The Strange Epicycles of Political Psychology: A Response to Commentaries

References

• Ashton, M. C., Danso, H. A., Maio, G. R., Esses, V. M., Bond, M. H., & Keung, D. K. Y. (2005). Two dimensions of political attitudes and their individual difference correlates: A cross-cultural perspective. In Culture and social behavior: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 10, pp. 1–29). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Achen, C. H., & Bartels, L. M. (2016). Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumard, N., André, J. B., & Sperber, D. (2013). A mutualistic approach to morality: The evolution of fairness by partner choice. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(1), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11002202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, D. (2010). Bobos in paradise: The new upper class and how they got there. Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, J. R., Baron, R. S., & Inman, M. L. (2006). Misperceptions in intergroup conflict: Disagreeing about what we disagree about. Psychological Science, 17(1), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01662.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, J. R., Schlenker, B. R., & Collisson, B. (2013). Ideology and Prejudice: The Role of Value Conflicts. Psychological Science, 24(2), 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612447820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currid-Halkett, E. (2017). The Sum of Small Things: A Theory of the Aspirational Class. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Curry, O. S., Mullins, D. A., & Whitehouse, H. (2019). Is it good to cooperate? Testing the theory of morality-as-cooperation in 60 societies. Current Anthropology, 60(1), 47–69. https://doi.org/10.1086/701478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darwin, C. (1859). On the Origin of Species. HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• DeScioli, P., & Kurzban, R. (2013). A solution to the mysteries of morality. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 477–496. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeScioli, P., Massenkoff, M., Shaw, A., Petersen, M. B., & Kurzban, R. (2014). Equity or equality? Moral judgments follow the money. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281(1797), 20142112. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.2112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditto, P. H., Liu, B. S., Clark, C. J., Wojcik, S. P., Chen, E. E., Grady, R. H., Celniker, J. B., & Zinger, J. F. (2019). At least bias is bipartisan: A meta-analytic comparison of partisan bias in liberals and conservatives. Perspectives on Psychological Science: a Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 14(2), 273–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617746796
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Evans, G., & Neundorf, A. (2020). Core political values and the long-term shaping of partisanship. British Journal of Political Science, 50(4), 1263–1281. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123418000339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florida, R. (2003). Cities and the creative class. City & Community, 2(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6040.00034
   Google Scholar
• Frimer, J. A., Gaucher, D., & Schaefer, N. K. (2014). Political conservatives’ affinity for obedience to authority is loyal, not blind. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(9), 1205–1214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214538672
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gampa, A., Wojcik, S. P., Motyl, M., Nosek, B. A., & Ditto, P. H. (2019). (Ideo) Logical reasoning: Ideology impairs sound reasoning. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(8), 1075–1083. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619829059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., Silver, N., Edlin, A. S. (2009). What is the Probability Your Vote Will Make a Difference? NBER Working Paper No. w15220. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1454936
   Google Scholar
• Goren, P. (2005). Party identification and core political values. American Journal of Political Science, 49(4), 881–896. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00161.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. (2012). The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Hanel, P. H., Wolfradt, U., Maio, G. R., & Manstead, A. S. (2018). The source attribution effect: Demonstrating pernicious disagreement between ideological groups on non-divisive aphorisms. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harcourt, A. H., & De Waal, F. B. (1992). Coalitions and Alliances in Humans and Other Animals. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• James, W. (1893). The Principles of Psychology (Vol. 1). Holt.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, J. J., Sommers, R., Bloom, P., & Rand, D. G. (2017). Why do we hate hypocrites? Evidence for a theory of false signaling. Psychological Science, 28(3), 356–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616685771
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinder, D. R., & Kalmoe, N. P. (2017). Neither Liberal nor Conservative: Ideological Innocence in the American public. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Dawson, E. C., & Slovic, P. (2017). Motivated numeracy and enlightened self-government. Behavioural Public Policy, 1(1), 54–86. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2016.2
   Google Scholar
• Kurzban, R., Dukes, A., & Weeden, J. (2010). Sex, drugs, and moral goals: Reproductive strategies and views about recreational drugs. Proceedings. Biological Sciences, 277(1699), 3501–3508. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.0608
