A comparison of cultural representation and ideologies in the multimodal discourses of textbooks used in public and private Iranian contexts: a cross-textual study

References

• Adkins, L. 2013. “The Self in and through The Other: A Bakhtinian approach to Little Dorrit and Middlemarch.” PhD diss., University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Nakeeb, O., and S. Kunjamma. 2018. “Language and Ideology: Linguistic and Philosophical Perspectives.” India’s Higher Education Authority UGC Approved List of Journals 18: 137–148.
   Google Scholar
• Althusser, L. 1971. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses: Notes Towards an Investigation.” In Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, edited by L. Althusser, 80–87. London: New Left Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. 2000. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bezemer, J., and C. Jewitt. 2009. “Social Semiotics.” In Handbook of Pragmatics: 2009 Installment, edited by Jan-Ola Östman, Jef Verschueren, and Eline Versluys, 81–99. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. D. 1995. The Elements of the Language Curriculum:: A Systematic Approach to Program Development. Boston: Heinle ELT.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, D. 2002. Semiotics: The Basics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J. 2006. “Culture and Counterfactuals: On the Importance of Life Domains.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 37 (1): 75–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortazzi, M., and L. Jin. 1999. Cultural Mirrors: Materials and Methods in the EFL Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningsworth, A. 1995. Choosing Your Course Book. Oxford, England: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningsworth, A., and B. Tomlinson. 1984. Evaluating and Selecting EFL Teaching Materials. London: Heinemann Educational.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fantini, A. E. 1995. “ABA-ZAK: A Worldview Exercise.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations 19 (2): 297–302. doi:10.1016/0147-1767(95)00011-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. Baltimore: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A., and R. Hasan. 1989. Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hinkel, E. 1999. Culture in Second Language Teaching and Learning, 131–137. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, B., and G. R. Kress. 1988. Social Semiotics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, Robert. 2006. “Language (s) in the Global News: Translation, Audience Design, and Discourse (mis) Representation.” Target 18 (2): 229–259.
   Google Scholar
• Holquist, M. 2002. Dialogism: Bakhtin and His World. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C., ed. 2009. The Routledge Handbook for Multimodal Analysis. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C., and G. Kress, eds. 2003. Multimodal Literacy. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Kachru, B. B. 1986. The Alchemy of English: The Spread, Functions, and Models of Non-native Englishes, 127–147. New York, NY: Pergamon Institute of English.
   Google Scholar
• Kheirabadi, R., and S. B. Alavi Moghadam. 2014. “New Horizons in Teaching English in Iran: A Transition from Reading-based Methods to Communicative Ones by” English for Schools” Series.” International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World 5 (4): 225–232.
   Google Scholar
• Kramsch, C. 1993. Context and Culture in Language Teaching, 233–256. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kramsch, C. 2009. Contemporary Applied Linguistics: Volume 1 Language Teaching and Learning, edited by L. Wei and V. Cook, 233–254. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. 2010. Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London & New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. R., and B. Hodge. 1979. Language as Ideology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K. Y. 2009. “Treating Culture: What 11 High School EFL Conversation Textbooks in South Korea1 do.” English Teaching: Practice and Critique 8 (1): 76–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macgilchrist, F. 2017. “Textbooks.” In Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, edited by J. Flowerdew, and J. Richardson, 525–539. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McKay, S. L. 2002. Teaching English as an International Language: Rethinking Goals and Approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKay, S. 2003. “Teaching English as an International Language: The Chilean Context.” ELT Journal . doi:10.1093/elt/57.2.139.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, M. 2011. “Learning to Communicate in a Globalized World: To What Extent Do School Textbooks Facilitate the Development of Intercultural Pragmatic Competence?.” RELC Journal 42 (1): 17–30. doi:10.1177/0033688210390265.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. 1931. The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Vol. 1, 101–155. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Phillipson, R. 1992. Linguistic Imperialism, 57–76. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pulverness, A. 2004. "Here and There: Issues In Materials Development for Intercultural Learning.” Teachers' Forum. British Council web site. http://elt.britcoun.org.pl/forum/handt.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, J. C. 2001. Curriculum Development in Language Teaching, 23–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogti, M. 2019. “Critical Discourse Analysis in Literature-Oriented Classes: A Theoretical Perspective.” European Academic Research Vii (6): 3327–3330.
   Google Scholar
• Sajid, M. J. 2015. “Ideology in Text Books.” Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Studies 03 (06): 575–576.
   Google Scholar
• Sammler, S. 2018. “Textbook Research: Past Achievements, Current Developments, Future Challenges. A Georg Eckert Institut Researcher's View.” Didacticae 4: 74–84.
   Google Scholar
• Setyono, B., and H. P. Widodo. 2019. “The Representation of Multicultural Values in the Indonesian Ministry of Education and Culture-Endorsed EFL Textbook: A Critical Discourse Analysis.” Intercultural Education 30 (4): 383–397. doi:10.1080/14675986.2019.1548102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skutnabb-Kangas, T. 2000. Linguistic Genocide in Education–or Worldwide Diversity and Human Rights?, 261–289. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C., and J. Sheyholislami. 2022. “Current Trends in Critical Discourse Studies of Textbooks: A Look at Selected Literature.” Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics / Revue Canadienne de Linguistique Appliquée 25 (1): 47–63. doi:10.37213/cjal.2022.31515.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, B. 2012. “Materials Development for Language Learning and Teaching.” Language Teaching 45 (2): 143–179. doi:10.1017/S0261444811000528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng, Y. 2002. “A Lesson in Culture.” ELT Journal 56 (1): 11–21. doi:10.1093/elt/56.1.11.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A., ed. 2011. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, 37–64. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, T. 2005. Introducing Social Semiotics, 160–179. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weninger, C. 2020. “Multimodality in Critical Language Textbook Analysis.” Language, Culture and Curriculum 0 (0): 1–14. doi:10.1080/07908318.2020.1797083.
   Google Scholar
• Weninger, C., and T. Kiss. 2013. “Culture in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Textbooks: A Semiotic Approach.” TESOL Quarterly 47 (4): 694–716. doi:10.1002/tesq.87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yassine, S. 2012. “Culture Ideology and Otherness in EFL Textbooks in Algeria: A Multimodal Approach” Ph.D. diss., Mouloudi Mammeri University of Tizi-Ouzou, Algeria.
   Google Scholar
• Yuen, K. 2011. “The Representation of Foreign Cultures in English Textbooks.” ELT Journal 65 (4): 458–466. doi:10.1093/elt/ccq089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar