Advanced search
Publication Cover
Psychological Inquiry
An International Journal for the Advancement of Psychological Theory
Volume 34, 2023 - Issue 4
Submit an article Journal homepage
297
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reply

A Call for Keeping Doors Open and for Parallel Efforts

Paul De Boecka Department of Psychology, The Ohio State UniversityColumbus, OhioCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0884-2582
ORCID Icon,
Jolynn Peka Department of Psychology, The Ohio State UniversityColumbus, Ohio
,
Katherine Waltona Department of Psychology, The Ohio State UniversityColumbus, Ohio
,
Duane T. Wegenera Department of Psychology, The Ohio State UniversityColumbus, Ohio
,
Brandon M. Turnera Department of Psychology, The Ohio State UniversityColumbus, Ohio
,
Barbara L. Andersena Department of Psychology, The Ohio State UniversityColumbus, Ohio
,
Theodore P. Beauchaineb University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana
,
Luc Lecavaliera Department of Psychology, The Ohio State UniversityColumbus, Ohio
,
Jay I. Myunga Department of Psychology, The Ohio State UniversityColumbus, Ohio
&
Richard E. Pettya Department of Psychology, The Ohio State UniversityColumbus, Ohio
 show all
Pages 291-297 | Published online: 19 Jan 2024

References

  • Bhaskar, R., & Danermark, B. (2006). Metatheory, interdisciplinarity and disability research: A critical realist perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 8(4), 278–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/15017410600914329
  • Cronbach, L. J. (1982). In praise of uncertainty. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1982(15), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1310
  • Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957
  • Cronbach, L. J., Rajaratnam, N., & Gleser, G. C. (1963). Theory of generalizability: A liberalization of reliability theory. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 16(2), 137–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.2044-8317
  • Davidse, K., & Olivier, N. (2008). English middles with mental and verbal predicates: Towards a typology. English Text Construction, 1(2), 169–197. https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.1.2.02dav
  • De Boeck, P., DeKay, M., & Xu, M. (2022). The potential of factor analysis for replication, generalization, and integration. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 117(540), 1622–1626. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2022.2096618
  • De Boeck, P., & Gore, L. R. (2023). The Janus face of psychometrics. In A. van der Ark, Emmons, W., & Meijer, R. (Eds.), Practical measurement essays on contemporary psychometrics (pp. 31–46). Springer.
  • De Boeck, P., & Jeon, M. (2018). Perceived crisis and reforms: Issues, explanations, and remedies. Psychological Bulletin, 144(7), 757–777. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000154
  • DeKay, M., Rubinchik, N., Li, Z., & De Boeck, P. (2022). Accelerating psychological science with metastudies: A demonstration using the risky-choice framing effect. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(6), 1704–1736. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221079611
  • Dickens, W. T., & Flynn, J. R. (2001). Heritability estimates versus large environmental effects: The IQ paradox resolved. Psychological Review, 108(2), 346–369. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.346
  • Flake, J., & Fried, E. I. (2020). Measurement schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920952393
  • Haig, B. D. (2005). An abductive theory of scientific method. Psychological Methods, 10(4), 371–388. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.10.4.371
  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1967). Notes on transitivity and theme in English. Part 1. Journal of Linguistics, 3(1), 37–81. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700012949
  • Haslbeck, J. M. B., Ryan, O., Robinaugh, D. J., Waldorp, L. J., & Borsboom, D. (2022). Modeling psychopathology: From data models to formal theories. Psychological Methods, 27(6), 930–957. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000303
  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2022). ISO 704:2022, Terminology work—Principles and methods (4th ed.). ISO.
  • Mäki, U. (2005). Reglobalizing realism by going local, or (how) should our formulations of scientific realism be informed about science? Erkenntnis, 63(2), 231–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-005-3227-6
  • Mari, L., Wilson, M., & Maul, A. (2019). Measurement across the sciences. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65558-7
  • Markus, K.A., & Borsboom, D. (2013). Frontiers of test validity and theory: Measurement, causality, and meaning. Routledge.
  • McDonald, R.P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • McShane, B. B., Böckenholt, U., & Hansen, K. T. (2022). Variation and covariation in large-scale replication projects: An evaluation of replicability. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 117(540), 1605–1621. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2022.2117703
  • Pek, J., & Park, J. (2019). Complexities in power analysis: Quantifying uncertainties with a Bayesian- classical hybrid approach. Psychological Methods, 24(5), 590–605. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000208
  • Pek, J., Pitt, M., & Wegener, D. (2022). Uncertainty limits the use of power analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001273
  • Shrout, P. E., & Rodgers, J. L. (2018). Psychology, science, and knowledge construction: Broadening perspectives from the replication crisis. Annual Review of Psychology, 69(1), 487–510. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011845
  • Stanford, P. K. (2003). Pirrhic victories for scientific realism. Journal of Philosophy, 100(11), 553–572.
  • Wu, H., & Browne, M. W. (2015). Quantifying adventitious error in a covariance structure as a random effect. Psychometrika, 80(3), 571–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-015-9451-3

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.