Local calibration and Implementation of AASHTOWARE Pavement ME performance models for Oklahoma pavement systems

References

• AASHTO, 2010. Guide for the local calibration of the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO, 2015. Mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide: A manual of practice (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• ARA, Inc., ERES Consultants Division, 2004. “Guide for Mechanistic–Empirical Design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures.” In NCHRP Project. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Ceylan, Halil, et al., 2015. “Investigation of AASHTOWare Pavement ME Design/Darwin-ME™ performance prediction models for Iowa pavement analysis and design.” In. Iowa Department of Transportation, Ames, IA.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, Stephen A, Gibbe, Robel, and Aryal, Nirajan, 2011. “Development of a flexible pavement database for local calibration of the MEPDG, Part 2 evaluation of ODOT SMA mixtures.” In. Oklahoma Department of Transportation, Oklahoma City, OK.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, Stephen A, Jakatimath, Yatish, and Sumesh, KC., 2007. “Determination of dynamic modulus master curves for Oklahoma HMA mixtures.” In. Oklahoma Department of Transportation, Oklahoma City, OK.
   Google Scholar
• Darter, Michael I, et al., 2014. “Calibration and implementation of the AASHTO Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide in Arizona.” In. Arizona Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Kevin D, Xiao, Danny X, and Wang, Kelvin CP, 2011. Calibration of the mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide for flexible pavement design in Arkansas. Journal of the Transportation Research Record, 2226 (1), 135–141.
   Google Scholar
• Hossain, Zahid, et al., 2011. “Development of flexible pavement database for local calibration of MEPDG.” In. Oklahoma Department of Transportation, Oklahoma City, OK.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y Richard, et al., 2011. “Local calibration of the MEPDG for flexible pavement design.” In. North Carolina State University. Dept. of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Sunghwan, Halil Ceylan, Di Ma, and Gopalakrishnan, Kasthurirangan, 2014. Calibration of pavement ME Design and Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide performance prediction models for Iowa pavement systems. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 140 (10), 04014052. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Qiang, et al., 2011. Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG): a bird’s-eye view. Journal of Modern Transportation, 19 (2), 114–133.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Jianhua, Pierce, Linda M, and Uhlmeyer, Jeff, 2009. Calibration of flexible pavement in mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide for Washington state. Journal of the Transportation Research Record, 2095 (1), 73–83.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Joshua Qiang, Wang, Kelvin CP, and Lou, Junxiang, 2016. Impact of time coverage of traffic data collection on Pavement ME design. International Journal of Pavement Research Technology, 9 (1), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Mallela, Jagannath, et al., 2013. “Implementation of the AASHTO mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide for Colorado.” In. Colorado. Dept. of Transportation. Research Branch, Denver, CO: Colorado. Dept. of Transportation. Research Branch.
   Google Scholar
• Nobakht, Mona, et al., 2018. Mechanistic-Empirical methodology for the selection of cost-effective rehabilitation strategy for flexible pavements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 19 (8), 675–684. doi:10.1080/10298436.2016.1199878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nobakht, Mona, Sakhaeifar, Maryam S., and Newcomb, David E., 2017. Selection of structural overlays using asphalt mixture performance. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 29 (11), 04017209. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oklahoma Department of Transportation (ODOT), 2019. Materials. In: Standard Specifications for Highway Construction, 613–788. Oklahoma City, OK: ODOT, Pavement Management Branch..
   Google Scholar
• OWRB. 2018. “The Oklahoma Water Resource Board.” https://www.owrb.ok.gov/.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, Mary M, et al., 2017. Pavement ME design–A summary of local calibration efforts for flexible pavements. Auburn, AL: National Center for Asphalt Technology, 1–98.
   Google Scholar
• Sakhaeifar, Maryam S., et al., 2015. “Selection of long lasting rehabilitation treatment using life cycle cost analysis and present serviceability rating.” In ODOT SP&R Item Number 2261. Oklahoma Department of Transportation, Materials and Research Division Oklahoma City, OK.
   Google Scholar
• Sakhaeifar, Maryam S, et al., 2019. “Compilation of local studies and regional calibration of pavement me design for rigid and flexible pavements in Oklahoma.” In. Oklahoma: Oklahoma Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, Charles W, et al., 2011. “Sensitivity evaluation of MEPDG performance prediction.” In. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Kelvin CP, et al., 2014. Pavement ME Design distress modeling for Oklahoma. Paper presented at the T&DI Congress: Planes, Trains, and Automobiles, Orlando, Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R Chris, and Shaidur, R, 2013. “Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide calibration for pavement rehabilitation.” In.: Oregon. Dept. of Transportation. Research Section, Salem, Ore. and Federal Highway Administration, Washington D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Witczak, MW, Zapata, CE, and Houston, WN, 2006. “Models incorporated into the current enhanced integrated climatic model: NCHRP 9-23 project findings and additional changes after version 0.7.” In. Project NCHRP.
   Google Scholar
• WSS. 2018. “USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS).” https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm.
   Google Scholar