Performance-optimised design of sand fog seal for pavement cold repair using RSM I-optimal methodology

References

• Barast, G., et al., 2017. Swelling properties of natural and modified bentonites by rheological description. Applied Clay Science, 142, 60–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bashir, M. J., et al., 2010. Application of response surface methodology (RSM) for optimization of ammoniacal nitrogen removal from semi-aerobic landfill leachate using ion exchange resin. Desalination, 254 (1-3), 154–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandan, C., et al., 2004. Application of imaging techniques to geometry analysis of aggregate particles. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 18 (1), 75–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Q., et al., 2021. Optimization of construction method of waterborne epoxy asphalt cape seal based on performance evolution. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 34 (7), 236.
   Google Scholar
• Coetzer, R., and Haines, L. M., 2017. The construction of D- and I-optimal designs for mixture experiments with linear constraints on the components. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 171, 112–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Gryze, S., Langhans, I., and Vandebroek, M., 2007. Using the correct intervals for prediction: a tutorial on tolerance intervals for ordinary least-squares regression. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 87 (2), 147–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, D., et al., 2021. Optimized design of steel fibres reinforced ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) composites: towards to dense structure and efficient fibre application. Construction and Building Materials, 273, 121698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, P., et al., 2021. Application of design-expert response surface methodology for the optimization of recycled asphalt mixture with waste engine oil. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 33 (5), 04021075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajj, E. Y., Loria, L., and Sebaaly, P. E., 2010. Performance evaluation of asphalt pavement preservation activities. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2150 (1), 36–46.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, C., et al., 2019. Laboratory evaluation of waterborne epoxy bitumen emulsion for pavement preventative maintenance application. Construction and Building Materials, 197, 220–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, C., et al., 2020. Performance of waterborne epoxy emulsion sand fog seal as a preventive pavement maintenance method: from laboratory to field. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2020, 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Im, J. H., and Kim, Y. R., 2013. Methods for Fog seal field test with polymer-modified emulsions. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2361, 88–97.
   Google Scholar
• Im, J. H., and Kim, Y. R., 2015. Performance evaluation of fog seals on chip seals and verification of fog seal field tests. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 42 (11), 872–880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam, R. M., Arafat, S., and Wasiuddin, N. M., 2017. Quantification of reduction in hydraulic conductivity and skid resistance caused by fog seal in low-volume roads. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2657 (1), 99–108.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, Y., et al., 2020. Development and application of skid resistance fog seal for pavements. Coatings, 10 (9), 867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B., and Goos, P., 2012. I-optimal versus D-optimal split-plot response surface designs. Journal of Quality Technology, 44 (2), 85–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiihnl, L., and Braham, A., 2021. Exploring the influence of pavement preservation, maintenance, and rehabilitation on Arkansas’ highway network: an education case study. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 22 (5), 570–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. R., and Im, J. H., 2012. Fog seal effectiveness for bituminous surface treatments. Report No. HWY-2010-02. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Z., 2014. Asphalt pavement preventive maintenance technology overview. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 638–640, 1135–1138.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, F., et al., 2021. Performance evaluation of waterborne epoxy resin-SBR composite modified emulsified asphalt fog seal. Construction and Building Materials, 301, 124106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, Z., et al., 2022. Optimal design of fresh sand fog seal mortar using response surface methodology (RSM): towards to its workability and rheological properties. Construction and Building Materials, 340, 127638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhammed, N. S., Olayiwola, T., and Elkatatny, S., 2021. A review on clay chemistry, characterization and shale inhibitors for water-based drilling fluids. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 206, 109043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, H. H., 2006. Applied clay mineralogy: occurrences, processing and applications of kaolins, bentonites, palygorskitesepiolite, and common clays. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, R. H., Montgomery, D. C., and Anderson-Cook, C. M., 2016. Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments. USA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Najjar, S., Moghaddam, A. M., and Sahaf, A., 2021. Mixed mode (I/II) fracture energy of cement emulsified asphalt mortar under intermediate temperature. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 241, 107374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prapaitrakul, N., Freeman, T., and Glover, C. J., 2005. Analyze existing fog seal asphalts and additives: literature review.
   Google Scholar
• Qureshi, N. A., et al., 2013. Effects of rejuvenator seal and fog seal on performance of open-graded friction course pavement. Maejo International Journal of Science and Technology, 7 (2), 189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Son, H. J., et al., 2014. Influences of curing time on polymer-modified emulsion used for slurry seal and micro-surfacing mixes. In Recent Developments in Evaluation of Pavements and Paving Materials, 2014, 35–42.
   Google Scholar
• Steven, B., Monismith, C. L., and Tsai, B. W., 2009. Friction testing of pavement preservation treatments: friction measurements on fog seal trials using six rejuvenators, state route KER58.
   Google Scholar
• Tian, T., et al., 2021. Development and performance evaluation of a high-permeability and high-bonding fog-sealing adhesive material. Materials, 14 (13), 3599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witek-Krowiak, A., et al., 2014. Application of response surface methodology and artificial neural network methods in modelling and optimization of biosorption process. Bioresource Technology, 160, 150–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, H., et al., 2020. Review on China’s pavement engineering research 2020. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 33, 1–66.
   Google Scholar
• Zahran, A., Anderson-Cook, C. M., and Myers, R. H., 2003. Fraction of design space to assess prediction capability of response surface designs. Journal of Quality Technology, 35 (4), 377–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., et al., 2019. Traffic open time prediction of fog seal with sand using image processing technology. Construction and Building Materials, 209, 9–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar