Numerical analysis of hydroplaning and veer-off risk of dual-tyre on a wet runway

References

• Anupam, K., et al., 2014. Study of cornering maneuvers of a pneumatic tire on asphalt pavement surfaces using the finite element method. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2457 (1), 129–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedetto, A., 2002. A decision support system for the safety of airport runways: the case of heavy rainstorms. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 36, 665–682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson, D.J., and Okazawa, S., 2004. Contact in a multi-material eulerian finite element formulation. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 193, 4277–4298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, M., Hung, K., and Chong, O., 2005. Numerical study of water mitigation effects on blast wave. Shock Waves, 14, 217–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, J.R., et al., 2004. Mesh generation considering detailed tread blocks for reliable 3D tire analysis. Advances in Engineering Software, 35, 105–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciavarella, M., 2018. A simplified version of Persson's multiscale theory for rubber friction due to viscoelastic losses. Journal of Tribology, 140, 011403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Company B, 2016. Statistical summary of commercial jet airplane accidents worldwide operations_1959-2016.
   Google Scholar
• Do, M.T., et al., 2013. Modeling of the connection road surface microtexture/water depth/friction. Wear, 302, 1426–1435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreher, R.C., and Horne, W., 1963. Phenomena of pneumatic tire hydroplaning. Skidding.
   Google Scholar
• Forster, S.W., 1989. Pavement microtexture and its relation to skid resistance. Transportation Research Record, 1215, 151–164.
   Google Scholar
• Fwa, T.F., and Ong, G.P., 2008. Wet-Pavement hydroplaning risk and skid resistance: analysis. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 134, 182–190.
   Google Scholar
• Gallaway, B.M., et al., 1975. Tentative pavement and geometric design criteria for minimizing hydroplaning.
   Google Scholar
• Goodyear Company, 2022. Tire Specifications. https://www.goodyearaviation.com/resources/pdf/Data-Section-2022.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hermange, C., et al., 2019. A 3D SPH–FE coupling for FSI problems and its application to tire hydroplaning simulations on rough ground. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 355, 558–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivey, D.L., 1984. Truck tire hydroplaning–empirical confirmation of Horne’s thesis. Mini-Tech Seminar on Tires, Service and Evaluation, Committee F-9, ASTM.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, M., et al., 2017. Contribution to pavement friction modelling: an introduction of the wetting effect. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 20 (8), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S.S., et al., 2012. Study of hydroplaning risk on rolling and sliding passenger car. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 53, 1019–1027.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, X., et al., 2019. Evaluation of vehicle braking performance on wet pavement surface using an integrated tire-vehicle modeling approach. Transportation Research Record, 2673, 295–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najafi, S., Flintsch, G.W., and McGhee, K.K., 2013. Assessment of operational characteristics of continuous friction measuring equipment (CFME). International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 14, 706–714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong, G.P., and Fwa, T.F., 2007. Wet-pavement hydroplaning risk and skid resistance: modeling. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 133, 590–598.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, G., and Fwa, T., 2010. Mechanistic interpretation of braking distance specifications and pavement friction requirements. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2155 (1), 145–157.
   Google Scholar
• Peery, J.S., and Carroll, D.E., 2000. Multi-material ALE methods in unstructured grids. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 187, 591–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson, B.N.J., 2001. Theory of rubber friction and contact mechanics. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 115, 3840–3861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson, B., Bucher, F., and Chiaia, B., 2002. Elastic contact between randomly rough surfaces: comparison of theory with numerical results. Physical Review B, 65, 184106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safety Report. ICAO; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Srirangam, S.K., et al., 2015. Study of influence of operating parameters on braking friction and rolling resistance. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2525 (1), 79–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, D., et al., 2019. High-efficiency aircraft antiskid brake control algorithm via runway condition identification based on an on-off valve array. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 32, 2538–2556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka, H., et al., 2016. Prediction of the friction coefficient of filled rubber sliding on dry and wet surfaces with self-affine large roughness. Mechanical Engineering Journal, 3, 15–00084. -15-.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., et al., 2020. Consideration on aircraft tire spray when running on wet runways. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 33, 520–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., and Cundy, T.W., 1989. Modeling of two-dimensional overland flow. Water Resources Research, 25, 2019–2035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, B., et al., 2018. Adhesion characteristics of tire-asphalt pavement interface based on a proposed tire hydroplaning model. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 12.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, X., et al., 2021. Effects of surface texture deterioration and wet surface conditions on asphalt runway skid resistance. Tribology International, 153, 106589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar