Discomfort limits provided by railroad crossings to passenger cars

References

• Abudinen, D., Fuentes, L.G., and Carvajal Muñoz, J.S, 2017. Travel quality assessment of urban roads based on international roughness index. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2612, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agostinacchio, M., Ciampa, D., and Olita, S, 2013. The vibrations induced by surface irregularities In road pavements – a matlab® approach. European Transport Research Review, 6 (3), 267–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astarita, V., et al., 2012. A mobile application for road surface quality control: uniqualroad. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 54, 1135–1144.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM, 1997. Standard practices for simulating vehicular response to longitudinal profiles of traveled surface. ASTM E 1170-97. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM, 2016. Standard practice for roads and parking lots pavement condition index surveys. ASTM D 6433-16. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• Bonin, G., et al., 2007. Ride quality evaluation: 8 d.O.F. Vehicle model calibration. 4th International SIIV Congress. Palermo, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Bridgelall, R, 2015. Precision bounds of pavement distress localization with connected vehicle sensors. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 21 (3), 04014045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantisani, G., and Loprencipe, G, 2010. Road roughness and whole body vibration: evaluation tools and comfort limits. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 136 (9), 818–826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, H., et al., 2020. Advanced seat suspension control system design for heavy duty vehicles, 1st ed. London, UK: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duarte, M.L.M., and De Melo, G.C., 2018. Influence of pavement type and speed on whole body vibration (wbv) levels measured on passenger vehicles. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 40 (3), 150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuentes, L., et al., 2021. Pavement serviceability evaluation using whole body vibration techniques: A case study for urban roads. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 22 (10), 1238–1249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, M.J, 2007. Discomfort from feeling vehicle vibration. Vehicle System Dynamics, 45 (7-8), 679–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, M.J, 2012. Handbook of human vibration. London, UK: Academic press.
   Google Scholar
• Guanyu, W., Michael, B., and Gurmel, G, 2020. Study of the factors affecting road roughness measurement using smartphones. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 26 (3), 04020020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, R., Hudson, W.R., and Zaniewski, J.P., 1994. Modern pavement management. Malabar, FL: Krieger Pub. Co.
   Google Scholar
• Hou, X., et al., Year. The analysis of the correlation between international roughness index and body ride comforted.^eds. Ninth International Conference of Chinese Transportation Professionals (ICCTP), Harbin, China: American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2554-2561.
   Google Scholar
• ISO, 1995. Mechanical vibration - road surface profiles - reporting of measured data. ISO 8608. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
   Google Scholar
• ISO, 1997. Mechanical vibration and shock - evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration, part 1: general requirement. ISO 2631-1. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
   Google Scholar
• ISO, 2005. Human response to vibration - measuring instrumentation. ISO BS EN 8041. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
   Google Scholar
• ISO, 2016. Mechanical vibration — laboratory method for evaluating vehicle seat vibration — part 1: basic requirements. ISO 10326-1. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
   Google Scholar
• Janani, L., Sunitha, V., and Mathew, S, 2020. Influence of surface distresses on smartphone-based pavement roughness evaluation. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 22 (13), 1637–1650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kırbaş, U., and Karaşahin, M, 2016. Performance models for hot mix asphalt pavements In urban roads. Construction and Building Materials, 116, 281–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kırbaş, U., and Karaşahin, M, 2018a. Investigation of ride comfort limits on urban asphalt concrete pavements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 19 (10), 949–955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kırbaş, U., and Karaşahin, M, 2018b. Pavement performance levels causing human health risks. Journal of the Croatian Association of Civil Engineers, 70 (10), 851–861.
   Google Scholar
• Kırbaş, U., and Karaşahin, M, 2019. Determination of pavement performance thresholds for comfortable riding on urban roads. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 47 (1), 20170319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Torre, F., Ballerini, L., and Di Volo, N., 2002. Correlation between longitudinal roughness and user perception In urban areas. Transportation Research Record, 1806 (1), 131–139.
   Google Scholar
• Loprencipe, G., and Zoccali, P, 2017. Ride quality due to road surface irregularities: comparison of different methods applied on a set of real road profiles. Coatings, 7 (59), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Múčka, P, 2015. Sensitivity of road unevenness indicators to distresses of composite pavements. International Journal Pavement Research Technology, 8 (2), 72–84.
   Google Scholar
• Múčka, P, 2017. Road roughness limit values based on measured vehicle vibration. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 23 (2), 04016029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Múčka, P, 2020. Vibration dose value In passenger car and road roughness. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements, 146 (4), 1–15, 04020064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Múčka, P, 2021. International roughness index thresholds based on whole-body vibration In passenger cars. Transportation Research Record, 2675 (1), 305–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Múčka, P., and Gagnon, L, 2015. Influence of tyre–road contact model on vehicle vibration response. Vehicle System Dynamics, 53 (9), 1227–1246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muniz De Farias, M., and De Souza, R.O., 2009. Correlations and analyses of longitudinal roughness indices. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 10 (2), 399–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T., et al., 2019. Bus ride index – a refined approach to evaluating road surface irregularities. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 22 (2), 423–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S., Popov, A.A., and Cole, D.J, 2004. Influence of soil deformation on off-road heavy vehicle suspension vibration. Journal of Terramechanics, 41 (1), 41–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmani, H., et al., 2020. A new criterion for comfort assessment of In-wheel motor electric vehicles. Journal of Vibration and Control, 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauerwein, P.M., and Smith, B.L., 2011. Investigation of the implementation of a probe-vehicle based pavement roughness estimation system. Final Report, University of Virginia Center for Transportation Studies, Charlottesville, VA, UVA-2010-01.
   Google Scholar
• Vittorio, A., et al., 2014. Automated sensing system for monitoring of road surface quality by mobile devices. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 111, 242–251.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, F., and Easa, S, 2016. Analytical evaluation of ride comfort on asphalt concrete pavements. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 44 (4), 1671–1682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Who, 2015. Global status report on road safety. Italy: Organization. W.H., WA 275.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, J., Chou, E.Y.J., and Yau, J.-T, 2006. Development of speed-related ride quality thresholds using international roughness index. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1974, 47–53.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., et al., 2020. Iri threshold values based on riding comfort. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements, 146 (1), 04020001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., and Yang, W, 2010. Evaluation method of pavement roughness based on human-vehicle-road interaction. Icctp 2010. 3541-3551.
   Google Scholar