Exploring Interprofessional Development of Entrustable Professional Activities For Pediatric Intensive Care Fellows: A Proof-of-Concept Study

References

• Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, et al. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. The Lancet. 2010;376(9756):1923–1958. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61854-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgar L, Sydney McLean C, Sean Hogan MO, Hamstra S, Holmboe ES. The Milestones Guidebook. https://www.acgme.org/What-We-Do/Accreditation/Milestones/Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Frank JR, Snell L, Sherbino J. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. CanMEDS 2015 Physician Competency Framework.
   Google Scholar
• ten Cate O, Schumacher DJ. Entrustable professional activities versus competencies and skills: Exploring why different concepts are often conflated. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2022;27(2):491–499. doi:10.1007/s10459-022-10098-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ten Cate O. Entrustability of professional activities and competency-based training. Med Educ. 2005;39(12):1176–1177. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02341.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Dowd E, Lydon S, O’Connor P, Madden C, Byrne D. A systematic review of 7 years of research on entrustable professional activities in graduate medical education, 2011–2018. Med Educ. 2019;53(3):234–249. doi:10.1111/medu.13792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shorey S, Lau TC, Lau ST, Ang E. Entrustable professional activities in health care education: a scoping review. Med Educ. 2019;53(8):766–777. doi:10.1111/medu.13879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ten Cate O, Chen HC, Hoff RG, Peters H, Bok H, van der Schaaf M. Curriculum development for the workplace using Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs): AMEE Guide No. 99. Med Teach. 2015;37(11):983–1002. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2015.1060308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnenberg LK, Pritchard-Wiart L, Hodgson CS, Yu YQ, King S. Assessment of resident physicians’ communicator and collaborator competencies by interprofessional clinicians: a mixed-methods study. Teach Learn Med. 2017;29(4):392–401. doi:10.1080/10401334.2017.1301817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feller K, Berendonk C. Identity matters – Perceptions of inter-professional feedback in the context of workplace-based assessment in diabetology training: a qualitative study. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(1):33. doi:10.1186/s12909-020-1932-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Vleuten CPM, Schuwirth LWT, Scheele F, Driessen EW, Hodges B. The assessment of professional competence: building blocks for theory development. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;24(6):703–719. doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2010.04.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnon T, Al Ansari A, Al Alawi S, Violato C. The reliability, validity, and feasibility of multisource feedback physician assessment: a systematic review. Acad Med. 2014;89(3):511–516. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weller JM, Castanelli DJ, Chen Y, Jolly B. Making robust assessments of specialist trainees’ workplace performance. Br J Anaesth. 2017;118(2):207–214. doi:10.1093/bja/aew412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weller JM, Misur M, Nicolson S, et al. Can I leave the theatre? A key to more reliable workplace-based assessment. Br J Anaesth. 2014;112(6):1083–1091. doi:10.1093/bja/aeu052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossley J, Johnson G, Booth J, Wade W. Good questions, good answers: construct alignment improves the performance of workplace-based assessment scales. Med Educ. 2011;45(6):560–569. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03913.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennus MP, Nusmeier A, Heesch G v, et al. Development of entrustable professional activities for paediatric intensive care fellows: a national modified Delphi study. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(3):e0248565. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0248565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Likert R. Technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol. 1932;140:1–55. doi:10.4135/9781412961288.n454.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res. 1986;35(6):382–385. doi:10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiger ME, Varpio L. Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Med Teach. 2020;42(8):846–854. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cate T, Taylor DR. The recommended description of an entrustable professional activity: AMEE Guide No. 140. Med Teach. 2021;43(10):1106–1114. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2020.1838465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ten Cate O. Entrustment as assessment: recognizing the ability, the right, and the duty to act. J Grad Med Educ. 2016;8(2):261–262. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-16-00097.1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ten Cate O. Entrustment decisions: bringing the patient into the assessment equation. Acad Med. 2017;92(6):736–738. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000001623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalmeijer RE, Varpio L. The wolf you feed: challenging intraprofessional workplace-based education norms. Med Educ. 2021;55(8):894–902. doi:10.1111/medu.14520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overeem K, Faber MJ, Arah OA, et al. Doctor performance assessment in daily practise: does it help doctors or not? A systematic review. Med Educ. 2007;41(11):1039–1049. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02897.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson J, Wakeling J, Bowie P. Factors influencing the effectiveness of multisource feedback in improving the professional practice of medical doctors: a systematic review. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14(1):76. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-14-76.
   Google Scholar
• Miller A, Archer J. Impact of workplace based assessment on doctors’ education and performance: a systematic review. BMJ. 2010;341(7775):c5064. doi:10.1136/bmj.c5064.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Overeem K, Lombarts MJMH, Arah OA, Klazinga NS, Grol RPTM, Wollersheim HC. Three methods of multi-source feedback compared: a plea for narrative comments and coworkers’ perspectives. Med Teach. 2010;32(2):141–147. doi:10.3109/01421590903144128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundsgaard KS, Tolsgaard MG, Mortensen OS, Mylopoulos M, Østergaard D. Embracing multiple stakeholder perspectives in defining trainee competence. Acad Med. 2019;94(6):838–846. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000002642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christen HJ, Kordonouri O, Lange K, Berendonk C. Pilotstudie zum interprofessionellen feedback in der pädiatrischen Weiterbildung. Monatsschr Kinderheilkd. 2015;163(5):455–462. doi:10.1007/s00112-015-3324-9.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner I, Balsiger A, Goldszmidt M, Huwendiek S. Innovating pediatric emergency care and learning through interprofessional briefing and workplace-based assessment a qualitative study background: managing pediatric emergencies can be both clinically, 2020. www.pec-online.com. doi:10.1097/PEC.0000000000002218.
   Google Scholar
• Tielemans C, de Kleijn R, van der Schaaf M, van den Broek S, Westerveld T. The Westerveld framework for interprofessional feedback dialogues in health professions education. Assess Eval High Educ. 2023;48(2):241–257. Published online doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1967285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar