A parametric 3D printed assistive device for people with cerebral palsy – assessment of outcomes and comparison with a commercial counterpart

References

• Andrich, R. (2011). Towards a global information network: The European assistive technology information network and the world alliance of at information providers. In R. Thorsen, D. Cugnod, M. Ramella, R. M. Converti, & M. Ferrarin (Eds.), Everyday technology for independence and care (pp. 190–197). IOS Press. https://ebooks.iospress.nl/volume/everyday-technology-for-independence-and-care
   Google Scholar
• Bromley, I. (2006). Tetraplegia and paraplegia: A guide for physiotherapists. Elsevier Health Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Demers, L., Weiss Lambrou, R., & Ska, B. (2002). The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0): An overview and recent progress. Technology and Disability, 14(3), 101–105. https://doi.org/10.3233/TAD-2002-14304
   Google Scholar
• Federici, S., & Borsci, S. (2016). Providing assistive technology in Italy: The perceived delivery process quality as affecting abandonment. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 11(1), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2014.930191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, G., Dickinson, C., Brittain, K., & Robinson, L. (2019). Personalisation, customisation and bricolage: How people with dementia and their families make assistive technology work for them. Ageing and Society, 39(11), 2502–2519. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X18000661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gower, V., Andrich R., Agnoletto A., Winkelmann P., Lyhne T., Rozis R., & Thurmair G. (2012). The European assistive technology information portal (EASTIN): Improving usability through language technologies. In International Conference on Computers for Handicapped Persons. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 9999 Assistive Products for Persons with Disability–Classification and Terminology. (2011). Draft international standard 2010 (5th ed.). International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Parametric online configurator. (2022, March). www.grippos.it
   Google Scholar
• Piergrossi, J. C. (2013). The function of “doing” in the intermediate space: Donald Winnicott and occupational therapy. In L. Nicholls, J. Piergrossi, C. de Sena Gibertoni, & M. Daniel (Eds.), Psychoanalytic thinking in occupational therapy (pp. 57–67). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, M. J., & Craddock, G. (2002). Matching person & technology (MPT) assessment process. Technology and Disability, 14(3), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.3233/TAD-2002-14308
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, J. K., Fermin, A., Fine, K., Iglesias, N., Pivarnik, D., Struck, S., Varela, N., & Janes, W. E. (2020). Methodology and feasibility of a 3D printed assistive technology intervention. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 15(2), 141–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2018.1539877
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorsen, R., Bortot, F., & Caracciolo, A. (2019). From patient to maker-a case study of co-designing an assistive device using 3D printing. Assistive Technology, 33(6), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2019.1634660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorsen, R., Cugnod, D., Ramella, M., Converti, R. M., & Ferrarin, M. (2023). From patient to maker-A workflow including people with cerebral palsy in co-creating assistive devices using 3D printing technologies. Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology, 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veneziano, F., Tirone, D., Masuccio, F. G., Actis, M. V., & Massazza, G. (2015). A new magnetic device for quadriplegia. Spinal Cord Series and Cases, 1, 15014. https://doi.org/10.1038/scsandc.2015.14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wessels, R., Persson, J., Lorentsen, Ø., Andrich, R., Ferrario, M., Oortwijn, W., VanBeekum T., Brodin H., & De Witte L. (2002). IPPA: Individually prioritised problem assessment. Technology and Disability, 14(3), 141–145. https://doi.org/10.3233/TAD-2002-14310
   Google Scholar