Fairness, relationships and perceptions of police legitimacy in the context of integrated offender management

References

• Annison, H., Bradford, B., and Grant, E., 2015. Theorizing the role of ‘the brand’ in criminal justice: the case of integrated offender management. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 15 (4), 387–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Augustyn, M.B., 2015. The (ir)relevance of procedural justice in the pathways to crime. Law and Human Behavior, 39 (4), 388–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beetham, D., 1991. The legitimation of power. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Beetham, D., 2013. Revisiting legitimacy, twenty years on. In: J. Tankebe and A. Liebling, eds. Legitimacy and criminal justice: an international exploration. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 19–36.
   Google Scholar
• Bottoms, A.E., 2001. Compliance with community penalties. In: A. Bottoms, L. Gelsthorpe, and S. Rex, eds. Community penalties: change and challenges. Cullompton: Willan, 87–116.
   Google Scholar
• Bottoms, A.E., and Rose, X., 1998. The importance of staff–prisoner relationships: results from a study in three male prisons. In: D. Price and A. Liebling, eds. Staff prisoner relationships: a review of the literature. Unpublished report submitted to the Prison Service.
   Google Scholar
• Bottoms, A.E., and Tankebe, J., 2012. Beyond procedural justice: a dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 102 (1), 119–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottoms, A.E., and Tankebe, T., 2017. Police legitimacy and the authority of the state. In: A. du Bois-Pedain, ed. Criminal law and the authority of the state. Oxford: Hart Publishing Limited, 47–88.
   Google Scholar
• Bottoms, A.E., and Tankebe, J., 2021. Procedural justice, legitimacy, and social contexts. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bradford, B., 2017. Stop and search and police legitimacy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bradford, B., Murphy, K., and Jackson, J., 2014. Officers as mirrors: policing, procedural justice and the (re)production of social identity. British Journal of Criminology, 54 (4), 527–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrabine, E., 2004. Power, discourse, and resistance: a genealogy of the Strangeways prison riot. Aldershot: Ashgate Pub Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Choongh, S., 1997. Policing as social discipline. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cram, F., 2016. Perceptions of me, conceptions of you: refining ideas of access to, and ‘acceptance’ within, the police organisational field. Policing and Society, 28 (4), 360–374.
   Google Scholar
• Cram, F., 2020. The ‘carrot’ and ‘stick’ of integrated offender management: implications for police culture. Policing & Society, 30 (4), 378–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cram, F., 2023. Integrated offender management and the policing of prolific offenders. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J.W., and Miller, L., 2000. Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39 (3), 124–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crewe, B., 2011. Soft power in prison: implications for staff–prisoner relationships, liberty and legitimacy. European Journal of Criminology, 8, 455–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Criminal Justice Joint Inspection, 2014. A joint inspection of the integrated offender management approach. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, P., and Stanko, B., 2011. An evaluation of the diamond initiative: year two findings. London: Metropolitan Police Service. London Criminal Justice Partnership.
   Google Scholar
• Fagan, J., and Piquero, A., 2007. Rational choice and developmental influences on recidivism among adolescent felony offenders. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4 (4), 715–748.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Franke, D., Bierie, D., and Mackenzie, D., 2010. Legitimacy in corrections: a randomized experiment comparing a boot camp with a prison. Criminology and Public Policy, 9, 89–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gau, J., and Brunson, R.K., 2010. Procedural justice and order maintenance policing: a study of inner-city young men’s perceptions of police legitimacy. Justice Quarterly, 27 (2), 255–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadfield, E., et al., 2020. A systematic review into the effectiveness of integrated offender management. Criminology & Criminal Justice, doi:10.1177/1748895820912295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpin, M., and Richard, N., 2021. An invitation to analytic abduction. Methods in Psychology, doi:10.1016/j.metip.2021.100052.
   Google Scholar
• Home Office and Ministry of Justice, 2020. Neighbourhood crime integrated offender management strategy: a unified approach to offender supervision in the community. London: Home Office/Ministry of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, P., 2009. Improving prediction of reoffending using the offender assessment system (OASys). London: Ministry of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Karakus, O., 2017. Instrumental and normative pathways to legitimacy and public cooperation with the police in Turkey: considering perceived neighborhood characteristics and local government performance. Justice Quarterly, 34 (1), 25–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyprianides, A., Stott, C., and Bradford, B., 2021. “Playing the game”: power, authority and procedural justice in interactions between police and homeless people in London. The British Journal of Criminology, 61, 670–689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyprianides, A., et al., 2022. Relational and instrumental perspectives on compliance with the law among people experiencing homelessness. Law and Human Behavior, 46 (1), 1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.H., and Cho, S., 2021. Assessing a multidimensional model of police legitimacy in South Korea with latent class analysis. Journal of Crime and Justice, 44 (3), 353–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebling, A., 2011. Moral performance, inhuman and degrading treatment and prison pain. Punishment and Society, 13 (5), 530–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lister, S., et al., 2008. Street policing of problem drug users. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, F., and Robinson, G., 2013. Liquid legitimacy and community sanctions. In: A. Crawford and A. Hucklesby, eds. Legitimacy and compliance in criminal justice. Cullompton: Willan.
   Google Scholar
• Novich, M., and Hunt, G., 2018. Trust in police motivations during involuntary encounters: an examination of young gang members of colour. Race and Justice, 8 (1), 51–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papachristos, A., Meares, T., and Fagan, J., 2012. Why do criminals obey the law? The influence of legitimacy and social networks on active gun offenders. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 102 (2), 397–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paternoster, R., et al., 1997. Do fair procedures matter? The effect of procedural justice on spouse assault. Law & society review, 31 (1), 163–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piquero, A., et al., 2005. Developmental trajectories of legal socialization among serious adolescent offenders. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 96 (2), 267–298.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pósch, K., et al., 2021. “Truly free consent”? Clarifying the nature of police legitimacy using causal mediation analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 17 (4), 563–595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radburn, M., and Stott, C., 2019. The social psychological processes of ‘procedural justice’: concepts, critiques and opportunities. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 19, 421–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisig, M., et al., 2007. The construct validity and refinement of process-based policing measures. Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 34 (8), 1005–1028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, M., Irving, A., and Soppitt, S., 2018. The legitimacy of offender management programmes in a post-TR landscape. Safer Communities, 17 (2), 69–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savigar-Shaw, L., et al., 2021. Procedural justice as a reward to the compliant: an ethnography of police-citizen interaction in police custody. Policing and Society, 1–16. doi:10.1080/10439463.2021.1960332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senior, P., et al., 2011. Process evaluation of five integrated offender management pioneer areas. London: Ministry of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Skogan, W.G., 2006. Asymmetry in the impact of encounters with police. Policing & Society, 16 (2), 99–126.
   Google Scholar
• Sleath, E., and Brown, S., 2019. Staff and offender perspectives of integrated offender management and the impact of its introduction on arrests and risk of reoffending in one police force region. Policing & Society, 29 (5), 511–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparks, R., Hey, W., and Bottoms, A.E., 1996. Prisons and the problem of order. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sunshine, J., and Tyler, T., 2003. The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law & Society Review, 37 (3), 513–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tankebe, J., 2009. Public cooperation with the police in Ghana: does procedural fairness matter? Criminology, 47 (4), 1265–1293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tankebe, J., 2013. Viewing things differently: the dimensions of public perceptions of police legitimacy. Criminology, 51 (1), 103–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibaut, J.W., and Walker, L., 1975. Procedural justice: a psychological analysis. Hillsdale: L. Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Trinkner, R., Jackson, J., and Tyler, T.R., 2018. Bounded authority: expanding “appropriate” police behavior beyond procedural justice. Law and Human Behavior, 42 (3), 280–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T., 1990. Why people obey the law. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T., 2006. Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T., 2013. Legitimacy and compliance: the virtues of self-regulation. In: A. Crawford and A. Hucklesby, eds. Legitimacy and compliance in criminal justice. Cullompton: Willan, 8–28.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T., and Fagan, J., 2008. Legitimacy and cooperation: why do people help the police fight crime in their communities? Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 6, 231–275.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T.R., and Huo, Y.J., 2002. Trust in the law encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T., and Jackson, J., 2013. Future challenges in the study of legitimacy and criminal justice. In: J. Tankebe, and A. Liebling, eds. Legitimacy and criminal justice: an international exploration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T.R., and Wakslak, C.J., 2004. Profiling and the legitimacy of the police: procedural justice, attributions of motive, and the acceptance of social authority. Criminology, 42 (2), 253–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T., Schulhofer, S., and Huq, A.Z., 2010. Legitimacy and deterrence effects in counterterrorism policing: a study of Muslim Americans. Law & Society Review, 44, 365–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T., Fagan, J., and Geller, A., 2014. Street stops and police legitimacy: teachable moments in young urban men’s legal socialisation. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 11 (4), 751–785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddington, P.A.J., Stenson, K., and Don, D., 2004. In proportion: race, and police stop and search. British Journal of Criminology, 44 (6), 889–914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, G.D., and Bolger, C.P., 2019. Procedural justice perceptions, legitimacy beliefs and compliance with the law: a meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 15 (2), 341–372.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, B., and McNeill, F., 2010. Travelling hopefully: desistance research and probation practice. In: J. Brayford, F. Cowe, and J. Deering, eds. What else works? Creative work with participants. Cullompton: Willan.
   Google Scholar
• White, M.D., Mulvey, P., and Dario, L.M., 2016. ‘Arrestees’ perceptions of the police: exploring procedural justice, legitimacy and willingness to cooperate with police across offender types. Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 43 (3), 343–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, B., 2005. In the beginning was the deed: realism and moralism in political argument. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, A., and Ariel, B., 2013. The Bristol integrated offender management scheme: a pseudo-experimental test of desistance theory. Policing, 7 (2), 123–134.
   Google Scholar