The “menstruating” Muslim Brotherhood: taboo metaphor, face attack, and gender in Egyptian culture

References

• Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed. 2016. “Mostafa Houssien’s Satan’s Family: Conceptual Blending in a Post-Coup Egypt Editorial Cartoon.” Metaphor and the Social World 6 (2): 303–325.
   Google Scholar
• Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed. 2018. “Multimodal Humour: Integrating Blending Model, Relevance Theory, and Incongruity Theory.” Multimodal Communication 7 (1). doi:10.1515/mc-2017-0013
   Google Scholar
• Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed. 2019. Pictorial Framing in Moral Politics: A Corpus-Based Experimental Study. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed. 2021. “Where Covid Metaphors Come from: Reconsidering Context and Modality in Metaphor.” Social Semiotics. doi:10.1080/10350330.2021.1971493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed. 2022. “Metaphorical Creativity Contributing to Multimodal Impoliteness in Political Cartoons.” Intercultural Pragmatics 19 (1): 35–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan, Keith, ed. 2019. The Oxford Handbook of Taboo Words and Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allan, Keith, and Kate Burridge. 1991. Euphemism and Dysphemism: Language Used as Shield and Weapon. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allan, Keith, and Kate Burridge. 2006. Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, Katherine R., and Abbie E. Goldberg. 2009. “Sexual Activity During Menstruation: A Qualitative Study.” Journal of Sex Research 46 (6): 535–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Razi, Abu ‘Abd Allah Fakhr al-Din Muhammad b. ‘Umar d.1209. n.d. Mafatih al-ghayb (al-tafsir al-kabir), n.p., Vol. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Luvell, and Ernie Lepore. 2013. “What Did You Call Me? Slurs as Prohibited Words.” Analytic Philosophy 54 (3): 350–363.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, Lars, and Peter Trudgill. 1990. Bad Language. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bednarek, Monika. 2015. “‘Wicked’ Women in Contemporary Pop Culture: ‘Bad’ Language and Gender in Weeds, Nurse Jackie and Saving Grace.” Text and Talk 35 (4): 431–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bednarek, Monika. 2019a. “Don’t Say Crap. Don’t Use Swear Words.’ – Negotiating the Use of Swear/Taboo Words in the Narrative Mass Media.” Discourse, Context, and Media 29: 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bednarek, Monika. 2019b. “The Multifunctionality of Swear/Taboo Words in Television Series.” In Emotion in Discourse, edited by J. Lachlan Mackenzie and Laura Alba-Juez, 29–54. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Bednarek, Monika. 2021. “Swear/Taboo Words in US TV Series. Combining Corpus Linguistics with Selected Insights from Screenwriters and Learners.” In Pop Culture in Language Education. Theory, Research, Practice, edited by Valentin Werner and Friederike Tegge, 50–70. London/New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bergson, Henri. [1900] 1911. Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic. Translated by Cloudesley Brereton and Fred Rothwell. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Black, Max. 1979. “More About Metaphor.” In Metaphor and Thought, edited by Andrew Ortony, 19–45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blake, Barry J. 2019. “Taboo Language as Source of Comedy.” In The Oxford Handbook of Taboo Words and Language, edited by Keith Allan, 353–371. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blakemore, Diane. 2015. “Slurs and Expletives: A Case Against a General Account of Expressive Meaning.” Language Sciences 52: 22–35. doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2014.06.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobel, Chris, eds. 2019. The Managed Body: Developing Girls and Menstrual Health in the Global South. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bobel, Chris, Inga T. Winkler, Breanne Fahs, Katie Ann Hasson, Elizabeth Arveda Kissling, and Tomi-Ann Roberts. 2020. The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Menstruation. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, Michael H., and Tat-ming Lai. 1986. “Embarrassment and Code-Switching Into a Second Language.” Journal of Social Psychology 126: 179–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandes, Stanley H. 2019. “An Anthropological Approach to Taboo Words and Language.” In The Oxford Handbook of Taboo Words and Language, edited by Keith Allan, 372–390. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, Per Aage. 2004. Spaces, Domains, and Meanings. Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Brouwer, Susanne. 2019. “The Auditory Foreign-Language Effect of Moral Decision Making in Highly Proficient Bilinguals.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 40 (10): 865–878. doi:10.1080/01434632.2019.1585863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Lucien, and Pilar Prieto. 2017. “(Im)Politeness: Prosody and Gesture.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)Politeness, edited by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 357–379. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Burridge, Kate, and Tonya N. Stebbins. 2019. For the Love of Language: An Introduction to Linguistics. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, Deborah. [1985] 1992. Feminism and Linguistic Theory. London: The Macmillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, Lynne. 2011. Metaphor and Reconciliation: The Discourse Dynamics of Empathy in Post-Conflict Conversations. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, Stan. 2019, May 21. “Why Is Everyone Suddenly Using the C-Word?” The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/may/21/c-word-everywhere-tommy-robinson-game-of-thrones.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, Ronald. 2004. Language and Creativity: The Art of Common Talk. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2004. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2018. Analysing Political Speeches: Rhetoric, Discourse, and Metaphor. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2019. Metaphors of Brexit: No Cherries on the Cake. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Chilton, Paul. 1987. “Metaphor, Euphemism, and the Militarization of Language.” War, Peace, Culture 10 (1): 7–19.
   Google Scholar
• Chrisler, Joan. 2013. “Teaching Taboo Topics: Menstruation, Menopause, and the Psychology of Women.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 37 (1): 128–132..
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, Spring Chenoa, and Patricia Barthalow Koch. 2007. “Nobody Told Me Nothing”: Communication About Menstruation among Low-Income African-American Women.” Women and Health 46 (1): 57–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, Albert, Alice Foucart, Inbal Arnon, Melina Aparici, and Jose Apesteguia. 2014. “‘Piensa’’ Twice: On the Foreign Language Effect in Decision Making.” Cognition 130: 236–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crespo-Fernández, Eliecer. 2015. Sex in Language: Euphemistic and Dysphemistic Metaphors in Internet Forums. London and New York: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Crespo-Fernández, Eliecer. 2018. Taboo in Discourse: Studies on Attenuation and Offence in Communication. Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Crespo-Fernández, Eliecer. 2022. “Euphemism in Laxative TV Commercials: At the Crossroads Between Politeness and Persuasion.” Journal of Politeness Research 18 (1): 11–35. doi:10.1515/pr-2018-0047.
   Google Scholar
• Culpeper, Jonathan. 1996. “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics 25: 349–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culpeper, Jonathan. 2005. “Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show: The Weakest Link.” Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 1: 35–72.
   Google Scholar
• Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Culpeper, Jonathan. 2019. “Taboo Language and Impoliteness.” In The Oxford Handbook of Taboo Words and Language, edited by Keith Allan, 28–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Culpeper, Jonathan, and Claire Hardaker. 2017. “Impoliteness.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)Politeness, edited by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 199–225. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Culpeper, Jonathan, Michael Haugh, and Valeria Sinkeviciute. 2017. “(Im)Politeness and Mixed Messages.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)Politeness, edited by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 323–355. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Culpeper, Jonathan, and Vittorio Tantucci. 2021. “The Principle of (Im)Politeness Reciprocity.” Journal of Pragmatics 175: 146–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deignan, Alice. 2010. “The Evaluative Properties of Metaphors.” In Researching and Applying Metaphor in Use, edited by Z. Todd, A. Deignan, and L. Cameron, 357–373. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Demjén, Zsófia, and Claire Hardaker. 2016. “Metaphor, Impoliteness, and Offence in Online Communication.” In The Routledge Handbook of Metaphor and Language, edited by Elena Semino and Zsófia Demjén, 353–368. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dewaele, Jean-Marc. 2015. “British ‘Bollocks’ Versus American ‘Jerk’: Do Native British English Speakers Swear More – or Differently – Compared to American English Speakers?” Applied Linguistics Review 6: 309–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewaele, Jean-Marc. 2019. “Linguistic Taboos in a Second or Foreign Language.” In The Oxford Handbook of Taboo Words and Language, edited by Keith Allen, 218–232. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dynel, Marta. 2015. “The Landscape of Impoliteness Research.” Journal of Politeness Research 11 (2): 329–354. doi:10.1515/pr-2015-0013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckert, Penelope, and Sally McConnell-Ginet. 2003. Language and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, Janis L. 1997. Political Cartoons in the 1988 Presidential Campaign: Image, Metaphor, and Narrative. New York and London: Garland.
   Google Scholar
• El Refaie, Elisabeth. 2011. “The Pragmatics of Humor Reception: Young People’s Responses to a Newspaper Cartoon.” HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research 24 (1): 87–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Refaie, Ellisabeth. 2015. “Reconsidering ‘Image Metaphor’ in the Light of Perceptual Simulation Theory.” Metaphor and Symbol 30 (1): 63–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Refaie, Elisabeth. 2019. Visual Metaphor and Embodiment in Graphic Illness Narratives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ernster, V. 1975. “American Menstrual Expressions.” Sex Roles 1: 3–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fägersten, Kristy Beers. 2012. Who's Swearing Now? The Social Aspects of Conversational Swearing. New York, NY: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fahs, Breanne. 2011. “Sex During Menstruation: Race, Sexual Identity, and Women’s Accounts of Pleasure and Disgust.” Feminism and Psychology 21 (2): 155–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari, Federica. 2018. Metaphor and Persuasion in Strategic Communication: Sustainable Perspectives. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Forceville, Charles. 2005. “Visual Representations of the Idealized Cognitive Model of Anger in the Asterix Album La Zizanie.” Journal of Pragmatics 37 (1): 69–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forceville, Charles. 2016. “Mixing in Pictorial and Multimodal Metaphors?” In Mixing Metaphor, edited by Raymond W. Gibbs, 223–239. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Gathigia, Moses, Daniel Ochieng Orwenjo, and Ruth Wangeci Ndung’u. 2018. “A Cognitive Linguistics Approach to Menstruation as a Taboo in Gĩkũyũ.” In Linguistic Taboo Revisited: Novel Insights from Cognitive Perspectives, edited by Andrea Pizarro Pedraza, 161–178. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Geeraerts, Dirk, Gitte Kristiansen, and Yves Peirsman, eds. 2010. Advances in Cognitive Sociolinguistics. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Geipel, Janet, Constantinos Hadjichristidis, and Luca Surian. 2015. “How Foreign Language Shapes Moral Judgment.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 59: 8–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghali, Muhammad. 2008. Towards Understanding the Ever-Glorious Qur′an. 5th ed. Cairo: Dar An-NashrLiljami’at.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, Raymond. 2015. “Do Pragmatic Signals Affect Conventional Metaphor Understanding? A Failed Test of Deliberate Metaphor Theory.” Journal of Pragmatics 90: 77–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, Raymond, ed. 2016. Mixing Metaphor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Giora, Rachel. 2003. On Our Mind: Salience, Context, and Figurative Language. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giora, Rachel, Shir Givoni, Vered Heruti, and Ofer Fein. 2017. “The Role of Defaultness in Affecting Pleasure: The Optimal Innovation Hypothesis Revisited.” Metaphor and Symbol 32 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1080/10926488.2017.1272934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddard, Cliff. 2015. “Swear Words” and “Curse Words” in Australian (and American) English: At the Crossroads of Pragmatics, Semantics and Sociolinguistics.” Intercultural Pragmatics 12 (2): 189–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golub, Sharon. 1992. Periods from Menarche to Menopause. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gradečak-Erdeljić, Tanja. 2004. “Euphemisms in the Language of Politics or how Metonymy Opens one Door but Closes the Other.” In Pragmatics Today, edited by Piotr Cap, 287–299. Frankfurt, Berlin and Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Gradečak-Erdeljić, Tanja, and Goran Milić. 2011. “Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Case of Euphemisms and Dysphemisms.” In Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a Consensus View, edited by Réka Benczes, Antonio Barcelona, and Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, 147–166. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Grady, Joseph. 1999. “A Typology of Motivation for Conceptual Metaphors: Correlations vs. Resemblance.” In Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics, edited by Ray W. Gibbs, and Gerard J. Steen, 79–100. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Grainger, Karen, Zainab Kerkam, Fathia Mansor, and Sara Mills. 2015. “Offering and Hospitality in Arabic and English.” Journal of Politeness Research 11 (1): 41–70. doi:10.1515/pr-2015-0003.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, Michael A. K., and Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Hamam, Iman. 2012. “Disarticulating Egyptian Humour: The Case of Egyptian Comedies.” In Arab Cultural Studies: Mapping the Field, edited by Tarik Sabry, 186–213. London: I.B.Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Haugh, Michael. 2010. “When Is an Email Really Offensive? Argumentativity and Variability in Evaluations of Impoliteness.” Journal of Politeness Research 6: 7–31.
   Google Scholar
• Haugh, Michael, and Derek Bousfield. 2012. “Mock Impoliteness Jocular Mockery and Jocular Abuse in Australian and British English.” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (9): 1099–1114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstadter, Douglas, and Liane Gabora. 1989. “Synopsis of a Workshop on Humor and Cognition.” Humor 2 (4): 417–440.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, Janet. 2006. “Sharing a Laugh: Pragmatic Aspects of Humor and Gender in the Workplace.” Journal of Pragmatics 38 (1): 26–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, Janet, and Maria Stubbe. 2015. Power and Politeness in the Workplace: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Talk at Work. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, Laurence R. 2018. “Nice Words for Nasty Things: Taboo and its Discontents.” In Bad Words: Philosophical Perspectives on Slurs, edited by David Sosa, 193–229. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jay, Timothy. 1992. Cursing in America: A Psycholinguistic Study of the Use of Dirty Language in the Courts, in the Movies, in the Schoolyears and on the Streets. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, Philip Nicholas. 1983. Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston-Robledo, Ingrid, and Joan C. Chrisler. 2013. “The Menstrual Mark: Menstruation and Social Stigma.” Sex Roles 68: 9–18. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0052-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, John M. 1982. “Metaphor in Pictures.” Perception 11 (5): 589–605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiek, Miranda. 2013, September 3. “On Film, Allusions to Sex Can Be Even Better Than the Real Thing.” The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/film/filmblog/2013/sep/03/showing-sex-onscreen-linda-lovelace-film.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Minju. 2008. “On the Semantic Derogation of Terms for Women in Korean, with Parallel Developments in Chinese and Japanese.” Korean Studies 32: 148–176.
   Google Scholar
• Kipfer, Barbara Ann, and Robert L. Chapman. 2007. Dictionary of American Slang. 4th ed. New York: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Kissling, Elizabeth. 1996. “Bleeding Out Loud: Communication About Menstruation.” Feminism and Psychology 6 (4): 481–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knipple, Sheilendr. 2001, May 13. “Word for Word/Hospital Lingo; What’s a Bed Plug? An L.O.L. in N.A.D.” The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/13/weekinreview/word-for-word-hospital-lingo-what-s-a-bed-plug-an-lol-in-nad.html.
   Google Scholar
• Koller, Veronika. 2011. “Analyzing Metaphor and Gender in Discourse.” In Unité et Diversité de la Linguistique, edited by Francis Manzano, 125–158. Lyon: Atelier intégré de publication de l’Université Jean Moulin – Lyon 3, (Cahiers du Centre d’Etudes Linguistique).
   Google Scholar
• Koller, Veronika, and Elena Semino. 2009. “Metaphor, Politics and Gender: A Case Study from Germany.” In Politics, Gender and Conceptual Metaphors, edited by Kathleen Ahrens, 9–35. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kövecses, Zoltán. 2010. “A New Look at Metaphorical Creativity in Cognitive Linguistics.” Cognitive Linguistics 21 (4): 663–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kövecses, Zoltán. 2015. Where Metaphors Come from: Reconsidering Context in Metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kromhout, Roelf, and Charles Forceville. 2013. “LIFE IS A JOURNEY: The Source-Path-Goal Schema in the Videogames “Half-Life 2,” “Heavy Rain,” and “Grim Fandango”.” Metaphor and the Social World 3 (1): 100–116.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, George, and Mark Turner. 1989. More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Langton, Rae. 1999. “Pornography: A Liberal’s Unfinished Business.” The Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 12 (1): 109–133.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, Edmund. 1989. “Anthropological Aspects of Language: Animal Categories and Verbal Abuse.” Anthrozoös: A Multidisciplinary Journal of the Interactions Between People and Other Animals 2 (3): 151–165.
   Google Scholar
• Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Leech, Geoffrey. 1985. “Stylistics.” In Discourse and Literature, edited by Teun A. van Dijk, 39–57. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Leech, Geoffrey N. 2014. The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Littlemore, Jeannette. 2015. Metonymy: Hidden Shortcuts in Language, Thought, and Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loos, Cornelia, Jens-Michael Cramer, and Donna Jo Napoli. 2020. “The Linguistic Sources of Offense of Taboo Terms in German Sign Language.” Cognitive Linguistics 31 (1): 73–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López Rodríguez, Irene. 2009. “Of Women, Bitches, Chickens and Vixens: Animal Metaphors for Women in English and Spanish.” Cultura, Lenguaje y Representación/Culture, Language and Representation 7: 77–100.
   Google Scholar
• Lutzky, Ursula, and Andrew Kehoe. 2016. “Your Blog is (the) Shit”: A Corpus Linguistic Approach to the Identification of Swearing in Computer Mediated Communication.” International Journal Corpus Linguistics 21 (2): 165–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maalej, Zohair. 2007. “Doing Critical Discourse Analysis with Metaphor: Towards a Discourse Model of Metaphor.” In Cognitive Linguistics in Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Christopher Hart, and Dominik Lukeš, 132–158. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, Emily. 1988. “Medical Metaphors of Women’s Bodies: Menstruation and Menopause.” International Journal of Health Services 18 (2): 237–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, Sara. 2003. Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mondragon, Nahia Idoiaga, and Maitane Belasko Txertudi. 2019. “Understanding Menstruation: Influence of Gender and Ideological Factors. A Study of Young People’s Social Representations.” Feminism and Psychology 19 (3): 357–373. doi:10.1177/0959353519836445.
   Google Scholar
• Moritz, Ivana. 2018. “Metonymy-based Euphemisms in war-Related Speeches by George W. Bush and Barack Obama.” In Linguistic Taboo Revisited: Novel Insights from Cognitive Perspectives, edited by Andrea Pizarro Pedraza, 55–78. Berlin Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Mukařovský, Jan. 1970. “Standard Language and Poetic Language, ed. and Trans. by Paul L. Garvin.” In Linguistics and Literary Style, edited by Donald C. Freeman, 40–56. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, Bróna. 2010. Corpus and Sociolinguistics: Investigating Age and Gender in Female Talk. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Musolff, Andreas. 2001. “Political Imagery of Europe: A House Without Exit Doors?” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 21 (3): 216–229.
   Google Scholar
• Musolff, Andreas. 2015. “Dehumanizing Metaphors in UK Immigrant Debates in Press and Online Media.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 3 (1): 41–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musolff, Andreas. 2016a. Political Metaphor Analysis: Discourse and Scenarios. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Musolff, Andreas. 2016b. “Cross-cultural Variation in Deliberate Metaphor Interpretation.” Metaphor and the Social World 6: 205–224.
   Google Scholar
• Naguib, Shuruq. 2003. “The Meaning of Purity in Classical Exegesis of the Qur’an.” Unpublished PhD thesis, The University of Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• Naguib, Shuruq. 2010. “Horizons and Limitations of Feminist Muslim Hermeneutics: Reflections on the Menstruation Verse.” In New Topics in Feminist Philosophy of Religion: Contestations and Transcendence Incarnate, edited by Pamela Sue Anderson, 33–49. Dordrecht: Springer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nerlich, Brigitte, and David D. Clarke. 2001. “Ambiguities We Live By: Towards a Pragmatics of Polysemy.” Journal of Pragmatics 33: 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Driscoll, Jim. 2020. Offensive Language: Taboo, Offence, and Social Control. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Overvad, Anna T., and Brady Wagoner. 2020. “Grief After Suicide: A Study of Taboo and Metaphor.” Culture and Pyschology 26 (3): 369–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paolillo, John C. 1998. “Gary Larson’s Far Side: Nonsense? Nonsense!.” Humor 11 (3): 261–290. doi:10.1515/humr.1998.11.3.261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearman, Tory Vandeventer. 2010. Woman and Disability in Medieval Literature. New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Pedraza, Andrea Pizarro, ed. 2018. Linguistic Taboo Revisited: Novel Insights from Cognitive Perspectives. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Pfaff, Kerry L., Raymond Gibbs, and Michael Johnson. 1997. “Metaphor in Using and Understanding Euphemism and Dysphemism.” Applied Psycholinguistics 18 (1): 59–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plester, Barbara A., and Janet Sayers. 2007. “Taking the Piss: Functions of Banter in the IT Industry.” Humor 20 (2): 157–187. doi:10.1515/HUMOR.2007.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponterotto, Diane. 2003. “The Cohesive Role of Cognitive Metaphor in Discourse and Conversation.” In Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective, edited by Antonio Barcelona, 283–298. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Schnurr, Stephanie. 2009. Leadership Discourse at Work: Interactions of Humour, Gender and Workplace Culture. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, Muriel R. 1975. “How Serious is Sex Bias in Language?” College Composition and Communication 26 (2): 163–167.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, Muriel R. 2000. “The Semantic Degradation of Women (1975).” In The Routledge Language and Cultural Theory Reader, edited by Lucy Burke, Tony Cowley, and Alan Girvin, 82–91. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer-Oatey, Helen D. M. 2002. “Managing Rapport in Talk: Using Rapport Sensitive Incidents to Explore the Motivational Concerns Underlying the Management of Relations.” Journal of Pragmatics 34 (5): 529–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer-Oatey, Helen D. M. 2008. Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport Through Talk Across Cultures. 2nd ed. London and New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer-Oatey, Helen, and Dániel Z. Kádár. 2021. Intercultural Politeness: Managing Relations Across Cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, Julia Penelope. 1977. “Paradigmatic Woman: The Prostitute.” In Papers in Language Variation: SAMLA-ADS Collection, edited by David L. Shores and Carol Hines, 303–321. Alabama: Alabama University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stapleton, Karyn. 2010. “Swearing.” In Interpersonal Pragmatics, edited by Miriam A. Locher and Sage L. Graham, 289–306. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Steen, Gerard. 2017. “Deliberate Metaphor Theory: Basic Assumptions, Main Tenets, Urgent Issues.” Intercultural Pragmatics 14 (1): 1–24. doi:10.1515/ip-2017-0001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stollznow, Karen. 2020. On the Offensive: Prejudice in Language Past and Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sveen, Hanna. 2016. “Lava or Code Red: A Linguistic Study of Menstrual Expressions in English and Swedish.” Women's Reproductive Health 3 (3): 145–159.
   Google Scholar
• Tanfer, Koray, and Sevgi O. Aral. 1996. Sexual Intercourse During Menstruation and Self-Reported Sexually Transmitted Disease History among Women.” Sexually Transmitted Diseases 23 (5): 395–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, Charlotte. 2016. Mock Politeness in English and Italian. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Thibodeau, Paul H., and Lera Boroditsky. 2011. “Metaphors We Think With: The Role of Metaphor in Reasoning.” PLoS ONE 6 (2): e16782. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016782.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, John.B. 1984. Studies in the Theory of Ideology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thorne, Barrie, and Nancy Henley, eds. 1975. Sex and Language: Difference and Dominance. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
   Google Scholar
• Toivo, Taru Iris Wilhelmiina. 2020. “Reduced Emotional Resonance in Bilinguals’ L2: Potential Causes, Methods of Measurement, and Behavioural Implications.” Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Glasgow.
   Google Scholar
• Tokar, Alexander. 2015. “Metonymic Euphemism from a Cognitive Linguistic Point of View.” In Meaning, Frames, and Conceptual Representation. Studies in Language and Cognition, edited by Thomas Gamerschlag, Doris Gerland, Rainer Osswald, and Wiebke Petersen, 237–264. Düsseldorf: Düsseldorf University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van de Walle, Etienne, and Elisha P. Renne, eds. 2001. Regulating Menstruation: Beliefs, Practices, Interpretations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, Teun. 1998. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, Teun. 2008. Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, Teun. 2014. Discourse and Knowledge: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wald, Elijah. 2019. “Taboo Language Used as Banter.” In The Oxford Handbook of Taboo Words and Language, edited by Keith Allan, 334–352. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, Richard J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Werner, Heinz. 1919. Die Ursprünge der Metapher [The Originator of Metaphor]. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann.
   Google Scholar
• Widawski, Maicej. 2015. African American Slang: A Linguistic Description. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Widawski, Maicej, and Malgorzata Kowalczyk. 2011. The Dictionary of City Names in American Slang. Frankfurt: Peter Lang Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, Sherman. 2015. “Signed Languages.” In Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, edited by Ewa Dabrowska, and Dagmar Divjak, 668–689. Berlin, München, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, Galston, and Bee Chin Ng. 2018. “Moral Judgement in Early Bilinguals: Language Dominance Influences Responses to Moral Dilemmas.” Frontiers in Psychology 9: 1070. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zawrotna, Magdalena. 2018. “Taboo Subjects as Insult Intensifiers in Egyptian Arabic.” In Linguistic Taboo Revisited: Novel Insights from Cognitive Perspectives, edited by Andrea Pizarro Pedraza, 117–140. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar