A hybrid approach of ANN and improved PSO for estimating soaked CBR of subgrade soils of heavy-haul railway corridor

References

• Agarwal, K.B., and Ghanekar, K.D, 1970. Prediction of CBR from plasticity characteristics of soil. Proceeding 2nd south-east Asian Conf. soil Eng. Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Busultan, S., et al., 2020. Application of artificial neural networks in predicting subbase CBR values using soil indices data. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 671. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/671/1/012106.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Refeai, T., and Al-Suhaibani, A, 1997. Prediction of CBR using dynamic cone penetrometer. Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences, 9, 191–203. doi:10.1016/S1018-3639(18)30676-7.
   Google Scholar
• Alam, S.K., Mondal, A., and Shiuly, A, 2020. Prediction of CBR value of fine grained soils of bengal basin by genetic expression programming, artificial neural network and krigging method. Journal of the Geological Society of India, 95, 190–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alemdag, S., et al., 2016. Modeling deformation modulus of a stratified sedimentary rock mass using neural network, fuzzy inference and genetic programming. Engineering Geology, 203, 70–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alzabeebee, S., Mohamad, S.A., and Al-Hamd, R.K.S, 2021. Surrogate models to predict maximum dry unit weight, optimum moisture content and California bearing ratio form grain size distribution curve. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 23 (12), 2733–2750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alzo’ubi, A.K., and Ibrahim, F, 2018a. Towards building a neural network model for predicting pile static load test curves. In MATEC Web of Conferences (Vol. 149, p. 02031). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201814902031.
   Google Scholar
• Alzo’ubi, A.K., and Ibrahim, F., 2018b, November. The proposed use of generalized regression neural network to predict the entire static load test. In International Congress and Exhibition" Sustainable Civil Infrastructures: Innovative Infrastructure Geotechnology" (pp. 49-60). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01902-0_5.
   Google Scholar
• Alzo’ubi, A.K., and Ibrahim, F, 2019. Predicting loading–unloading pile static load test curves by using artificial neural networks. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 37 (3), 1311–1330. doi:10.1007/s10706-018-0687-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alzo’Ubi, A.K., and Ibrahim, F, 2021. Predicting the pile static load test using backpropagation neural network and generalized regression neural network–a comparative study. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 15 (7), 810–821. doi:10.1080/19386362.2018.1519975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armaghani, D.J., et al., 2014. Blasting-induced flyrock and ground vibration prediction through an expert artificial neural network based on particle swarm optimization. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 7, 5383–5396. doi:10.1007/s12517-013-1174-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asmawisham Alel, M.N., et al., 2018. Optimizing blasting’s air overpressure prediction model using swarm intelligence. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 995. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/995/1/012046.
   Google Scholar
• Asteris, P.G., and Mokos, V.G, 2020. Concrete compressive strength using artificial neural networks. Neural Computing and Applications, 32, 11807–11826. doi:10.1007/s00521-019-04663-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao, G.Q., and Mao, K.F, 2009. Particle swarm optimization algorithm with asymmetric time varying acceleration coefficients. 2009 IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Biomimetics, ROBIO 2009 2134–2139. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBIO.2009.5420504.
   Google Scholar
• Bardhan, A., et al., 2021. ELM-based adaptive neuro swarm intelligence techniques for predicting the California bearing ratio of soils in soaked conditions. Applied Soft Computing, 110, 107595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatt, S., Jain, P.K, and Pradesh, M. 2014. Prediction of California bearing ratio of soils using artificial neural network. American International Journal of Research in Sciences, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, 8 (2), 156–161.
   Google Scholar
• Black, W.P.M, 1962. A method of estimating the California bearing ratio of cohesive soils from plasticity data. Geotechnique, 12 (4), 271–282.
   Google Scholar
• Bui, X.N., et al., 2020. Prediction of blast-induced air over-pressure in open-Pit mine: assessment of different artificial intelligence techniques. Natural Resources Research, 29, 571–591. doi:10.1007/s11053-019-09461-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui, D.T., Nhu, V.H., and Hoang, N.D, 2018. Prediction of soil compression coefficient for urban housing project using novel integration machine learning approach of swarm intelligence and multi-layer perceptron neural network. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 38, 593–604. doi:10.1016/j.aei.2018.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabalar, A.F., and Karabash, Z, 2015. California bearing ratio of a sub-base material modified with tire buffings and cement addition. ASTM International, 43 (6).
   Google Scholar
• Cabalar, A.F., Zardikawi, O.A.A., and Abdulnafaa, M.D, 2019. Utilisation of construction and demolition materials with clay for road pavement subgrade. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 20 (3), 702–714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cevik, A., et al., 2011. Modeling of the uniaxial compressive strength of some clay-bearing rocks using neural network. Applied Soft Computing, 11 (2), 2587–2594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandra, S., Agrawal, S., and Chauhan, D.S, 2018. Soft computing based approach to evaluate the performance of solar PV module considering wind effect in laboratory condition. Energy Reports, 4, 252–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L., et al., 2020. PSO_LSSVM prediction model and its MATLAB Implementation, in: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. IOP Publishing, p. 12089.
   Google Scholar
• Cui, Z., Zeng, J., and Yin, Y., 2008. An improved PSO with time-varying accelerator coefficients. Proc. - 8th Int. Conf. Intell. Syst. Des. Appl. ISDA 2008 2, 638–643. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISDA.2008.86.
   Google Scholar
• De Graft-Johnson, JWS, and Bhatia, HS. 1969. The engineering characteristics of the lateritic gravels of Ghana. 1969. In: Proceedings of 7th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, vol. 2, Mexico, August 28–29. Bangkok: Asian Institute of Technology, p. 13–43.
   Google Scholar
• Dorn, M., et al., 2012. A GMDH polynomial neural network-based method to predict approximate three-dimensional structures of polypeptides. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 12268–12279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebtehaj, I., et al., 2015. GMDH-type neural network approach for modeling the discharge coefficient of rectangular sharp-crested side weirs. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, 18, 746–757. doi:10.1016/j.jestch.2015.04.012.
   Google Scholar
• Edincliler, A., Cabalar, A.F., and Cevik, A, 2013. Modelling dynamic behaviour of sand–waste tires mixtures using neural networks and neuro-fuzzy. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 17 (8), 720–741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erzin, Y., and Turkoz, D, 2016. Use of neural networks for the prediction of the CBR value of some aegean sands. Neural Computing and Applications, 27, 1415–1426. doi:10.1007/s00521-015-1943-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faridmehr, I., et al., 2021. Hybrid krill herd-ANN model for prediction strength and stiffness of bolted connections. Buildings, 11 (6), 229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, Y., and Yoshida, H., 2001. A particle swarm optimization for reactive power and voltage control in electric power systems, in: Proceedings of the 2001 Congress on Evolutionary Computation (IEEE Cat. No. 01TH8546). IEEE, pp. 87–93.
   Google Scholar
• Ghorbani, A., and Hasanzadehshooiili, H, 2018. Prediction of UCS and CBR of microsilica-lime stabilized sulfate silty sand using ANN and EPR models; application to the deep soil mixing. Soils and Foundations, 58, 34–49. doi:10.1016/j.sandf.2017.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golafshani, E.M., Behnood, A., and Arashpour, M, 2020. Predicting the compressive strength of normal and high-performance concretes using ANN and ANFIS hybridized with grey wolf optimizer. Construction and Building Materials, 232, 117266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González Farias, I., Araujo, W., and Ruiz, G., 2018. Prediction of California bearing ratio from index properties of soils using parametric and non-parametric models. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 36, 3485–3498. doi:10.1007/s10706-018-0548-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajihassani, M., et al., 2014. Prediction of airblast-overpressure induced by blasting using a hybrid artificial neural network and particle swarm optimization. Applied Acoustics, 80, 57–67. doi:10.1016/j.apacoust.2014.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasanipanah, M., et al., 2017. Application of PSO to develop a powerful equation for prediction of flyrock due to blasting. Neural Computing and Applications, 28, 1043–1050. doi:10.1007/s00521-016-2434-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan, J., Alshameri, B., and Iqbal, F, 2022. Prediction of California bearing ratio (CBR) using index soil properties and compaction parameters of low plastic fine-grained soil. Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology, 9, 764–776. doi:10.1007/s40515-021-00197-0.
   Google Scholar
• Heidari, A.A., et al., 2019. Harris hawks optimization: algorithm and applications. Future Generation Computer Systems, 97, 849–872. doi:10.1016/j.future.2019.02.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, F., Alzo’ubi, A., and Odhabi, H, 2022. A generalized regression neural network model to predict CFA piles performance using borehole and static load test data. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 1–17. doi:10.1007/s13369-022-06969-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IS 2720 (Part 16) - 1987. Methods of test for soil, Part 16 Laboratory determination of CBR (Second revision), Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• Ivakhnenko, A.G, 1971. Polynomial theory of complex systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, (4), 364–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katte, V.Y., et al., 2019. Correlation of California bearing ratio (CBR) value with soil properties of road subgrade soil. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 37, 217–234. doi:10.1007/s10706-018-0604-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, J., and Eberhart, R., 1995. Particle swarm optimization, in: Proceedings of ICNN’95-International Conference on Neural Networks. IEEE, pp. 1942–1948.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, M.U.A., Shukla, S.K., and Raja, M.N.A, 2021. Soil–conduit interaction: an artificial intelligence application for reinforced concrete and corrugated steel conduits. Neural Computing and Applications, 33, 14861–14885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, M.U.A., Shukla, S.K., and Raja, M.N.A, 2022. Load-settlement response of a footing over buried conduit in a sloping terrain: a numerical experiment-based artificial intelligent approach. Soft Computing, 26 (14), 6839–6856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kin, M.W, 2006. California bearing ratio correlation with soil index properties. Master Degree Proj. Fac. Civ. Eng. Univ. Technol. Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Koopialipoor, M., et al., 2019. Three hybrid intelligent models in estimating flyrock distance resulting from blasting. Engineering with Computers, 35, 243–256. doi:10.1007/s00366-018-0596-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S.A., Kumar, J.P., and Rajeev, J, 2013. Application Of machine learning techniques To predict soaked CBR Of remolded soils, 2, 3019–3024.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar Pradeep, KJ, and Patel Harish, YM, 2016. Soft computing technique for prediction of CBR from index properties of subgrade soil 13852–13860. https://doi.org/10.15680/IJIRSET.2016.0507214.
   Google Scholar
• Kurnaz, T.F., and Kaya, Y, 2019. Prediction of the California bearing ratio (CBR) of compacted soils by using GMDH-type neural network. The European Physical Journal Plus, 134 (7), 326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le, L.T., et al., 2019. A comparative study of PSO-ANN, GA-ANN, ICA-ANN, and ABC-ANN in estimating the heating load of buildings’ energy efficiency for smart city planning. Applied Sciences, 9), doi:10.3390/app9132630.
   Google Scholar
• Li, S., et al., 2020. Slime mould algorithm: a new method for stochastic optimization. Future Generation Computer Systems, 111, 300–323. doi:10.1016/j.future.2020.03.055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liou, S.-W., Wang, C.-M., and Huang, Y.-F, 2009. Integrative discovery of multifaceted sequence patterns by frame-relayed search and hybrid PSO-ANN. J. UCS, 15, 742–764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ly, H.B., et al., 2020. Estimation of axial load-carrying capacity of concrete-filled steel tubes using surrogate models. Neural Computing and Applications, 0123456789. doi:10.1007/s00521-020-05214-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandal, A., Cho, H., and Chauhan, B.S, 2021. ANN prediction of performance and emissions of CI engine using biogas flow variation. Energies, 14 (10), 2910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min, S.H., Lee, J., and Han, I, 2006. Hybrid genetic algorithms and support vector machines for bankruptcy prediction. Expert Systems with Applications, 31, 652–660. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2005.09.070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moayedi, H., et al., 2020. Prediction of ultimate bearing capacity through various novel evolutionary and neural network models. Engineering with Computers, 36, 671–687. doi:10.1007/s00366-019-00723-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monjezi, M., Amini Khoshalan, H., and Yazdian Varjani, A, 2010. Prediction of flyrock and backbreak in open pit blasting operation: a neuro-genetic approach. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 5, 441–448. doi:10.1007/s12517-010-0185-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murlidhar, B.R., et al., 2020. A novel intelligent ELM-BBO technique for predicting distance of mine blasting-induced flyrock. Natural Resources Research, 29, 4103–4120. doi:10.1007/s11053-020-09676-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NCHRP, 2004. Guide for Mechanistic -Empirical Design of new and rehailated pavement structures, NCHRP 1-37A Final Report, Appendix CC-4: Development of a revised predictive model for the dynamic (complex) modulus of asphalt mixtures 8.
   Google Scholar
• Nefeslioglu, H.A., Gokceoglu, C., and Sonmez, H, 2008. An assessment on the use of logistic regression and artificial neural networks with different sampling strategies for the preparation of landslide susceptibility maps. Engineering Geology, 97 (3-4), 171–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikafshan Rad, H., et al., 2020. Prediction of flyrock in mine blasting: a new computational intelligence approach. Natural Resources Research, 29, 609–623. doi:10.1007/s11053-019-09464-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordin, N.F.C., et al., 2021. Groundwater quality forecasting modelling using artificial intelligence: a review. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 14, 100643.
   Google Scholar
• Otchere, D.A., et al., 2021. Application of supervised machine learning paradigms in the prediction of petroleum reservoir properties: comparative analysis of ANN and SVM models. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 200, 108182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey, S.K., Sodum, V.R., Janghel, R.R. and Raj, A., 2020. ECG arrhythmia detection with machine learning algorithms. In: Data engineering and communication technology (pp. 409–417). Springer, Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, R.S., and Desai, M.D, 2010. CBR predicted by index properties for alluvial soils of South Gujarat. Indian Geotechnical Conference – 2010, GEOtrendz December 16–18, 2010 IGS Mumbai Chapter & IIT Bombay, 79–82.
   Google Scholar
• Quan, V., and Do, H.Q, 2022. Prediction of California bearing ratio (CBR) of stabilized expansive soils with agricultural and industrial waste using light gradient boosting machine. Journal of Science and Transport Technology, 1 (1). doi:10.58845/jstt.utt.2021.en3.
   Google Scholar
• Raghurama, G., and Vermaa, A, 2018. Dedicated Freight Corridor: Current Challenges.
   Google Scholar
• Raja, M.N.A., and Shukla, S.K, 2021a. Multivariate adaptive regression splines model for reinforced soil foundations. Geosynthetics International, 28 (4), 368–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raja, M.N.A., and Shukla, S.K, 2021b. Predicting the settlement of geosynthetic-reinforced soil foundations using evolutionary artificial intelligence technique. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 49, 1280–1293. doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2021.04.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raja, M.N.A., Shukla, S.K., and Khan, M.U.A, 2021. An intelligent approach for predicting the strength of geosynthetic-reinforced subgrade soil. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 23, 1–17. doi:10.1080/10298436.2021.1904237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratnaweera, A., Halgamuge, S.K., and Watson, H.C, 2004. Self-organizing hierarchical particle swarm optimizer with time-varying acceleration coefficients. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 8, 240–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, T.K., Kuity, A., and Roy, S.K., 2013. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Engineering under Uncertainty: Safety Assessment and Management (ISEUSAM - 2012). Proc. Int. Symp. Eng. under Uncertain. Saf. Assess. Manag. (ISEUSAM - 2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-0757-3.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, P., Mahapatra, G.S., and Dey, K.N, 2019. Forecasting of software reliability using neighborhood fuzzy particle swarm optimization based novel neural network. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 6 (6), 1365–1383.
   Google Scholar
• Sabat, A.K, 2015. Prediction of California bearing ratio of a stabilized expansive soil using artificial neural network and support vector machine. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 20, 981–991.
   Google Scholar
• Silalahi, D.D., et al., 2016. Using genetic algorithm neural network on near infrared spectral data for ripeness grading of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) fresh fruit. Information Processing in Agriculture, 3 (4), 252–261.
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava, P., Shukla, A., and Bansal, A, 2021. A comprehensive review on soil classification using deep learning and computer vision techniques. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 80 (10), 14887–14914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, D.J, 1990. The prediction of the California bearing ratio. Civ. Eng. Siviele Ingenieurswese, 1990, 523–528.
   Google Scholar
• Suthar, M., and Aggarwal, P, 2018. Predicting CBR value of stabilized pond ash with lime and lime sludge using ANN and MR models. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 4, 0. doi:10.1007/s40891-017-0125-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taha, S., Gabr, A., and El-Badawy, S, 2019. Regression and neural network models for California bearing ratio prediction of typical granular materials in Egypt. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 44, 8691–8705. doi:10.1007/s13369-019-03803-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, Z., and Zhang, D., 2009. A modified particle swarm optimization with an adaptive acceleration coefficients. 2009 Asia-Pacific Conference on Information Processing, 2, 330–332. doi:10.1109/APCIP.2009.217.
   Google Scholar
• Taskiran, T, 2010. Prediction of California bearing ratio (CBR) of fine grained soils by AI methods. Advances in Engineering Software, 41, 886–892. doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2010.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C.E, 1994. Adaptation in natural and artificial systems: an introductory analysis with applications to biology, control, and artificial intelligence. complex adaptive systems. john H. holland. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 69, 88–89. doi:10.1086/418447.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, K.E, 2001. Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 106, 7183–7192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenpe, A.R., and Patel, A, 2020. Utilization of support vector models and gene expression programming for soil strength modeling. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 45, 4301–4319. doi:10.1007/s13369-020-04441-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trong, D.K., et al., 2021. On random subspace optimization-based hybrid computing models predicting the California bearing ratio of soils. Materials, 14 (21), 6516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu, J., et al., 2021. The colony predation algorithm. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 18, 674–710. doi:10.1007/s42235-021-0050-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Bergh, F., and Engelbrecht, A.P., 2006. A study of particle swarm optimization particle trajectories. Information Sciences, 176, 937–971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varghese, V.K., et al., 2013. Artificial neural networks: a solution to the ambiguity in prediction of engineering properties of fine-grained soils. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 31, 1187–1205. doi:10.1007/s10706-013-9643-5.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, H.L., and Yin, Z.Y, 2020. High performance prediction of soil compaction parameters using multi expression programming. Engineering Geology, 276, 105758. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildirim, B., and Gunaydin, O, 2011. Estimation of California bearing ratio by using soft computing systems. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 6381–6391. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar