Effective disciplinary literacy strategies for students with disabilities in middle and high school science classrooms

References

• Anders, P. L., & Bos, C. S. (1986). Semantic feature analysis: An interactive strategy for vocabulary development and text comprehension. Journal of Reading, 29(7), 610–616.
   Google Scholar
• Applebee, A. N., Langer, J. A., Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (2003). Discussion-based approaches to developing understanding: Classroom instruction and student performance in middle and high school English. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 685–730. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312040003685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, A. L., & Hughes, C. A. (2011). Explicit instruction: Effective and efficient teaching. The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, Z. (2021). Examining required special education coursework for middle school science teachers: A content analysis of course descriptions. SRATE Journal, 30(2), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Blachowicz, C. Z., & Fisher, P. J. (2006). Teaching vocabulary in all classrooms. Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Borsuk, E. R. (2010). Examination of an administrator-read vocabulary-matching measure as an indicator of science achievement. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 35(3), 168–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508410372081
   Google Scholar
• Bos, C. S., & Anders, P. L. (1990). Effects of interactive vocabulary instruction on the vocabulary learning and reading comprehension of junior–high learning–disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/1510390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlisle, L. M., VanUitert, V. J., Kennedy, M. J., Rodgers, W. J., Romig, J. E., Mathews, H. M., & Peeples, K. N. (2023). Intersectionality in inclusive science classrooms: Enhancing student performance via multimedia teacher professional development. Journal of Special Education Technology, 38(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434221088023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dexter, D. D., & Hughes, C. A. (2011). Graphic organizers and students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34(1), 51–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/073194871103400104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dexter, D. D., Park, Y. J., & Hughes, C. A. (2011). A meta-analytic review of graphic organizers and science instruction for adolescents with learning disabilities: Implications for the intermediate and secondary science classroom. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26(4), 204–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540–5826.2011.00341.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Cesare, D. M., Kaczorowski, T., & Hashey, A. (2021). A piece of the (Ed)Puzzle: Using Edpuzzle interactive video platform to facilitate explicit instruction. Journal of Special Education Technology, 36(2), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643421994266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, C., Rabren, K. S., Taylor, S. L., & Dotson, C. K. (2012). Assisting students with high-incidence disabilities to pursue careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Intervention in School and Clinic, 48(1), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451212443151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elleman, A. M., Lindo, E. J., Morphy, P., & Compton, D. L. (2009). The impact of vocabulary instruction on passage level comprehension of school-age children: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345740802539200
   Google Scholar
• Elleman, A. M., Oslund, E. L., Griffin, N. M., & Myers, K. E. (2019). A review of middle school vocabulary interventions. Five research-based recommendations for practice. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 50(4), 477–492. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_LSHSS-VOIA-18-0145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endrew, F. v. Douglas County School District, 580 U.S. ____(2017).
   Google Scholar
• Executive Office of the President. (2018). Charting a course for success: America’s strategy for STEM education. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED5904 74.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Foorman, B., Beyler, N., Borradaile, K., Coyne, M., Denton, C. A., Dimino, J., … Wissel, S. (2016). Foundational skills to support reading for understanding in kindergarten through 3rd grade (NCEE 2016-4008). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Mathes, P. G., & Simmons, D. C. (1997). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Making classrooms more responsive to diversity. American Educational Research Journal, 34(1), 174–206. https://doi.org/10.2307/1163346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gajria, M., Jitendra, A. K., Sood, S., & Sacks, G. (2007). Improving comprehension of expository text in students with LD: A research synthesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(3), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194070400030301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groves, F. (1995). Science vocabulary load of selected secondary science textbooks. School Science and Mathematics, 95(5), 231–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1995.tb15772.x
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, S. H., Rawe, J., & Whittaker, M. C. (2017). The State of learning disabilities: Understanding the 1 in 5. National Center for Learning Disabilities.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, C. A., Maccini, P., & Gagnon, J. C. (2003). Interventions that positively impact the performance of students with learning disabilities in secondary general education classes. Learning Disabilities, 12, 101–111.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, C. A., Morris, J. R., Therrien, W. J., & Benson, S. K. (2017). Explicit instruction: Historical and contemporary contexts. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 32(3), 140–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, M. (1982). Mastery teaching. TIP Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2006 & Supp. V. 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Jimenez, B. A., Browder, D. M., Spooner, F., & Dibiase, W. (2012). Inclusive inquiry science using peer-mediated embedded instruction for students with moderate intellectual disability. Exceptional Children, 78(3), 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291207800303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, S., & Lewis, A. R. (2014). Survey on teaching science to K–12 students with disabilities: Teacher preparedness and attitudes. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(8), 885e910. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9406-z
   Google Scholar
• Kaldenberg, E. R., Watt, S. J., & Therrien, W. (2015). Reading instruction in science for students with disabilities: A meta-analysis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 38(3), 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948714550204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamil, M. L., Borman, G. D., Dole, J., Kral, C. C., Salinger, T., & Torgesen, J. (2008). Improving adolescent literacy: Effective classroom and intervention practices: A practice guide (NCEE #2008-4027). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc.
   Google Scholar
• Kauffman, J. M., Wiley, A. L., Travers, J. C., Badar, J., & Anastasiou, D. (2021). Endrew and FAPE: Concepts and implications for all students with disabilities. Behavior Modification, 45(1), 177–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445519832990
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, M. J., Deshler, D. D., & Lloyd, J. W. (2015). Effects of multimedia vocabulary instruction on adolescents with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(1), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413487406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, M. J., Thomas, C. N., Meyer, J. P., Alves, K. D., & Lloyd, J. W. (2014). Using evidence based multimedia to improve vocabulary performance of adolescents with LD: A UDL approach. Learning Disability Quarterly, 37(2), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948713507262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, A. H., Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., & Wei, S. (2004). Graphic organizers and their effects on the reading comprehension of students with LD: A synthesis of research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(2), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194040370020201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauterbach, A. A., Benedict, A. E., Yakut, A. D., & Garcias, A. A. (2020). Improving vocabulary outcomes in inclusive secondary science classrooms through professional development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 31(1), 56–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2019.1661738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C. D., & Spratley, A. (2010). Reading in the disciplines: The challenges of adolescent literacy. Carnegie Corporation of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, L. H., & Hedin, L. R. (2011). Reading science text: Challenges for students with learning disabilities and considerations for teachers. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26(4), 214–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540–5826.2011.00342.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, A. L., & Hughes, M. T. (2018). Student with learning disabilities in inquiry-based science classrooms: A cross-case analysis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 41(3), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948717736007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor, K. K., Oleson, J., Bahnsen, A., & Duff, D. (2013). Children with developmental language impairment have vocabulary deficits characterized by limited breadth and depth. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 48(3), 307–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeskey, J., Barringer, M.-D., Billingsley, B., Brownell, M., Jackson, D., Kennedy, M., & Ziegler, D. (2017). High-leverage practices in special education. Council for Exceptional Children & CEEDAR Center.
   Google Scholar
• McLeskey, J., Landers, E., Williamson, P., & Hoppey, D. (2012). Are we moving toward educating students with disabilities in less restrictive settings? Journal of Special Education, 46(3), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466910376670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon, D., Wright, R., Cihak, D. F., Moore, T. C., & Lamb, R. (2016). Podcasts on mobile devices as read-aloud testing accommodation in middle school science assessment. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(2), 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9591-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, C. M., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Praise for intelligence can undermine children’s motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.75.1.33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Educational Statistics. (2021). Students with disabilities. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/cgg#:∼:text=In%202019%E2%80%9320%2C%20the%20number,of%20all%20public%20school%20students.&text=Data%20collection%20activities%20to%20monitor%20compliance%20with%20IDEA%20began%20in%201976.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D., Canas, A. J. (2008). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them. Institute for Human and Machine Cognition. Retrieved August 11, 2022, from http://cmap.ihmc.us/publications/researchpapers/theorycmaps/TheoryUnderlyingConceptMaps.bck-11-01-06.htm
   Google Scholar
• Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117–175. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1
   Google Scholar
• Plasman, J. S., & Gottfriend, M. A. (2018). Applied STEM coursework, high school dropout rates, and students with learning disabilities. Educational Policy, 23(5), 664–696. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904816673738
   Google Scholar
• Raphael, T. E. (1986). Teaching question answer relationships, revisited. The Reading Teacher, 39(6), 516–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raphael, T. E., & Au, K. H. (2005). QAR: Enhancing comprehension and test taking across grades and content areas. The Reading Teacher, 59(3), 206–221. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.59.3.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riccomini, P. J., Morano, S., & Hughes, C. A. (2017). Big ideas in special education: Specially designed instruction, high-leverage practices, explicit instruction, and intensive intervention. Teaching Exceptional Children, 50(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059917724412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzo, K. L., & Taylor, J. C. (2016). Effects of inquiry-based instruction on science achievement for students with disabilities: An analysis of the literature. Journal of Science Education for Students with Disabilities, 19(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.14448/jsesd.06.00015
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. (2003). Self-efficacy for reading and writing: Influence of modeling, goal setting, and self-evaluation. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308219
   Google Scholar
• Seifert, K., & Espin, C. (2012). Improving reading of science text for secondary students with learning disabilities: Effects of text reading, vocabulary learning, and combined approaches to instruction. Learning Disability Quarterly, 35(4), 236–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948712444275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelton, A., Wexler, J., Kurz, L. A., & Swanson, E. (2021). Incorporating evidence-based literacy practices into middle school content areas. Teaching Exceptional Children, 53(4), 270–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059920968582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spektor-Levy, O., & Yifrach, M. (2019). If science teachers are positively inclined toward inclusive education, why is it so difficult? Research in Science Education, 49(3), 737–766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9636-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson, E., Vaughn, S., & Wexler, J. (2017). Enhancing adolescents’ comprehension of text by building vocabulary knowledge. Teaching Exceptional Children, 50(2), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059917720777
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, E., Wanzek, J., McCulley, L., Stillman-Spisak, S., Vaughn, S., Simmons, D., … Hairrell, A. (2016). Literacy and text reading in middle and high school social studies and English language arts classrooms. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 32(3), 199–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2014.910718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Therrien, W. J., Taylor, J. C., Hosp, J. L., Kaldenberg, E. R., & Gorsh, J. (2011). Science instruction for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26(4), 188–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2011.00340.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J. K. (2004). Avoiding the devastating downward spiral: The evidence that early intervention prevents reading failure. American Educator, 28(3), 6–19.
   Google Scholar
• VanUitert, V. J., Kennedy, M. J., Romig, J. E., & Carlisle, L. M. (2020). Enhancing science vocabulary knowledge of students with learning disabilities using explicit instruction and multimedia. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 18(1), 3–25.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., Gersten, R., Dimino, J., Taylor, M. J., Newman-Gonchar, R., … Jayanthi, M. (2022). Providing reading interventions for students in grades 4–9 (WWC 2022007). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE), Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://whatworks.ed.gov/
   Google Scholar
• Wexler, J., Mitchell, M. A., Clancy, E. E., & Silverman, R. D. (2016). An investigation of literacy practices in high school science classrooms. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 33(3), 258–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2016.1193832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, C. G. (1998). Using concept maps to assess conceptual knowledge of function. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(4), 414–421. https://doi.org/10.2307/749858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar