Predicting the dynamic modulus of asphalt mixture using hybridized artificial neural network and grey wolf optimizer

References

• Al-Khateeb, G., et al., 2006. A new simplistic model for dynamic modulus predictions of asphalt paving mixtures. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 75, 1254–1293.
   Google Scholar
• Ali, Y., et al., 2016. Investigation of factors affecting dynamic modulus and phase angle of various asphalt concrete mixtures. Materials and Structures/Materiaux et Constructions, 49 (3), 857–868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arifuzzaman, M., Islam, M.S., and Hossain, M.I, 2017. Moisture damage evaluation in SBS and lime modified asphalt using AFM and artificial intelligence. Neural Computing and Applications, 28 (1), 125–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azari, H., et al., 2007. Comparison of simple performance test |E*| of accelerated loading facility mixtures and prediction |E*| use of NCHRP 1-37A and Witczak’s new equations. Transportation Research Record, 1998, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Bari, J., and Witczak, M, 2006. Development of a new revised version of the Witczak E* predictive model for hot mix asphalt mixtures. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 75, 381–423.
   Google Scholar
• Behnood, A., et al., 2017. Prediction of the compressive strength of normal and high-performance concretes using M5P model tree algorithm. Construction and Building Materials, 142, 199–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behnood, A, 2019. Application of rejuvenators to improve the rheological and mechanical properties of asphalt binders and mixtures: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 231, 171–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behnood, A, 2020. A review of the warm mix asphalt (WMA) technologies: effects on thermo-mechanical and rheological properties. Journal of Cleaner Production, 259, 120817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behnood, A., and Daneshvar, D, 2020. A machine learning study of the dynamic modulus of asphalt concretes: An application of M5P model tree algorithm. Construction and Building Materials, 262, 120544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behnood, A., and Golafshani, E.M, 2018. Predicting the compressive strength of silica fume concrete using hybrid artificial neural network with multi-objective grey wolves. Journal of Cleaner Production, 202, 54–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behnood, A., and Golafshani, E.M, 2020. Machine learning study of the mechanical properties of concretes containing waste foundry sand. Construction and Building Materials, 243, 118152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behnood, A., and Modiri Gharehveran, M, 2019. Morphology, rheology, and physical properties of polymer-modified asphalt binders. European Polymer Journal, 112, 766–791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behnood, A., and Mohammadi Golafshani, E, 2021. Predicting the dynamic modulus of asphalt mixture using machine learning techniques: An application of multi biogeography-based programming. Construction and Building Materials, 266, 120983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behnood, A., Olek, J., and Glinicki, M.A, 2015. Predicting modulus elasticity of recycled aggregate concrete using M5′ model tree algorithm. Construction and Building Materials, 94, 137–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceylan, H., et al., 2009. Accuracy of predictive models for dynamic modulus of hot-mix asphalt. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 21 (6), 286–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceylan, H., Gopalakrishnan, K., and Kim, S, 2009. Looking to the future: the next-generation hot mix asphalt dynamic modulus prediction models. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 10 (5), 341–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceylan, H., Kim, S., and Gopalakrishnan, K., 2007. Hot mix asphalt dynamic modulus prediction models using neural network approach. In: The ANNIE 2007. St. Louis: ASME.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, M.-Y., Prayogo, D., and Wu, Y.-W, 2019. Prediction of permanent deformation in asphalt pavements using a novel symbiotic organisms search–least squares support vector regression. Neural Computing and Applications, 31 (10), 6261–6273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, D.W., Pellinen, T., and Bonaquist, R.F, 2003. Hirsch model for estimating the modulus of asphalt concrete. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 72, 97–121.
   Google Scholar
• Czarnecki, S., Sadowski, Ł., and Hoła, J, 2020. Artificial neural networks for non-destructive identification of the interlayer bonding between repair overlay and concrete substrate. Advances in Engineering Software, 141, 102769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daneshvar, D., and Behnood, A, 2020. Estimation of the dynamic modulus of asphalt concretes using random forests algorithm. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2020.1741587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dantas, A.T.A., Batista Leite, M., and De Jesus Nagahama, K., 2013. Prediction of compressive strength of concrete containing construction and demolition waste using artificial neural networks. Construction and Building Materials, 38, 717–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dongre, R., et al., 2005. Field evaluation of Witczak and Hirsch models for predicting dynamic modulus of hot-mix asphalt (with discussion). Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 75, 381–442.
   Google Scholar
• El-Badawy, S., Abd El-Hakim, R., and Awed, A, 2018. Comparing artificial neural networks with regression models for hot-mix asphalt dynamic modulus prediction. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 30 (7), 4018128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Badawy, S., Bayomy, F., and Awed, A, 2012. Performance of MEPDG dynamic modulus predictive models for asphalt concrete mixtures: local calibration for Idaho. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 24 (11), 1412–1421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Badawy, S., Khattab, A.M., and Al Abbas, A.H., 2016. Using artificial neural networks (ANNs) for Hhot mix asphalt E* predictions. In: Forth Geo-China 2016: Innovative Technologies for Severe Weather and Climate Change. GSP, 264.
   Google Scholar
• El Ayadi, A., et al., 2012. An improved dynamic model for the study of a flexible pavement. Advances in Engineering Software, 44 (1), 44–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faris, H., et al., 2018. Grey wolf optimizer: a review of recent variants and applications. Neural Computing and Applications, 30, 413–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandomi, A.H., and Roke, D.A, 2015. Assessment of artificial neural network and genetic programming as predictive tools. Advances in Engineering Software, 88, 63–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgouli, K., Loizos, A., and Plati, C, 2016. Calibration of dynamic modulus predictive model. Construction and Building Materials, 102, 65–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golafshani, E.M., et al., 2012. Prediction of bond strength of spliced steel bars in concrete using artificial neural network and fuzzy logic. Construction and Building Materials, 36, 411–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golafshani, E.M., and Behnood, A, 2018a. Automatic regression methods for formulation of elastic modulus of recycled aggregate concrete. Applied Soft Computing, 64, 377–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golafshani, E.M., and Behnood, A, 2018b. Application of soft computing methods for predicting the elastic modulus of recycled aggregate concrete. Journal of Cleaner Production, 176, 1163–1176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golafshani, E.M., and Behnood, A, 2019. Estimating the optimal mix design of silica fume concrete using biogeography-based programming. Cement and Concrete Composites, 96, 95–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golafshani, E.M., Behnood, A., and Arashpour, M, 2020. Predicting the compressive strength of normal and high-performance concretes using ANN and ANFIS hybridized with grey wolf optimizer. Construction and Building Materials, 232, 117266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagan, M.T., and Menhaj, M.B, 1994. Training feedforward networks with the marquardt algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 5 (6), 989–993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidarabadizadeh, N., Ghanizadeh, A.R., and Behnood, A, 2021. Prediction of the resilient modulus of non-cohesive subgrade soils and unbound subbase materials using a hybrid support vector machine method and colliding bodies optimization algorithm. Construction and Building Materials, 275, 122140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamshidi, A., et al., 2019. Characterization of effects of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) source and content on dynamic modulus of hot mix asphalt concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 217, 487–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandiri, A., Mohammadi Golafshani, E., and Behnood, A, 2020. Estimation of the compressive strength of concretes containing ground granulated blast furnace slag using hybridized multi-objective ANN and salp swarm algorithm. Construction and Building Materials, 248, 118676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khattab, A.M., et al., 2014. Evaluation of Witczak E* predictive models for the implementation of AASHTOWare-Pavement ME Design in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Construction and Building Materials, 64, 360–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khattab, A.M., et al., 2017. Comparison of Witczak NCHRP 1-40D & hirsh dynamic modulus models based on different binder characterization methods: a case study. MATEC Web of Conferences, 120, 07003.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J., et al., 2018. Using artificial neural networks to predict the dynamic modulus of asphalt mixtures containing recycled asphalt shingles. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 30 (4), 4018051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maroufpoor, S., et al., 2019. Soil moisture simulation using hybrid artificial intelligent model: hybridization of adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system with grey wolf optimizer algorithm. Journal of Hydrology, 575, 544–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirjalili, S., Mirjalili, S.M., and Lewis, A, 2014. Grey wolf optimizer. Advances in Engineering Software, 69, 46–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özgan, E., Korkmaz, İ., and Emiroğlu, M., 2012. Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference approach for prediction the stiffness modulus on asphalt concrete. Advances in Engineering Software, 45 (1), 100–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellinen, T.K., 2002. Investigation of the use of dynamic modulus as an indicator of hot-mix asphalt peformance. Thesis (PhD). Arizona State University.
   Google Scholar
• Reuter, U., Sultan, A., and Reischl, D.S, 2018. A comparative study of machine learning approaches for modeling concrete failure surfaces. Advances in Engineering Software, 116, 67–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SakhaeiFar, M., et al., 2009. Application of artificial neural networks for estimating dynamic modulus of asphalt concrete. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2127, 173–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, C.W., 2005. Evaluation of the Witczak dynamic modulus prediction model. In: Proceedings of the 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, No. 05-211. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Shu, X., and Huang, B, 2008. Dynamic modulus prediction of HMA mixtures based on the viscoelastic micromechanical model. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 20 (8), 530–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, D., Zaman, M., and Commuri, S, 2012. Inclusion of aggregate angularity, texture, and form in estimating dynamic modulus of asphalt mixes. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 13 (2), 327–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, D., Zaman, M., and Commuri, S, 2013. Artificial neural network modeling for dynamic modulus of hot mix asphalt using aggregate shape properties. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 25 (1), 54–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sollazzo, G., Fwa, T.F., and Bosurgi, G, 2017. An ANN model to correlate roughness and structural performance in asphalt pavements. Construction and Building Materials, 134, 684–693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H., et al., 2019. Structural assessment of asphalt pavement condition using backcalculated modulus and field data. Construction and Building Materials, 211, 943–951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, F., and Amirkhanian, S.N, 2009. Artificial neural network approach to estimating stiffness behavior of rubberized asphalt concrete containing reclaimed asphalt pavement. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 135 (8), 580–589.
   Google Scholar
• Yousefdoost, S., et al., 2013. Evaluation of dynamic modulus predictive models for typical Australian asphalt mixes. In: Delivering New Age Solutions: 15th AAPA International Flexible Pavements Conference, 22–25.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, C., Shen, S., and Jia, X, 2017. Modification of the Hirsch dynamic modulus prediction model for asphalt mixtures. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 29 (12), 4017241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., Luo, R., and Lytton, R, 2012. Characterizing permanent deformation and fracture of asphalt mixtures by using compressive dynamic modulus tests. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 24 (7), 898–906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar