The Full Equation: On the Context-Dependency of Ideological Morality

References

• Anderson, L. R., Mellor, J. M., & Milyo, J. (2005). Do liberals play nice? The effects of party and political ideology in public goods and trust games. In Advances in applied microeconomics (Vol. 13, pp. 107–131). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-0984(05)13005-3
   Google Scholar
• Baekgaard, M., Christensen, J., Madsen, J. K., & Mikkelsen, K. S. (2020). Rallying around the flag in times of COVID-19: Societal lockdown and trust in democratic institutions. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 3(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.30636/jbpa.32.172
   Google Scholar
• Balliet, D., Tybur, J. M., Wu, J., Antonellis, C., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2018). Political ideology, trust, and cooperation: In-group favoritism among republicans and democrats during a US national election. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 62(4), 797–818. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002716658694
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, J. C. (2020). Ideology and the promotion of social change. In Current opinion in behavioral sciences (Vol. 34, pp. 6–11). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.10.005
   Google Scholar
• Boxell, L., Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2022). Cross-country trends in affective polarization. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1–60. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01160
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, G. W. (1978). Self-serving biases in the attribution process: A reexamination of the fact or fiction question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(1), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.1.56
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brambilla, M., & Leach, C. W. (2014). On the importance of being moral: The distinctive role of morality in social judgment. Social Cognition, 32(4), 397–408. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2014.32.4.397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt, M. J., & Crawford, J. T. (2019a). Studying a heterogeneous array of target groups can help us understand prejudice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(3), 292–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419830382
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt, M. J., & Crawford, J. T. (2019b). Worldview conflict and prejudice. In Advances in experimental social psychology. Academic Press Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2019.09.002
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, M. J., Wisneski, D. C., & Skitka, L. J. (2015). Moralization and the 2012 U.S. presidential election campaign. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 3(2), 211–237. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v3i2.434
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, M. B., Buchan, N. R., Ozturk, O. D., & Grimalda, G. (2023). Parochial altruism and political ideology. Political Psychology, 44(2), 383–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnahan, S., & Greenwood, B. N. (2018). Managers’ political beliefs and gender inequality among subordinates: Does his ideology matter more than hers? Administrative Science Quarterly, 63(2), 287–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839217708780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coricelli, G., Fehr, D., & Fellner, G. (2004). Partner selection in public goods experiments. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 48(3), 356–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002704264143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, J. T. (2014). Ideological symmetries and asymmetries in political intolerance and prejudice toward political activist groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 284–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Amore, C., van Zomeren, M., & Koudenburg, N. (2022). Attitude moralization within polarized contexts: An emotional value-protective response to dyadic harm cues. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 48(11), 1566–1579. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211047375/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_01461672211047375-FIG4.JPEG
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Disch, L. J. (2002). The tyranny of the two-party system. Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/DISC11034/HTML
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of political action in a democracy. Journal of Political Economy, 65(2), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1086/257897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drutman, L. (2021, June 16). Why the two-party system is effing up U.S. Democracy. FiveThirtyEight. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/why-the-two-party-system-is-wrecking-american-democracy/
   Google Scholar
• Efferson, C., Lalive, R., & Fehr, E. (2008). The coevolution of cultural groups and ingroup favoritism. Science (New York, N.Y.), 321(5897), 1844–1849. https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.1155805/SUPPL_FILE/EFFERSON.SOM.PDF
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Effron, D. A., & Helgason, B. A. (2023). Moral inconsistency. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 67, 1–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/BS.AESP.2022.11.001
   Google Scholar
• Ellemers, N., De Gilder, D., & Haslam, S. A. (2004). Motivating individuals and groups at work: A social identity perspective on leadership and group performance. Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 459–478. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2004.13670967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellemers, N., Van Der Toorn, J., Paunov, Y., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2019). The psychology of morality: A review and analysis of empirical studies. Personality and Social Psychology Review: An Official Journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc, 23(4), 332–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868318811759
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Social Survey. (2020). European Social Survey round 10. Norwegian Agency for Shared Services in Education and Research, Norway – Data Archive and distributor of ESS data for ESS ERIC. https://doi.org/10.21338/NSD-ESS10-2020
   Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503620766/XML
   Google Scholar
• Fiagbenu, M. E., Proch, J., & Kessler, T. (2021). Of deadly beans and risky stocks: Political ideology and attitude formation via exploration depend on the nature of the attitude stimuli. British Journal of Psychology (London, England: 1953), 112(1), 342–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/BJOP.12430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, D. T., & Jones, E. E. (1986). Exemplification: The self-presentation of moral character. Journal of Personality, 54(3), 593–615. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1986.tb00414.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gries, T., Müller, V., & Jost, J. T. (2022). The market for belief systems: A formal model of ideological choice. Psychological Inquiry, 33(2), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2022.2065128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grünhage, T., & Reuter, M. (2022). Political orientation is associated with behavior in public-goods- and trust-games. Political Behavior, 44(1), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11109-020-09606-5/FIGURES/2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science (New York, N.Y.), 316(5827), 998–1002. https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.1137651/SUPPL_FILE/HAIDT.SOM.PDF
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harcourt, A., & de Waal, F. (1992). Coalitions and alliances in humans and other animals. Oxford University Press. https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=US201300702303
   Google Scholar
• Harmon-Jones, E., & Mills, J. (2019). An introduction to cognitive dissonance theory and an overview of current perspectives on the theory. In Cognitive dissonance: Reexamining a pivotal theory in psychology (2nd ed., pp. 3–24). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000135-001
   Google Scholar
• Hartstone, M., & Augoustinos, M. (1995). The minimal group paradigm: Categorization into two versus three groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25(2), 179–193. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420250205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoenig, L. C., Pliskin, R., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2023). Political ideology and moral dilemmas in public good provision. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 2519. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29512-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. J. (2019). The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22(1), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T. (2017). Ideological asymmetries and the essence of political psychology. Political Psychology, 38(2), 167–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 307–337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T., Stern, C., Rule, N. O., & Sterling, J. (2017). The politics of fear: Is there an ideological asymmetry in existential motivation? Social Cognition, 35(4), 324–353. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2017.35.4.324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, H. H., & Michela, J. L. (1980). Attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 31(1), 457–501. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV.PS.31.020180.002325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerschbamer, R., & Müller, D. (2020). Social preferences and political attitudes: An online experiment on a large heterogeneous sample. Journal of Public Economics, 182, 104076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.104076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler, T., Proch, J., Hechler, S., & Nägler, L. A. (2015). Political diversity versus stimuli diversity: Alternative ways to improve social psychological science. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 38, e148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X14001241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kteily, N. S., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., & Ho, A. K. (2017). Hierarchy in the eye of the beholder: (Anti-)egalitarianism shapes perceived levels of social inequality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(1), 136–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapsley, D. K. (1996). Moral psychology. https://philpapers.org/rec/LAPMP
   Google Scholar
• Leach, C. W., Ellemers, N., & Barreto, M. (2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(2), 234–249. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.2.234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of topological psychology, 1936. In McGraw-Hill Publications in Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Lindqvist, E., & Östling, R. (2010). Political polarization and the size of government. American Political Science Review, 104(3), 543–565. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055410000262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansell, J. (2018). Social cues and ideology. Politics and the Life Sciences: The Journal of the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences, 37(1), 32–52. https://doi.org/10.1017/pls.2017.29
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mansell, J. (2020). Ideology and social cognition: Are liberals and conservatives differentially affected by social cues about group inequality? Politics and the Life Sciences: The Journal of the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences, 39(1), 9–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/pls.2019.24
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McDonald, R. I., & Crandall, C. S. (2015). Social norms and social influence. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 3, 147–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElreath, R., Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2003). Shared norms and the evolution of ethnic markers. Current Anthropology, 44(1), 122–130. https://doi.org/10.1086/345689/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/FG9.JPEG
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milstein, R., Academy, S. U. S. M., Point, W., & Green, D. P. (2010). Using experiments to estimate the effects of education on voter turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 54(1), 174–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00425.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monin, B., & Merritt, A. (2012). Moral hypocrisy, moral inconsistency, and the struggle for moral integrity. In M. Mikulincer & P. Shaver (Eds.), The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil, Herzliya Series on Personality and Social Psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 167–184). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, M. T., & Janoff-Bulman, R. (2013). Lessons from morality-based social identity: The power of outgroup “hate,” not just ingroup “love.” Social Justice Research, 26(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-012-0175-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, S., Trussler, M., Clinton, J., & Lapinski, J. (2022, October 17). Vast majority of Republicans support abortion exceptions for rape, incest and mother’s health. NBC News. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2022-election/vast-majority-republicans-support-abortion-exceptions-rape-incest-moth-rcna52237
   Google Scholar
• Pliskin, R., & Halperin, E. (2021). The study of affective processes in political contexts: Accomplishments and challenges. Affective Science, 2(4), 345–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42761-021-00096-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pliskin, R., Halperin, E., Bar-Tal, D., & Sheppes, G. (2018). When ideology meets conflict-related content: Influences on emotion generation and regulation. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 18(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pliskin, R., Ruhrman, A., & Halperin, E. (2020). Proposing a multi-dimensional, context-sensitive approach to the study of ideological (a)symmetry in emotion. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 75–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pliskin, R., Sheppes, G., & Halperin, E. (2015). Running for your life, in context: Are rightists always less likely to consider fleeing their country when fearing future events? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 59, 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romano, A., Sutter, M., Liu, J. H., & Balliet, D. (2021). Political ideology, cooperation and national parochialism across 42 nations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 376(1822), 20200146. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahar, G. (2014). On the importance of attribution theory in political psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(5), 229–249. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12102
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116
   Google Scholar
• Sheldon, K. M., & Nichols, C. P. (2009). Comparing democrats and republicans on intrinsic and extrinsic values. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(3), 589–623. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00452.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., & Mitchell, M. (1994). In-group identification, social dominance orientation, and differential intergroup social allocation. The Journal of Social Psychology, 134(2), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1994.9711378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skitka, L. J., Hanson, B. E., Morgan, G. S., & Wisneski, D. C. (2021). The psychology of moral conviction. Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 347–366. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV-PSYCH-063020-030612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skitka, L. J., Morgan, G. S., & Wisneski, D. C. (2015). Political orientation and moral conviction: A conservative advantage or an equal opportunity motivator of political engagement? In J. P. Forgas, K. Fiedler, & W. D. Crano (Eds.), Social psychology and politics (pp. 57–74). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, C., West, T. V., Jost, J. T., & Rule, N. O. (2014). “Ditto heads”: Do conservatives perceive greater consensus within their ranks than liberals? Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(9), 1162–1177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214537834
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2019). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Political psychology (pp. 276–293). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203505984-16
   Google Scholar
• Tetlock, P. E. (2003). Thinking the unthinkable: Sacred values and taboo cognitions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(7), 320–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00135-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorisdottir, H., Jost, J. T., Liviatan, I., & Shrout, P. E. (2007). Psychological needs and values underlying left-right political orientation: Cross-national evidence from Eastern and Western Europe. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71(2), 175–203. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfm008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2010). Groups in mind: The coalitional roots of war and morality. In H. Høgh-Olesen (Ed.), Human morality and sociality: Evolutionary and comparative perspectives (pp. 91–234). Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, E., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2021). Experimental games and social decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 72(1), 415–438. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-081420-110718
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Lange, P. A. M., Bekkers, R., Chirumbolo, A., & Leone, L. (2012). Are conservatives less likely to be prosocial than liberals? From games to ideology, political preferences and voting. European Journal of Personality, 26(5), 461–473. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Prooijen, J. W., & Krouwel, A. P. M. (2019). Psychological features of extreme political ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(2), 159–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418817755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zmigrod, L. (2022). Mental computations of ideological choice and conviction: The utility of integrating psycho-economics and Bayesian models of belief. Psychological Inquiry, 33(2), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2022.2065134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar