Optimisation of recycled concrete aggregates for cement-treated bases by response surface method

References

• Ä, S.B.M., et al., 2012. Innovative materials and techniques in concrete construction. Innovative Materials and Techniques in Concrete Construction.
   Google Scholar
• Aghililotf, M., Palassi, M., and Ramezanianpour, A.M., 2021. Mechanical and durability assessment of unconfined recycled concrete aggregates and natural aggregates used in road constructions. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 22 (12), 1518–1530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrela, F., et al., 2012. Construction of road sections using mixed recycled aggregates treated with cement in Malaga, Spain. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 58, 98–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akhtar, A., and Sarmah, A.K., 2018. Construction and demolition waste generation and properties of recycled aggregate concrete: a global perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 186, 262–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arulrajah, A., et al., 2012. Geotechnical properties of recycled concrete aggregate in pavement sub-base applications. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 35 (5), 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arulrajah, A., et al., 2016. Stabilization of recycled demolition aggregates by geopolymers comprising calcium carbide residue, fly ash and slag precursors. Construction and Building Materials, 114, 864–873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arulrajah, A., Piratheepan, J., and Disfani, M.M., 2014. Reclaimed asphalt pavement and recycled concrete aggregate blends in pavement subbases: laboratory and field evaluation. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 26 (2), 349–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASTM C39-01, 2003. Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens 1. ASTM Standard Book, i (March), 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM C496, 2020. Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, i, 545-545-3.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM C78, 2018. Standard test method for flexural strength of concrete (using simple beam with third-point loading) 1. Hand The, C78-02 (C), 1–4. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D1557-07, 2014. a.S.T.M D1557.Pdf. Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D-559, 1996. Métodos de prueba estándar para humedecimiento y secado de mezclas compactadas de suelo y cemento, 14–19.
   Google Scholar
• Aydilek.pdf, n.d.
   Google Scholar
• Aydin, S., 2013. A ternary optimisation of mineral additives of alkali activated cement mortars. Construction and Building Materials, 43, 131–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bestgen, J.O., et al., 2016. Mechanical and environmental suitability of recycled concrete aggregate as a highway base material. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 28 (9), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardoso, R., et al., 2016. Use of recycled aggregates from construction and demolition waste in geotechnical applications: a literature review. Waste Management, 49, 131–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, S.S., and Lo, C.W.H., 2003. Evaluating sustainability in waste management: the case of construction and demolition, chemical and clinical wastes in Hong Kong. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 37 (2), 119–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, S., et al., 2021. A novel method for testing the fatigue performance of cement stabilized base field coring samples. Construction and Building Materials, 274, 122065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebrahim Abu El-Maaty Behiry, A., 2013. Utilization of cement treated recycled concrete aggregates as base or subbase layer in Egypt. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 4 (4), 661–673.
   Google Scholar
• Eren, Ş., and Filiz, M., 2009. Comparing the conventional soil stabilization methods to the consolid system used as an alternative admixture matter in Isparta Darıdere material. Construction and Building Materials, 23 (7), 2473–2480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabr, A.R., and Cameron, D.A., 2012. Properties of recycled concrete aggregate for unbound pavement construction. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 24 (6), 754–764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, K.P., 1990. Characterization and structural design of cement-treated base. Transportation Research Record, 1288, 78–87.
   Google Scholar
• Haider, I., et al., 2014. Evaluation of the mechanical performance of recycled concrete aggregates used in highway base layers, 3686–3694.
   Google Scholar
• Hou, Y., Ji, X., and Su, X., 2019. Mechanical properties and strength criteria of cement-stabilised recycled concrete aggregate. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 20 (3), 339–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IRC, 37, 2018. Guidelines for the design of flexible pavements (Fourth Revision). IRC 37-2018. New Delhi: Indian Roads Congress.
   Google Scholar
• IRC SP 89_Part 1, 2010. Guidelines for soil and granular material stabilization using cement, lime and fly ash. Indian Roads Congress, 53 (9), 1689–1699.
   Google Scholar
• IS 4332 Part 4, 1968. Methods of test for stabilized soils Part IV wetting and drying, and freezing and thawing tests for compacted soil-cement mixtures. IS 4332 (Part 4), New Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• IS 5816, 1999. Indian standard splitting tensile strength of concrete- method of test. Bureau of Indian Standards, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Jayakody, S., Gallage, C., and Ramanujam, J., 2019. Performance characteristics of recycled concrete aggregate as an unbound pavement material. Heliyon, 5 (9), e02494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jofre, C., and Kraemer, C., 2008. Manual of soil stabilization with cement or lime. Madrid: Spanish Institute of Cement and its Applications (SICA).
   Google Scholar
• Kockal, N.U., and Ozturan, T., 2011. Optimization of properties of fly ash aggregates for high-strength lightweight concrete production. Materials & Design, 32 (6), 3586–3593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leite, F.D.C., et al., 2011. Laboratory evaluation of recycled construction and demolition waste for pavements. Construction and Building Materials, 25 (6), 2972–2979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z., Lu, D., and Gao, X., 2021. Optimization of mixture proportions by statistical experimental design using response surface method – a review. Journal of Building Engineering, 36 (September 2020), 102101.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, S., and Zollinger, D.G., 2003. Estimation of the compressive strength and modulus of elasticity of cement-treated aggregate base materials. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1837, 30–38.
   Google Scholar
• Maduabuchukwu Nwakaire, C., et al., 2020. Utilisation of recycled concrete aggregates for sustainable highway pavement applications; a review. Construction and Building Materials, 235, 117444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Conesa, E.J., et al., 2017. Optimization of geometric parameters in a welded joint through response surface methodology. Construction and Building Materials, 154, 105–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mermerdaş, K., et al., 2017. Optimization of lightweight GGBFS and FA geopolymer mortars by response surface method. Construction and Building Materials, 139, 159–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadinia, A., et al., 2015. Laboratory evaluation of the use of cement-treated construction and demolition materials in pavement base and subbase applications. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 27 (6), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadinia, A., et al., 2016. Stabilization of demolition materials for pavement base/subbase applications using fly ash and slag geopolymers: laboratory investigation. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 28 (7), 04016033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadinia, A., et al., 2019a. Small-strain behavior of cement-stabilized recycled concrete aggregate in pavement base layers. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 31 (5), 04019044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadinia, A., et al., 2019b. Flexural fatigue strength of demolition aggregates stabilized with alkali-activated calcium carbide residue. Construction and Building Materials, 199, 115–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammed, B.S., et al., 2017. Evaluation of nano-silica modified ECC based on ultrasonic pulse velocity and rebound hammer. The Open Civil Engineering Journal, 11 (1), 638–649.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammed, B.S., et al., 2019. Optimization and characterization of cast in-situ alkali-activated pastes by response surface methodology. Construction and Building Materials, 225, 776–787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MoRTH, 2013. Specifications for road bridge works 5th revision. Indian Roads Congress on Behalf of the Govet. of India, Ministry of Road Transport & Highway, 1, 1–883.
   Google Scholar
• Nataatmadja, A., and Tan, Y.L., 2001. Resilient response of recycled concrete road aggregates. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 127 (5), 450–453.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, Z., and Qingfu, L., 2009. Effect of polypropylene fibre on mechanical and shrinkage properties of cement-stabilised macadam. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 10 (6), 435–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poon, C.S., and Chan, D., 2006. Feasible use of recycled concrete aggregates and crushed clay brick as unbound road sub-base. Construction and Building Materials, 20 (8), 578–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, M.A., et al., 2014. Resilient modulus and permanent deformation responses of geogrid-reinforced construction and demolition materials. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 26 (3), 512–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaifar, O., Hasanzadeh, M., and Gholhaki, M., 2016. Concrete made with hybrid blends of crumb rubber and metakaolin: optimization using response surface method. Construction and Building Materials, 123, 59–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, X., et al., 2022. Response surface methodology for multi-objective optimization of fly ash-GGBS based geopolymer mortar. Construction and Building Materials, 315 (October 2021), 125644.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, W.C., et al., 2018. Influence of red mud on fresh and hardened properties of self-compacting concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 178, 288–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toka, E.B., and Olgun, M., 2021. Performance of granular road base and sub-base layers containing recycled concrete aggregate in different ratios. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 23 (11), 3729–3742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usman Kankia, M., et al., 2021. Effects of petroleum sludge ash in fly ash-based geopolymer mortar. Construction and Building Materials, 272, 121939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaowarat, T., et al., 2022. Cement stabilisation of recycled concrete aggregate modified with polyvinyl alcohol. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 23 (2), 349–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeo, R., 2008. The development and evaluation of protocols for the laboratory characterisation of cemented materials.
   Google Scholar