Strange Bedfellows: The Alliance Theory of Political Belief Systems

References

• Abrajano, M., & Hajnal, Z. L. (2015). White backlash: Immigration, race, and American politics. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Abramowitz, A. I. (2018). The great alignment: Race, party transformation, and the rise of Donald Trump. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Achen, C. H., & Bartels, L. M. (2016). Democracy for realists: Why elections do not produce responsive government. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Ahler, D. J., & Sood, G. (2018). The parties in our heads: Misperceptions about party composition and their consequences. The Journal of Politics, 80(3), 964–981. https://doi.org/10.1086/697253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aktipis, A., Cronk, L., Alcock, J., Ayers, J. D., Baciu, C., Balliet, D., Boddy, A. M., Curry, O. S., Krems, J. A., Muñoz, A., Sullivan, D., Sznycer, D., Wilkinson, G. S., & Winfrey, P. (2018). Understanding cooperation through fitness interdependence. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(7), 429–431. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0378-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. University of Manitoba press.
   Google Scholar
• Andrighetto, L., Mari, S., Volpato, C., & Behluli, B. (2012). Reducing competitive victimhood in Kosovo: The role of extended contact and common ingroup identity. Political Psychology, 33(4), 513–529. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00887.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Applebaum, A. (2007). Gulag: A history. Anchor.
   Google Scholar
• Auers, D. (2012). The curious case of the Latvian Greens. Environmental Politics, 21(3), 522–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2012.671579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, B. N., Lelkes, Y., & Malka, A. (2021). Reconsidering the link between self-reported personality traits and political preferences. American Political Science Review, 115(4), 1482–1498. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balliet, D., Wu, J., & De Dreu, C. K. (2014). Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(6), 1556–1581. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037737
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, L. M. (2018). Partisanship in the Trump era. The Journal of Politics, 80(4), 1483–1494. https://doi.org/10.1086/699337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumard, N., André, J. B., & Sperber, D. (2013). A mutualistic approach to morality: The evolution of fairness by partner choice. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(1), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11002202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., Stillwell, A., & Wotman, S. R. (1990). Victim and perpetrator accounts of interpersonal conflict: autobiographical narratives about anger. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(5), 994–1005. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.59.5.994
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F. (1999). Evil: Inside human violence and cruelty. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bealey, F. (1999). Political ideologies. In F. Bealey, R. A. Chapman, & M. Sheehan (Eds.), Elements in political science. Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, C., & Dijkstra, J. K. (2013). Competition, envy, or snobbism? How popularity and friendships shape antipathy networks of adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23(3), 586–595. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berinsky, A. J. (2007). Assuming the costs of war: Events, elites, and American public support for military conflict. The Journal of Politics, 69(4), 975–997. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00602.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilali, R., Tropp, L. R., & Dasgupta, N. (2012). Attributions of responsibility and perceived harm in the aftermath of mass violence. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 18(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026671
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, G. F. (2004). The illusion of public opinion: Fact and artifact in American public opinion polls. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bocian, K., & Wojciszke, B. (2014). Self-interest bias in moral judgments of others’ actions. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(7), 898–909. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214529800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonica, A. (2014). Mapping the ideological marketplace. American Journal of Political Science, 58(2), 367–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosson, J. K., Vandello, J. A., Michniewicz, K. S., & Lenes, J. G. (2012). American men’s and women’s beliefs about gender discrimination: For men, it’s not quite a zero-sum game. Masculinities and Social Change, 1(3), 210239.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, G. W. (1978). Self-serving biases in the attribution process: A reexamination of the fact or fiction question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(1), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.1.56
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt, M. J., Reyna, C., Chambers, J. R., Crawford, J. T., & Wetherell, G. (2014). The ideological conflict hypothesis: Intolerance among both liberals and conservatives. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413510932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt, M. J. (2017). Predicting ideological prejudice. Psychological Science, 28(6), 713–722. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617693004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, M. B., & Campbell, D. T. (1976). Ethnocentrism and intergroup attitudes: East African evidence. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brint, S. (1984). “New-class” and cumulative trend explanations of the liberal political attitudes of professionals. American Journal of Sociology, 90(1), 30–71. https://doi.org/10.1086/228047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, R. P., Wohl, M. J., & Exline, J. J. (2008). Taking up offenses: Secondhand forgiveness and group identification. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(10), 1406–1419. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208321538
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A. R. (2010). Are governors responsible for the state economy? Partisanship, blame, and divided federalism. The Journal of Politics, 72(3), 605–615. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381610000046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1980). The American voter. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, B., & Manning, J. (2014). Microaggression and moral cultures. Comparative Sociology, 13(6), 692–726. https://doi.org/10.1163/15691330-12341332
   Google Scholar
• Ceci, S. J., Peters, D., & Plotkin, J. (1985). Human subjects review, personal values, and the regulation of social science research. American Psychologist, 40(9), 994–1002. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.40.9.994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, J. R., & Melnyk, D. (2006). Why do I hate thee? Conflict misperceptions and intergroup mistrust. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(10), 1295–1311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206289979
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, J. R., Schlenker, B. R., & Collisson, B. (2013). Ideology and prejudice: The role of value conflicts. Psychological Science, 24(2), 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612447820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapais, B. (1995). Alliances as a means of competition in primates: Evolutionary, developmental, and cognitive aspects. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 38(S21), 115–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330380607
   Google Scholar
• Chen, D. L., & Lind, J. T. (2007). Religion, welfare politics, and church-state separation. Journal of Ecumenical Studies, 42(1), 42.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, M. D. (2013). Emotion and the ultimate attribution error. Current Psychology, 32(1), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-013-9164-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor, R. C., Heithaus, M. R., & Barre, L. M. (2001). Complex social structure, alliance stability and mating access in a bottlenose dolphin ‘super-alliance. Proceedings. Biological Sciences, 268(1464), 263–267. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2000.1357
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, L. G., Gornick, L. J., Houck, S. C., Anderson, C., Stockert, J., Sessoms, D., & McCue, K. (2016). Are conservatives really more simple‐minded than liberals? The domain specificity of complex thinking. Political Psychology, 37(6), 777–798. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrales, J. (2014). Explaining chavismo: The unexpected alliance of radical leftists and the military in Venezuela under Hugo Chávez. In R. Hausmann & F. R. Rodríguez (Eds.), Venezuela before Chávez: Anatomy of an economic collapse. Penn State Press.
   Google Scholar
• Costello, T. H., Bowes, S. M., Stevens, S. T., Waldman, I. D., Tasimi, A., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2022). Clarifying the structure and nature of left-wing authoritarianism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 122(1), 135–170. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottrell, C. A., & Neuberg, S. L. (2005). Different emotional reactions to different groups: A sociofunctional threat-based approach to "prejudice". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(5), 770–789. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, J. T. (2012). The ideologically objectionable premise model: Predicting biased political judgments on the left and right. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 138–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, J. T. (2014). Ideological symmetries and asymmetries in political intolerance and prejudice toward political activist groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 284–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, J. T., & Pilanski, J. M. (2014). Political intolerance, right and left. Political Psychology, 35(6), 841–851. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00926.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, J. T., Kay, S. A., & Duke, K. E. (2015). Speaking out of both sides of their mouths: Biased political judgments within (and between) individuals. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(4), 422–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614566858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deegan-Krause, K. (2007). New dimensions of political cleavage. In R. J. Dalton & H. D. Klingemann (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political behaviour (pp. 538–556). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Leeuw, S. E., Rekker, R., Azrout, R., & van Spanje, J. H. (2021). Are would-be authoritarians right? Democratic support and citizens’ left-right self-placement in former left-and right-authoritarian countries. Democratization, 28(2), 414–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1827230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Regt, S., Mortelmans, D., & Smits, T. (2011). Left-wing authoritarianism is not a myth, but a worrisome reality. Evidence from 13 Eastern European countries. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 44(4), 299–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2011.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeScioli, P., & Kurzban, R. (2009). The alliance hypothesis for human friendship. PloS One, 4(6), e5802. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeScioli, P., & Kurzban, R. (2013). A solution to the mysteries of morality. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 477–496. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeScioli, P., & Kimbrough, E. O. (2019). Alliance formation in a side-taking experiment. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 6(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/XPS.2018.19
   Google Scholar
• DeScioli, P., Massenkoff, M., Shaw, A., Petersen, M. B., & Kurzban, R. (2014). Equity or equality? Moral judgments follow the money. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281(1797), 20142112. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.2112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devos, T., & Banaji, M. R. (2005). American = white? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 447–466. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditto, P. H., Pizarro, D. A., & Tannenbaum, D. (2009). Motivated moral reasoning. In H. R. Brian (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 50, pp. 307). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doosje, B., Zebel, S., Scheermeijer, M., & Mathyi, P. (2007). Attributions of responsibility for terrorist attacks: The role of group membership and identification. International Journal of Conflict and Violence (IJCV), 1(2), 127–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duarte, J. L., Crawford, J. T., Stern, C., Haidt, J., Jussim, L., & Tetlock, P. E. (2015). Political diversity will improve social psychological science. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 38, e130. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X14000430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckworth, A. L., Weir, D., Tsukayama, E., & Kwok, D. (2012). Who does well in life? Conscientious adults excel in both objective and subjective success. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 356. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efferson, C., Lalive, R., & Fehr, E. (2008). The coevolution of cultural groups and ingroup favoritism. Science, 321(5897), 1844–1849. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1155805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan, M., Daly, M., Delaney, L., Boyce, C. J., & Wood, A. M. (2017). Adolescent conscientiousness predicts lower lifetime unemployment. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(4), 700–709. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emanuele, V., Maggini, N., & Paparo, A. (2020). ‘The times they are a-changin’: party campaign strategies in the 2018 Italian election. West European Politics, 43(3), 665–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2019.1655966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, K., Simpson, B., & Strimling, P. (2019). Political double standards in reliance on moral foundations. Judgment & Decision Making, 14(4), 440–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fessler, D. M., & Quintelier, K. (2013). Suicide bombers, weddings, and prison tattoos: An evolutionary perspective on subjective commitment and objective commitment. Cooperation and Its Evolution., 459–483 MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forsyth, D. R., & Schlenker, B. R. (1977). Attributing the causes of group performance: Effects of performance quality, task importance, and future testing. Journal of Personality, 45(2), 220–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1977.tb00148.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frimer, J. A., Gaucher, D., & Schaefer, N. K. (2014). Political conservatives’ affinity for obedience to authority is loyal, not blind. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(9), 1205–1214. 0146167214538672. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214538672
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallup. (2017). Putin’s image rises in US, mostly among republicans. http://www.gallup.com/poll/204191/putin-image-rises-mostly-among-republicans.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Gallup. (2020). Most Americans say policing needs ‘major changes’. https://news.gallup.com/poll/315962/americans-say-policing-needs-major-changes.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Ganzach, Y., & Schul, Y. (2021). Partisan ideological attitudes: Liberals are tolerant; the intelligent are intolerant. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(6), 1551–1566. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1998). The third way: The renewal of social democracy. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goren, P. (2005). Party identification and core political values. American Journal of Political Science, 49(4), 881–896. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00161.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, K., Rand, D. G., Ert, E., Lewis, K., Hershman, S., & Norton, M. I. (2014). The emergence of “us and them” in 80 lines of code: Modeling group genesis in homogeneous populations. Psychological Science, 25(4), 982–990. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614521816
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, R. (2018). Do Americans think too many immigrants are coming to the U.S.? It depends on their country of origin. Public Religion Research Institute. https://www.prri.org/spotlight/do-americans-think-too-many-immigrants-are-coming-to-the-u-s-it-depends-on-their-country-of-origin/
   Google Scholar
• Gunther, R., & Diamond, L. (2003). Species of political parties: A new typology. Party Politics, 9(2), 167–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688030092003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurzban, R., & Aktipis, C. A. (2007). Modularity and the social mind: Are psychologists too self-ish? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868306294906
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. (2016). Why concepts creep to the left. Psychological Inquiry, 27(1), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2016.1115713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hainmueller, J., & Hopkins, D. J. (2015). The hidden American immigration consensus: A conjoint analysis of attitudes toward immigrants. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 529–548. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamlin, J. K. (2013). Moral judgment and action in preverbal infants and toddlers: Evidence for an innate moral core. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(3), 186–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412470687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harcourt, A. H., & De Waal, F. B. (1992). Coalitions and alliances in humans and other animals. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haslam, N. (2016). Concept creep: Psychology’s expanding concepts of harm and pathology. Psychological Inquiry, 27(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2016.1082418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Henrich, J., & Gil-White, F. J. (2001). The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22(3), 165–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1090-5138(00)00071-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewstone, M. (1990). The ‘ultimate attribution error’? A review of the literature on intergroup causal attribution. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20(4), 311–335. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420200404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, G., & Busseri, M. A. (2012). Bright minds and dark attitudes lower cognitive ability predicts greater prejudice through right-wing ideology and low intergroup contact. Psychological Science, 23(2), 187–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611421206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, A. C. (2018). Diminished Expectations: Redistributive preferences in truncated welfare states. World Politics, 70(4), 555–594. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887118000096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollander, P. (2016). Revisiting the banality of evil: Contemporary political violence and the Milgram experiments. Society, 53(1), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-015-9973-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollander, P. (2017). Political pilgrims: Western intellectuals in search of the good society. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Honeycutt, N., & Freberg, L. (2017). The liberal and conservative experience across academic disciplines: An extension of Inbar and Lammers. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(2), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616667617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornsey, M. J. (2008). Social identity theory and self‐categorization theory: A historical review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 204–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00066.x
   Google Scholar
• Huber, J. D., & Stanig, P. (2011). Church-state separation and redistribution. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7-8), 828–836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hugh-Jones, D., Ron, I., & Zultan, R. (2019). Humans reciprocate by discriminating against group peers. Evolution and Human Behavior, 40(1), 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huitsing, G., Snijders, T. A., Van Duijn, M. A., & Veenstra, R. (2014). Victims, bullies, and their defenders: A longitudinal study of the coevolution of positive and negative networks. Development and Psychopathology, 26(3), 645–659. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579414000297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, J. A., Stringer, M., & Watson, R. P. (1991). Intergroup violence and intergroup attributions. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 30(3), 261–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1991.tb00943.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jacobs, N., & Munis, B. K. (2023). Place-based resentment in contemporary U.S. elections: The individual sources of America’s urban-rural divide. Political Research Quarterly, 76(3), 1102–1118. https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129221124864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasinenko, A., Christandl, F., & Meynhardt, T. (2020). Justified by ideology: Why conservatives care less about corporate social irresponsibility. Journal of Business Research, 114, 290–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, L., Markey, R., & Markey, R. (2006). Class and labour: The British Labour Party and the Australian Labor Party compared. Labour History, 90, 23–41. https://doi.org/10.2307/27516112
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. P., Cox, D., Dionne, E. J., Galston, B. C., Lienesch, R. (2016). How immigration and concerns about cultural change are shaping the 2016 election. Public Religion Research Institute. http://www.prri.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/PRRI-Brookings-2016-Immigration-survey-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M., Jenkins‐Smith, H., & Braman, D. (2011). Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research, 14(2), 147–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2010.511246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M., Hoffman, D. A., Braman, D., & Evans, D. (2012). They saw a protest: Cognitive illiberalism and the speech-conduct distinction. Stan. L. Rev, 64, 851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalmoe, N. P., Mason, L. (2019). Lethal mass partisanship: Prevalence, correlates, and electoral contingencies. Working paper. https://www.dannyhayes.org/uploads/6/9/8/5/69858539/kalmoe___mason_ncapsa_2019_-_lethal_partisanship_-_final_lmedit.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Karol, D. (2009). Party position change in American politics: Coalition management. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koo, H. J., Piff, P. K., & Shariff, A. F. (2023). If I could do it, so can they: Among the rich, those with humbler origins are less sensitive to the difficulties of the poor. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 14(3), 333–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506221098921
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kossowska, M., & Sekerdej, M. (2015). Searching for certainty: Religious beliefs and intolerance toward value-violating groups. Personality and Individual Differences, 83, 72–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearns, J. N., & Fincham, F. D. (2005). Victim and perpetrator accounts of interpersonal transgressions: Self-serving or relationship-serving biases? Personality and social. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(3), 321–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271594
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, K. A., & Pronin, E. (2008). When disagreement gets ugly: Perceptions of bias and the escalation of conflict. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(6), 833–848. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208315158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinder, D. R., & Kam, C. D. (2010). Us against them: Ethnocentric foundations of American opinion. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kinder, D. R., & Kalmoe, N. P. (2017). Neither liberal nor conservative: Ideological innocence in the American public. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, W. M., & Kunda, Z. (1992). Motivated person perception: Constructing justifications for desired beliefs. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28(2), 145–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(92)90036-J
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalski, R. M. (2000). “I was only kidding!”: Victims’ and perpetrators’ perceptions of teasing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(2), 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200264009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraus, M. W., Horberg, E. J., Goetz, J. L., & Keltner, D. (2011). Social class rank, threat vigilance, and hostile reactivity. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(10), 1376–1388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211410987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuran, T. (1998). Ethnic norms and their transformation through reputational cascades. The Journal of Legal Studies, 27(S2), 623–659. https://doi.org/10.1086/468038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurzban, R., Dukes, A., & Weeden, J. (2010). Sex, drugs and moral goals: Reproductive strategies and views about recreational drugs. Proceedings. Biological Sciences, 277(1699), 3501–3508. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.0608
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuziemko, I., Buell, R. W., Reich, T., & Norton, M. I. (2014). “Last-place aversion”: Evidence and redistributive implications. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(1), 105–149. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjt035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwiatkowska, A. (2019). Institutionalisation without voters: The Green Party in Poland in comparative perspective. Zeitschrift Für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 13(2), 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-019-00424-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2015). Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 690–707. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, R. R., & Russell, D. (1980). Attributions in the sports pages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.1.29
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, T. C. (2017). Illiberal reformers: Race, eugenics, and American economics in the progressive era. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, V., & Lewis, H. (2022). The myth of left and right: How the political spectrum misleads and harms America. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman, D., & Linke, L. (2007). The effect of social category on third party punishment. Evolutionary Psychology, 5(2), 147470490700500. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490700500203
   Google Scholar
• Lilienfeld, S. O. (2017). Microaggressions: Strong claims, inadequate evidence. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(1), 138–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616659391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linke, L. H. (2012). Social closeness and decision making: Moral, attributive and emotional reactions to third party transgressions. Current Psychology, 31(3), 291–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-012-9146-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukianoff, G., & Haidt, J. (2018). The coddling of the American mind: How good intentions and bad ideas are setting up a generation for failure. Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macfarlan, S. J., Walker, R. S., Flinn, M. V., & Chagnon, N. A. (2014). Lethal coalitionary aggression and long-term alliance formation among Yanomamö men. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(47), 16662–16669. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1418639111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macy, M., Deri, S., Ruch, A., & Tong, N. (2019). Opinion cascades and the unpredictability of partisan polarization. Science Advances, 5(8), eaax0754. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax0754
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magni-Berton, R., & Ríos, D. (2019). Why do academics oppose the market? A test of Nozick’s hypothesis. Current Sociology, 67(6), 856–878. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392118812934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malka, A., Lelkes, Y., & Soto, C. J. (2019). Are cultural and economic conservatism positively correlated? A large-scale cross-national test. British Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 1045–1069. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maass, A., Ceccarelli, R., & Rudin, S. (1996). Linguistic intergroup bias: Evidence for in-group-protective motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3), 512–526. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maass, A., Milesi, A., Zabbini, S., & Stahlberg, D. (1995). Linguistic intergroup bias: Differential expectancies or in-group protection? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(1), 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.68.1.116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maass, A., Salvi, D., Arcuri, L., & Semin, G. R. (1989). Language use in intergroup contexts: The linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 981–993. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.57.6.981
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra, N., & Kuo, A. G. (2008). Attributing blame: The public’s response to Hurricane Katrina. The Journal of Politics, 70(1), 120–135. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381607080097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manson, J. H. (2020). Right-wing authoritarianism, left-wing authoritarianism, and pandemic-mitigation authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 167, 110251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchesi, A. (2017). Latin America’s radical left: Rebellion and Cold War in the global 1960s (Vol. 107). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, L. (2018). Uncivil agreement: How politics became our identity. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• McElreath, R., Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2003). Shared norms and the evolution of ethnic markers. Current Anthropology, 44(1), 122–130. https://doi.org/10.1086/345689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meuleman, B., Abts, K., Schmidt, P., Pettigrew, T. F., & Davidov, E. (2020). Economic conditions, group relative deprivation and ethnic threat perceptions: A cross-national perspective. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46(3), 593–611. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1550157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihálik, J., & Jankoľa, M. (2016). European migration crisis: Positions, polarization and conflict management of Slovak political parties. Baltic Journal of Law & Politics, 9(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1515/bjlp-2016-0001
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. C. (2017). Republican men say it’s a better time to be a woman than a man. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/17/upshot/republican-men-say-its-a-better-time-to-be-a-woman-than-a-man.html
   Google Scholar
• Mooijman, M., Hoover, J., Lin, Y., Ji, H., & Dehghani, M. (2018). Moralization in social networks and the emergence of violence during protests. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(6), 389–396. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0353-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore-Berg, S. L., Ankori-Karlinsky, L., Hameiri, B., & Bruneau, E. (2020). Exaggerated meta-perceptions predict intergroup hostility between American political partisans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(26), 14864–14872. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2001263117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, P. (2014). Overwhelming opposition to reparations for slavery and Jim Crow. https://today.yougov.com/news/2014/06/02/reparations/
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, G. S., Mullen, E., & Skitka, L. J. (2010). When values and attributions collide: Liberals’ and conservatives’ values motivate attributions for alleged misdeeds. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(9), 1241–1254. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210380605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura, K., Tita, G., & Krackhardt, D. (2011). Violence in the "Balance": A structural analysis of how rivals, allies, and third-parties shape inter-gang violence. Heinz College Working Paper Series, 1–41.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. E., & Kinder, D. R. (1996). Issue frames and group-centrism in American public opinion. The Journal of Politics, 58(4), 1055–1078. https://doi.org/10.2307/2960149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noor, M., Brown, R. J., & Prentice, G. (2008). Precursors and mediators of intergroup reconciliation in Northern Ireland: A new model. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 47(Pt 3), 481–495. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466607X238751
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Noor, M., Shnabel, N., Halabi, S., & Nadler, A. (2012). When suffering begets suffering: The psychology of competitive victimhood between adversarial groups in violent conflicts. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(4), 351–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868312440048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, J. I., Larsen, J. T., & Stastny, B. J. (2010). Social perceptions of torture: Genuine disagreement, subtle malleability, and in-group bias. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 16(3), 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/10781919.2010.488164
   Google Scholar
• Norton, M. I., & Ariely, D. (2011). Building a better America—One wealth quintile at a time. Perspectives on Psychological Science: a Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 6(1), 9–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393524
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Norton, M. I., & Sommers, S. R. (2011). White people see racism as a zero-sum game that they are now losing. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 215–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton, M. I., Neal, D. T., Govan, C. L., Ariely, D., & Holland, E. (2014). The not‐so‐common‐wealth of Australia: Evidence for a cross‐cultural desire for a more equal distribution of wealth. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 14(1), 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orehek, E., & Forest, A. L. (2016). When people serve as means to goals: Implications of a motivational account of close relationships. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(2), 79–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415623536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens, L. A., & Pedulla, D. S. (2014). Material welfare and changing political preferences: The case of support for redistributive social policies. Social Forces, 92(3), 1087–1113. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sot101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peña, Y., & Sidanius, J. (2002). US patriotism and ideologies of group dominance: A tale of asymmetry. The Journal of Social Psychology, 142(6), 782–790. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540209603936
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, M. B. (2015). Evolutionary Political Psychology. In D. Buss (Ed.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, M. B., Osmundsen, M., & Bor, A. (2021). Beyond populism: The psychology of status-seeking and extreme political discontent. In The psychology of populism (pp. 62–80). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, T. F. (1979). The ultimate attribution error: Extending Allport’s cognitive analysis of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5(4), 461–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616727900500407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2009). Muslims widely seen as facing discrimination. http://www.pewforum.org/2009/09/09/muslims-widely-seen-as-facing-discrimination/
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2014). Most see inequality growing, but partisans differ over solutions. http://www.people-press.org/2014/01/23/most-see-inequality-growing-but-partisans-differ-over-solutions/2/
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2015). Beyond distrust: How Americans view their government. http://www.people-press.org/files/2015/11/11-23-2015-Governance-release.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2016a). The parties on the eve of the 2016 election: Two coalitions, moving further apart. http://www.people-press.org/2016/09/13/the-parties-on-the-eve-of-the-2016-election-two-coalitions-moving-further-apart/
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2016b). Campaign exposes fissures over issues, values and how life has changed in the U.S. https://www.people-press.org/2016/03/31/campaign-exposes-fissures-over-issues-values-and-how-life-has-changed-in-the-u-s/
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2016c). Partisanship and political animosity in 2016. http://www.people-press.org/2016/06/22/partisanship-and-political-animosity-in-2016/
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2017). Partisans have starkly different opinions about how the world views the U.S. https://www.people-press.org/2017/11/09/partisans-have-starkly-different-opinions-about-how-the-world-views-the-u-s/
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2018). Growing partisan differences in views of the FBI; stark divide over ICE. http://www.people-press.org/2018/07/24/growing-partisan-differences-in-views-of-the-fbi-stark-divide-over-ice/
   Google Scholar
• Pietraszewski, D. (2016). How the mind sees coalitional and group conflict: The evolutionary invariances of n-person conflict dynamics. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37(6), 470–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piketty, T. (2020). Capital and ideology. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pinsof, D., & Haselton, M. (2016). The political divide over same-sex marriage: Mating strategies in conflict? Psychological Science, 27(4), 435–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615621719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulse of the Nation. (2017a). Free speech (From Poll 4, December). https://thepulseofthenation.com/#free-speech/
   Google Scholar
• Pulse of the Nation. (2017b). Foreigners (From Poll 4, December). https://thepulseofthenation.com/#foreigners/
   Google Scholar
• Pulse of the Nation. (2017c). Collective blame (From Poll 5, January). https://thepulseofthenation.com/#collective-blame/
   Google Scholar
• Pulse of the Nation. (2017d). Getting all offended (From Poll 4, December). https://thepulseofthenation.com/#getting-all-offended/
   Google Scholar
• Pulse of the Nation. (2018a). Respect my authority (From Poll 11, July). https://thepulseofthenation.com/#respect-my-authority/
   Google Scholar
• Pulse of the Nation. (2018b). Government handouts (From Poll 11, July). https://thepulseofthenation.com/#government-handouts/
   Google Scholar
• Pulse of the Nation. (2018c). Fairness (From Poll 10, June). https://thepulseofthenation.com/#fairness/
   Google Scholar
• Pulse of the Nation. (2018d). Stereotypes (From Poll 11, July). https://thepulseofthenation.com/#stereotypes/
   Google Scholar
• Rambaran, J. A., Dijkstra, J. K., Munniksma, A., & Cillessen, A. H. (2015). The development of adolescents’ friendships and antipathies: A longitudinal multivariate network test of balance theory. Social Networks, 43, 162–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2015.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rantilla, A. K. (2000). Collective task responsibility allocation revisiting the group-serving bias. Small Group Research, 31(6), 739–766. https://doi.org/10.1177/104649640003100606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen Reports. (2013). More Americans view black people as racist than Whites, Hispanics. http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/lifestyle/general_lifestyle/july_2013/more_americans_view_blacks_as_racist_than_whites_hispanics
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen Reports. (2015a). 58% Think there’s a war on police in America today. http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/lifestyle/general_lifestyle/august_2015/58_think_there_s_a_war_on_police_in_america_today
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen Reports. (2015b). Americans think illegals are taking their jobs. http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/business/general_business/august_2015/americans_think_illegals_are_taking_their_jobs
   Google Scholar
• Reeder, G. D., Pryor, J. B., Wohl, M. J., & Griswell, M. L. (2005). On attributing negative motives to others who disagree with our opinions. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(11), 1498–1510. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205277093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothschild, J. E., Howat, A. J., Shafranek, R. M., & Busby, E. C. (2019). Pigeonholing Partisans: Stereotypes of Party Supporters and Partisan Polarization. Political Behavior, 41(2), 423–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9457-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satherley, N., Sibley, C. G., & Osborne, D. (2021). Ideology before party: Social dominance orientation and right‐wing authoritarianism temporally precede political party support. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(2), 509–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatz, R. T., Staub, E., & Lavine, H. (1999). On the varieties of national attachment: Blind versus constructive patriotism. Political Psychology, 20(1), 151–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schelling, T. C. (1980). The strategy of conflict: With a new preface by the author. Harvard university press.
   Google Scholar
• Schiller, B., Baumgartner, T., & Knoch, D. (2014). Intergroup bias in third-party punishment stems from both ingroup favoritism and outgroup discrimination. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35(3), 169–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, M. T., Branscombe, N. R., & Kappen, D. M. (2003). Attitudes toward group‐based inequality: Social dominance or social identity? The British Journal of Social Psychology, 42(Pt 2), 161–186. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466603322127166
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sears, D. O., Henry, P. J., & Kosterman, R. (2000). Egalitarian values and contemporary racial politics. In D. O. Sears, J. Sidanius, & L. Bobo (Eds.), Racialized politics: The debate about racism in America (pp. 75–117). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sell, A., Sznycer, D., Cosmides, L., Tooby, J., Krauss, A., Nisu, S., Ceapa, C., & Petersen, M. B. (2017). Physically strong men are more militant: A test across four countries. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38(3), 334–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamir, J., & Shikaki, K. (2002). Self–serving perceptions of terrorism among Israelis and Palestinians. Political Psychology, 23(3), 537–557. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, D. K., & Kim, H. S. (2005). Is there an "I" in "team"? The role of the self in group-serving judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(1), 108–120. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, D. K., Kinias, Z., Major, B., Kim, H. S., & Prenovost, M. (2007). The group as a resource: Reducing biased attributions for group success and failure via group affirmation. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(8), 1100–1112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207303027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (2001). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sirin, C. V., & Villalobos, J. D. (2011). Where does the buck stop? Applying attribution theory to examine public appraisals of the president. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 41(2), 334–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5705.2011.03857.x
   Google Scholar
• Skitka, L. J., & Bauman, C. W. (2008). Moral conviction and political engagement. Political Psychology, 29(1), 29–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00611.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smaldino, P. E. (2019). Social identity and cooperation in cultural evolution. Behavioural Processes, 161, 108–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2017.11.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smaldino, P. E., Lukaszewski, A., von Rueden, C., & Gurven, M. (2019). Niche diversity can explain cross-cultural differences in personality structure. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(12), 1276–1283. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0730-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, J. K., Fessler, D. M., Tiokhin, L., Frederick, D. A., Lee, S. W., & Navarrete, C. D. (2011). Trade-offs in a dangerous world: Women’s fear of crime predicts preferences for aggressive and formidable mates. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32(2), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, E. D., Hackathorn, J. M., & Crittendon, D. (2019). Judging scandal: Standards or bias in politics. The Journal of Social Psychology, 159(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2018.1453468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sosis, R., Kress, H. C., & Boster, J. S. (2007). Scars for war: Evaluating alternative signaling explanations for cross-cultural variance in ritual costs. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(4), 234–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staples, B. (2018). How the suffrage movement betrayed black women. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/28/opinion/sunday/suffrage-movement-racism-black-women.html
   Google Scholar
• Steffens, N. K., Haslam, S. A., Jetten, J., & Mols, F. (2018). Our followers are lions, theirs are sheep: How social identity shapes theories about followership and social influence. Political Psychology, 39(1), . 3–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, B. (2017). Communism through rose-colored glasses. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/27/opinion/communism-rose-colored-glasses.html
   Google Scholar
• Stillwell, A. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (1997). The construction of victim and perpetrator memories: Accuracy and distortion in role-based accounts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(11), 1157–1172. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672972311004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, J. L., Piereon, J. E., & Markus, G. E. (1982). Political tolerance and American democracy. Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tannenbaum, D., Ditto, P. H., & Pizarro, D. A. (2007). Different moral values produce different judgments of intentional action. Unpublished manuscript, University of California-Irvine.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, D. M., & Doria, J. R. (1981). Self-serving and group-serving bias in attribution. The Journal of Social Psychology, 113(2), 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1981.9924371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, D. M., & Jaggi, V. (1974). Ethnocentrism and causal attribution in a South Indian context. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 5(2), 162–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/002202217400500202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teney, C., Jacobs, D., Rea, A., & Delwit, P. (2010). Ethnic voting in Brussels: Voting patterns among ethnic minorities in Brussels (Belgium) during the 2006 local elections. Acta Politica, 45(3), 273–297. https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2009.25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teney, C., Lacewell, O. P., & De Wilde, P. (2014). Winners and losers of globalization in Europe: Attitudes and ideologies. European Political Science Review, 6(4), 575–595. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773913000246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tetlock, P. E., Kristel, O. V., Elson, S. B., Green, M. C., & Lerner, J. S. (2000). The psychology of the unthinkable: Taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 853–870. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.78.5.853
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tooby, J., Cosmides, L. (1996). Friendship and the Banker’s paradox: Other pathways to the evolution of adaptations for altruism. In Proceedings of the British Academy (Vol. 88, pp. 119–143). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2010). Groups in mind: The coalitional roots of war and morality. In H. Høgh-Olesen (Eds.), Human morality and sociality: Evolutionary and comparative perspectives (pp. 91–234). Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Tooby, J. (2017). Coalitional instincts. Edge. https://www.edge.org/response- detail/27168
   Google Scholar
• Turchin, P. (2012). Dynamics of political instability in the United States, 1780–2010. Journal of Peace Research, 49(4), 577–591. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343312442078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhlmann, E. L., Pizarro, D. A., Tannenbaum, D., & Ditto, P. H. (2009). The motivated use of moral principles. Judgment and Decision Making, 4(6), 479–491. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500004022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valdesolo, P., & DeSteno, D. (2007). Moral hypocrisy: Social groups and the flexibility of virtue. Psychological Science, 18(8), 689–690. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01961.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Prooijen, J. W., & Krouwel, A. P. (2016). Extreme political beliefs predict dogmatic intolerance. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(3), 292–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Hippel, W., Sekaquaptewa, D., & Vargas, P. (1997). The linguistic intergroup bias as an implicit indicator of prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(5), 490–509. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1997.1332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waytz, A., Young, L. L., & Ginges, J. (2014). Motive attribution asymmetry for love vs. hate drives intractable conflict. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(44), 15687–15692. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1414146111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, S., Motta, M. (2019). Many Americans think that climate change deniers ‘get what they deserve’ when disasters strike. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2019/01/24/many-americans-think-that-climate-change-deniers-get-what-they-deserve-when-disasters-strike/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.41be15f547e6
   Google Scholar
• Weeden, J., & Kurzban, R. (2013). What predicts religiosity? A multinational analysis of reproductive and cooperative morals. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(6), 440–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeden, J., & Kurzban, R. (2014). The hidden agenda of the political mind: How self-interest shapes our opinions and why we won’t admit it. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weiner, B., Osborne, D., & Rudolph, U. (2011). An attributional analysis of reactions to poverty: The political ideology of the giver and the perceived morality of the receiver. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(2), 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310387615
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westwood, S. J., Iyengar, S., Walgrave, S., Leonisio, R., Miller, L., & Strijbis, O. (2018). The tie that divides: Cross‐national evidence of the primacy of partyism. European Journal of Political Research, 57(2), 333–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetherell, G. A., Brandt, M. J., & Reyna, C. (2013). Discrimination across the ideological divide: The role of value violations and abstract values in discrimination by liberals and conservatives. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(6), 658–667. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550613476096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, D. (2021). Socially adaptive belief. Mind & Language, 36(3), 333–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YouGov. (2017). Americans and Trump part ways over Russia. https://today.yougov.com/news/2016/12/14/americans-and-trump-part-ways-over-russia/
   Google Scholar
• YouGov. (2020). 75% of republicans trust Trump’s medical advice. https://today.yougov.com/topics/politics/articles-reports/2020/04/24/75-republicans-trust-trumps-medical-advice
   Google Scholar
• YouGov/Economist. (2019). https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/hqfjbs2lws/econTabReport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zakrisson, I. (2005). Construction of a short version of the Right-Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(5), 863–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.02.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar