Evaluation of void beneath the airport pavement slab corner based on the strain monitoring

References

• Barriera, M., et al., 2020. In situ pavement monitoring: a review. Infrastructures, 5 (2), 18.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, A.S., and Roesler, J.R., 2014. Finite element analysis of a concrete slab under various non-uniform support conditions. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 15 (5), 460–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brill, D.R., Flynn, R.M., and Pecht, F., 2007. Faa rigid pavement instrumentation at Atlanta hartsfield-jackson international airported. In: 2007 worldwide airport technology transfer conference. Atlantic City, New Jersey, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Chun, S., et al., 2015. Evaluation of interlayer bonding condition on structural response characteristics of asphalt pavement using finite element analysis and full-scale field tests. Construction and Building Materials, 96, 307–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coni, M., et al., 2023. The effect of subgrade cavity on pavement. A case studyed. In: International conference on computational science and its applications. Springer, 244–259.
   Google Scholar
• Crosby, H., Damoulas, T., and Jarvis, S.A., 2020. Road and travel time cross-validation for urban modelling. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 34 (1), 98–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darter, M.I., Hall, K.T., and Kuo, C.-M., 1995. Support under Portland cement concrete pavements. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Debbarma, S., and Ransinchung Rn, G., 2022. Using artificial neural networks to predict the 28-day compressive strength of roller-compacted concrete pavements containing rap aggregates. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 23 (1), 149–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, M., Hayhoe, G.F. & Fang, Y.W., 1997. Runway instrumentation at denver international airport: dynamic sensor data processinged. In: Frank V. Hermann, ed. Aircraft/pavement technology In the midst of change. Seattle, Washington: American Society of Civil Engineers, 363–378.
   Google Scholar
• Dong, Z., Ma, X., and Shao, X., 2018. Airport pavement responses obtained from wireless sensing network upon digital signal processing. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 19 (5), 381–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, X., Yuan, Q., and Ni, F., 2011. Feasibility study of void evaluation beneath cement slabs based on pfwd. Journal of Hefei University of Technology, 34 (5), 729–733.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, Y., 2019. Quantitative analysis and residual life prediction of void beneath airport rigid pavement. Master’s thesis. Chang'an University.
   Google Scholar
• Han, W., and Li, J., 2011. Identifying the depth of voids beneath rigid pavement slabs method based on gpr. Icte, 2011, 1560–1565.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, C., et al., 2021. Experimental study on fatigue strength of airport concrete pavement slab. Construction and Building Materials, 270, 121493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y., et al., 2012. Identification of void beneath airport cement concrete pavement and its influence. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science Edition), 40 (6), 861–866.
   Google Scholar
• Ikeagwuani, C.C., Nwonu, D.C., and Nweke, C.C., 2022. Resilient modulus descriptive analysis and estimation for fine-grained soils using multivariate and machine learning methods. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 23 (10), 3409–3424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawamura, N., Tsubokawa, Y., and Kato, E., 2017. Detection method of voids under concrete slab by using fwd. Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. E1 (Pavement Engineering), 73 (1), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., Kumar, V., and Singh, A.K., 2022. Prediction of maximum pressure of journal bearing using ann with multiple input parameters. Australian Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 20 (4), 1069–1078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., et al., 2022. Load transfer efficiency analysis and void evaluation of composite pavement cement concrete slab. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2022, 4490485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, B., et al., 2020. Finite element simulation and multi-factor stress prediction model for cement concrete pavement considering void under slab. Materials, 13 (22), 5294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao, L., 2016. The analysis of mechanics response of cement concrete pavement with void and joint load transfer coupling. Master Thesis. Southwest Jiaotong University.
   Google Scholar
• Olita, S., Diomedi, M., and Ciampa, D., 2020. Alternative formula for rigid pavement stress calculation in corner load conditions. The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 15 (5), 59–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, Y., Tan, Y.-Q., and Zhang, X., 2005. Void identification of jointed slab on elastic foundation by acoustic vibration. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 26 (12), 1981–1986.
   Google Scholar
• Scholz, F., 2003. Statistical extreme value analysis of anc taxiway centerline deviations for 747 aircraft. Washington, DC, United States: Administration, F.A.
   Google Scholar
• Seguini, M., et al., 2021. Crack prediction in pipeline using ann-pso based on numerical and experimental modal analysis. Smart Structures and Systems, 27 (3), 507–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, B., et al., 2023. Voids prediction beneath cement concrete slabs using a fem-ann method. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 24 (1), 2191198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sholichin, I., Ahyudanari, E., and Muntini, M.S., 2022. Review of runway pavement monitoring. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 971 (1), 012017. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/971/1/012017.
   Google Scholar
• Tyagi, S., and Panigrahi, S., 2017. A hybrid genetic algorithm and back-propagation classifier for gearbox fault diagnosis. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 31 (7-8), 593–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Q., and Wang, X., 2009. Evaluation of detecting cavity under cement pavement slab by deflection difference of the same slab and pumping heighted. International Conference on Transportation Engineering, 2009, 49–54.
   Google Scholar
• Xue, Y., et al., 2013. Improvement on recognition method of void beneath slab based on nondestructive testing technologies. Sustainable Construction Materials, 2012, 77–91.
   Google Scholar
• Yasarer, H., and Najjar, Y., 2012. Development of void prediction models for Kansas concrete mixes used in pcc pavement. Procedia Computer Science, 8, 473–478.
   Google Scholar
• Zeng, M., et al., 2020. Identification of cavities underneath concrete pavement based on pavement vibration. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 33 (3), 42.
   Google Scholar
• Zeng, S., Xu, J., and Zeng, X., 2009. Criterion for void identification beneath cement concrete pavement slab corner. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 40 (1), P248–P255.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y.P., and Meng, X.J., 2014. Void prediction of cement concrete overly on old cement pavement after rubblization. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 525, 457–460.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, H., et al., 2014. Pavement condition monitoring system at Shanghai pudong international airport.In Proceedings of the Geo-Shanghai 2014 International Conference. 26-28 May 2014. Shanghai, China. 283–295.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, H., et al., 2019. Assessment of concrete pavement support conditions using distributed optical vibration sensing fiber and a neural network. Construction and Building Materials, 216, 214–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, H., et al., 2021. Effect of support-loss on stress distribution of airport concrete pavement slab and critical support condition. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science Edition), 49 (2), 243–253. Available from: jtunsen/article/abstract/202102011.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, Z., et al., 2010. Evaluation of load transfer efficiency at joints for rigid airport pavement. Journal of Tongji University. Natural Science, 38 (6), 844–849.
   Google Scholar