Logistic regression analysis to determine gender specific challenges and factors affecting seaweed farming along the coast of Tanzania mainland

References

• Akwilapo, F. 2011. Coastal management in Tanzania. A presentation made at the UN-NF Alumni Meeting in Nairobi, 11-15th July,2011.
   Google Scholar
• Athirah, A., A. Mustafa, E. Ratnawati, R. Asaf, and Tarunamulia. 2020. Correlation between socio-demographic characteristics and adoption rate of good aquaculture practices in traditional technology-based fishpond in Pinrang Regency. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 564 (1). doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/564/1/012069.
   Google Scholar
• Bryan, E., C. Ringler, B. Okoba, C. Roncoli, S. Silvestri, and M. Herrero. 2013. Adapting agriculture to climate change in Kenya: Household strategies and determinants. Journal of Environmental Management 114:26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.10.036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryceson, I. 2002. Coastal aquaculture developments in Tanzania: Sustainable and non-sustainable experience. Western Indian Ocean Journal of Marine Science 1 (1):1–10. http://hdl.handle.net/1834/21.
   Google Scholar
• Buschmann, A. H., C. Camus, J. Infante, A. Neori, Á. Israel, M. C. Hernández-González, S. V. Pereda, J. L. Gomez-Pinchetti, A. Golberg, N. Tadmor-Shalev, et al. 2017. Seaweed production: Overview of the global state of exploitation, farming and emerging research activity. European Journal of Phycology 52 (4):391–406. doi:10.1080/09670262.2017.1365175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busthanul, N., P. Diansari, I. Sumase, N. Made, and V. Sulianderi. 2020. Advances in Environmental Biology Reform of development strategy for economic strengthening of seaweed farmers in Bulukumba Regency, Indonesia. Advances in Environmental Biology 14 (5):17–23. doi:10.22587/aeb.2020.14.5.3.
   Google Scholar
• Bwathondi, P. O. J. 2019. Lessons learned from past mariculture initiatives in the United Republic of Tanzania. A report for South West Indian Ocean Fisheries Governance and Shared Growth Program (SWIOFish), Tanzania Ministry of Livestock and Fisheries
   Google Scholar
• Cai, J., Lovatelli, A., Aguilar-Manjarrez, J., Cornish, L., Dabbadie, L., Desrochers, A., Diffey, S. et al. 2021. Seaweeds and microalgae: An overview for unlocking their potential in global aquaculture development. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular 1229.
   Google Scholar
• Comoé, H., and M. Siegrist. 2015. Relevant drivers of farmers’ decision behavior regarding their adaptation to climate change: A case study of two regions in Côte d’Ivoire. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 20 (2):179–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-013-9486-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottier-Cook, E. J., N. Nagabhatla, Y. Badis, M. L. Campbell, T. Chopin, J. Fang, P. He, C. L. Hewitt, G. H. Kim, Y. Huo, et al. 2016. Safeguarding the future of the global seaweed aquaculture industry. United Nations University and Scottish Association for Marine Science Policy Brief. United Nations University (INWEH) and Scottish Association for Marine Science, 12.
   Google Scholar
• Deressa, T. T., R. M. Hassan, C. Ringler, T. Alemu, and M. Yusuf. 2009. Determinants of farmers’ choice of adaptation methods to climate change in the Nile basin of Ethiopia. Journal of Global Environmental Change 1–88. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doty, M., and V. Alvarez. 1975. Status, Problems, Advances and Economics of Eucheuma Farms. Marine Technology Society 9 (4):30–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duarte, C. M., J. Wu, X. Xiao, A. Bruhn, and D. Krause-Jensen. 2017. Can seaweed farming play a role in climate change mitigation and adaptation? Frontiers in Marine Science 4 (APR). doi: 10.3389/fmars.2017.00100.
   Google Scholar
• Dubale, S., and H. Beshir. 2020, January. Factors affecting loan repayment performance of smallholder farmers in factors affecting loan repayment performance of smallholder farmers in Ethiopia. doi:10.11648/j.aff.20200903.15.
   Google Scholar
• Duda, I., A. Fasse, and U. Grote. 2018. Drivers of rural-urban migration and impact on food security in rural Tanzania. Food Security 10 (4):785–98. doi:10.1007/s12571-018-0788-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, C., V. Pede, G. Toth, K. Kilcline, C. O’Donoghue, M. Ryan, and C. Spillane. 2021. Drivers of household and agricultural adaptation to climate change in Vietnam. Climate and Development 13 (3):242–55. doi:10.1080/17565529.2020.1757397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggertsen, M., and C. Halling. 2021. Knowledge gaps and management recommendations for future paths of sustainable seaweed farming in the Western Indian Ocean. Ambio 50 (1):60–73. doi:10.1007/s13280-020-01319-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eranza, D. R. D., J. M. Alin, A. Bahron, and R. Mahmud. 2015. Determinants of women’s participation in seaweed farming in the regency of jeneponto, South Sulawesi, Indonesia1. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences 6 (5 S5):43. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n5s5p43.
   Google Scholar
• Eshetu, G., T. Johansson, W. Garedew, and T. Yisahak. 2021. Determinants of smallholder farmers’ adaptation options to climate change in a coffee-based farming system of Southwest Ethiopia. Climate and Development 13 (4):318–25. doi:10.1080/17565529.2020.1772706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAO. 2013. Social and economic dimensions of carrageenan seaweed farming. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper (Issue 580).
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 2020. Understanding diseases and control in seaweed farming in Zanzibar. Understanding diseases and control in seaweed farming in Zanzibar. 10.4060/ca9004en
   Google Scholar
• FAO (Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations). 2010. The state of the world fisheries and aquaculture 2010. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations,Rome. www.fao.org/docrep/013/i1820e/i1820e00.htm
   Google Scholar
• Fausayana, I., W. G. Abdullah, F. Susanti, D. Sidu, P. Arimbawa, and L. Yunus. 2017. Factors affecting the behavior of farmers toward the risk of seaweed farming in the Bungin Permai village, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia. AACL Bioflux 10 (6):1647–53.
   Google Scholar
• Fausayana, I. Y., R. Budiyanto, and Y. Taufik. 2019. Factors affecting productivity of seaweed farming (Eucheuma Cottonii) in South Konawe regency, Indonesia. International Journal of Innovative Research and Development 8 (7):95–99. doi:10.24940/ijird/2019/v8/i7/jul19034.
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. P. 2009. Discovering statistics using SPSS. 3rd ed. London: Sage. 264–312.
   Google Scholar
• Geo, L. O., Halim, and W. O. R. Ariani. 2020. Farming production analysis of seaweed and farmer’s perception towards climate change effect in Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 23 (8):1004–09. doi:10.3923/pjbs.2020.1004.1009.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hamad, S. O., and H. G. Mtae. 2012. Prospects and constraints of seaweeds farming along the west and South Coasts of Zanzibar. Huria - Journal of the Open University of Tanzania 11 (1):69–79.
   Google Scholar
• Hassan, I. H., and W. J. Othman. 2019. Seaweed (Mwani) farming as an adaptation strategy to impacts of climate change and variability in Zanzibar. In Climate change and coastal resources in Tanzania, 53–68. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-04897-6_4.
   Google Scholar
• Holdt, S. L., and S. Kraan. 2011. Bioactive compounds in seaweed: Functional food applications and legislation. Journal of Applied Phycology 23:543–97. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10811-010-9632-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holsti, O. R. 1968. Content analysis. The Handbook of Social Psychology 2:596–692.
   Google Scholar
• Huppi, M. 2012. The role of groups and credit cooperatives in rural lending. 5 (2):187–204.
   Google Scholar
• Hurtado, A. Q., R. F. Agbayani, R. Sanares, and M. T. de Castro-Mallare. 2001. The seasonality and economic feasibility of cultivating Kappaphycus alvarezii in Panagatan Cays, Caluya, Antique, Philippines. Aquaculture 199 (3–4):295–310. doi:10.1016/S0044-8486(00)00553-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2014. Summary for policymakers in climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 1–32. [Field, C. B., Barros, V. R., Dokken, D. J., Mach, K. J., Mas-Trandrea, M. D., Bilir, T. E., … Girma, B. (2014)].
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2018. Summary for policymakers. In global warming of 1.5 C. An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global. Geneva, Switzerland. [Masson-Delmotte, T. W. V., Zhai, P., Pörtner, H. O., Roberts, D., Skea, J., Shukla, P. R., … Connors, S. (2018)].
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. K., M. Stekoll, and C. Yarish. 2019. Opportunities, challenges and future directions of open-water seaweed aquaculture in the United States. Phycologia 58 (5):446–61. doi:10.1080/00318884.2019.1625611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. K., C. Yarish, E. K. Hwang, M. Park, and Y. Kim. 2017. Seaweed aquaculture: Cultivation technologies, challenges and its ecosystem services. Algae 32 (1):1–13. doi:10.4490/algae.2017.32.3.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsner, J. B., and R. G. Shorter. 1982. Recent developments in nonspecific inflammatory bowel disease. New England Journal of Medicine 306 (14):837–48. doi:10.1056/nejm198204083061404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kothari, C. R. 2004. Research methodology: Methods and techniques. New Age International.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnan, M., and R. Narayanakumar. 2013. Social and economic dimensions of carrageenan seaweed farming. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper (580):163–84.
   Google Scholar
• Kronen, M. 2013. Social and economic dimensions of carrageenan seaweed farming in the Solomon Islands. In Social and economic dimensions of carrageenan seaweed farming, ed. D. Valderrama, J. Cai, N. Hishamunda, and N. Ridler, 147–61. Fisheries and Aquaculture.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, G., C. Engle, and C. Tucker. 2018. Factors driving aquaculture technology adoption. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society 49 (3):447–76. doi:10.1111/jwas.12514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, S., N. Stoeckl, M. E. Fachry, M. Dalvi Mustafa, I. Lapong, A. H. Purnomo, M. A. Rimmer, and N. A. Paul. 2021. Women’s well-being and household benefits from seaweed farming in Indonesia. Aquaculture 530 (April 2020):735711. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735711.
   Google Scholar
• Lesperance, A. D. 2011. Mariculture development in seychelles and other Western Indian Ocean Island States: An overview of challenges and prospects. Mariculture in the WIO region-Challenges and Prospects (11):19.
   Google Scholar
• Loureiro, R., C. M. M. Gachon, and C. Rebours. 2015. Seaweed cultivation: Potential and challenges of crop domestication at an unprecedented pace. New Phytologist 206 (2):489–92. doi:10.1111/nph.13278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mariño, M., A. Breckwoldt, M. Teichberg, A. Kase, and H. Reuter. 2019. Livelihood aspects of seaweed farming in Rote Island, Indonesia. Marine Policy 107 (January):103600. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103600.
   Google Scholar
• McHugh, D. J. 2002. Prospects for seaweed production in developing countries. FAO Fisheries Circular. No. 968. FAO, Rome. 28.
   Google Scholar
• Mmochi, A. J. 2009, December. Overview of aquaculture activities in Tanzania. Procedding In of Workshop on Mariculture in the WIO region: Challenges and Prospects.
   Google Scholar
• Mmochi, A. J., Y. W. Shaghude, and F. E. Msuya. 2005. Comparative study of seaweed farms in Tanga, Tanzania. Submitted to SEEGAAD Project, August 2005, 37
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. 1996. Focus groups as qualitative research, Vol. 16. Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. 1998. Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: Applications to health research. Qualitative Health Research 8 (3):362–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L., and R. A. Krueger. 1993. When to use focus groups and why. Successful Focus Groups: Advancing the State of the Art 1:3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Mshigeni, K. E. 1976. Seaweed farming: A possibility in Tanzania’s coastal ujamma villages. Tanzania. Notes and Records pp. 79–80, pp. 99–105
   Google Scholar
• Mshigeni, K. E. 1983. Mwani: Ukulima wake baharini na manufaa yake kwetu, Dar es Salaam: Tanzania Publishing House. 43.
   Google Scholar
• Mshigeni, K. E. 1985. Pilot seaweed farming in Tanzania: Progress report and future trends. University of Dar es Salaam. 22
   Google Scholar
• Msuya, F. E. 1995. Feasibility study for starting seaweed farming in lindi and mtwara regions, Tanzania. Consultancy report submitted to the Regional Integrated Project Support (RIPS) Programme (Phase I), Institute of Marine Sciences, Zanzibar, Tanzania, Mtwara, Tanzania. 49.
   Google Scholar
• Msuya, F. E. 1996. Seaweed farming in lindi and mtwara regions, phase-two, implementation and expansion. Consultancy report for Rural Integrated Project Support (RIPS) Programme, Mtwara, Tanzania. IMS 1997/01, 71 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Msuya, F. E. 2005, January 24-25). Seaweed farming in Tanzania: Farming processes and interactions between farmers and other stakeholders proceedings of the national stakeholders workshop on establishment of an innovation systems and clusters programme in Tanzania, Bagamoyo, 195–206.
   Google Scholar
• Msuya, F. E. 2006. The impact of seaweed farming on the social and economic structure of seaweed farming communities in zanzibar, Tanzania. 26.
   Google Scholar
• Msuya, F. E. 2009. Development of seaweed cultivation in Tanzania: The role of the University of Dar es Salaam and other institutions. Development 82 (2):1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Msuya, F. E. 2010. Development of seaweed cultivation in Tanzania: The role of the University of Dar es Salaam and other institutions.
   Google Scholar
• Msuya, F. E. 2011a. Environmental changes and their impact on seaweed farming in Tanzania. World Aquaculture, World Aquaculture 4 (34–37):71.
   Google Scholar
• Msuya, F. E. 2011b. The impact of seaweed farming on the socio-economic status of coastal communities in Zanzibar, Tanzania. World Aquaculture 42 (3):45–49.
   Google Scholar
• Msuya, F. E. 2012. ”A study of working conditions in the Zanzibar seaweed farming industry.”
   Google Scholar
• Msuya, F. E. 2013. Social and economic dimensions of carrageenan seaweed farming in the United Republic of Tanzania. In Social and economic dimensions of carrageenan seaweed farming, ed. D. Valderrama, J. Cai, N. Hishamunda, and N. Ridler, 115–46. Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No. 580. Rome, FAO. 204 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Msuya, F. E. 2015. A study of working conditions in the Zanzibar Seaweed farming industry. Journal of Applied Phycology 26 (2).
   Google Scholar
• Msuya, F. E. 2020. Seaweed resources of Tanzania: Status, potential species, challenges and development potentials. Botanica Marina 63 (4):371–80. doi:10.1515/bot-2019-0056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Msuya, F. E., and I. C. Neish 2013. Seaweed value chain assessment of Zanzibar: Creating value for the poor. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Msuya, F. E., M. S. Shalli, K. Sullivan, B. Crawford, J. Tobey, and A. J. Mmochi. 2007. ”A comparative economic analysis of two seaweed farming methods in Tanzania.” The Sustainable Coastal Communities and Ecosystems Program. Coastal Resources Center, University of Rhode Island and the Western Indian Ocean Marine Science Association.
   Google Scholar
• Msuya, F. E., M. S. Shalli, K. Sullivan, B. Crawford, J. Tobey, and A. J. Mmochi. 2007. A comparative economic analysis of two seaweed farming methods in tanzania. The sustainable coastal communities and ecosystems program. Coastal Resources Center, University of Rhode Island and the Western Indian Ocean Marine Science Association. 27.
   Google Scholar
• Muthalib, A. A., A. Putra, A. M. Nuryadi, and M. N. Afiat. 2017. Seaweed business conditions and marketing channels in coastal district of Southeast Sulawesi. The International Journal of Engineering and Science (IJES) 35–41. doi:10.9790/1813-0610013541.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• NBS. 2021, June. United republic of Tanzania; national beaural of statistic 2020 Tanzania in figures.
   Google Scholar
• Neish, I. C., and F. E. Msuya 2013. Seaweed value chain assessment of Zanzibar, report submitted for UNIDO project no 13083 “Building seaweed processing capacities in zanzibar and pemba: creating value for the poor”.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, B. S. 1957. A preliminary survey of the hydrography of the British East African coastal waters. http://hdl.handle.net/1834/7218
   Google Scholar
• Nor, A. M., T. S. Gray, G. S. Caldwell, and S. M. Stead. 2017. Is a cooperative approach to seaweed farming effectual? An analysis of the seaweed cluster project (SCP), Malaysia. Journal of Applied Phycology 29 (5):2323–37. doi:10.1007/s10811-016-1025-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmieri, N., and M. B. Forleo. 2021. An explorative study of key factors driving Italian consumers’ willingness to eat edible seaweed. Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974438.2021.1904082
   Google Scholar
• Palmieri, N., and M. B. Forleo. 2021. An explorative study of key factors driving Italian consumers’ willingness to eat edible seaweed. Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing 1–23. doi:10.1080/08974438.2021.1904082.
   Google Scholar
• Parry, M. L., O. F. Canziani, J. P. Palutikof, P. J. Van Der Linden, and C. E. Hanson 2007. IPCC, 2007: Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge Unversity Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Patty O’Biso, M. C. L. S. C. Y. 1999. Tanzania mariculture issue profile Tanzania coastal management partnership.
   Google Scholar
• Periyasamy, C., P. Anantharaman, and T. Balasubramanian. 2013. Social upliftment of coastal fisher women through seaweed (Kappaphycus alvarezii (Doty) farming in Tamil Nadu, India. doi:10.1007/s10811-013-0228-8.
   Google Scholar
• Pettersson-Löfquist, P. 1995. The development of open-water algae farming in Zanzibar: Reflections on the socioeconomic impact. Ambio 24 (7–8):487–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, M. 1990. Environmental aspects of seaweed culture. Technical Resource Papers Regional Workshop on the Culture and Utilization of Seaweeds, 2(Table 1), 9.
   Google Scholar
• Ramachandran, C. 2012. A Sea of One’s Own!” A perspective on gendered political ecology in Indian mariculture. Asian Fisheries Science 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Ramirez, P. J., T. A. Narvaez, and E. J. Santos-Ramirez. 2020. Gender-inclusive value chains: The case of seaweed farming in Zamboanga Peninsula, Philippines. Gender, Technology and Development 24 (1):110–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2020.1728810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimmer, M. A., S. Larson, I. Lapong, A. H. Purnomo, P. R. Pong‐masak, L. Swanepoel, and N. A. Paul. 2021. Seaweed aquaculture in Indonesia contributes to social and economic aspects of livelihoods and community wellbeing. Sustainability (Switzerland) 13 (19):1–22. doi:10.3390/su131910946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubekie, A. P., N. M. Pauline, L. T. Kaaya, A. P. Rubekie, N. M. Pauline, and L. T. K. Coastal. 2022. Coastal communities’ responses to climate change and variability impacts: A threat to coastal and marine resources? Coastal and marine resources? Climate and Development 1–15. doi:10.1080/17565529.2021.2018984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rukanda, J. J. 2018. Evaluation of aquaculture development in Tanzania. Nations University Fisheries Training Programme, Iceland [final project]. 1–34. http://www.unuftp.is/static/fellows/document/janeth16aprf.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Samah, R., and R. Kamaruddin. 2015. The influence of socio-demographic factors in adopting good aquaculture practices: Case of aquaculture farmers in Malaysia. Journal of Sustainable Development 8 (9):97. doi:10.5539/jsd.v8n9p97.
   Google Scholar
• SDSP. 2005. Seaweed development strategic plan ministry of natural resources and Tourism, The United Republic of Tanzania, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. 47.
   Google Scholar
• Shimba, A. 2010. The Seaweeds of Zanzibar, http://sig.ias.edu/nodeon16thMay2011
   Google Scholar
• Songwe, B. A., S. M. Khamis, M. H. Khalfan, and F. E. Msuya. 2016. Commercial seaweed farming in zanzibar coastal villages: Potential for innovative and competitive economic growth. Huria: Journal of the Open University of Tanzania 22 (1):140–157–157.
   Google Scholar
• Teniwut, W. A., K. D. Betaubun, Marimin, and T. Djatna. 2017a. A conceptual mitigation model for asymmetric information of supply chain in seaweed cultivation. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 89 (1):012022. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/89/1/012022.
   Google Scholar
• Teniwut, W. A., Y. K. Teniwut, R. M. K. Teniwut, and C. L. Hasyim. 2017b. Family vs village-based: Intangible view on the sustainable of seaweed farming. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 89 (1):6–12. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/89/1/012021.
   Google Scholar
• Tiwari, K. R., S. Rayamajhi, R. K. Pokharel, and M. K. Balla. 2014. Determinants of the climate change adaptation in rural farming in Nepal. Himalaya. International Journal of Multidisciplinary and Current Research 2:234–40.
   Google Scholar
• Tongruksawattana, S. 2014. Climate shocks and choice of adaptation strategy for Kenyan maize-legume farmers: Insights from poverty, food security and gender perspectives. DF (Mexico): International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT).
   Google Scholar
• Troell, M., T. Hecht, M. Beveridge, S. Stead, I. Bryceson, N. Kautsky, … F. Ollevier 2011. Mariculture in the WIO region-challenges and prospects.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. Statistical Division. 2008. Designing household survey samples: Practical guidelines (Vol. 98). United Nations Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Uyenco, F. R., L. S. Saniel, and G. S. Jacinto. 1981. The “Ice-Ice” problem in seaweed farming. In Xth international seaweed symposium, 625–30. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Valderrama, D., J. Cai, N. Hishamunda, and N. Ridler, 2013. Social and economic dimensions of carrageenan seaweed farming. Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper 580. FAO, Rome.
   Google Scholar
• Valderrama, D., J. Cai, N. Hishamunda, N. Ridler, I. C. Neish, A. Q. Hurtado, F. E. Msuya, M. Krishnan, R. Narayanakumar, M. Kronen, et al. 2015. The economics of kappaphycus seaweed cultivation in developing countries: A Comparative analysis of farming systems. Aquaculture Economics and Management 19 (2):251–77. doi:10.1080/13657305.2015.1024348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, F. 1965. Further notes on the biology of East African pelagic fishes of the families Carangidae and Sphyraenidae. East African Agricultural and Forestry Journal 31 (2):141–68. doi:10.1080/00128325.1965.11662035.
   Google Scholar
• Yahya, B. M., S. A. Yahya, A. J. Mmochi, and N. S. Jiddawi. 2020. The trophic structure of fish in seaweed farms, and adjacent seagrass and coral habitats in Zanzibar, Tanzania. Western Indian Ocean Journal of Marine Science 19 (2):17–27. doi:10.4314/wiojms.v19i2.2.
   Google Scholar
• Yusah, H. M., A. Shuib, P. Kunasekaran, and N. A. Nordin. 2018. Factors influencing residents’ attitude towards marine resource utilization in Tun Sakaran Marine Park, Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Society 19 (S1):37–46.
   Google Scholar
• Zamroni, A., K. Laoubi, and M. Yamao. 2011. The development of seaweed farming as a sustainable coastal management method in Indonesia: An opportunities and constraints assessment. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment 150:505–16. doi:10.2495/SDP110421.
   Google Scholar