The Race to Exclude: Residential Growth Controls in California Cities, 1970–1992

References

• Allison, P. D. (2002). Missing data. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Allison, P. D. (2014). Listwise deletion: It’s NOT evil. Statistical Horizons Blog Post.
   Google Scholar
• Alvarez, R. M., & Butterfield, T. L. (2000). The resurgence of nativism in California? The case of Proposition 187 and illegal immigration. Social Science Quarterly, 81(1), 167–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apostle, R. A., Charles, Y. G., Piazza, T., & Suelzle, M. (1983). The anatomy of racial attitudes. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Asquith, B., Mast, E., & Reed, D. (2020). Supply shock versus demand shock: The local effects of new housing in low-income areas. Federal Reserve Board of Philadelphia Working Paper 20–07.
   Google Scholar
• Baldassare, M. (1986). Trouble in paradise: The suburban transformation in America. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Been, V., Ellen, I. G., & O’Regan, K. (2019). Supply skepticism: Housing supply and affordability. Housing Policy Debate, 29(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2018.1476899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolton, R. (1992). Place prosperity vs. people prosperity’ revisited: An old issue with a new angle. Urban Studies, 29(2), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420989220080261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boustan, L. P. (2010). Was postwar suburbanization ‘white flight’? Evidence from the Black migration. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(1), 417–443. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2010.125.1.417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowler, S., & Donovan, T. (1994). Information and opinion change on ballot propositions. Political Behavior, 16(4), 411–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01498825
   Google Scholar
• Brueckner, J. K. (1998). Testing for strategic interaction among local governments: The case of growth controls. Journal of Urban Economics, 44(3), 438–467. https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1997.2078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrows, L. B. (1978). Growth management: Issues, techniques, and policy implications. Center for Urban Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Calabrese, S., Epple, D., & Romano, R. (2012). Inefficiencies from metropolitan political and fiscal decentralization: Failures of Tiebout competition. The Review of Economic Studies, 79(3), 1081–1111. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdr048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, D. T. (1996). From George Wallace to Newt Gingrich: Race in the conservative counter-revolution, 1963-1994. Louisiana State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charles, C. Z. (2000). Neighborhood racial-composition preferences: Evidence from a multiethnic metropolis. Social Problems, 47(3), 379–407. https://doi.org/10.2307/3097236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christopher, B. (2023). California is losing population and building new houses. When will home prices come down? CalMatters, May 16.
   Google Scholar
• Cleveland, W. S. (1979). Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(368), 829–836. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1979.10481038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coan, T. G., & Holman, M. R. (2008). Voting green. Social Science Quarterly, 89(5), 1121–1135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2008.00564.x
   Google Scholar
• Colby, S., & Ortman, J. M. (2014). The baby boom cohort in the United States: 2012 to 2060 [Current Population Reports]. U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, W. J., & Margo, R. A. (2011). Race and home ownership from the end of the Civil War to the present. American Economic Review, 101(3), 355–359. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.3.355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly, M. (2008). Fatal misconception: The struggle to control world population. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohn, D. (1979). Big is no longer beautiful for many U.S. communities. Santa Barbara News-Press, March 4, A-1.
   Google Scholar
• Cutler, D. M., Glaeser, E. L., & Vigdor, J. L. (1999). The rise and decline of the American Ghetto. Journal of Political Economy, 107(3), 455–506. https://doi.org/10.1086/250069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawkins, C. (2023). Homelessness and housing supply. Journal of Urban Affairs, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2023.2168553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derenoncourt, E., Kim, C. H., Kuhn, M., & Schularick, M. (2022). Wealth of two nations: The U.S. racial wealth gap, 1860-2020. NBER Working Paper No. 30101.
   Google Scholar
• Desmond, M. (2016). Evicted: Poverty and profit in the American City. Crown Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dougherty, C. (2020). Golden gates: Fighting for housing in America. Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dubin, J. A., Kiewiet, D. R., & Noussair, C. (1992). Voting on growth control measures: Preferences and strategies. Economics & Politics, 4(2), 191–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0343.1992.tb00062.x
   Google Scholar
• Ehrlich, P. R., & Ehrlich, A. (1968). The population bomb. Sierra Club/Ballantine Books.
   Google Scholar
• Einstein, K. L., Glick, D. M., & Palmer, M. (2019). Neighborhood defenders: Participatory politics and America’s housing crisis. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, M. O., Yancey, G., & Chai, K. J. (2001). Does race matter in residential segregation? Exploring the preferences of White Americans. American Sociological Review, 66(6), 922–935. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240106600607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewing, R., & Cervero, R. (2017). “Does compact development make people drive less?” The answer is yes. Journal of the American Planning Association, 83(1), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2016.1245112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewing, R., & Rong, F. (2008). The impact of urban form on U.S. residential energy use. Housing Policy Debate, 19(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2008.9521624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faber, J. W. (2020). We built this: Consequences of New Deal Era Intervention in America’s racial geography. American Sociological Review, 85(5), 739–775. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122420948464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farley, R., Bianchi, S., & Colasanto, D. (1979). Barriers to the racial integration of neighborhoods: The Detroit case. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 441(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271627944100108
   Google Scholar
• Farley, R., Schuman, H., Bianchi, S., Colasanto, D., & Hatchett, S. (1978). “Chocolate city, vanilla suburbs”: Will the trend toward racially separate communities continue? Social Science Research, 7(4), 319–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/0049-089X(78)90017-0
   Google Scholar
• Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta. (2023). Home ownership affordability monitor. https://www.atlantafed.org/center-for-housing-and-policy/data-and-tools/home-ownership-affordability-monitor
   Google Scholar
• Fischel, W. A. (2001). The homevoter hypothesis. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischel, W. A. (2008). Political structure and exclusionary zoning: Are small suburbs the big problem? In G. K. Ingram & Y.-H. Hong (Eds.), Fiscal decentralization and land policies (pp. 111–136). Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, C. S., Stockmayer, G., Stiles, J., & Hout, M. (2004). Distinguishing the geographic levels and social dimensions of U.S. metropolitan segregation, 1960-2000. Demography, 41(1), 37–59. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2004.0002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frieden, B. J. (1979). The new regulation comes to suburbia. The Public Interest, Spring, 15–27.
   Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. L., & Kahn, M. E. (2010). The greenness of cities: Carbon dioxide emissions and urban development. Journal of Urban Economics, 67(3), 404–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2009.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. L., & Ward, B. A. (2009). The causes and consequences of land use regulation: Evidence from Greater Boston. Journal of Urban Economics, 65(3), 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2008.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glickfeld, M., Levine, N. (1992). Regional growth…local reaction: The enactment and effects of local growth control and management measures in California. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Gotham, K. F. (2002). Beyond invasion and succession: School segregation, real estate block-busting, and the political economy of neighborhood racial transition. City & Community, 1(1), 83–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6040.00009
   Google Scholar
• Gyourko, J., Saiz, A., & Summers, A. A. (2008). A new measure of the local regulatory environment for housing markets: The Wharton Residential Land Use Regulatory Index. Urban Studies, 45(3), 693–729. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098007087341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyourko, J., Hartley, J., & Krimmel, J. (2019). The local residential land use regulatory environment across U.S. housing markets: Evidence from a New Wharton Index. NBER Working Paper No. 26573.
   Google Scholar
• Gyourko, J., & Molloy, R. (2015). Chapter 19, Regulation and housing supply. In G. Duranton, J. V. Henderson, & W. C. Strange (Eds.), Handbook of regional and urban economics (Vol. 5B). North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, A., & Yoder, J. (2022). Does homeownership influence political behavior? Evidence from administrative data. The Journal of Politics, 84(1), 351–366. https://doi.org/10.1086/714932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, B. W. (1975). Zoning and property taxation in a system of local governments. Urban Studies, 12(2), 205–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420987520080301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helper, R. (1969). Racial policies and practices of real estate brokers. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• HoSang, D. (2010). Racial propositions: Ballot initiatives and the making of postwar California. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, J., & Lin, J. (2016). What have we learned about the causes of recent gentrification? Cityscape, 18(3), 9–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Immergut, E. M. (1990). Institutions, veto points, and policy results: A comparative analysis of health care. Journal of Public Policy, 10(4), 391–416. 10https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00006061
   Google Scholar
• Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. (1995). Referenda and primary election materials. https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/series/65/variables
   Google Scholar
• Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. (2013). General election data for the United States, 1950-1990. https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/series/00059/publications
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, K. T. (1987). Crabgrass frontier: The suburbanization of the United States. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, K. (2016). Do land use regulations stifle residential development? Evidence from California cities. Journal of Urban Economics, 91, 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2015.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. P. (2001). Environmental impacts of urban sprawl: A survey of the literature and proposed research agenda. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 33(4), 717–735. https://doi.org/10.1068/a3327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, H., & McGhee, E. (2023). Who’s leaving California–and who’s moving in? Public Policy Institute of California blog post.
   Google Scholar
• Jones-Correa, M. (2000). The origins and diffusion of racial restrictive covenants. Political Science Quarterly, 115(4), 541–568. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, M., & Matsusaka, J. (1997). Demand for environmental goods: Evidence from voting patterns on California initiatives. The Journal of Law and Economics, 40(1), 137–174. https://doi.org/10.1086/467369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, L., & Rosen, K. T. (1987). The interjurisdictional effects of growth controls on housing prices. The Journal of Law and Economics, 30(1), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1086/467133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krimmel, J. (2022). Reclaiming local control: School finance reforms and housing supply restrictions. Working paper.
   Google Scholar
• LaBriola, J. (2023). Housing market dynamics and the White-Black wealth gap. SocArXiv.
   Google Scholar
• Lancaster, J. (1990). Role of minorities in environmental movement remains limited. Washington Post, November 23.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, J., & Reina, V. J. (2021). Do restrictive land use regulations make housing more expensive everywhere? Economic Development Quarterly, 35(4), 305–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912424211043500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lens, M. C., & Monkkonen, P. (2016). Do strict land use regulations make metropolitan areas more segregated by income? Journal of the American Planning Association, 82(1), 6–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2015.1111163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeSage, J., & Pace, R. K. (2009). Introduction to spatial econometrics. CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, N. (1999). The effects of local growth controls on regional housing production and population redistribution in California. Urban Studies, 36(12), 2047–2068. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098992539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, N., Glickfield, M., & Fulton, W. (1996). Home rule: Local growth control…regional consequences. Report to the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California and the Southern California Association of Governments.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, P. G., & Neiman, M. (2002). Cities under pressure: Local growth controls and residential development policy. Public Policy Institute of California.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, P. G., & Marantz, N. J. (2019). What planners know: Using surveys about local land use regulation to understand housing development. Journal of the American Planning Association, 85(4), 445–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2019.1643253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X. (2022). Do new housing units in your backyard raise your rents? Journal of Economic Geography, 22(6), 1309–1352. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbab034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Link, M. W., & Oldendick, R. W. (1996). Social construction and White attitudes toward equal opportunity and multiculturalism. The Journal of Politics, 58(1), 149–168. https://doi.org/10.2307/2960353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littlewood, T. B. (1977). The politics of population control. University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Logan, J. (1978). Growth, politics, and the stratification of places. American Journal of Sociology, 84(2), 404–416. https://doi.org/10.1086/226790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, J., & Molotch, H. (1987). Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Logan, J., & Zhou, M. (1990). The adoption of growth controls in suburban communities. Social Science Quarterly, 71(1), 118–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mankiw, N. G., & Weil, D. (1989). The baby boom, the baby bust, and the housing market. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 19(2), 235–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(89)90005-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manson, S., Schroeder, J., Van Riper, D., Kugler, T., & Ruggles, S. (2022). IPUMS National Historical Geographic Information System: Version 17.0. IPUMS. .
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. S., & Rugh, J. S. (2017). The intersections of class and race: Zoning, affordable housing, and segregation in U.S. metropolitan areas. In G. D. Squires (Ed.), The fight for fair housing. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mast, E. (2023). JUE insight: The effect of new market-rate housing construction on the low- income housing market. Journal of Urban Economics, 133, 103383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2021.103383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe, B. (2013). Are homeowners better citizens? Homeownership and community participation in the United States. Social Forces, 91(3), 929–954. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sos185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, R. B. (2012). Land use regulation: Where have we been, where are we going? Cities, 29, S50–S55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2011.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merchant, E. K. (2021). Building the population bomb. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mleczko, M., & Desmond, M. (2023). Using natural language processing to construct a National Zoning and Land Use Database. Urban Studies, 60(13), 2564–2584. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980231156352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molotch, H. (1976). The city as a growth machine: Toward a political economy of place. American Journal of Sociology, 82(2), 309–332. https://doi.org/10.1086/226311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondragon, J., & Wieland, J. (2022). Housing demand and remote work. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Working Paper Series 2022–11.
   Google Scholar
• Monkkonen, P., & Manville, M. (2019). Opposition to development or opposition to developers? Experimental evidence on attitudes toward new housing. Journal of Urban Affairs, 41(8), 1123–1141. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2019.1623684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monkkonen, P., Lens, M., & Manville, M. (2020). Built-out cities? How California cities restrict housing production through prohibition and process. Terner Center Land Use Working Paper Series.
   Google Scholar
• Mummolo, J., & Nall, C. (2017). Why partisans do not sort: The constraints on political segregation. The Journal of Politics, 79(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1086/687569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41(5), 673–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington, K. (2021). Does building new housing cause displacement? The supply and demand effects of construction in San Francisco. Working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, S., Manville, M., & Lens, M. (2021). Research Roundup: The effect of market-rate development on neighborhood rents. UCLA Lewis Center for Regional Policy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Pogodzinski, J. M., & Sass, T. R. (1994). The theory and estimation of endogenous zoning. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 24(5), 601–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(94)02059-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quigley, J. M., & Raphael, S. (2005). Regulation and the high cost of housing in California. American Economic Review, 95(2), 323–328. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282805774670293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raphael, S. (2010). Housing market regulation and homelessness. In I. Gould Ellen and B. O’Flaherty (Eds.), How to house the homeless (pp. 110–140). Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Ray, B. K., Papademetriou, D., & Jachimowicz, M. (2004). Immigrants and homeownership in the urban America: An examination of nativity, socio-economic status and place. Migration Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Realtor.com. (2023). Housing Inventory: Median days on market in the United States. FRED (Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis).
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, R. V. (2017). Dream hoarders. Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reny, T. T., & Newman, B. J. (2018). Protecting the right to discriminate: The second Great Migration and racial threat in the American West. American Political Science Review, 112(4), 1104–1110. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055418000448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rienow, R., & Rienow, L. T. (1967). Moment in the sun: A report on the deteriorating quality of the American environment. Dial Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rolleston, B. S. (1987). Determinants of restrictive suburban zoning: An empirical analysis. Journal of Urban Economics, 21(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(87)90019-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein, R. (2017). The color of law: A forgotten history of how our government segregated America. W.W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Rothwell, J., & Massey, D. S. (2009). The effect of density zoning on racial segregation in U.S. urban areas. Urban Affairs Review, 44(6), 779–806. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087409334163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothwell, J., & Massey, D. S. (2010). Density zoning and class segregation in U.S. metropolitan areas. Social Science Quarterly, 91(5), 1123–1143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2010.00724.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahn, A. (2023). Racial diversity and exclusionary zoning: Evidence from the Great Migration. Working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Schafran, A. (2018). The road to resegregation: Northern California and the failure of politics. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schanzenbach, D. W., Nunn, R., & Bauer, L. (2016). The changing landscape of American Life expectancy. The Hamilton Project.
   Google Scholar
• Schuman, H., Steeh, C., & Bobo, L. (1985). Racial attitudes in America: Trends and interpretations. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Self, R. O. (2003). American Babylon: Race and the struggle for postwar Oakland. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shertzer, A., Twinam, T., & Walsh, R. P. (2016). Race, ethnicity, and discriminatory zoning. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 8(3), 217–246. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20140430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shertzer, A., Twinam, T., Walsh, R. P. (2021). Zoning and segregation in urban economic history. NBER Working Paper No. 28351.
   Google Scholar
• Silver, C. (1997). The racial origins of zoning in American cities. In J. M. Thomas & M. Ritzdorf (Eds.), Urban planning and the African American Community: In the shadows. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Steele, F. (2011). Multilevel discrete-time event history models with applications to the analysis of recurrent employment transitions. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 53(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842X.2011.00604.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, F., & Washbrook, E. (2013). Discrete-time event history analysis. Lecture, Centre for Multilevel Modeling, University of Bristol, July 16–17.
   Google Scholar
• Stessa. (2021). U.S. States building the least new housing relative to job growth. https://www.stessa.com/blog/states-building-least-new-housing-relative-to-job-growth/
   Google Scholar
• Support U.S. Population Stabilization. (2022). Official Sierra Club population policy. https://www.susps.org/history/scpolicy.html#:∼:text=The%20Sierra%20Club%20believes%20that,of%20national%20or%20racial%20genocide.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. (2015). California’s high housing costs: Causes and consequences. California Legislative Analyst’s Office.
   Google Scholar
• The California Association of Local Agency Formation Commissions (CALAFCO). (2021). California cities by incorporation date. https://calafco.org/resources/incorporated-cities/california-cities-incorporation-date
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (1998). Durable inequality. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tolbert, C. J., & Grummel, J. A. (2003). Revisiting the racial threat hypothesis: White voter support for California’s Proposition 209. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 3(2), 183–202.
   Google Scholar
• Torgeson, D. (1971). Which way for Echo Park—Inner city oasis or slum? Los Angeles Times, September 19.
   Google Scholar
• Troesken, W., & Walsh, R. (2019). Collective action, white flight, and the origins of racial zoning laws. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 35(2), 289–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trounstine, J. (2018). Segregation by design: Local politics and inequality in American cities. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trounstine, J. (2020). The geography of inequality: How land use regulation produces segregation. American Political Science Review, 114(2), 443–455. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twinam, T. (2018). The long-run impact of zoning: Institutional hysteresis and durable capital in Seattle, 1920-2015. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 73, 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2018.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. (2015). Annual survey of state and local government finances and census of governments 1967–2012. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/gov-finances.html
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, D. (2018). ‘California Greenin’: How the golden state became an environmental leader. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weden, M. M., Peterson, C. E., Miles, J. N., & Shih, R. A. (2015). Evaluating linearly interpolated intercensal estimates of demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of U.S. counties and census tracts 2001-2009. Population Research and Policy Review, 34(4), 541–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-015-9359-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittemore, A. H. (2018). The role of racial bias in exclusionary zoning: The case of Durham, North Carolina, 1945-2014. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 50(4), 826–847. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X18755144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiener, S. (2018). Senator Wiener introduces zoning reform bill to allow more housing near public transportation and job centers. https://sd11.senate.ca.gov/news/20181204-senator-wiener-introduces-zoning-reform-bill-allow-more-housing-near-public
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, E. N. (2016). Household wealth trends in the United States, 1962 to 2013: What happened over the Great Recession? RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 2(6), 24–43.
   Google Scholar
• Yoder, J. (2020). Does property ownership lead to participation in local politics? Evidence from property records and meeting minutes. American Political Science Review, 114(4), 1213–1229. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuk, M., & Chapple, K. (2016). Housing production, filtering, and displacement: Un-tangling the relationships. UC Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies Research Brief.
   Google Scholar