735
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Exploring potential of Marshall-RT as simple performance test to evaluate rutting resistance of asphalt mixtures

&
Article: 2265030 | Received 20 Jul 2023, Accepted 25 Sep 2023, Published online: 06 Oct 2023

References

  • AASHTO, 2015. Standard method of test for determining the dynamic modulus and flow number for asphalt mixtures using the asphalt mixture performance tester (AMPT). AASHTO TP 79. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
  • AASHTO. 2017. Standard method of test for Hamburg wheel-track testing of compacted asphalt mixtures. AASHTO T324. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
  • Ameri, M., Sheikhmotevali, A. H., and Fasihpour, A, 2014. Evaluation and comparison of flow number calculation methods. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 15 (1), 182–206.
  • Anderson, R. M., Christensen, D. W., and Bonaquist, R, 2003. Estimating the rutting potential of asphalt mixtures using superpave gyratory compaction properties and indirect tensile strength (with discussion). Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 72, 1–26.
  • Asphalt Institute. 2014. Mix design methods for asphalt concrete, manual series no. 2, (MS-2) (7th ed.). Lexington, KY: Asphalt Institute.
  • ASTM. 2021. Standard test method for resistance to plastic flow of bituminous mixtures using marshall apparatus (6in. diameter specimen). ASTM D5581. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
  • ASTM. 2022a. Standard test method for determination of rutting tolerance index of asphalt mixture using the ideal rutting test. ASTM D8360. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
  • ASTM. 2022b. Standard test method for marshall stability and flow of asphalt mixtures. ASTM D6927. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
  • Bennert, T., 2021. Performance evaluation of asphalt mixtures statewide. No. C-19-03. Albany, NY: University Transportation Research Center.
  • Bennert, T., Haas, E., and Wass, E, 2018. Indirect tensile test (IDT) to determine asphalt mixture performance indicators during quality control testing in New Jersey. Transportation Research Record, 2672 (28), 394–403.
  • Bennert, T., Haas, E., Wass, E., & Berger, B. 2021. Indirect tensile testing for balanced mixture design and quality control performance testing. In Asphalt paving technology: association of asphalt paving technologists-proceedings of the technical sessions (Vol. 86, pp. 363–389). Association of Asphalt Paving Technologist.
  • Biligiri, K. P., et al., 2007. Rational modeling of tertiary flow for asphalt mixtures. Transportation Research Record, 2001 (1), 63–72.
  • Bonaquist, R. F, 2008. Ruggedness testing of the dynamic modulus and flow number tests with the simple performance tester (No. Project 9-29).
  • Bonaquist, R. F., 2010. Wisconsin mixture characterization using the asphalt mixture performance tester (AMPT) on historical aggregate structures. Wisconsin Highway Research Program.
  • Bonaquist, R. F., Christensen, D. W., and Stump, W, 2003. Simple performance tester for superpave mix design: first-article development and evaluation, national cooperative highway research program (NCHRP) report 513. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.
  • Boz, I., et al., 2022. A critical review of monotonic loading tests to evaluate rutting potential of asphalt mixtures. Construction and Building Materials, 335, 127484.
  • Boz, I., et al., 2023. Simple and Practical Tests for Rutting Evaluation of Asphalt Mixtures in the Balanced Mix Design Process.
  • Brown, R. R., and Bassett, C. E. 1990. Effects of maximum aggregate size on rutting potential and other properties of asphalt–aggregate mixtures. Transportation research board, Washington, DC, 107–119.
  • Brown, E. R., Kandhal, P. S., and Zhang, J, 2001. Performance testing for hot mix asphalt. NCAT report – 05. Auburn, AL: National Center for Asphalt Technology.
  • Christensen, D. W., et al., 2004. Indirect tension strength as a simple performance test. Transportation Research Circular, Number E-C, 068, 44–57.
  • Christensen, D., and Bonaquist, R, 2007. Using the indirect tension test to evaluate rut resistance in developing hot-mix asphalt mix designs. Practical Approaches to Hot-Mix Asphalt Mix Design and Production Quality Control Testing, 62.
  • Christensen, D. W., Bonaquist, R., and Jack, D. P., 2000. “Evaluation of triaxial strength as a simple test for asphalt concrete rut resistance.” (Final Report to the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, Report No. FHWA-PA-2000-010-97-04). University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University.
  • Christensen Jr, D. W., and Bonaquist, R., 2002. Use of strength tests for evaluating the rut resistance of asphalt concrete. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 71, 692–711.
  • Divandari, H, 2019. Predict of asphalt rutting potential based on IDT and validation with ANN. Journal of Applied Engineering Sciences, 2, 131–138.
  • Dong, N., et al., 2019. Comparison of the Hamburg, indirect tensile, and multi-sequenced repeated load tests for evaluation of HMA rutting resistance. Construction and Building Materials, 216, 588–598.
  • Faruk, A. N., et al., 2015. Measurement of HMA shear resistance potential in the lab: the simple punching shear test. Construction and Building Materials, 99, 62–72.
  • Francken, L., 1977. Pavement deformation Law of bituminous road mixes in repeated load triaxial compression. In: Proc. 4th international conference on the structural design of asphalt pavements, Vol. 1. University of Michigan, 483–496.
  • Huber, G. A., and Heiman, G. H, 1987. Effect of asphalt concrete parameters on rutting performance: a field investigation. Proceedings of The Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 56, 33–61.
  • Jenks, C. W., et al., 2011. Nchrp report 673: A manual for design of hot mix asphalt with commentary. In: Transportation research board, Washington, DC.
  • Kandhal, P. S., et al., 1996. Precision of Marshall stability and flow test using 6-in. (152.4-mm) diameter specimens. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 24 (1), 20–25.
  • Khosla, N. P., and Harikrishnan, K. I., 2007. Tensile strength-a design and evaluation tool for superpave mixtures. The North Carolina Department of Transportation, Report No. FHWA/NC/2006-24. Raleigh, NC.
  • Kim, K. W., et al., 2011. A new static strength test for characterization of rutting of dense-graded asphalt mixtures. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 39 (1), 1.
  • Kim, S., Choi, C. J., and Kim, K. W, 2019. Feasibility of estimating rut resistance of SMA mixture by static loading test using confined specimen. Journal of The Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers, 61 (3), 43–53.
  • Kim, S., Shen, J., and Myung Jeong, M, 2018. Effects of aggregate size on the rutting and stripping resistance of recycled asphalt mixtures. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 30 (2), 04017280.
  • Kruger, J., and Horak, E., 2005. The appropriateness of accelerated pavement testing to assess the rut prediction capability of laboratory asphalt tests. In: Proceedings of 24th sothern African transport conference (SATC). University of Pretoria, South Africa, 380–390.
  • Li, P., Ding, Z., and Rao, W, 2016. Evaluation of deformation properties of asphalt mixture using aggregate slip test. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 17 (6), 542–549.
  • Luo, X., et al., 2022. Simple asphalt mixture shear rutting test and mechanical analysis. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 34 (9), 04022220.
  • McCarthy, L., et al., 2016. Nchrp synthesis 492: performance specifications for asphalt mixtures: a synthesis of highway practice. In: Transportation research board of the national Academies, Washington, DC.
  • Miller, J. S., and Bellinger, W. Y., 2003. Distress identification manual for the long-term pavement performance program, federal highway administration. Report No. FHWA-RD-03-031. McLean.
  • Moghadas Nejad, F., et al., 2014. Rutting performance prediction of warm mix asphalt containing reclaimed asphalt pavements. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 15 (1), 207–219.
  • Morea, F., Agnusdei, J. O., and Zerbino, R, 2011. The use of asphalt low shear viscosity to predict permanent deformation performance of asphalt concrete. Materials and Structures, 44, 1241–1248.
  • MoRTH (Ministry of Road Transport and Highways)., 2013. Specifications for road and bridge works. Indian Roads Congress, 5th Revision. New Delhi, India.
  • Ozer, H., et al., 2018. Prediction of pavement fatigue cracking at an accelerated testing section using asphalt mixture performance tests. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 19 (3), 264–278.
  • Pellinen, T. K., and Xiao, S., 2006. “Stiffness of Hot-Mix Asphalt.” The Indiana Department of Transportation, Report No. FHWA/IN/JTRP-2005/20. Indianapolis, IN.
  • Radhakrishnan, V., et al., 2019. Evaluation of wheel tracking and field rutting susceptibility of dense bituminous mixes. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 20 (1), 90–109.
  • Rajan, B., Suchismita, A., and Singh, D, 2023. Rutting resistance evaluation of highly polymer-modified asphalt binder and mixes using different performance parameters. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 35 (8), 04023266.
  • Rezvan, B., and Hassan, Z, 2017. Evaluation of rutting performance of stone matrix asphalt mixtures containing warm mix additives. Journal of Central South University, 24, 360–373.
  • Roberts, F. L., Mohammad, L. N., and Wang, L. B, 2002. History of hot mix asphalt mixture design in the United States. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 14 (4), 279–293.
  • Tran, N. T., and Takahashi, O, 2018. Evaluating the rutting resistance of wearing course mixtures with different fine aggregate sources using the indirect tensile strength test. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 48 (4), 2865–2879.
  • Vamsikrishna, G., and Singh, D. 2023. Forthcoming. Comparison of rutting resistance of plant produced asphalt mixes using Hamburg wheel tracker and surrogate simple performance tests: IDEAL-RT and HT-IDT. doi:10.1061/JMCEE7/MTENG-16205.
  • Walubita, L. F., et al., 2012. Hot-mix asphalt permanent deformation evaluated by Hamburg wheel tracking, dynamic modulus, and repeated load tests. Transportation Research Record, 2296 (1), 46–56.
  • Walubita, L. F., et al., 2018. Sensitivity analysis and validation of the simple punching shear test (SPST) for screening HMA mixes. Construction and Building Materials, 169, 205–214.
  • Walubita, L. F., et al., 2019a. Using the simple punching shear test (SPST) for evaluating the HMA shear properties and predicting field rutting performance. Construction and Building Materials, 224, 920–929.
  • Walubita, L. F., et al., 2019b. Comparative evaluation of five HMA rutting-related laboratory test methods relative to field performance data: DM, FN, RLPD, SPST, and HWTT. Construction and Building Materials, 215, 737–753.
  • Wen, H., et al., 2016. Long-term field rutting and moisture susceptibility performance of warm-mix asphalt pavement. Transportation Research Record, 2575 (1), 103–112.
  • Wen, H., and Bhusal, S, 2013. A laboratory study to predict the rutting and fatigue behavior of asphalt concrete using the indirect tensile test. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 41 (2), 299–304.
  • West, R., et al., 2018. Development of a framework for balanced mix design. Final Rep. No. of Project NCHRP 20-07/Task 406. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
  • Witczak, M. W., 2007. Specification criteria for simple performance tests for rutting: Volume I: Dynamic modulus (E*) and volume II: Flow number and flow time (NCHRP report 580). Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
  • Yin, F., et al., 2020. Performance testing for quality control and acceptance of balanced mix design. The national center for asphalt technology (NCAT) report, 20–02.
  • Yin, F., and West, R. C, 2021. Balanced mix design resource guide. Greenbelt, MD: NAPA IS-143. National Asphalt Pavement Association.
  • Zaniewski, J. P., and Srinivasan, G., 2004. Evaluation of indirect tensile strength to identify asphalt concrete rutting potential. In: Asphalt technology program, department of civil and environmental engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV.
  • Zhang, J., et al., 2013. Comparison of flow number, dynamic modulus, and repeated load tests for evaluation of HMA permanent deformation. Construction and Building Materials, 44, 391–398.
  • Zhou, F., et al., 2019. Development and validation of an ideal shear rutting test for asphalt Mix design and QC/QA. In: Association of asphalt paving technologists.
  • Zhou, F., Hu, S., and Newcomb, D, 2020. Development of a performance-related framework for production quality control with ideal cracking and rutting tests. Construction and Building Materials, 261, 120549.
  • Zhou, F., Steger, R., and Mogawer, W, 2021. Development of a coherent framework for balanced mix design and production quality control and quality acceptance. Construction and Building Materials, 287, 123020.
  • Zhu, F., 2008. “Developing simple lab test to evaluate HMA resistance to moisture, rutting, thermal cracking distress.” Doctoral dissertation, University of Akron.
  • Zieliński, P, 2019. Indirect tensile test as a simple method for rut resistance evaluation of asphalt concrete. Archives of Civil Engineering, 65 (3), 31–43.
  • Zieliński, P, 2022. Indirect tensile test as a simple method for rut resistance evaluation of asphalt mixtures–Polish experience. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 23 (1), 112–128.
  • Zoorob, S. E., and Suparma, L. B, 2000. Laboratory design and investigation of the properties of continuously graded asphaltic concrete containing recycled plastics aggregate replacement (Plastiphalt). Cement and Concrete Composites, 22 (4), 233–242.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.