How Legislators Frame Contentious Megaprojects: Insights from Parliamentary Debates on Letpadaung Mines and Myitsone Dam in Myanmar

References

• Amnesty International. (2017). Mountain of trouble: Human rights abuses continue at Myanmar’s Letpadaung mine. Amnesty International.
   Google Scholar
• Apter, D. E., & Sawa, N. (1984). Against the state: Politics and social protest in Japan. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aung, G. (2018). Postcolonial capitalism and the politics of dispossession: Political trajectories in Southern Myanmar. European Journal of East Asian Studies, 17, 193–227.
   Google Scholar
• Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 611–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras, S. M., Jr., Hall, R., Scoones, I., White, B., & Wolford, W. (2011). Towards a better understanding of global land grabbing: An editorial introduction. Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(2), 209–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bugden, D., Evensen, D., & Stedman, R. (2017). A drill by any other name: Social representations, framing, and legacies of natural resource extraction in the fracking industry. Energy Research and Social Science, 29, 62–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bünte, M. (2017). Policing politics: Myanmar’s military regime and protest spaces in transition. In E. Hansson & M. L. Weiss (Eds.), Political participation in Asia: Defining and deploying political space. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Buttel, F. H. (2005). The environmental and post-environmental politics of genetically modified crops and foods. Environmental Politics, 14(3), 309–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, C. (2018). Winners and losers: Land grabbing in the new Myanmar. In C. Carter & A. Harding (Eds.), Land grabs in Asia: What role for the law? Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, D. S. W. (2017). Asymmetric bargaining between Myanmar and China in the Myitsone dam controversy: Social opposition akin to David’s stone against Goliath. Pacific Review, 30(5), 674–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, D. S. W., & Ngai Pun. (2020). Renegotiating Belt and Road cooperation: Social resistance in a Sino–Myanmar copper mine. Third World Quarterly, 41(12), 2109–2129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, D. S. W., & Ngai Pun. (2022). Reactive to domestic constraints: Dynamic operations of a China-backed copper mine in Myanmar, 2011–2021. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 63(5), 653–677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheesman, N. (2014). What does the rule of law have to do with democratization (in Myanmar)? South East Asia Research, 22(2), 213–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chheat, S. (2022). Contesting China-funded projects in Cambodia: The case of Stung Chhay Areng Hydropower. Asian Studies Review, 46(1), 19–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 103–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edberg, K., & Tarasova, E. (2016). Phasing out or phasing in: Framing the role of nuclear power in the Swedish energy transition. Energy Research & Social Science, 13, 170–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egreteau, R. (2021). The inchoate legislative scrutiny of the Myanmar police forces: A study of the USDP legislature (2011–16). Contemporary Southeast Asia, 43(3), 531–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egreteau, R. (2022). Crafting parliament in Myanmar’s disciplined democracy (2011–2021). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fink, C. (2015). Myanmar’s proactive national legislature. Social Forces, 82(2), 327–354.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B., & Molloy, E. (2011). Delusion, deception, and corruption in major infrastructure projects: Causes, consequences, and cures. In S. Rose-Ackerman & T. Soreide (Eds.), International handbook on the economics of corruption (Vol. II). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Foran, T., Kiik, L., Hatt, S., Fullbrook, D., Dawkins, A., Walker, S., & Chen, Y. (2017). Large hydropower and legitimacy: A policy regime analysis, applied to Myanmar. Energy Policy, 110, 619–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gellert, P. K., & Lynch, B. D. (2003). Mega-projects as displacements. International Social Science Journal, 55(175), 15–25.
   Google Scholar
• Huda, M. S. (2022). Autocratic power? Energy megaprojects in the age of democratic backsliding. Energy Research & Social Science, 90, 102605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Human Rights Watch [HRW]. (2018). ‘Nothing for our land’: Impact of land confiscation on farmers in Myanmar. HRW.
   Google Scholar
• Kachin Development Networking Group [KDNG]. (2007). Damming the Irrawaddy. KDNG Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kachin Development Networking Group [KDNG]. (2010). Tyrants, tycoons, and tigers: Yuzana company ravages Burma’s Hugawng Valley. KDNG Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Karen Human Rights Group [KHRG]. (2015). ‘With only our voices, what can we do?’ Land confiscation and local response in Southeast Myanmar. KHRG Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kean, T. (2014). Myanmar’s parliament: From scorn to significance. In N. Cheesman, N. Farrelly, & T. Wilson (Eds.), Debating democratisation in Myanmar. ISEAS Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kiik, L. (2016). Nationalism and anti-ethno-politics: Why ‘Chinese development’ failed at Myanmar’s Myitsone dam. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 57(3), 374–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiik, L. (2020). Confluences amid conflict: How resisting China’s Myitsone dam project linked Kachin and Bamar nationalisms in war-torn Burma. Journal of Burma Studies, 24(2), 229–273.
   Google Scholar
• Kiik, L. (2023). Inter-national conspiracy? Speculating on the Myitsone dam controversy in China, Burma, Kachin, and a displaced village. Geopolitics, 28(1), 72–98.
   Google Scholar
• Kirchherr, J. (2018). Strategies of successful anti-dam movements: Evidence from Myanmar and Thailand. Society & Natural Resources, 31(2),166–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchherr, J., Charles, K. J., & Walton, M. J. (2016). Multi-causal pathways of public opposition to dam projects in Asia: A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA). Global Environmental Change, 41, 33–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchherr, J., Charles, K. J., & Walton, M. J. (2017). The interplay of activists and dam developers: The case of Myanmar’s mega-dams. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 33(1), 111–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locatelli, G., Mariani, G., Sainati, T., & Greco, M. (2017). Corruption in public projects and megaprojects: There is an elephant in the room! International Journal of Project Management, 35(3), 252–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, S. (2016). Myanmar’s resource nationalism and its influence. In C. Li et al. (Eds.), Myanmar: Reintegrating to the international community. World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D. (1996). The framing function of movement tactics: Strategic dramaturgy in the American civil rights movement. In D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy, & M. M. Zald (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mendoza, R. U., Bertulfo, D. J., & Cruz, J. P. E. (2018). From megaproject to white elephant: Lessons from the Philippines’s Bataan nuclear power plant. Philippines Studies, 66(3), 335–374.
   Google Scholar
• Min Zin. (2012). Burmese attitude toward Chinese: Portrayal of the Chinese in contemporary cultural and media works. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 31(1), 115–131.
   Google Scholar
• Morris-Jung, J. (Ed.). (2017). China’s backyard: Policies and politics of Chinese resource investments in Southeast Asia. ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsen, A. G. (2010). Dispossession & resistance in India: The river and the rage. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Noakes, J. A. (2000). Official frames in social movement theory: The FBI, HUAC, and the communist threat in Hollywood. Sociological Quarterly, 41(4), 657–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasse-Freeman, E. (2016). Grassroots protest movements and mutating conceptions of the political in an evolving Burma. In R. Egreteau & F. Robinne (Eds.), Metamorphosis: Studies in social and political change in Myanmar. NUS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roggeband, C., & Vliegenthart, R. (2007). Divergent framing: The public debate on migration in the Dutch parliament and media, 1995–2004. West European Politics, 30(3), 524–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, C., & Gamson, W. A. (2006). The art of reframing political debates. Contexts, 5(1), 13–18.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, A. (2013). Challenging hydropower development in Myanmar (Burma): Cross-border activism under a regime in transition. Pacific Review, 26(2), 129–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, A. (2016). Energy, governance, and security in Thailand and Myanmar (Burma): A critical approach to environmental politics in the South. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sovacool, B., & Cooper, C. J. (2013). The governance of energy megaprojects: Politics, hubris, and energy security. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Tang-Lee, D. (2016). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) and public engagement for a Chinese state-backed mining project in Myanmar – challenges and prospects. Resources Policy, 47, 28–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang-Lee, D. (2017). Complex contestation of Chinese energy and resource investments in Myanmar. In J. Morris-Jung (Ed.), China’s backyard: Policies and politics of Chinese resource investments in Southeast Asia. ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, H., Xu, J., & Wong-Parodi, G. (2019). The politics of Asian fracking: Public risk perceptions towards shale gas development in China. Energy Research and Social Science, 54, 46–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Transnational Institute [TNI]. (2015). The meaning of land in Myanmar: A primer. TNI.
   Google Scholar
• Werner, H. (2015). The politics of dams: Developmental perspectives and social critique in modern India. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chit Win. (2016). The Hluttaw and conflicts in Myanmar. In N. Cheesman & N. Farrelly (Eds.), Conflict in Myanmar: War, politics, religion. ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, K. (2015). Commercial agriculture expansion in Myanmar: Links to deforestation, conversion timber, and land conflicts. Forest Trends Report Series.
   Google Scholar
• Zerrouk, E. (2016). Development-forced land grabs and resistance in reforming Myanmar: The Letpadaung copper mine. In S. Price & J. Singer (Eds.), Global implications of development, disasters, and climate change. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zerrouk, E., & Neef, A. (2014). The media discourse of land grabbing and resistance during Myanmar’s legal reformation: The Monywa copper mine. Law and Development Review, 7(2), 275–312.
   Google Scholar