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araoz, G. F. 2011. “Preserving Heritage Places Under a New Paradigm.” Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development 1 (1): 55–60. doi:10.1108/20441261111129933.
   Google Scholar
• Araoz, G. 2013. “Conservation Philosophy and Its Development: Changing Understandings of Authenticity and Significance.” Heritage & Society 6 (2): 144–154. doi:10.1179/2159032X13Z.00000000010.
   Google Scholar
• Baudrillard, J. 2006. Simulacra and Simulation, edited by S. F. Glaser. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, J. M. 2006. “The Solidarity Revolution in Poland, 1980–1981.” The Oral History Review 33 (1): 33–64. doi:10.1525/ohr.2006.33.1.33.
   Google Scholar
• Boccardi, G. 2019. “Authenticity in the Heritage Context: A Reflection Beyond the Nara Document.” The Historic Environment: Policy & Practice 10 (1): 4–18. doi:10.1080/17567505.2018.1531647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandi, C. 2005. Theory of Restoration, edited by C. Rockwell. Florence: Nardini Editore.
   Google Scholar
• Brumann, C. 2017. “How to Be Authentic in the UNESCO World Heritage System: Copies, Replicas, Reconstructions, and Renovations in a Global Conservation Arena.” In The Transformative Power of the Copy: A Transcultural and Interdisciplinary Approach, edited by C. Forberg and P. W. Stockhammer, 269–287. Heidelberg: Heidelberg University Publishing. https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/29518
   Google Scholar
• Bukal, G., and P. Samól. 2017. “Authenticity of Architectural Heritage in a Rebuilt City. Comments to Vaclav Havel’s Impression After His Visit in Gdansk in 2005.” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 245 (5): 1–10. doi:10.1088/1757-899x/245/5/052077.
   Google Scholar
• Burra Charter. 1979–1999. The Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance. The Australia ICOMOS. Accessed 16 December 2020. http://australia.icomos.org/publications/burra-charter-practice-notes/burra-charter-archival-documents/
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, C. 2008. “From Warsaw to Mostar: The World Heritage Committee and Authenticity.” APT Bulletin: The Journal of Preservation Technology 39 (2/3): 19–24.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, C. 2009. “The Evolution of the Concept of Outstanding Universal Value.” In Conserving the Authentic: Essays in Honour of Jukka Jokilehto, edited by N. Stanley-Price and J. King, 127–136. Rome: ICCROM. https://www.iccrom.org/sites/default/files/publications/201911/iccrom_ics10_jukkafestchrift_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, C. 2019. “Shifting Doctrine for Reconstruction at World Heritage Sites.” In The Challenges of World Heritage Recovery, edited by M. Marcinkowska and K. Zalasińska, 55–63. Warsaw: Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa. https://ksiegarnia.nid.pl/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/TheChallengesOfWorldHeritageRecovery.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, C., and J. Herrmann. 2018. Guidance and Capacity Building for the Recognition of Associative Values Using World Heritage Criterion (vi): Final Report. Paris: World Heritage Centre. Accessed 3 October 2022. http://openarchive.icomos.org/id/eprint/2052/.
   Google Scholar
• Cracow Charter. 2000. Principles for Conservation and Restoration of Built Heritage. In International Conference on Conservation “Kraków 2000.” Accessed 18 December 2020. http://smartheritage.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/KRAKOV-CHARTER-2000.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dominiczak, J. 2014. “(Od)budowa [(Re)building].” In Gdańskie tożsamości [Gdańsk’s Identities], edited by B. Kerski, 261–279. Gdańsk: Instytut Kultury Miejskiej.
   Google Scholar
• Dymnicka, M., and J. Szczepański. 2016. “Dilemmas of Identity in Contemporary Cities. The City of Gdansk as an Example.” Procedia Engineering 161: 1225–1229. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.550.
   Google Scholar
• European Charter. 1975. European Charter of the Architectural Heritage. Council of Europe. Accessed 3 December 2020. https://www.icomos.org/en/charters-and-other-doctrinal-texts/179-articles-en-francais/ressources/charters-and-standards/170-european-charter-of-the-architectural-heritage
   Google Scholar
• Friedrich, J. 2015. Odbudowa Głównego Miasta w Gdańsku w latach 1945–1960 [Rebuilding of the Main Town of Gdańsk in 1945–1960]. Gdańsk: Słowo/Obraz Terytoria.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, Q., and S. Jones. 2021. “Authenticity and Heritage Conservation: Seeking Common Complexities Beyond the ‘Eastern’ and ‘Western’ Dichotomy.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 27 (1): 90–106. doi:10.1080/13527258.2020.1793377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawlicki, M. 2017. “Gdańsk on the UNESCO World Heritage List – 20 Years of Attempts and Missed Opportunities.” Protection of Cultural Heritage, 4: 61–70.
   Google Scholar
• Gfeller, A. E. 2017. “The Authenticity of Heritage: Global Norm-Making at the Crossroads of Cultures.” The American Historical Review 122 (3): 758–791. doi:10.1093/ahr/122.3.758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glendinning, M. 2013. The Conservation Movement: A History of Architectural Preservation: Antiquity to Modernity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gruszkowski, W. 2005. “The Main City: Half a Century of Dispute.” In Gdańsk Townhouse of the 21th Century, edited by W. Gruszkowski, et al., 78–96. Gdańsk: Urząd Miejski w Gdańsku.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. C. 2001. “Heritage Pasts and Heritage Presents: Temporality, Meaning and the Scope of Heritage Studies.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 7 (4): 319–338. doi:10.1080/13581650120105534.
   Google Scholar
• Holtorf, C. 2020. “Conservation and Heritage as Creative Processes of Future-Making.” International Journal of Cultural Property 27 (2): 277–290. doi:10.1017/S0940739120000107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jokilehto, J. [1999] 2008. A History of Architectural Conservation. Oxford: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Jokilehto, J. 2006. “Preservation Theory Unfolding.” Future Anterior: Journal of Historic Preservation, History, Theory, and Criticism 3 (1): 1–9. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25834983.
   Google Scholar
• Jokilehto, J. 2019. “Questions of Authenticity.” In Conversaciones … Con Herb Stovel. Vol. 8 of Conversaciones …, edited by V. Magar and J. King, 55–72. Rome: ICCROM. https://www.iccrom.org/sites/default/files/publications/2020-05/convern8_02_jjokilehto_ing.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Karabel, J. 1993. “Polish Intellectuals and the Origins of Solidarity: The Making of an Oppositional Alliance.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 26 (1): 25–46. doi:10.1016/0967-067X(93)90018-M.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalaf, R. W. 2017. “A Viewpoint on the Reconstruction of Destroyed UNESCO Cultural World Heritage Sites.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 23 (3): 261–274. doi:10.1080/13527258.2016.1269239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalaf, R. W. 2019. “World Heritage Policy on Reconstruction: From Exceptional Case to Conservation Treatment.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 25 (7): 871–885. doi:10.1080/10286632.2018.1429423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalaf, R. W. 2020. “Authenticity or Continuity in the Implementation of the UNESCO World Heritage Convention? Scrutinizing Statements of Outstanding Universal Value, 1978–2019.” Heritage 3 (2): 243–274. doi:10.3390/heritage3020015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalaf, R. W. 2021. “World Heritage on the Move: Abandoning the Assessment of Authenticity to Meet the Challenges of the Twenty-First Century.” Heritage 4 (1): 371–386. doi:10.3390/heritage4010023.
   Google Scholar
• Kidd, J. 2011. “Performing the Knowing Archive: Heritage Performance and Authenticity.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 17 (1): 22–35. doi:10.1080/13527258.2011.524003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loew, P. O. 2003. Gdańsk I Jego przeszłość. Kultura Historyczna Miasta Od Końca XVIII Wieku Do Dzisiaj [Gdańsk and Its Past: Historical Culture of the City from the End of the 18th Century Until Today]. Gdańsk: Słowo/Obraz Terytoria.
   Google Scholar
• Loew, P. O. 2006. Gdańsk: Między Mitami [Gdańsk: Among the Myths]. Olsztyn: Borussia.
   Google Scholar
• Loew, P. O. 2013. Gdańsk: Biografia miasta [Gdańsk: City Biography]. Gdańsk: Instytut Kultury Miejskiej.
   Google Scholar
• Lowenthal, D. 1998. “Fabricating Heritage.” History & Memory 10 (1): 5–24.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz Viñas, S. 2005. Contemporary Theory of Conservation. Oxford: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Nakonieczna, E. 2017. “Węzłowe Problemy XX-Wiecznego Konserwatorstwa [The Key Issues of the 20th Century Architectural Conservation].” Przestrzeń Ekonomia Społeczeństwo 11 (I): 33–48. doi:10.23830/11I2017/3348.
   Google Scholar
• Nara + 20. 2015. “Nara + 20: On Heritage Practices, Cultural Values, and the Concept of Authenticity.” Heritage & Society 8 (2): 144–147. doi:10.1080/2159032X.2015.1126115.
   Google Scholar
• Nara Document. 1994. The Nara Document on Authenticity. ICOMOS. Accessed 11 December 2020. https://www.icomos.org/charters/nara-e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nezhad, S. F., P. Eshrati, and D. Eshrati. 2015. “A Definition of Authenticity Concept in Conservation of Cultural Landscapes.” International Journal of Architectural Research 9 (1): 93–107. doi:10.26687/archnet-ijar.v9i1.473.
   Google Scholar
• Nora, P. 1989. “Between Memory and History: Les Lieux des Mémoire.” Representations 26 (Spring): 7–24. doi:10.2307/2928520.
   Google Scholar
• Operational Guidelines. 1977–2021. The Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention. UNESCO WHC. Accessed 13 January 2023. https://whc.unesco.org/en/guidelines/
   Google Scholar
• Parent, M. 1979. “Comparative Study of Nominations and Criteria for World Cultural Heritage.” In Third Session of the World Heritage Committee, Principles and Criteria for Inclusion of Properties on World Heritage List. UNESCO WHC. CC-79/CONF.003/11, Annex, 1–26. Accessed 27 January 2021. http://whc.unesco.org/archive/1979/cc-79-conf003-11e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pawlak, A. 2014. “Naprawdę trzeba było coś zrobić [Something Really Had to Be Done.” In Gdańskie tożsamości [Gdańsk’s Identities], edited by B. Kerski, 57–67. Gdańsk: Instytut Kultury Miejskiej.
   Google Scholar
• Reisinger, Y., and C. J. Steiner. 2006. “Reconceptualizing Object Authenticity.” Annals of Tourism Research 33 (1): 65–86. doi:10.1016/j.annals.2005.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riga Charter. 2000, October. The Riga Charter on Authenticity and Historical Reconstruction in Relationship to Cultural Heritage. Regional Conference on Authenticity and Historical Reconstruction in Relationship to Cultural Heritage, Riga, Latvia. Accessed 18 January 2022. https://www.iccrom.org/sites/default/files/publications/2020-05/convern8_07_rigacharter_ing.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. 2006. Uses of Heritage. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L., and G. Campbell. 2017. “The Tautology of ‘Intangible Values’ and the Misrecognition of Intangible Cultural Heritage.“ Heritage & Society 10 (1): 26–44. doi:10.1080/2159032X.2017.1423225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stovel, H. 2001. “The Riga Charter on Authenticity and Historical Reconstruction in Relationship to Cultural Heritage: Riga, Latvia, October 2000.” Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites 4 (4): 241–244. doi:10.1179/135050301793138173.
   Google Scholar
• Stovel, H. 2007. “Effective Use of Authenticity and Integrity as World Heritage Qualifying Conditions.” City & Time 2 (3): 21–36.
   Google Scholar
• Stovel, H. 2008. “Origins and Influence of the Nara Document on Authenticity.” APT Bulletin: The Journal of Preservation Technology 39 (2/3): 9–17.
   Google Scholar
• Taraszkiewicz, A., K. Grębowski, K. Taraszkiewicz, and J. Przewłócki. 2021. “Contemporary Architectural Design in the Context of Historic Remains: The Case of the Old City of Gdańsk.” Heritage & Society 14 (1): 1–19. doi:10.1080/2159032X.2021.2016051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomaszewski, A. 2012. ”Prehistoria ihistoria odbudowy Starego Miasta wWarszawie - legenda irzeczywistość [Prehistory and History of Warsaw’s Old Town Reconstruction: Legend and Reality].” In Ku nowej filozofii dziedzictwa [Toward aNew Philosophy of Heritage], edited by E. Święcka, 165–184. Kraków: Międzynarodowe Centrum Kultury.
   Google Scholar
• Touraine, A. 2011. “Od narodowych do globalnych ruchów społecznych [From National to Global Social Movements] [ Lecture at the University of Gdańsk on 20 May 2011].” Accessed 20 May 2021. https://ecs.gda.pl/title,Alain_Touraine,pid,293.html
   Google Scholar
• Touraine, A., J. Strzelecki, F. Dubet, and M. Wieviorka. 2010. Solidarność: analiza ruchu społecznego 1980–1981 [Solidarity: An Analysis of the Social Movement 1980–1981], edited by A. Krasiński. Gdańsk: Europejskie Centrum Solidarności.
   Google Scholar
• Vecco, M. 2010. “A Definition of Cultural Heritage: From the Tangible to the Intangible.” Journal of Cultural Heritage 11 (3): 321–324. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2010.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vecco, M. 2020. “Genius Loci as a Meta-Concept.” Journal of Cultural Heritage 41 (1): 225–231. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2019.07.001.
   Google Scholar
• Venice Charter. 1964. International Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites. ICOMOS. Accessed 1 December 2020. https://www.icomos.org/charters/venice_e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Waitt, G. 2000. “Consuming Heritage: Perceived Historical Authenticity.” Annals of Tourism Research 27 (4): 835–862. doi:10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00115-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warsaw Recommendation. 2018. Warsaw Recommendation on Recovery and Reconstruction of Cultural Heritage. In The International Conference on Reconstruction “The Challenges of World Heritage Recovery”, Warsaw, Poland, May 2018. Accessed 12 September 2022. https://whc.unesco.org/en/news/1826
   Google Scholar
• WHC (World Heritage Committee). 1979. Report of the Rapporteur on the Third Session of the World Heritage Committee. UNESCO. CC-79/CONF.003/13, para. 35, 8–9. Accessed 28 January 2021. http://whc.unesco.org/archive/1979/cc-79-conf003-13e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• WHC (World Heritage Committee). 1980. Bureau of World Heritage Committee, 4th Session, Paris, 19–22 May 1980, Report of the Rapporteur. Para. 4. UNESCO. Accessed 5 February 2021. http://whc.unesco.org/archive/repbur80.htm
   Google Scholar
• WHC (World Heritage Committee). 2021. Addendum Evaluations of Nominations of Cultural and Mixed Properties, ICOMOS Report for the World Heritage Committee, 44^th Extended Session, Fuzhou (China)/Online Meeting 16–31 July 2021. UNESCO. WHC-21/44.COM/INF.8B1.Add, 37–52. Accessed 9 August 2021. https://whc.unesco.org/archive/2021/whc21-44com-inf8B1.Add-en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wijesuriya, G. 2018. “Revisiting Authenticity in the Asian Context: Introductory Remarks.” In Revisiting Authenticity in the Asian Context, edited by G. Wijesuriya and J. Sweet, 17–24. Rome: ICCROM. https://www.iccrom.org/publication/revisiting-authenticity-asian-context
   Google Scholar
• Yamato Declaration. 2004, October. The Yamato Declaration on Integrated Approaches for Safeguarding Tangible and Intangible Cultural Heritage. The International Conference on the Safeguarding of Tangible and Intangible Cultural Heritage: Towards an Integrated Approach, Nara, Japan. Accessed 20 January 2022. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000137634
   Google Scholar
• Zalesiński, J. 2014. “Nowa gdańska duma [New Gdańsk’s Pride].” In Gdańskie tożsamości [Gdańsk’s Identities], edited by B. Kerski, 281–291. Gdańsk: Instytut Kultury Miejskiej.
   Google Scholar