Stakeholder and jurisdictional influence over IFRS 10's development

References

• Ang, N., Sid Ang, N., Sidhu, B. K., & Gallery, N. (2000). The incentives of Australian public companies lobbying against proposed superannuation accounting standards. Abacus, 36(1), 40–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6281.00053
   Google Scholar
• Bamber, M., & McMeeking, K. (2016). An examination of international accounting standard-setting due process and the implications for legitimacy. The British Accounting Review, 48(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2015.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beller, A. (2020). What is the due process and why does it matter? IFRS Foundation. Available at: https://www.ifrs.org/news-and-events/news/2020/08/what-is-the-due-process-and-why-does-it-matter/
   Google Scholar
• Benston, G. J., Bromwich, M., & Wagenhofer, A. (2006). Principles- versus rules-based accounting standards: The FASB’s standard setting strategy. Abacus, 42(2), 165–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2006.00196.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botzem, S., & Quack, S. (2009). (No) limits to Anglo-American accounting? Reconstructing the history of the International Accounting Standards Committee: A review article. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(8), 988–998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradbury, M. E., & Harrison, J. (2015). An analysis of the IASB’s dissenting opinions. SSRN Electronic Journal. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3535194
   Google Scholar
• Burlaud, A., & Colasse, B. (2011). International accounting standardisation: Is politics back? Accounting in Europe, 8(1), 23–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2011.574412
   Google Scholar
• Callao, S., Ferrer, C., Jarne, J. I., & Laínez, J. A. (2009). The impact of IFRS on the European Union: Is it related to the accounting tradition of the countries? Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 10(1), 33–55. https://doi.org/10.1108/09675420910963388
   Google Scholar
• Camfferman, K., & Zeff, S. A. (2018). The challenge of setting standards for a worldwide constituency: Research implications from the IASB’s early history. European Accounting Review, 27(2), 289–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2017.1296780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatham, M. D., Larson, R. K., & Vietze, A. (2010). Issues affecting the development of an international accounting standard on financial instruments. Advances in Accounting, 26(1), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2010.03.002
   Google Scholar
• Chee Chiu Kwok, W., & Sharp, D. (2005). Power and international accounting standard setting: Evidence from segment reporting and intangible assets projects. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18(1), 74–99. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570510584665
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, L., Ferguson, J., Helliar, C., & Power, D. (2014). Control over accounting standards within the European Union: The political controversy surrounding the adoption of IFRS 8. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 25(4-5), 304–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2013.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2009). Mapping the field of mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• De Villiers, C., & Maroun, W. (Eds.). (2017). Sustainability accounting and integrated reporting. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315108032
   Google Scholar
• De Luca, F., & Prather-Kinsey, J. (2018). Legitimacy theory may explain the failure of global adoption of IFRS: The case of Europe and the U.S. The Journal of Management and Governance, 22, 501–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-018-9409-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donelson, D. C., McInnis, J. M., & Mergenthaler, R. D. (2012). Rules-Based Accounting Standards and Litigation. The Accounting Review, 87(4), 1247–1279. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23246276 https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durocher, S., & Fortin, A. (2011). Practitioners’ participation in the accounting standard-setting process. Accounting and Business Research, 41(1), 29–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2011.549635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durocher, S., Fortin, A., & Côté, L. (2007). Users’ participation in the accounting standard-setting process: A theory-building study. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(1-2), 29–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2006.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durocher, S., & Gendron, Y. (2011). IFRS: On the docility of sophisticated users in preserving the ideal of comparability. European Accounting Review, 20(2), 233–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638181003687869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenschmidt, K., & Krasodomska, J. (2017). Insights into the IASB due process: The influence of country characteristics on constituents’ formal participation. Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości, 95(151), 117–145. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322129965_Insights_into_the_IASB_due_process_the_influence_of_country_characteristics_on_constituents%27_formal_participation
   Google Scholar
• Georgiou, G. (2005). Investigating corporate management lobbying in the UK accounting standard- setting process: A multi-issue/multi-period approach. Abacus, 41(3), 323–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2005.00185.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgiou, G. (2010). The IASB standard-setting process: Participation and perceptions of financial statement users. The British Accounting Review, 42(2), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2010.02.003
   Google Scholar
• Georgiou, O. (2018). The worth of fair value accounting: Dissonance between users and standard setters. Contemporary Accounting Research, 35(3), 1297–1331. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giner, B., & Arce, M. (2012). Lobbying on accounting standards: Evidence from IFRS 2 on share-based payments. European Accounting Review, 21(4), 655–691. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2012.701796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, S. J. (1988). Towards a theory of cultural influence on the development of accounting systems internationally. Abacus, 24(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.1988.tb00200.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, T. B. (2011). Lobbying of the IASB: An empirical investigation. Journal of International Accounting Research, 10(2), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.2308/jiar-10078
   Google Scholar
• Herbert, S., & Graham, M. (2022). Applying legitimacy theory to understand sustainability reporting behaviour within South African integrated reports. South African Journal of Accounting Research, 36(2), 147–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/10291954.2021.1918481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, N. T., Shelton, S. W., & Stevens, K. T. (2002). Corporate lobbying behaviour on accounting for stock-based compensation: Venue and format choices. Abacus, 38(1), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6281.00098
   Google Scholar
• Holthoff, G., Hoos, F., & Weissenberger, B. E. (2015). Are we lost in translation? The impact of using translated IFRS on decision-making. Accounting in Europe, 12(1), 107–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2015.1052824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoogervorst, H., & Prada, M. (2015). Working in the public interest: The IFRS Foundation and the IASB. IFRS Foundation. Available at: https://www.ifrs.org/content/dam/ifrs/about-us/who-we-are/working-in-the-public-interest.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hope, T., & Gray, R. (1982). Power and policy making: The development of an R & D standard. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 9(4), 531–558. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.1982.tb01014.x
   Google Scholar
• Huerta, E., Petrides, Y., & Braun, G. P. (2013). Translation of IFRS: Language as a barrier to comparability. Research in Accounting Regulation, 25(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.racreg.2012.11.007
   Google Scholar
• International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). (2018a). Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. IFRS Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) Foundation. (2018b). International Financial Reporting Standard 10 – Consolidated Financial Standards. IFRS Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Foundation. (2018a). Due Process Handbook. IFRS Foundation. Available at: http://www.ifrs.org/-/media/feature/about-us/legal-and-governance/constitution-docs/due-process-handbook.pdf?la=en&hash=E301B3030818C11E7E5A8A256745C66145E9C480
   Google Scholar
• International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Foundation. (2018b). How we set IFRS standards. IFRS Foundation. Available at: http://www.ifrs.org/about-us/how-we-set-standards/#standards
   Google Scholar
• International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Foundation. (2018c). Our structure. IFRS Foundation. Available at: https://www.ifrs.org/about-us/our-structure/
   Google Scholar
• International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Foundation. (2023). Who uses IFRS standards? IFRS Foundation. Available at: http://www.ifrs.org/use-around-the-world/use-of-ifrs-standards-by-jurisdiction/
   Google Scholar
• Jorissen, A., Lybaert, N., Orens, R., & Van Der Tas, L. (2012). Formal participation in the IASB’s due process of standard setting: A multi-issue/multi-period analysis. European Accounting Review, 21(4), 693–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2010.522775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jupe, R. E. (2000). Self-referential lobbying of the accounting standards board: The case of financial reporting standard no. 1. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 11(3), 337–359. https://doi.org/10.1006/cpac.1999.0366
   Google Scholar
• Larson, R. K. (1997). Corporate lobbying of the international accounting standards committee. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 8(3), 175–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-646X.00024
   Google Scholar
• Larson, R. K. (2007). Constituent participation and the IASB’s international financial reporting interpretations committee. Accounting in Europe, 4(2), 207–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480701727981
   Google Scholar
• Larson, R. K., & Kenny, S. Y. (2011). The financing of the IASB: An analysis of donor diversity. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing & Taxation, 20(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2010.12.003
   Google Scholar
• MacArthur, J. B. (1988). An analysis of the content of corporate submissions on proposed accounting standards in the UK. Accounting and Business Research, 18(71), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.1988.9729368
   Google Scholar
• Malsch, B., & Gendron, Y. (2011). Reining in auditors: On the dynamics of power surrounding an “innovation” in the regulatory space. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36(7), 456–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2011.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mans-Kemp, N., & van der Lugt, C. T. (2020). Linking integrated reporting quality with sustainability performance and financial performance in South Africa. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 23(1), a3572. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v23i1.3572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Lugt, 2020”)
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Diaz, L. (2005). Strategic experts and improvising regulators: Explaining the IASC’s rise to global influence, 1973–2001. Business and Politics, 7(3), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.2202/1469-3569.1135
   Google Scholar
• McKinnon, J. L. (1984). Application of Anglo-American Principles of Consolidation to Corporate Financial Disclosure in Japan. Abacus, 20(1), 16–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.1984.tb00189.x
   Google Scholar
• McLeay, S., Ordelheide, D., & Young, S. (2000). Constituent lobbying and its impact on the development of financial reporting regulations: Evidence from Germany. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25(1), 79–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(99)00028-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ndubizu, G. A., Choi, Y. C., & Jain, R. (1993). Corporate lobbying strategy and pension accounting deliberations: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 8(3), 277–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X9300800308
   Google Scholar
• Nistor, C. S., & Deaconu, A. (2016). Public accounting history in post-communist Romania. Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 29(1), 623–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2016.1193945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nobes, C. (2011). IFRS Practices and the Persistence of Accounting System Classification. Abacus, 47(3), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2011.00341.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’brien, P. C. (2009). Changing the concepts to justify the standards. Accounting Perspectives, 8(4), 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1506/ap.8.4.1
   Google Scholar
• Pacter, P. (2013). What have IASB and FASB convergence efforts achieved? Journal of Accountancy. [Online]. Available at: https://www.journalofaccountancy.com/issues/2013/feb/20126984.html
   Google Scholar
• Pelger, C. (2016). Practices of standard-setting–An analysis of the IASB’s and FASB’s process of identifying the objective of financial reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 50, 51–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2015.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pong, C. K., & Whittington, G. (1996). The withdrawal of current cost accounting in the United Kingdom: A study of the accounting standards committee. Abacus, 32(1), 30–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.1996.tb00449.x
   Google Scholar
• Prather-Kinsey, J., Boyar, S., & Hood, A. C. (2018). Implications for IFRS principles-based and US GAAP rules-based applications: Are accountants’ decisions affected by work location and core self-evaluations? Journal of International Accounting, Auditing & Taxation, 32, 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2018.08.002
   Google Scholar
• Prather-Kinsey, J., De Luca, F., & Phan, H. T. P. (2022). Improving the global comparability of IFRS-based financial reporting through global enforcement: A proposed organizational dynamic. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 19, 330–351. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-022-00145-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psaros, J. (2007). Do principles-based accounting standards lead to biased financial reporting? An Australian experiment. Accounting and Finance, 47(3), 527–550. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2007.00212.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramanna, K., & Sletten, E. (2009). Why do countries adopt international financial reporting standards? Harvard Business School Accounting & Management Unit. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1460763
   Google Scholar
• Roychowdhury, S., & Srinivasan, S. (2019). The Role of Gatekeepers in Capital Markets. Journal of Accounting Research, 57(2), 295–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, B., Scapens, R. W., & Theobald, M. (2002). Research method and methodology in finance and accounting. London: Thomson.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, C., Dunstan, K., & Stanley, T. (2000). Local Government Accounting Standard-setting in Australia: Did Constituents Participate? Financial Accountability & Management, 16(4), 373–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0408.00113
   Google Scholar
• Sacho, Z., & Oberholster, J. G. I. (2008). Factors impacting on the future of the IASB. Meditari Accountancy Research, 16(1), 117–137. https://doi.org/10.1108/10222529200800007
   Google Scholar
• Saemann, G. (1999). An Examination of Comment Letters Filed in the US Financial Accounting Standard-Setting Process by Institutional Interest Groups. Abacus, 35(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6281.00032
   Google Scholar
• Schipper, K. (2003). Principles-based accounting standards. Accounting Horizons, 17(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2003.17.1.61
   Google Scholar
• Stenka, R., & Taylor, P. (2010). Setting UK standards on the concept of control: An analysis of lobbying behaviour. Accounting and Business Research, 40(2), 109–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2010.9663387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsoukas, H., & Hatch, M. J. (2001). Complex Thinking, Complex Practice: The Case for a Narrative Approach to Organizational Complexity. Human Relations, 54(8), 979–1013. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726701548001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tutticci, I., Dunstan, K., & Holmes, S. (1994). Respondent lobbying in the Australian accounting standard-setting process: ED49–a case study. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 7(2), 86–104. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579410058201
   Google Scholar
• van Zijl, W., Wöstmann, C., & Maroun, W. (2017). Strategy disclosures by listed financial services companies: Signalling theory, legitimacy theory and South African integrated reporting practices. South African Journal of Business Management, 48(3), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v48i3.37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vivian, B., & Maroun, W. (2018). Progressive public administration and new public management in public sector accountancy: An international review. Meditari Accountancy Research, 26(1), 44–69. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-03-2017-0131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1978). Towards a positive theory of the determination of accounting standards. The Accounting Review, 53(1), 112–134. https://www.jstor.org/stable/245729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1979). The demand for and supply of accounting theories: The market for excuses. The Accounting Review, 54, 273–305. https://www.jstor.org/stable/245516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weetman, P. (2001). Controlling the standard-setting agenda: The role of FRS 3. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 14(1), 85–109. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570110381088
   Google Scholar
• Weetman, P., Davie, E., & Collins, W. (1996). Lobbying on accounting issues: Preparer/user imbalance in the case of the operating and financial review. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 9(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579610109978
   Google Scholar
• Yen, A. C., Hirst, D. E., & Hopkins, P. E. (2007). A content analysis of the comprehensive income exposure draft comment letters. Research in Accounting Regulation, 19, 53–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1052-0457(06)19003-7
   Google Scholar
• Young, J. J. (2006). Making up users. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(6), 579–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2005.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeff, S. A. (2002). “Political” lobbying on proposed standards: A challenge to the IASB. Accounting Horizons, 16(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2002.16.1.43
   Google Scholar
• Zeff, S. A. (2012). The Evolution of the IASC into the IASB, and the Challenges it Faces. The Accounting Review, 87(3), 807–837. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar