Requirements of Environmentally-Aware Consumers on the Implementation and Communication of Sustainability Measures in the Beverage Industry: A Qualitative Kano-Model Approach

References

• Atkinson, L., & Rosenthal, S. (2014). Signaling the green sell: The influence of eco-label source, argument specificity, and product involvement on consumer trust. Journal of Advertising, 43(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2013.834803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baviera-Puig, A., Gómez-Navarro, T., García-Melón, M., & García-Martínez, G. (2015). Assessing the communication quality of CSR reports. A case study on four Spanish food companies. Sustainability, 7(8), 11010–11031. https://doi.org/10.3390/su70811010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, C. (1993). Kano’s methods for understanding customer-defined quality. Center for Quality Management Journal, 2(4), 3–36.
   Google Scholar
• BMEL (Bundesminsterium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft). (2020). Deutschland, wie es isst: Der BMEL-Ernährungsreport 2020. BMEL. https://www.bmel.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Broschueren/ernaehrungsreport-2020.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=28
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, R. L., & Prediger, D. J. (1981). Coefficient kappa: Some uses, misuses, and alternatives. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 41(3), 687–699. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448104100307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canavari, M., & Coderoni, S. (2019). Green marketing strategies in the dairy sector: Consumer‐stated preferences for carbon footprint labels. Strategic Change, 28(4), 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2264
   Google Scholar
• Canio, F. D., Martinelli, E., & Endrighi, E. (2021). Enhancing consumers’ pro-environmental purchase intentions: The moderating role of environmental concern. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 49(9), 1312–1329. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-08-2020-0301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chekima, B., Syed Khalid Wafa, S. A. W., Igau, O. A., Chekima, S., & Sondoh, S. L. (2016). Examining green consumerism motivational drivers: Does premium price and demographics matter to green purchasing? Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 3436–3450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, C. C., Chang, Y. Y., Tsai, M. C., Chen, C. T., & Tseng, Y. C. (2019). An evaluation instrument and strategy implications of service attributes in LOHAS restaurants. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(1), 194–216. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-06-2017-0361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosio, L. D., Buruk, O., Fernández Galeote, D., Bosman, I. D. V., & Hamari, J. (2023). Virtual and augmented reality for environmental sustainability: A systematic review. In A. Schmidt, K. Väänänen, T. Goyal, P. O. Kristensson, A. Peters, S. Mueller, J. R. Williamson, & M. L. Wilson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–23). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581147
   Google Scholar
• Craig, A. B. (2013). Understanding augmented reality: Concepts and applications. Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• D’Amico, M., DiVita, G., & Monaco, L. (2016). Exploring environmental consciousness and consumer preferences for organic wines without sulfites. Journal of Cleaner Production, 120, 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, N., Gillen, P., Casson, K., & Wilson, I. (2019). STEER: Factors to consider when designing online focus groups using audiovisual technology in health research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 160940691988578. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919885786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echeverría, R., Hugo Moreira, V., Sepúlveda, C., & Wittwer, C. (2014). Willingness to pay for carbon footprint on foods. British Food Journal, 116(2), 186–196. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-07-2012-0292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ElHaffar, G., Durif, F., & Dubé, L. (2020). Towards closing the attitude-intention-behavior gap in green consumption: A narrative review of the literature and an overview of future research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, 122556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elofsson, K., Bengtsson, N., Matsdotter, E., & Arntyr, J. (2016). The impact of climate information on milk demand: Evidence from a field experiment. Food Policy, 58, 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2021, July 14). ‘Fit for 55’: Delivering the EU’s 2030 climate target on the way to climate neutrality. EUR-Lex. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=COM:2021:550:FIN
   Google Scholar
• FACIT. (2020). Nachhaltigkeitsstudie 2020. FACIT - Haus der Forschung. https://www.facit-group.com/content/dam/shared-content/news/facit/food-and-beverage/FACIT_Nachhaltigkeitsstudie_Food_Beverage_2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ferraris, A., Del Giudice, M., Grandhi, B., & Cillo, V. (2020). Refining the relation between cause-related marketing and consumers purchase intentions. International Marketing Review, 37(4), 651–669. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-11-2018-0322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FOODDRINKEUROPE. (2020). Data & trends: EU food & drink industry. 2020 edition. https://www.fooddrinkeurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/FoodDrinkEurope-Data-Trends-2020-digital.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Grebitus, C., Lusk, J. L., & Nayga, R. M. (2013). Effect of distance of transportation on willingness to pay for food. Ecological Economics, 88, 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GRI. (2023). Consolidated set of the GRI standards. https://www.globalreporting.org/how-to-use-the-gri-standards/gri-standards-english-language/
   Google Scholar
• Groening, C., Sarkis, J., & Zhu, Q. (2018). Green marketing consumer-level theory review: A compendium of applied theories and further research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 1848–1866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest, G., Namey, E., & McKenna, K. (2017). How many focus groups are enough? Building an evidence base for nonprobability sample sizes. Field Methods, 29(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X16639015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, D. I. D., Abreu, E., Silva, S. G., Schröder, K., Melissen, F., & Haggis-Burridge, M. (2022). Designing immersive sustainable food experiences in augmented reality: A consumer participatory Co-creation approach. Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 11(22), 3646. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11223646
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Högström, C., & Witell, L. (2011). The theory of attractive quality and experience offerings. The TQM Journal, 23(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1108/17542731111110195
   Google Scholar
• Jerzyk, E. (2016). Design and communication of ecological content on sustainable packaging in young consumers’ opinions. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 22(6), 707–716. https://doi.org/10.1080/10454446.2015.1121435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kano, N., Seaku, N., Takahashi, F., & Tsuji, S. (1984). Attractive quality and must-be quality. Journal of the Japanese Society for Quality Control, 14(2), 147–156. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/quality/14/2/14_KJ00002952366/_article/-char/en
   Google Scholar
• Ketelsen, M., Janssen, M., & Hamm, U. (2020). Consumers’ response to environmentally-friendly food packaging - a systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 254, 120123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S. (2022). The process of CSR communication—culture-specific or universal? Focusing on mainland China and Hong Kong consumers. International Journal of Business Communication, 59(1), 56–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488418805523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S., & Ferguson, M. A. T. (2014). Public expectations of CSR communication: What and how to communicate CSR. The Public Relations Journal, 8(3), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S., & Ferguson, M. A. T. (2018). Dimensions of effective CSR communication based on public expectations. Journal of Marketing Communications, 24(6), 549–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2015.1118143
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S., & Ji, Y. (2017). Chinese consumers’ expectations of corporate communication on CSR and sustainability. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(6), 570–588. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M., & Kim, H. S. (2022). Corporate social responsibility: What are foodservice companies reporting? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(15), 9214. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, J., & Barbour, R. S. (1999). Introduction: The challenge and promise of focus groups. In R. S. Barbour & J. Kitzinger (Eds.), Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice (pp. 1–20). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Koenig-Lewis, N., Palmer, A., Dermody, J., & Urbye, A. (2014). Consumers’ evaluations of ecological packaging – rational and emotional approaches. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 37, 94–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyguolienë, A., & Braziulytë, R. (2022). Application of augmented reality in product packaging: Challenges and development opportunities. Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, 88(1), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.2478/mosr-2022-0014
   Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics Bulletin, 33(1), 159. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
   Google Scholar
• Lehner, M. (2015). Translating sustainability: The role of the retail store. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 43(4/5), 386–402. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-02-2014-0013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le, A. T., Nguyen, M. T., Vu, H. T. T., & Nguyen Thi, T. T. (2020). Consumers’ trust in food safety indicators and cues: The case of Vietnam. Food Control, 112, 107162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., Chen, Y., & Qing, Q. (2021). Differentiated consumer responses to corporate social responsibility domains moderated by corporate social responsibility perceptions: A Kano model‐based perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(6), 1606–1619. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindh, H., Olsson, A., & Williams, H. (2016). Consumer perceptions of food packaging: Contributing to or counteracting environmentally sustainable development? Packaging Technology and Science, 29(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luor, T., Lu, H. P., Chien, K. M., & Wu, T. C. (2015). Contribution to quality research: A literature review of Kano’s model from 1998 to 2012. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 26(3–4), 234–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2012.733264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutsenko, I., Schrum, A., Karabon, M., & Snezhkova, N. (2023). Living with and responding to uncertainty: The state of grocery retail 2023 - Europe. McKinsey&Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/industries/retail/our%20insights/state%20of%20grocery%20europe%202023%20living%20with%20and%20responding%20to%20uncertainty/living-with-and-responding-to-uncertainty-the-state-of-grocery-retail-2023-europe.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Machín, L., Curutchet, M. R., Gugliucci, V., Vitola, A., Otterbring, T., de Alcantara, M., & Ares, G. (2020). The habitual nature of food purchases at the supermarket: Implications for policy making. Appetite, 155, 104844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2020.104844
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maciejewski, G., Mokrysz, S., & Wróblewski, Ł. (2019). Segmentation of coffee consumers using sustainable values: Cluster analysis on the polish coffee market. Sustainability, 11(3), 613. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madzík, P. (2018). Increasing accuracy of the Kano model – a case study. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 29(3–4), 387–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2016.1194197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnier, L., & Crié, D. (2015). Communicating packaging eco-friendliness. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 43(4/5), 350–366. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-04-2014-0048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnier, L., & Schoormans, J. (2015). Consumer reactions to sustainable packaging: The interplay of visual appearance, verbal claim and environmental concern. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 44, 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnier, L., & Schoormans, J. (2017). How do packaging material, colour and environmental claim influence package, brand and product evaluations? Packaging Technology and Science, 30(11), 735–751. https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Carrasco Martínez, L., Brugarolas Mollá-Bauzá, M., & Gascón Mora, A. (2020). A consumer behaviour approach to analyse the sustainability of food purchasing. Economía Agraria Y Recursos Naturales, 20(2), 73. https://doi.org/10.7201/earn.2020.02.04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matzler, K., Hinterhuber, H. H., Bailom, F., & Sauerwein, E. (1996). How to delight your customers. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 5(2), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610429610119469
