Fight for the Wild: emotion and place in conservation, community formation, and national identity

References

• Ainsworth, G. B., and G. L. Burns. 2020. “‘Although I Use Science, It’s an Emotional thing’: Conservation practitioners’ Use of Positive Affect to Frame Messages About Threatened Birds.” Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 27 (4): 351–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2020.1830446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflection on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. revised ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barbalet, J. M. 1998. Emotion, Social Theory and Social Structure: A Macrosociological Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, P. 1991. “What is Bioregionalism?” The Trumpeter: Journal of Ecosophy 8 (1): 6–8.
   Google Scholar
• Boler, M., and E. Davis. 2018. “The Affective Politics of the ‘Post-truth’ Era: Feeling Rules and Networked Subjectivity.” Emotion, Space and Society 27:75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2018.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, E. 2013. The Sublime in Modern Philosophy: Aesthetics, Ethics, and Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castillo-Huitron, N. M., E. J. Naranjao, D. Santos-Fita, and E. Estrada-Lugo. 2020. “The Importance of Human Emotions for Wildlife Conservation.” Frontiers in Psychology 11:1277. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eitzen, D. 2018. “The Duties of Documentary in a Post-Truth Society.” In Cognitive Theory and Documentary Film, edited by C. Brylla and M. Kramer, 93–111. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 2001. “Culture sits in places: reflections on globalism and subaltern strategies of localization.” Political Geography 20 (2): 149–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-6298(00)00064-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1985. The Nation-State and Violence, Vol. 2: A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. 1992. “Culture and the Perception of the Environment.” In Bush Base: Forest Farm, edited by E. Croll and D. Parkin, 39–56. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. 2011. The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Izard, C. E. 1977. Human Emotions. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood, A. 2016. “Graphs of Grief and Other Green Feelings: The Uses of Affect in the Study of Environmental Communication.” Environmental Communication 10 (6): 734–748. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2016.1205642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, B. 2010. Spinoza’s Ethics: An Edinburgh Philosophical Guide. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marinelli, K. 2019. “Three Affect Paradigms: The Historical Landscape of Emotional Inquiry.” In Affect, Emotion, and Rhetorical Persuasion in Mass Communication, edited by L. Zhang and C. Clark, 17–33. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. 1994. Space, Place & Gender. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. 2002. Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McClure, T. 2023, May 26. “From Thieving Parrots to Boozy Pigeons: Why New Zealand is Obsessed with Its Native Birds.” The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/may/26/from-thieving-parrots-to-boozy-pigeons-why-new-zealand-is-obsessed-with-its-native-birds.
   Google Scholar
• Milton, K. 2002. Loving Nature: Towards an Ecology of Emotion. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Norgaard, K. M. 2011. Living in Denial: Climate Change, Emotions, and Everyday Life. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. 2015. Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, E. 2013. “Climate Change and Non-Indigenous Belonging in Postcolonial Australia.” Continuum 27 (1): 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2013.737197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlesinger, P. 1991. Media, State & nation: Political Violence and Collective Identities. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, K. D. 2003. “Popularizing Science and Nature Programming: The Role of ‘Spectacle’ in Contemporary Wildlife Documentary.” Journal of Popular Film and Television 31 (1): 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/01956050309602866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. 2017. “Textual Analysis.” In The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods, edited by J. Matthes, 1–7. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. 1995. The Media & Modernity: A Social Theory of the Media. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Tomkins, S. 1995. “Interest-Excitement.” In Shame and Its Sisters: A Silvan Tomkins Reader, edited by E. Sedgwick Kosofsky and A. Frank, 75–80. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, G. 1994. Making It National: Nationalism and Australian Popular Culture. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Weik von Mossner, A. 2018. “Engaging Animals in Wildlife Documentaries: From Anthropomorphism to Trans-Species Empathy.” In Cognitive Theory and Documentary Film, edited by C. Brylla and M. Kramer, 163–179. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. 1990. “The Ideal of Community and the Politics of Difference.” In Feminism/postmodernism, edited by L. J. Nicholson, 300–323. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Young, T., and T. Young. 2000. “Belonging Not Containing: The Vision of Bioregionalism.” Landscape Journal 19 (1–2): 46–49. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.19.1-2.46.
   Google Scholar