References
- Borg, J., Larsson, S., Östergren, P.-O., Atiqur Rahman, A., Bari, N., & Noman Khan, A. (2012). User involvement in service delivery predicts outcomes of assistive technology use: A cross-sectional study in Bangladesh. BMC Health Services Research, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-330
- Brandt, Å., Hansen, E. M., & Christensen, J. R. (2020). The effects of assistive technology service delivery processes and factors associated with positive outcomes – a systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 15(5), 590–603. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2019.1682067
- Craddock, G., & McCormack, L. (2002). Delivering an at service: A client-focused, social and participatory service delivery model in assistive technology in Ireland. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24(1–3), 160–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280110063869
- de Witte, L., Steel, E., Gupta, S., Ramos, V. D., & Roentgen, U. (2018). Assistive technology provision: Towards an international framework for assuring availability and accessibility of affordable high-quality assistive technology. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 13(5), 467–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2018.1470264
- Elsaesser, L.-J., & Bauer, S. M. (2011). Provision of assistive technology services method (ATSM) according to evidence-based information and knowledge management. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 6(5), 386–401. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2011.557763
- Federici, S., Scherer, M. J., & Borsci, S. (2014). An ideal model of an assistive technology assessment and delivery process. Technology and Disability, 26(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.3233/TAD-140402
- Larsson Ranada, Å., & Lidström, H. (2019). Satisfaction with assistive technology device in relation to the service delivery process—A systematic review. Assistive Technology, 31(2), 82–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2017.1367737
- Pedersen, H., Kermit, P. S., & Söderström, S. (2021). “You have to argue the right way”: User involvement in the service delivery process for assistive activity technology. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 16(8), 840–850. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1741702
- Ripat, J., & Booth, A. (2005). Characteristics of assistive technology service delivery models: Stakeholder perspectives and preferences. Disability and Rehabilitation, 27(24), 1461–1470. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280500264535
- Visagie, S., Scheffler, E., Seymour, N., & Mji, G. (2020). Assistive technology service delivery in South Africa: Conceptualising a systems approach. South African Health Review, 2020(1), 119–127.
- World Health Organization. (2008). Guidelines on the provision of manual wheelchairs in less resourced-settings.
- World Health Organization. (2023). WHO wheelchair provision guidelines.