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, C. (2021). Virtue Hoarders: The Case Against the Professional Managerial Class. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malka, A., & Lelkes, Y. (2010). More than ideology: Conservative–liberal identity and receptivity to political cues. Social Justice Research, 23(2-3), 156–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-010-0114-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marie, A., Altay, S., & Strickland, B. (2023). Moralization and extremism robustly amplify myside sharing. PNAS Nexus, 2(4), pgad078. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad078
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mason, L. (2018). Ideologues without issues: The polarizing consequences of ideological identities. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(S1), 866–887. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfy005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercier, H., & Altay, S. (2022). Do cultural misbeliefs cause costly behavior? In The Cognitive Science of Belief: A Multidisciplinary Approach (pp. 193–208). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• More in Common. (2019). The Perception Gap. https://perceptiongap.us
   Google Scholar
• Moon, J. W., Krems, J. A., & Cohen, A. B. (2020). Opposition to short-term mating predicts anti-atheist prejudice. Personality and Individual Differences, 165, 110136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore-Berg, S. L., Ankori-Karlinsky, L., Hameiri, B., & Bruneau, E. (2020). Exaggerated meta-perceptions predict intergroup hostility between American political partisans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(26), 14864–14872. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2001263117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. E., & Kinder, D. R. (1996). Issue frames and group-centrism in American public opinion. The Journal of Politics, 58(4), 1055–1078. https://doi.org/10.2307/2960149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piketty, T. (2020). Capital and Ideology. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pulse of the Nation. (2018). The common good. (From Poll 11, July). https://thepulseofthenation.com/#the-common-good/
   Google Scholar
• Pulse of the Nation. (2018). Government handouts. (From Poll 11, July). https://thepulseofthenation.com/#government-handouts
   Google Scholar
• Osmundsen, M., Bor, A., Vahlstrup, P. B., Bechmann, A., & Petersen, M. B. (2021). Partisan polarization is the primary psychological motivation behind political fake news sharing on Twitter. American Political Science Review, 115(3), 999–1015. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens, L. A., & Pedulla, D. S. (2014). Material welfare and changing political preferences: The case of support for redistributive social policies. Social Forces, 92(3), 1087–1113. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sot101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinsof, D. (2023). The evolution of social paradoxes. https://psyarxiv.com/avh9t/
   Google Scholar
• Pinsof, D., & Haselton, M. (2016). The political divide over same-sex marriage: Mating strategies in conflict? Psychological Science, 27(4), 435–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615621719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinsof, D., & Haselton, M. G. (2017). The effect of the promiscuity stereotype on opposition to gay rights. PloS One, 12(7), e0178534. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sears, D. O., & Funk, C. L. (1991). The role of self-interest in social and political attitudes. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 1–91). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sears, D. O., & Henry, P. J. (2005). Over thirty years later: A contemporary look at symbolic racism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37(1), 95–125.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, B. F. (1965). Science and Human Behavior. Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Smallpage, S. M., Enders, A. M., & Uscinski, J. E. (2017). The partisan contours of conspiracy theory beliefs. Research & Politics, 4(4), 205316801774655. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168017746554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starmans, C., Sheskin, M., & Bloom, P. (2017). Why people prefer unequal societies. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(4), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Washburn, A. N., & Skitka, L. J. (2018). Science denial across the political divide: Liberals and conservatives are similarly motivated to deny attitude-inconsistent science. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(8), 972–980. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617731500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeden, J., & Kurzban, R. (2013). What predicts religiosity? A multinational analysis of reproductive and cooperative morals. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(6), 440–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westfall, J., Van Boven, L., Chambers, J. R., & Judd, C. M. (2015). Perceiving political polarization in the United States: Party identity strength and attitude extremity exacerbate the perceived partisan divide. Perspectives on Psychological Science: a Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 10(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615569849
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yu, H., Chen, J., Dardaine, B., & Yang, F. (2023). Moral barrier to compassion: How perceived badness of sufferers dampens observers’ compassionate responses. Cognition, 237, 105476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105476
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar