Evaluating Camera Mouse as a computer access system for augmentative and alternative communication in cerebral palsy: A case study

References

• Bates, R., & Istance, H. O. (2003). Why are eye mice unpopular? A detailed comparison of head and eye controlled assistive technology pointing devices. Universal Access in the Information Society, 2(3), 280–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-003-0053-y
   Google Scholar
• Beck, A., Fritz, H., Keller, A., & Dennis, M. (2000). Attitudes of school-aged children toward their peers who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610012331278874
   Google Scholar
• Betke, M., Gips, J., & Fleming, P. (2002). The camera mouse: Visual tracking of body features to provide computer access for people with severe disabilities. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 10(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2002.1021581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R., & Light, J. C. (2020). Augmentative & alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (5th ed.). Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co., Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Binger, C., & Light, J. (2008). The morphology and syntax of individuals who use AAC: Research review and implications for effective practice. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610701830587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryen, D. N., Potts, B. B., & Carey, A. C. (2007). So you want to work? What employers say about job skills, recruitment and hiring employees who rely on AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23(2), 126–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610600991175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buxton, W., Foulds, R., Rosen, M., Scadden, L., & Shein, F. (1986). Human interface design and the handicapped user. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 17(4), 291–297. https://doi.org/10.1145/22339.22386
   Google Scholar
• Chung, Y., Behrmann, M., Bannan, B., & Thorp, E. (2012). Perspectives of high tech augmentative and alternative communication users with cerebral palsy at the post-secondary level. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21(2), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1044/aac21.2.43
   Google Scholar
• Cockerill, H., Elbourne, D., Allen, E., Scrutton, D., Will, E., McNee, A. Fairhurst, C., & Baird, G. (2014). Speech, communication and use of augmentative communication in young people with cerebral palsy: The SH&PE population study. Child: Care, Health and Development, 40(2), 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, L., Balandin, S., & Trembath, D. (2009). The loneliness experiences of young adults with cerebral palsy who use alternative and augmentative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25(3), 154–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610903036785
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dattilo, J., Estrella, G., Estrella, L. J., Light, J., McNaughton, D., & Seabury, M. (2008). “I have chosen to live life abundantly”: Perceptions of leisure by adults who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610701390558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demers, L., Monette, M., Lapierre, Y., Arnold, D. L., & Wolfson, C. (2002). Reliability, validity, and applicability of the Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST 2.0) for adults with multiple sclerosis. Disability & Rehabilitation, 24(1–3), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280110066352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demers, L., Weiss-Lambrou, R., & Ska, B. (2002). The Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST 2.0): An overview and recent progress. Technology and Disability, 14(3), 101–105. https://doi.org/10.3233/TAD-2002-14304
   Google Scholar
• Fager, S. K. (2018). Alternative access for adults who rely on augmentative and alternative communication. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 3(12), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.1044/PERSP3.SIG12.6
   Google Scholar
• Fager, S. K., Beukelman, D. R., Fried-Oken, M., Jakobs, T., & Baker, J. (2012). Access interface strategies. Assistive Technology, 24(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2011.648712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, W., Zou, J., Kurauchi, A., Morimoto, C. H., & Betke, M. (2021). Hgaze typing: Head-gesture assisted gaze typing. In ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (pp. 1–11). Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, J. M., & Dagenais, P. A. (1998). Dysarthric sentence intelligibility: Contribution of iconic gestures and message predictiveness. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: JSLHR, 41(6), 1282–1293. https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4106.1282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gips, J. (2017). Camera Mouse 2018 user manual. http://www.cameramouse.org/downloads/CameraMouse2018Manual.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gips, J., Betke, M., & Fleming, P. (2000). The Camera Mouse: Preliminary investigation of automated visual tracking for computer access. In Proceedings of RESNA 2000, (pp. 98–100).
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J. (2009). In-person interaction in AAC: New perspectives on utterances, multimodality, timing, and device design. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18(4), 154–160. https://doi.org/10.1044/aac18.4.154
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, S. (2007). Why is the potential of augmentative and alternative communication not being realized? Exploring the experiences of people who use communication aids. Disability & Society, 22(5), 457–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590701427552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hustad, K. C., Schueler, B., Schultz, L., & DuHadway, C. (2012). Intelligibility of 4-year-old children with and without cerebral palsy. Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research, 55(4), 1177–1189. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2011/11-0083)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MATLAB. (2013). The MathWorks Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. F., Andriacchi, K., & Nockerts, A. (2011). Assessing language production using SALT software: A clinician’s guide to language sample analysis. SALT Software, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J., & Iglesias, A. (2012). Systematic analysis of language transcripts (SALT). SALT Software LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Ramirez, R. D. (2018). Evaluating the usability of three accessible smartphone designs by people with cerebral palsy. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 72(4_Supplement_1), 7211500063p1. https://doi.org/10.5014/AJOT.2018.72S1-PO7009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Schölderle, T., Staiger, A., Lampe, R., Strecker, K., & Ziegler, W. (2016). Dysarthria in adults with cerebral palsy: Clinical presentation and impacts on communication. Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research, 59(2), 216–229. https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_JSLHR-S-15-0086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shikako-Thomas, K., Majnemer, A., Law, M., & Lach, L. (2008). Determinants of participation in leisure activities in children and youth with cerebral palsy: Systematic review. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 28(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/01942630802031834
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith, A., Thruston, S., Light, J., Parnes, P., & O’Keefe, B. (1989). The form and use of written communication produced by physically disabled individuals using microcomputers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5(2), 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618912331275096
   Google Scholar
• Vojtech, J. M., Hablani, S., Cler, G. J., & Stepp, C. E. (2020). Integrated head-tilt and electromyographic cursor control. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 28(6), 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2020.2987144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yorkston, K. M., Beukelman, D. R., & Hakel, M. (1996). Speech Intelligibility Test for Windows.
   Google Scholar
• Yorkston, K. M., Beukelman, D. R., Smith, K., & Tice, R. (1990). Extended communication samples of augmented communicators II: Analysis of multiword sequences. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55(2), 225–230. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.5502.225
   PubMedGoogle Scholar