Taking Stock: A Scoping Review of Research in Criminal Justice Education

References

• Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616
   Google Scholar
• Barranco, Raymond E., Perry, Ashley., May, David C., Stives. (2022). Changing Influences in Criminology: Examining 45 Years of Criminology. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 33(1), 76–92.
   Google Scholar
• Beaulieu, M., Breton, M., & Brousselle, A. (2018). Conceptualizing 20 years of engaged scholarship: A scoping review. PloS One, 13(2), e0193201. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0193201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, D. (2013). How SoTL-active faculty members can be cosmopolitan assets to an institution. Teaching & Learning Inquiry the ISSOTL Journal, 1(1), 35–40. doi:10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.1.35
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, J. L. (2012). Signature pedagogies in political science. In Exploring more signature pedagogies: Approaches to teaching disciplinary habits of mind (pp. 85–96). Stylus Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cacchione, P. Z. (2016). The evolving methodology of scoping reviews. Clinical Nursing Research, 25(2), 115–119. doi:10.1177/1054773816637493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappello, A., & Miller-Young, J. (2020). Who are we citing and how? A SoTL citation analysis. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 8(2), 3–16. doi:10.20343/teachlearninqu.8.2.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chick, N. (2012). Signature pedagogies foreword. Transformative Dialogues: Teaching and Learning Journal, 6(1), 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Chick, N. L., Ostrowdun, C., Abbot, S., Mercer-Mapstone, L., & Grensavitch, K. (2021). Naming is power: Citation practices in SoTL. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 9(2), 1–26. doi:10.20343/teachlearninqu.9.2.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copes, H., Cardwell, S., & Sloan, J. J. (2012). h-index and m-quotient benchmarks of scholarly impact in criminology and criminal justice: A preliminary note. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 23(4), 441–461. doi:10.1080/10511253.2012.680896
   Google Scholar
• Cox, D., Cleak, H., Bhathal, A., & Brophy, L. (2021). Theoretical frameworks in social work education: A scoping review. Social Work Education, 40(1), 18–43. doi:10.1080/02615479.2020.1745172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crandall, K. L., Buckwalter, M. A., & Witkoski, M. (2021). Show and tell: An examination of experiential learning opportunities in Criminal justice courses. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 32(2). 155–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J., Cronley, C., Madden, E. E., & Kim, Y. K. (2014). Service-learning use in criminal justice education. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 25(2), 157–174. doi:10.1080/10511253.2014.882367
   Google Scholar
• DeJong, C., & St. George, S. (2018). Measuring journal prestige in criminal justice and criminology. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 29(2), 290–309. doi:10.1080/10511253.2017.1398344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Digest of Education Statistics. (2021). Undergraduate degree fields. Condition of education. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved October 23, 2022, from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d21/tables/dt21_322.10.asp
   Google Scholar
• Divan, A., Ludwig, L. O., Matthews, K. E., Motley, P. M., & Tomljenovic-Berube, A. M. (2017). Survey of research approaches utilised in the scholarship of teaching and learning publications. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 5(2), 16–29. doi:10.20343/teachlearninqu.5.2.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dooley, B. D., & Rydberg, J. (2014). Irreconcilable differences? Examining divergences in the orientations of criminology and criminal justice scholarship, 1951–2008. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 25(1), 84–105. doi:10.1080/10511253.2013.860995
   Google Scholar
• Durham, A. M. (1992). Observations on the future of criminal justice education: Legitimating the discipline and serving the general university population. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 3(1), 35–52. doi:10.1080/10511259200082511
   Google Scholar
• Fahmy, C., & Young, J. T. (2015). Invisible colleagues: The informal organization of knowledge production in criminology and criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 26(4), 423–445. doi:10.1080/10511253.2015.1051999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finckenauer, J. O. (2005). The quest for quality in criminal justice education. Justice Quarterly, 22(4), 413–426. doi:10.1080/07418820500364635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbidon, S. (2018). Editorial introduction. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 29(3), 323–323. doi:10.1080/10511253.2018.1448519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, H. (1999). Key aspects of teaching and learning in the social sciences and law. In H. Fry, S. Ketteridge and S. Marshall (eds.) p. 309–328. A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Enhancing Academic Practice.
   Google Scholar
• Geertsema, J. (2016). Academic development, SoTL and educational research. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(2), 122–134. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2016.1175144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, M., Lim, H., Lucas, S., & Meadows, R. (2015). Learning by doing: Experiential learning in criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 26(4), 471–492. doi:10.1080/10511253.2015.1052001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godfrey, C. (2020). Exploring the world “out there”: the use of scoping reviews in education research. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 18(5), 859–860. doi:10.11124/JBIES-20-00134
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gurung, R. A., Chick, N. L., & Haynie, A. (2009). Exploring signature pedagogies: Approaches to teaching disciplinary habits of mind Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, C., Beach, A., & Finkelstein, N. (2011). Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(8), 952–984. [Database] doi:10.1002/tea.20439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, B. B., & Buchanan, H. E. (2007). The scholarship of teaching and learning: A special niche for faculty at comprehensive universities? Research in Higher Education, 48(5), 523. doi:10.1007/s11162-006-9035-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden, G., Barker, K., Rosenberg, G., Kuppens, S., & Ferrell, L. W. (2011). The signature pedagogy of social work? An investigation of the evidence. Research on Social Work Practice, 21(3), 363–372. doi:10.1177/1049731510392061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubball, H., Clarke, A., & Poole, G. (2010). Ten‐year reflections on mentoring SoTL research in a research‐intensive university. International Journal for Academic Development, 15(2), 117–129. doi:10.1080/13601441003737758
   Google Scholar
• Hubball, H., Pearson, M. L., & Clarke, A. (2013). SoTL inquiry in broader curricular and institutional contexts: Theoretical underpinnings and emerging trends. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 1(1), 41–57.
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, W. G. (2013). On the importance of the Journal of Criminal Justice Education: A historical analysis using an alternative method. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 24(1), 122–133. doi:10.1080/10511253.2012.665933
   Google Scholar
• Khalil, H., Peters, M., Godfrey, C. M., McInerney, P., Soares, C. B., & Parker, D. (2016). An evidence‐based approach to scoping reviews. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 13(2), 118–123. doi:10.1111/wvn.12144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilgo, C. A., Ezell Sheets, J. K., & Pascarella, E. T. (2015). The link between high-impact practices and student learning: Some longitudinal evidence. Higher Education, 69(4), 509–525. doi:10.1007/s10734-014-9788-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. (1981). Experiential learning theory and the learning style inventory: A reply to freedman and stumpf. The Academy of Management Review, 6(2), 289–296. doi:10.2307/257885
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 193–212. doi:10.5465/amle.2005.17268566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kourgiantakis, T., Sewell, K. M., Hu, R., Logan, J., & Bogo, M. (2020). Simulation in social work education: A scoping review. Research on Social Work Practice, 30(4), 433–450. doi:10.1177/1049731519885015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krimmel, J. T., & Tartaro, C. (1999). Career choices and characteristics of criminal justice undergraduates. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 10(2), 277–289. doi:10.1080/10511259900084591
   Google Scholar
• Mainemelis, C., Boyatzis, R. E., & Kolb, D. A. (2002). Learning styles and adaptive flexibility: Testing experiential learning theory. Management Learning, 33(1), 5–33. doi:10.1177/1350507602331001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manarin, K., Adams, C., Fendler, R., Marsh, H., Pohl, E., Porath, S., & Thomas, A. (2021). Examining the focus of SoTL literature—teaching and learning? Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 9(1), 349–364. doi:10.20343/teachlearninqu.9.1.23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquis, E., Healey, M., & Vine, M. (2014). Building capacity for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) using international collaborative writing groups. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning, 8(1). Article 12. Available at: https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2014.080112
   Google Scholar
• McLean, K., Cruz, L., & Goff, C. (2021). The “Crime on Campus” study: Course-based undergraduate research and student confidence. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 32(2), 216–233.1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller-Young, J., & Yeo, M. (2015). Conceptualizing and communicating SoTL: A framework for the field. Teaching & Learning Inquiry the ISSOTL Journal, 3(2), 37–53. doi:10.20343/teachlearninqu.3.2.37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morn, F. (1995). Academic politics and the history of criminal justice education (No. 46). Greenwood Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Munn, Z., Peters, M. D., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 1–7. doi:10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2022). Undergraduate degree fields. Condition of Education. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved June 23, 2022, from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/cta.
   Google Scholar
• Nickelsburg, R. (2021). America is Losing its Black Police Officers. The Atlantic. October 4.
   Google Scholar
• O'Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85–95. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, W. M. (2016). Celebrating 100 years of criminal justice education, 1916–2016. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 27(4), 455–472. doi:10.1080/10511253.2016.1186992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penn, E. B., & Gabbidon, S. L. (2007). Criminal justice education at historically black colleges and universities: Three decades of progress. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 18(1), 137–162. doi:10.1080/10511250601144415
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M. D. J., Marnie, C., Tricco, A. C., Pollock, D., Munn, Z., Alexander, L., … Khalil, H. (2020). Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 18(10), 2119–2126. doi:10.11124/JBIES-20-00167
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pham, M. T., Rajić, A., Greig, J. D., Sargeant, J. M., Papadopoulos, A., & McEwen, S. A. (2014). A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Research Synthesis Methods, 5(4), 371–385. doi:10.1002/jrsm.1123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, S. K., Hickman, M. J., & Reynolds, P. (2011). A preliminary assessment of small world scholarship networks in criminology and criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 22(1), 67–83. doi:10.1080/10511253.2010.517651
   Google Scholar
• Santiago-Ortiz, A. (2019). From critical to decolonizing service-learning: Limits and possibilities of social justice-based approaches to community service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 25(1), 43–54.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, K. (2015). Community engaged research: Student and community perspectives. Partnerships: A Journal of Service Learning & Civic Engagement, 1(2), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134(3), 52–59. doi:10.1162/0011526054622015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southerland, M. D. (2002). Criminal justice curricula in the United States: A decade of change. Justice Quarterly, 19(4), 589–601. doi:10.1080/07418820200095361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southerland, M. D., Merlo, A. V., Robinson, L., Benekos, P. J., & Albanese, J. S. (2007). Ensuring quality in criminal justice education: Academic standards and the reemergence of accreditation. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 18(1), 87–105. doi:10.1080/10511250601144324
   Google Scholar
• Stentiford, L., & Koutsouris, G. (2021). What are inclusive pedagogies in higher education? A systematic scoping review. Studies in Higher Education, 46 (11), 2245–2261.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, G. (1976). Criminal justice education: Past, present and future. Criminal Justice Review, 1(1), 91–120. doi:10.1177/073401687600100109
   Google Scholar
• Sucharew, H., & Macaluso, M. (2019). Progress notes: methods for research evidence synthesis: the scoping review approach. Journal of Hospital Medicine, 14(7), 416–418. doi:10.12788/jhm.3248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tontodonato, P. (2006). Goals, expectations, and satisfaction of criminal justice majors: Implications for faculty, students, and programs. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 17(1), 162–180. doi:10.1080/10511250500336211
   Google Scholar
• Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C.,…Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMAScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2021). Employment situation summary. Retrieved October 23, 2022 from https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_nat.htm#33-0000.
   Google Scholar
• Wallengren Lynch, M., Bengtsson, A. R., & Hollertz, K. (2019). Applying a ‘signature pedagogy’in the teaching of critical social work theory and practice. Social Work Education, 38(3), 289–301. doi:10.1080/02615479.2018.1498474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesely, J. K. (2021). Skimming the surface or digging deeper: The role of emotion in students’ reflective journals during an experiential criminal justice course. Journal of Experiential Education, 44(2), 167–183.
   Google Scholar
• Wimshurst, K. (2011). Applying threshold concepts theory to an unsettled field: An exploratory study in criminal justice education. Studies in Higher Education, 36(3), 301–314. doi:10.1080/03075070903556063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodward, Vanessa H., Webb, Megan E., Griffin, O. Hayden., Copes, H. (2016). The Current State of Criminological Research in the United States: An Examination of Research Methodologies in Criminology and Criminal Justice. Volume 27(3), 340–361.
   Google Scholar