Full-scale validation of a mechanistic model for asphalt grid reinforcement

References

• Ahmed, A., and Erlingsson, S., 2016. Viscoelastic response modelling of a pavement under moving load. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 748–757.
   Google Scholar
• Andrei, D., Mirza, W., and Witczak, M., 1999. Development of a revised predictive model for the dynamic (complex) modulus of asphalt mixtures. NCHRP Report 1-37A.
   Google Scholar
• ARA Inc., 2004. Guide for mechanical-empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures. Transportation Research Board, NCHRP 1-37 (Final Report).
   Google Scholar
• Arsenie, I.M., et al., 2017. Laboratory characterisation of the fatigue behaviour of a glass fibre grid-reinforced asphalt concrete using 4PB tests. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 18 (1), 168–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asphalt Academy, 2008. TG3 – Asphalt reinforcement for road construction. Asphalt, (November).
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D2487, 2017. Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (Unified Soil Classification System).
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D4694, 2009. Standard test method for deflections with a falling-weight-type impulse load device.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D6951/D6951M, 2018. Standard test method for use of the dynamic cone penetrometer in shallow pavement applications.
   Google Scholar
• Baltzer, S., et al., 2010. Continuous bearing capacity profile of 18,000 km Australian road network in five months.
   Google Scholar
• Burmister, D.M., 1943. The theory of stresses and displacements in layered systems and applications to the design of airport runways. In: Highway research board, Vol. 23. Chicago, IL: Highway Research Board, 126–148.
   Google Scholar
• Burmister, D.M., 1945a. The general theory of stresses and displacements in layered systems. I. Journal of Applied Physics, 16 (2), 89–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burmister, D.M., 1945b. The general theory of stresses and displacements in layered soil systems. II. Journal of Applied Physics, 16 (3), 126–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burmister, D.M., 1945c. The general theory of stresses and displacements in layered soil systems. III. Journal of Applied Physics, 16 (5), 296–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Button, J.W., and Lytton, R.L., 2007. Guidelines for using geosynthetics with hot-mix asphalt overlays to reduce reflective cracking. Transportation Research Record, 2004, 111–119.
   Google Scholar
• Chadbourn, B.A., Newcomb, D.E., and Timm, D., 1997. Measured and theoretical comparisons of traffic loads and pavement response distributions. In: 8th international conference on Asphalt pavements. Seattle, Washington: International Society for Asphalt Pavements, 229–238.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, D.T.T., et al., 1999. Laboratory and case study for geogrid-reinforced flexible pavement overlay. Transportation Research Record, 1687, 125–130.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C., McDowell, G.R., and Thom, N.H., 2012. Discrete element modelling of cyclic loads of geogrid-reinforced ballast under confined and unconfined conditions. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 35, 76–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C., McDowell, G.R., and Thom, N.H., 2014. Investigating geogrid-reinforced ballast: experimental pull-out tests and discrete element modelling. Soils and Foundations, 54 (1), 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, Y.H., Park, D.W., and Hwang, S.D., 2010. A predictive equation for dynamic modulus of asphalt mixtures used in Korea. Construction and Building Materials, 24 (4), 513–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleveland, G.S., Button, J.W., and Lytton, R.L., 2001. Geosynthetics in flexible and rigid pavement. Fhwa/Tx-02/1777- 1, 7 (2), 298 pages.
   Google Scholar
• Correia, N.S., Esquivel, E.R., and Zornberg, J.G., 2018. Finite-element evaluations of geogrid-reinforced asphalt overlays over flexible pavements. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements, 144 (2), 04018020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correia, N.S., and Zornberg, J.G., 2018. Strain distribution along geogrid-reinforced asphalt overlays under traffic loading. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 46 (1), 111–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bondt, A.H., 1999. Anti-reflective cracking design of (reinforced) asphalt overlays. Thesis (PhD).
   Google Scholar
• EN 12697-26C, 2018. Bituminous mixtures – test methods – part 26: stiffness. European Standard.
   Google Scholar
• EN 13108-1, 2016. Bituminous mixtures – material specifications – part 1: Asphalt concrete.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 1999. COST 333: development of new bituminous pavement design method: final report of the action.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2000. AMADEUS advanced models for analytical design of european pavement structures. 1–178.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, J.R., and Popov, E.P., 1968. Layered beam systems with interlayer slip. Journal of the Structural Division, 94 (11), 2535–2548.
   Google Scholar
• Graziani, A., et al., 2014. Structural response of grid-reinforced bituminous pavements. Materials and Structures/Materiaux Et Constructions, 47 (8), 1391–1408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gusfeldt, K., and Dempwolff, K., 1967. Stress and strain measurements in experimental road sections under controlled loading conditions. In: 2nd international conference on the structural design of Asphalt pavements. Ann Arbor, MI: Highway Research Board, 663–669.
   Google Scholar
• Horak, E., et al., 2015. Flexible road pavement structural condition benchmark methodology incorporating structural condition indices derived from falling weight deflectometer deflection bowls. Journal of Civil Engineering and Construction, 4 (1), 12.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Y.H., 2004. Pavement analysis and design. 2nd ed Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. Available from: http://docshare04.docshare.tips/files/14013/140138713.pdf [Google Scholar].
   Google Scholar
• Khodaii, A., Fallah, S., and Moghadas, F., 2009. Effects of geosynthetics on reduction of reflection cracking in asphalt overlays. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 27 (1), 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., Lee, J., and Lutif, J.E., 2010. Geometrical evaluation and experimental verification to determine representative volume elements of heterogeneous asphalt mixtures. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 38 (6), 660–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konrad, J.M., and Lachance, D., 2001. Use of in situ penetration tests in pavement evaluation. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 38 (5), 924–935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krukar, M., and Cook, J., 1972. Practical design applications on Washington state university test track results. In: 3rd international conference on the structural design of Asphalt pavements. London, UK: College of Engineering, University of Michigan, 866–875.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, V.V., Roodi, G.H., and Zornberg, J.G., 2021. Asphalt strain response of geosynthetic-reinforced Asphalt overlays under static plate loads. In: Proceedings of geosynthetics conference 2021. Online: Industrial Fabrics Association International (IFAI), 350–361.
   Google Scholar
• Kyowa Electronic Instruments, 2022. KM series embedded strain gages. Available from: https://www.kyowa-ei.com/eng/product/category/strain_gages/km/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Leischner, S., et al., 2019. Mechanical testing and modeling of interlayer bonding in HMA pavements. Transportation Research Record, 2673 (11), 879–890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levenberg, E., 2013. Inverse analysis of viscoelastic pavement properties using data from embedded instrumentation. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 37 (9), 1016–1033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levenberg, E., 2016. Viscoelastic pavement modeling with a spreadsheet. In: 8th International conference on maintenance and rehabilitation of pavements, MAIREPAV 2016. Singapore: Research Publishing Services, 746–755.
   Google Scholar
• Levenberg, E., McDaniel, R.S., and Olek, J., 2009. Validation of NCAT structural test track experiment using INDOT APT facility. West Lafayette, Indiana: Joint Transportation Research Program, Indiana Department of Transportation and Purdue University, September.
   Google Scholar
• Levenberg, E., and Michaeli, N., 2013. Viscoelastic characterisation of asphalt-aggregate mixes in diametral compression. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 14 (SUPPL.1), 105–119.
   Google Scholar
• Levenberg, E., and Skar, A., 2020. Analytic pavement modelling with a fragmented layer. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 23 (4), 1108–1120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lytton, R.L., 1989. Use of geotextiles for reinforcement and strain relief in asphalt concrete. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 8 (3), 217–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mateos, A., and Snyder, M.B., 2002. Validation of flexible pavement structural response models with data from the Minnesota road research project. Transportation Research Record, 1806, 19–29.
   Google Scholar
• McDowell, G.R., et al., 2006. Discrete element modelling of geogrid-reinforced aggregates. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Geotechnical Engineering, 159 (1), 35–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newcomb, D.E., et al., 1995. Initial characterization of subgrade soils and granular base materials at the Minnesota road research project. Minnesota Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, M.L., et al., 2013. Review of glass fibre grid use for pavement reinforcement and APT experiments at IFSTTAR. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 14 (SUPPL.1), 287–308.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J., Levenberg, E., and Skar, A., 2020. Inference of pavement properties with roadside accelerometers. In: 9th international conference on maintenance and rehabilitation of pavements–mairepav9. Vol. 76. Online: Springer, 719–728.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J., Levenberg, E., and Skar, A., 2022. Mechanistic modelling of grid-reinforced milled-and-overlaid asphalt pavements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 1–16 [online].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, R.N., Oost, I., and Hopman, P.C., 1996. Viscoelastic analysis of full-scale pavements: validation of VEROAD. Transportation Research Record, 1539, 81–87.
   Google Scholar
• Osyczka, A., 1978. An approach to multicriterion optimization problems for engineering design. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 15 (3), 309–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saride, S., and Kumar, V.V., 2017. Influence of geosynthetic-interlayers on the performance of asphalt overlays on pre-cracked pavements. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 45 (3), 184–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schapery, R., 1962. Approximate methods of transform for viscoelastic stress analysis. In: 4th US national congress of applied mechanics. Berkely: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1075–1084.
   Google Scholar
• Schuettpelz, C., Fratta, D., and Edil, T.B., 2009. Evaluation of the zone of influence and stiffness improvement from geogrid reinforcement in granular materials. Transportation Research Record, 2116, 76–84.
   Google Scholar
• Skar, A., et al., 2021. Analysis of a moving measurement platform based on line profile sensors for project-level pavement evaluation. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 22 (9), 2069–2085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skar, A., and Andersen, S., 2020. ALVA: an adaptive MATLAB package for layered viscoelastic analysis. Journal of Open Source Software, 5 (55), 2548.
   Google Scholar
• Skar, A., Andersen, S., and Nielsen, J., 2020. Adaptive layered viscoelastic analysis (ALVA). Available from: https://github.com/asmusskar/ALVA.
   Google Scholar
• Skar, A., Nielsen, J., and Levenberg, E., 2020. Pavement instrumentation with near surface LVDTs. In: Advances in materials and pavement performance prediction ii. San Antonio, TX: CRC Press, 232–235.
   Google Scholar
• S&P Clever Reinforcement Company AG, 2020. S&P Carbophalt ® G 200/200. Available from: https://p.widencdn.net/rx8gq5/R_CarbophaltG200200_Pub_Tds_Prod__EN_EN.
   Google Scholar
• Terrel, R., and Krukar, M., 1970. Evaluation of test tracking pavements. In: Proceedings of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists. Vol. 39. Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 273–296.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M.L., Landel, R.F., and Ferry, J.D., 1955. The temperature dependence of relaxation mechanisms in amorphous polymers and other glass-forming liquids. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 77 (14), 3701–3707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witczak, M.W., and Fonseca, O.A., 1996. Revised predictive model for dynamic (complex) modulus of asphalt mixtures. Transportation Research Record, 1540, 15–23.
   Google Scholar
• Zofka, A., Maliszewski, M., and Maliszewska, D., 2017. Glass and carbon geogrid reinforcement of asphalt mixtures. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 18, 471–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar