3D modelling of asphalt concrete overlay based on GPR data

References

• Al-Qadi, I. L., et al., 2005. Accuracy of Ground-Penetrating Radar for estimating rigid and flexible pavement layer thicknesses. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1940 (1), 69–78.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Qadi, I. L., and Lahouar, S, 2005. Measuring layer thicknesses with GPR – Theory to practice. Construction and Building Materials, 19 (10), 763–772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autodesk Civil 3D. 2020. User Guide, Autodesk Knowledge Network, About Creating a TIN Surface. Available from: https://knowledge.autodesk.com/support/civil-3d/learn-explore/caas/CloudHelp/cloudhelp/2019/ENU/Civil3D-UserGuide/files/GUID-D0FCED34-D68F-42D2-A6FB-14C454CA57FA-htm.html. [Accessed 4 February 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Ayala-Cabrera, D., et al., 2016. 3D representation of (buried) water supply Elements using Pre-processed GPR images. Athens Journal of Technology & Engineering, 3 (3), 241–253.
   Google Scholar
• Benedetto, A., and Pajewski, L., ed, 2015. Civil Engineering applications of ground penetrating radar. Cham: Springer International: Springer Transactions in Civil and Environmental Engineering, 371.
   Google Scholar
• Bianchini, A., Gonzalez, C.R., and Bell, H.P, 2018. Correction for the asphalt overlay thickness of flexible pavements considering pavement conditions. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 19 (7), 577–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalla Valle, P., and Thom, N., 2018. Pavement layer thickness variability evaluation and effect on performance life. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 21 (7), 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Coster, A., et al., 2018. Evaluation of pavement layer thicknesses using GPR: A comparison between full-wave inversion and the straight-ray method. Construction and Building Materials, 168 (20), 91–104.
   Google Scholar
• De Floriani, L., and Magillo, P., 2003. Algorithms for visibility computation on terrains: a survey. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30 (5), 709–728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinh, K., Gucunski, N., and Zayed, T, 2018. Automated visualization of concrete bridge deck condition from GPR data. NDT and E International, 102, 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyana, A., Rao, C. H., and Kuloor, R, 2012. 3D Segmentation of ground penetrating radar data for landmine detection. In: Proceedings of Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR), 14th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR), 4-8 June 2012 Shanghai, China. Publisher: IEEE, 858-863.
   Google Scholar
• Eide, E., et al., 2005. Airfield runway inspection using 3 dimensional GPR. In: S. Lambot and A. G. Gorriti, eds. Proceedings of 3rd International Workshop on Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar IWAGPR 2005, 2-3 May 2005 Delft, 87–91.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Aviation Administration, 2016. Airport pavement design and evaluation, advisory circular 150/5320-6F. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Forte, E., et al., 2021. Optimised extraction of Archaeological features from full 3-D GPR data. Applied Sciences, 11, 8517.
   Google Scholar
• Gjuranić, Z, 2008. Terrain modelling by using Delaunay triangulation. KoG, 11 (11), 45–52.
   Google Scholar
• Graczyk, M., et al., 2016. The Use of three-dimensional analysis of GPR data in Evaluation of operational safety of Airfield pavements. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 3704–3712.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, J., et al., 2016. Pavement thickness and stabilised foundation layer assessment using ground-coupled GPR. Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation, 31 (3), 267–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshaghani, A, 2019. Identifying the problematic areas with structural deficiencies of pavements using non-destructive tests (NDT). International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 20 (11), 1359–1369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenneth, R., and Maser, P.E., 1994. Ground Penetrating Radar Survey of Pavement Thickness on Minnesota Road Sections. Minnesota Department of Transportation, Report No. MN/RC-95/06, 28.
   Google Scholar
• Leckebusch, J, 2003. Ground-penetrating radar: A modern three-dimensional Prospection method. Archaeological Prospection, 10 (4), 213–240.
   Google Scholar
• Leucci, G., et al., 2016. 3D GPR survey for the archaeological characterization of the ancient messapian necropolis in Lecce. South Italy. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 7, 290–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, S.H, 2015. 3D Delaunay triangulation of 1 billion points on a PC. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 102, 65–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loizos, A., and Plati, C, 2007. Accuracy of pavement thicknesses estimation using different ground penetrating radar analysis approaches. NDT & E International, 40 (2), 147–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loulizi, A., Al-Qadi, I.L., and Lahouar, S, 2003. Optimization of ground penetrating radar to predict layer thicknesses in flexible pavements. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 129 (1), 93–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maser, K., Carmichael, A., and Weiss, W., 2013. Use of GPR for Subsurface Pavement Investigations of 23 Airports in South Carolina. In: I. Hoff, H. Mork and R. Garba Saba ed. Proceedings Ninth International Conference on the Bearing Capacity of Roads, Railways and Airfields, Vol 1., 25–27 June 2013 Trondheim, Norway. 191–197.
   Google Scholar
• Maser, K.R., and Scullion, T, 1991. Automated detection of pavement layer thicknesses and Subsurface moisture using Ground Penetrating radar. Transportation Research Record, 1344, 22–30.
   Google Scholar
• Ožbolt, M., Rukavina, T., and Domitrović, J, 2012. Comparison of the pavement layers thickness measured by georadar and conventional methods – examples from Croatia. Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 7 (1), 30–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perumal, L, 2019. New approaches for Delaunay triangulation and optimisation. Heliyon, 5 (8), e02319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plati, C., and Loizos, A, 2012. Using ground-penetrating radar for assessing the structural needs of asphalt pavements. Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation, 27 (3), 273–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saarenketo, T, 2009. NDT Transportation. In: H. M. Jol, ed. Ground Penetrating Radar: Theory and Applications. Amsterdam, Elsevier, 395–444.
   Google Scholar
• Saarenketo, T., and Scullion, T, 2000. Road evaluation with ground penetrating radar. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 43 (2-4), 119–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato, M., et al., 2012. Landmine detection by 3D GPR system In: T. Broach and J. H. Holloway Jr., eds. Detection and Sensing of Mines, Explosive Objects, and Obscured Targets XVII, 23-27 April 2012 Baltimore, Maryland, United States. Publisher: SPIE.
   Google Scholar
• Setiawan, A.D., and Suksmono, A.B., 2011. 3-dimensional analysis of Ground Penetrating Radar image for non-destructive road inspection. In: 2nd International Conference on Instrumentation, Communications, Information Technology, and Biomedical Engineering, 8-9 November 2011 Bandung, Indonesia. Publisher: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Uddin, W, 2006. Ground Penetrating Radar Study – Phase I Technology Review and Evaluation. Mississippi Department of Transportation, Report No. FHWA/MS-DOT-RD-06-182.
   Google Scholar
• Varnavina, A. V., et al., 2015. Data acquisition and processing parameters for concrete bridge deck condition assessment using ground-coupled ground penetrating radar: some considerations. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 114, 123–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wai-Lok Lai, W., Dérobert, X., and Annan, P., 2018. A review of Ground Penetrating Radar application in civil engineering: A 30-year journey from locating and Testing to imaging and diagnosis. NDT & E International, 96, 58–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S., Zhao, S., and Al-Qadi, I. L, 2019. Real-time density and thickness estimation of thin asphalt pavement overlay during compaction using ground penetrating radar data. Surveys in Geophysics, 41, 431–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenzlick, J., Scullion, T., and Maser, K. R, 1999. High accuracy pavement thickness measurement using ground penetrating radar. Missouri Department of Transportation, Report No. RAT 99-003.
   Google Scholar
• Willett, D. A., Mahboub, K. C., and Rister, B, 2006. Accuracy of Ground-Penetrating Radar for pavement-layer thickness analysis. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 132 (1), 96–103.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, J., et al., 2019. Towards a 3D data model of underground utilities for land administration. Remote Sensing, 11 (17), 1957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, S., and Al-Qadi, I. L, 2019. Algorithm development for real-time thin asphalt concrete overlay compaction monitoring using ground-penetrating radar. NDT & E International, 104, 114–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, S., Al-Qadi, I. L., and Wang, S, 2018. Prediction of thin asphalt concrete overlay thickness and density using nonlinear optimization of GPR data. NDT & E International, 100, 20–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, F., and Scullion, T, 2006. Development of an Advanced Overlay Design System Incorporating Both Rutting and Reflection Cracking Requirements. Report 0-5123-2, Texas Transportation Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, S., et al., 2014. 3D Ground Penetrating Radar to detect Tree Roots and estimate Root biomass in the field. Remote Sensing, 6 (6), 5754–5773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou, L., et al., 2020. Mapping and assessment of Tree Roots using ground penetrating radar with Low-Cost GPS. Remote Sensing, 12 (8), 1300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar