The REHAB-LAB model for individualized assistive device co-creation and production

References

• Aflatoony, L., & Lee, S. J. (2020). CODEA: A framework for co-designing assistive technologies with occupational therapists, industrial designers, and end-users with mobility impairments. Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference, 1, 1843–1852. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.332
   Google Scholar
• Aflatoony, L., Lee, S. J., & Sanford, J. (2021). Collective making: Co-designing 3D printed assistive technologies with occupational therapists, designers, and end-users. Assistive Technology, 35(2), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2021.1983070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allègre, W. (2020). REHAB-LAB 4U community [2019-2020]. REHAB-LAB La communauté. https://rehab-lab.org/categories/projects/projet-rehab-lab-4-u-2019-2020
   Google Scholar
• Allègre, W. (2021). Projet REHAB-LAB 4ALL [2020-2021]. REHAB-LAB La communauté. https://rehab-lab.org/categories/projects/rehab-lab-4-all
   Google Scholar
• Allègre, W., David, S., Gaudin, P., Le Besque, R., Marivain, S., & Departe, J.-P. (2017). REHAB-LAB, aides techniques et impression 3D: de «patient » à «créateur ». ErgOThérapies, 67, 59–70. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333457927_REHAB-LAB_aides_techniques_et_impression_3D_de_patient_a_createur#:~:text=C%27est%20un%20nouvel%20outil,(ou%20le%20référent%20technologique)
   Google Scholar
• Assistive Technology Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. Public Law 108–364, [H.R. 4278] 118 SAT. 1707 1707 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, S., Elsaesser, L.-J., Scherer, M., Sax, C., & Arthanat, S. (2014). Promoting a standard for assistive technology service delivery. Technology and Disability, 26(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.3233/TAD-140403
   Google Scholar
• Booth, A., & Rohwer, A. (2016). Guidance on the use of logic models in health technology assessment of complex interventions. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1269.4807
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, Å., Hansen, E. M., & Christensen, J. R. (2020). The effects of assistive technology service delivery processes and factors associated with positive outcomes – A systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 15(5), 590–603. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2019.1682067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buehler, E., Hurst, A., & Hofmann, M. (2014). Coming to grips: 3D printing for accessibility. In Proceedings of the 16th International ACM SIGACCESS conference on computers & accessibility - ASSETS ’14 (pp. 291–292). https://doi.org/10.1145/2661334.2661345
   Google Scholar
• Delarosa, E., Donnelly, C., Murphy, S., & Davies, C. (2018). Building better together: Engineering design with occupational therapists and end users. In Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association. CEEA. https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.v0i0.10188
   Google Scholar
• Desmond, D., Layton, N., Bentley, J., Boot, F. H., Borg, J., Dhungana, B. M., Gallagher, P., Gitlow, L., Gowran, R. J., Groce, N., Mavrou, K., Mackeogh, T., McDonald, R., Pettersson, C., & Scherer, M. J. (2018). Assistive technology and people: A position paper from the first global research, innovation and education on assistive technology (GREAT) summit. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 13(5), 437–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2018.1471169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganesan, B., Al-Jumaily, A., & Luximon, A. (2016). 3D printing technology applications in occupational therapy. Physical Medicine Rehabilitation-International, 3(3), 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Gherardini, F., Mascia, M. T., Bettelli, V., & Leali, F. (2019). A co-design method for the additive manufacturing of customised assistive devices for hand pathologies. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science, 22(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.3233/jid-2018-0002
   Google Scholar
• Gill, S. V., Khetani, M. A., Yinusa-Nyahkoon, L., McManus, B., Gardiner, P. M., & Tickle Degnen, L. (2017). Forging alliances in interdisciplinary rehabilitation research (FAIRR): A logic model. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 96(7), 479–486. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000654
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holliday, L. R. (2014). Using logic model mapping to evaluate program fidelity. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 42, 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2014.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, J., Fisher, Z., Kemp, A. H., Lindsay, S., Tasker, L. H., & Tree, J. J. (2022). Exploring the barriers to using assistive technology for individuals with chronic conditions: A meta-synthesis review. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 17(4), 390–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1788181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurst, A., & Tobias, J. (2011). Empowering individuals with do-it-yourself assistive technology. In The Proceedings of the 13th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility - ASSETS ’11 (pp. 11). https://doi.org/10.1145/2049536.2049541
   Google Scholar
• Julien, C., Lamontagne, M.-E., Julien-Gauthier, F., St-Pierre, M.-C., & Desmarais, C. (2021). Using a five-step logic model development process to design an intervention for adolescents with developmental language disorder. Canadian Journal of Speech-Language Pathology & Audiology, 45(3), 167–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S. A., & Garrett, K. E. (2005). The use of logic models by community-based initiatives. Evaluation and Program Planning, 28(2), 167–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2004.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kothari, A., & Wathen, C. N. (2013). A critical second look at integrated knowledge translation. Health Policy, 109(2), 187–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.11.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson Ranada, Å., & Lidström, H. (2019). Satisfaction with assistive technology device in relation to the service delivery process—A systematic review. Assistive Technology, 31(2), 82–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2017.1367737
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K. H., Kim, D. K., Cha, Y. H., Kwon, J.-Y., Kim, D.-H., & Kim, S. J. (2019). Personalized assistive device manufactured by 3D modelling and printing techniques. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 14(5), 526–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2018.1494217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemaire, D. (2016). Mobilizing knowledge: The evidence gap for assistive devices. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(9), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1018
   Google Scholar
• Lexis, M. A. S., Slegers, K., Hagedoren, E., van der Heide, L., Jansens, R., & Daniels, R. (2022). Perspectives on 3D printing technology for manufacturing customized assistive technology in rehabilitation by occupational therapists. ICCHP-AAATE 2022 Open Access Compendium, Assistive Technology, Accessibility(pp. 42–52). https://doi.org/10.35011/ICCHP-AAATE22-P2-06
   Google Scholar
• Li, W., & Sellers, C. (2009). Improving assistive technology economics for people with disabilities: Harnessing the voluntary and education sectors. In 2009 IEEE Toronto International Conference Science and Technology for Humanity (TIC-STH) (pp. 789–794). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIC-STH.2009.5444391
   Google Scholar
• Mahapatra, C., Jensen, J. K., McQuaid, M., & Ashbrook, D. (2019). Barriers to end-user designers of augmented fabrication. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–15). https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300613
   Google Scholar
• Meissner, J. L., Vines, J., McLaughlin, J., Nappey, T., Maksimova, J., & Wright, P. (2017). Do-it-yourself empowerment as experienced by novice makers with disabilities. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 1053–1065). https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064674
   Google Scholar
• Mihailidis, A., & Polgar, J. M. (2016). Occupational therapy and engineering: Being better together. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 83(2), 68–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008417416638842
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar, A., Simeone, R. S., & Carnevale, J. T. (2001). Logic models: A systems tool for performance management. Evaluation and Program Planning, 24(1), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7189(00)00048-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, T., Lawton, R., & Sheard, L. (2019). Advancing complexity science in healthcare research: The logic of logic models. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0701-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Naderifar, M., Goli, H., & Ghaljaie, F. (2017). Snowball sampling : A purposeful method of sampling in qualitative research. Strides in Development of Medical Education, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.5812/sdme.67670
   Google Scholar
• Ostuzzi, F., Rognoli, V., Saldien, J., & Levi, M. (2015). +TUO project: Low cost 3D printers as helpful tool for small communities with rheumatic diseases. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 21(5), 491–505. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-09-2014-0111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, B., & Zhao, H. (1993). Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assistive Technology, 5(1), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.1993.10132205
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• REHAB-LAB. (2021). Charte de la communauté REHAB-LAB. Charte de la communauté REHAB-LAB. https://rehab-lab.org/charter
   Google Scholar
• REHAB-LAB. (2022). Communauté des FAB-LABs intégrés, spécialisés, solidaires. REHAB-LAB La communauté. https://rehab-lab.org/
   Google Scholar
• Russo, L. O., Airò Farulla, G., & Boccazzi Varotto, C. (2018). Hackability : A methodology to encourage the development of DIY assistive devices. In K. Miesenberger & G. Kouroupetroglou (Eds.), Computers helping people with special needs (Vol. 10897, pp. 156–163). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94274-2_22
   Google Scholar
• Santos, A. V. F., Licursi, L., Amaral, M., Cavalcanti, A., & Silviera, Z. (2019). User-centered design of a customized assistive device to support feeding. Procedia CIRP, 84, 743–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.318
   Google Scholar
• Santos, A. V. F., & Silveira, Z. C. (2021). Design for assistive technology oriented to design methodology: A systematic review on user-centered design and 3D printing approaches. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 43(11), 483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-021-03184-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, A., & Silveira, Z. (2020). AT-d8sign: Methodology to support development of assistive devices focused on user-centered design and 3D technologies. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 42(5), 260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-02347-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, J. (2018). A 3D-Printed assistive technology intervention: A phase I trial. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 72(4_Supplement_1), 72115152791–72115152791. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2018.72S1-RP302B
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, J. K., Fermin, A., Fine, K., Iglesias, N., Pivarnik, D., Struck, S., Varela, N., & Janes, W. E. (2020). Methodology and feasibility of a 3D printed assistive technology intervention. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 15(2), 141–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2018.1539877
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slegers, K., Krieg, A. M., Lexis, M. A., & Hilton, C. (2022). Acceptance of 3D printing by occupational therapists: An exploratory survey study. Occupational Therapy International, 2022, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4241907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorsen, R., Bortot, F., & Caracciolo, A. (2021). From patient to maker—A case study of co-designing an assistive device using 3D printing. Assistive Technology, 33(6), 306–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2019.1634660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorsen, R., Cugnod, D., Ramella, M., Converti, R. M., & Ferrarin, M. (2023). From patient to maker-a workflow including people with cerebral palsy in co-creating assistive devices using 3D printing technologies. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2023.2177754
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, J. B., Scheinfeld, L., Leeman, B., Pardini, K., Saragossi, J., & Flood, K. (2018). Three professions come together for an interdisciplinary approach to 3D printing: Occupational therapy, biomedical engineering, and medical librarianship. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 106(3). https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojcik, B. W. (2015). Learning from experience : Understanding assistive technology knowledge and skills through an online community of practice. In D. L. Edyburn (Ed.), Advances in special education technology (Vol. 1, pp. 203–227). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2056-769320150000001008
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization & United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). (2022). Global report on assistive technology. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/354357
   Google Scholar