2,849
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Evaluation framework for smartphone-based road roughness index estimation systems

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Article: 2183402 | Received 27 Oct 2022, Accepted 17 Feb 2023, Published online: 03 Mar 2023

References

  • Ahmed, H.U., et al., 2021. Effects of smartphone sensor variability in road roughness evaluation. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 0 (0), 1–6. doi:10.1080/10298436.2021.1946059.
  • Austroads, 2016a. AG:AM/T003 validation validation of an inertial profilometer for measuring pavement roughness (loop device method). Available from: https://austroads.com.au/publications/asset-management/agam-t003-16 [Accessed 11 October 2022].
  • Austroads, 2016b. AG:AM/T004 pavement pavement roughness repeatability and bias checks for an inertial profilometer, (May), 1–9. Available from: https://austroads.com.au/publications/asset-management/agam-t004-16 [Accessed 11 October 2022].
  • Austroads, 2016c. AG:AM/T001 pavement pavement roughness measurement with an inertial profilometer. Available from: https://austroads.com.au/publications/asset-management/agam-t001-16 [Accessed 11 October 2022].
  • Austroads, 2019. Guide to pavement technology Part 4K: selection and design of sprayed seals. Available from: https://austroads.com.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0024/107448/AGPT04K-18_Guide_to_Pavement_Technology_Part-4K_Selection-_Design_Sprayed_Seals.pdf [Accessed 11 October 2022].
  • Botshekan, M., et al., 2020. Roughness-induced vehicle energy dissipation from crowdsourced smartphone measurements through random vibration theory. Data-Centric Engineering, 1 (2), 1–25. doi:10.1017/dce.2020.17.
  • Botshekan, M., et al., 2021. Smartphone-enabled road condition monitoring: from accelerations to road roughness and excess energy dissipation. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 477 (2246), 20200701. doi:10.1098/rspa.2020.0701.
  • Bridgelall, R., Hough, J., and Tolliver, D., 2019. Characterising pavement roughness at non-uniform speeds using connected vehicles. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 20 (8), 958–964. doi:10.1080/10298436.2017.1366768.
  • Cameron, C.A., 2014. Innovative means of collecting international roughness index using smartphone technology. The University of New Brunswick. University of New Brunswick. Available from: https://unbscholar.lib.unb.ca/islandora/object/unbscholar%3A9404 [Accessed 23 January 2023].
  • Dollár, P., et al., 2012. Pedestrian detection: an evaluation of the state of the art. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 34 (4), 743–761. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2011.155.
  • Douangphachanh, V. and Oneyama, H., 2014a. Using smartphones to estimate road pavement condition. International Symposium for Next Generation Infrastructure. doi:10.14453/isngi2013.proc.16.
  • Douangphachanh, V. and Oneyama, H., 2014b. A study on the use of smartphones under realistic settings to estimate road roughness condition. Eurasip Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2014 (1), 1551–1564. doi:10.1186/1687-1499-2014-114.
  • Forslöf, L. and Jones, H., 2015. Roadroid: continuous road condition monitoring with smart phones. Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 9 (4), 485–496. doi:10.17265/1934-7359/2015.04.012.
  • Galagoda, D.Y. and Lanka, S., 2019. Smartphone applications for pavement roughness computation of Sri Lankan roadways. Journal of Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 13, 2581–2597. doi:10.11175/easts.13.2581.
  • Gamage, D., Pasindu, H.R., and Bandara, S., 2016. Pavement roughness evaluation method for low volume roads. 8th International Conference on Maintenance and Rehabilitation of Pavements, 976–985. doi:10.3850/978-981-11-0449-7-199-cd.
  • Hanson, T., Cameron, C., and Hildebrand, E., 2014. Evaluation of low-cost consumer-level mobile phone technology for measuring international roughness index (IRI) values. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 41 (9), 819–827. doi:10.1139/cjce-2014-0183.
  • Hastie, T., et al., 2021. An introduction to statistical learning. 2nd ed. Springer Texts. Available from: https://www.statlearning.com/ [Accessed 11 October 2022].
  • Hossain, M., et al., 2019. Evaluation of android-based cell phone applications to measure international roughness index of rural roads. International Conference on Transportation and Development, 309–318. doi:10.1061/9780784482575.034.
  • Islam, S., 2015. Development of a smartphone application to measure pavement. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Available from: https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/89119 [Accessed 11 October 2022].
  • Islam, S., et al., 2014. Use of cellphone application to measure pavement roughness. Int&DI Congress 2014: Planes, Trains, and Automobiles, 553–563. doi:10.1061/9780784413586.053.
  • Janani, L., Sunitha, V., and Mathew, S., 2020. Influence of surface distresses on smartphone-based pavement roughness evaluation. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 0 (0), 1–14. doi:10.1080/10298436.2020.1714045.
  • Jeong, J.H., Jo, H., and Ditzler, G., 2020. Convolutional neural networks for pavement roughness assessment using calibration-free vehicle dynamics. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 35 (11), 1209–1229. doi:10.1111/mice.12546.
  • Laubis, K., Simko, V., and Schuller, A., 2016. Road condition measurement and assessment: a crowd based sensing approach. International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2016, 1–10. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319261042_Road_Condition_Measurement_and_Assessment_A_Crowd_Based_Sensing_Approach [Accessed 11 Octover 2022].
  • Louhghalam, A., Akbarian, M., and Ulm, F.J., 2017. Carbon management of infrastructure performance: integrated big data analytics and pavement-vehicle-interactions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 956–964. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.198.
  • Louhghalam, A., et al., 2019. Closed-form solution of road roughness-induced vehicle energy dissipation. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 86 (1), 1–8. doi:10.1115/1.4041500.
  • Mann, A. V., McManus, K.J., and Holden, J.C., 1997. Power spectral density analysis of road profiles for road defect assessment. Road and Transport Research, 6 (3), 36–46. https://trid.trb.org/view/476053.
  • Moorefield, F., 2020. Global positioning system standard positioning service performance standard. GPS Navstar. Available from: https://www.gps.gov/systems/gps/performance/accuracy/ [Accessed 11 October 2022].
  • NSW Government, 2017. Windscreen mounted phones and GPS Fact Sheet. Available from: https://roadsafety.transport.nsw.gov.au/downloads/windscreen-mounted-phones-gps.pdf [Accessed 11 October 2022].
  • Ordaz, M. and Doyle, J., 2021. Quantifying extreme event-induced pavement roughness via smartphone apps. Geo-Extrme GSP, 330, 222–231. doi:10.1061/9780784483701.022.
  • Płaczek, M. and Piszczek, Ł., 2018. Testing of an industrial robot’s accuracy and repeatability in off and online environment. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc, 20 (3), 455–464. doi:10.17531/ein.2018.3.15.
  • Sandamal, R.M.K. and Pasindu, H.R., 2020. Applicability of smartphone-based roughness data for rural road pavement condition evaluation. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 0 (0), 1–10. doi:10.1080/10298436.2020.1765243.
  • Sayers, M.W., 1995. On the calculation of international roughness index from longitudinal road profile. Transportation Research Record. Available from: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/trr/1995/1501/1501-001.pdf [Accessed 23 January 2023].
  • Sayers, M.W., Gillespie, T.D., and Paterson, W.D.O., 1986. Guidelines for conducting and calibrating road roughness measurements. World Bank Technical Paper. ISBN: 0-8213-0590-5.
  • Schall, M.C., et al., 2016. Accuracy and repeatability of an inertial measurement unit system for field-based occupational studies. Ergonomics, 59 (4), 591–602. doi:10.1080/00140139.2015.1079335.
  • Schlotjes, M.R., Visser, A., and Bennett, C., 2014. Evaluation of a smartphone roughness meter. 33rd Southern African Transport Conference, 141–153. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/2263/45571 [Accessed 11 October 2022].
  • Shah, A., Zhong, J., and Ly, J., 2017. Adopting smartphone technology to supplement road asset performance monitoring. In: AAPA international flexible pavement conference. Available from: https://trid.trb.org/view/1485235 [Accessed 11 October 2022].
  • Steyn, W.J., et al., 2014. Freight-truck-pavement interaction, logistics, and economics: final executive summary report compilation of executive summaries, (February). Available from: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/70(4t0fp [Accessed 23 January 2023].
  • Thiandee, P., et al., 2019. An experiment on measurement of pavement roughness via android-based smartphones. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, Applied Science and Technologies, 10 (9), 1–9.
  • Wambold, J.C., et al., 1981. State of the art of measurement and analysis of road roughness. Transportation Research Record, 21–29. Available from: https://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/trr/1981/836/836-004.pdf [Accessed 11 October 2022].
  • Wang, G. and Ghataora, G., 2020. Study of the factors affecting road roughness measurement using smartphones. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 26 (3), 04020020. doi:10.1061/(asce)is.1943-555x.0000558.
  • Wessels, I. and Steyn, W.J.M., 2020. Continuous, response-based road roughness measurements utilising data harvested from telematics device sensors. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 21 (4), 437–446. doi:10.1080/10298436.2018.1483505.
  • Wix, R, 2016. Measuring road roughness with a smartphone – horses for courses? 27th ARRB Conference-Linking People, Places and Opportunities, 1, 13. Available from: https://trid.trb.org/view/1446692 [Accessed 11 October 2022].
  • Xue, K., Nagayama, T., and Zhao, B., 2020. Road profile estimation and half-car model identification through the automated processing of smartphone data. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 142. doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106722.
  • Yang, X., et al., 2020. Calibration of smartphone sensors to evaluate the ride quality of paved and unpaved roads. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 0 (0), 1–11. doi:10.1080/10298436.2020.1809659.
  • Yu, Q., Fang, Y., and Wix, R., 2022. Pavement roughness index estimation and anomaly detection using smartphones. Automation in Construction, 141 (March), 104409. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104409.
  • Zaabar, I. and Chatti, K., 2014. Estimating vehicle operating costs caused by pavement surface conditions. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2455, 63–76. doi:10.3141/2455-08.
  • Zhang, Z., et al., 2021. Pavement roughness evaluation method based on the theoretical relationship between acceleration measured by smartphone and IRI. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 0 (0), 1–17. doi:10.1080/10298436.2021.1881783.
  • Zhao, B. and Nagayama, T., 2017. IRI estimation by the frequency domain analysis of vehicle dynamic responses. Procedia Engineering, 188, 9–16. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.45.
  • Zhao, B., Nagayama, T., and Xue, K., 2019. Road profile estimation, and its numerical and experimental validation, by smartphone measurement of the dynamic responses of an ordinary vehicle. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 457, 92–117. doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2019.05.015.