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, K. B., & Simons, J. (2021). Good attitudes are not good enough: An ethnographical approach to investigate attitude-behavior inconsistencies in sustainable choice. Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 10(6), 1317. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10061317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihailescu, R., Moscovici, D., Gow, J., Ugaglia, A. A., Valenzuela, L., & Rinaldi, A. (2021). Identifying the willingness to pay for eco-certified wine by south African consumers: A comparison of biodynamic, fair trade and sustainably produced wines. Research in Hospitality Management, 11(3), 235–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/22243534.2021.2005948
   Google Scholar
• Mikulić, J., & Prebežac, D. (2011). A critical review of techniques for classifying quality attributes in the Kano model. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 21(1), 46–66. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604521111100243
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L., & Krueger, R. A. (1993). When to use focus groups and why. In D. L. Morgan (Ed.), Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 3–19). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: Stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00460.x
   Google Scholar
• Nuttavuthisit, K., & Thøgersen, J. (2017). The importance of consumer trust for the emergence of a market for green products: The case of organic food. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(2), 323–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2690-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2020). Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 160940691989922. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. O., Jestratijevic, I., Uanhoro, J., & Knight, D. K. (2023). Investigation of a consumer’s purchase intentions and behaviors towards environmentally friendly grocery packaging. Sustainability, 15(11), 8789. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onuoha, O. A., & Nnenanya, D. (2017). Cause-related marketing and consumer response: A study of Nigerian soft drink industry. Journal of Marketing and Consumer Research, 35, 10–16. https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JMCR/article/view/37146
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Dickinson, W. B., Leech, N. L., & Zoran, A. G. (2009). A qualitative framework for collecting and analyzing data in focus group research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800301
   Google Scholar
• Orzan, G., Cruceru, A., Bălăceanu, C., & Chivu, R. G. (2018). Consumers’ behavior concerning sustainable packaging: An exploratory study on Romanian consumers. Sustainability, 10(6), 1787. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polisetty, A., Madhavi, B., & Jha, R. (2023). Validating consumer-centric approaches in attaining ecological sustainability. Environment and Ecology Research, 11(1), 183–194. https://doi.org/10.13189/eer.2023.110113
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Sanchez, C., & Sellers-Rubio, R. (2021). Sustainability in the beverage industry: A research agenda from the demand side. Sustainability, 13(1), 186. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SB Insight. (2022). Sustainable brand index - Official report 2022: Europe’s largest brand study on sustainability. https://www.rankingthebrands.com/PDF/Sustainable%20Brand%20Index%20Netherlands%202022.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sogari, G., Mora, C., & Menozzi, D. (2016). Factors driving sustainable choice: The case of wine. British Food Journal, 118(3), 632–646. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-04-2015-0131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenis, N. D., van Herpen, E., van der Lans, I. A., Ligthart, T. N., & van Trijp, H. C. (2017). Consumer response to packaging design: The role of packaging materials and graphics in sustainability perceptions and product evaluations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 286–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, D. W., & Shamdasani, P. (2017). Online focus groups. Journal of Advertising, 46(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2016.1252288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taufique, K. M. R., Polonsky, M. J., Vocino, A., & Siwar, C. (2019). Measuring consumer understanding and perception of eco‐labelling: Item selection and scale validation. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 43(3), 298–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng, C. H. (2016). The effect of price discounts on green consumerism behavioral intentions. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 15(4), 325–334. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, C. A. (2019). Food practices of environmentally conscientious new zealanders. Environmental Sociology, 5(1), 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2018.1495038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Giesen, R., & Leenheer, J. (2019). Towards more interactive and sustainable food retailing. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 47(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-11-2017-0280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Loo, E. J., Caputo, V., Nayga, R. M., Seo, H. S., Zhang, B., & Verbeke, W. (2015). Sustainability labels on coffee: Consumer preferences, willingness-to-pay and visual attention to attributes. Ecological Economics, 118, 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Violante, M. G., & Vezzetti, E. (2017). Kano qualitative vs quantitative approaches: An assessment framework for products attributes analysis. Computers in Industry, 86, 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2016.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, E. Y. C., Chan, F. F. Y., & So, S. (2020). Consumer perceptions on product carbon footprints and carbon labels of beverage merchandise in Hong Kong. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, 118404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar