Setting the Record Straight Regarding Tools That Assess Risk for Youth with Sexually Abusive Behavior

References

• American Educational Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Association (APA), & National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME). (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. AERA.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct, Section 8: Research and Publication, 8.10 B (Reporting Research Results). https://www.apa.org/ethics/code
   Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association. (2022). Standardized test. APA Dictionary of Psychology. Retrieved November 12, 2022 from https://dictionary.apa.org/standardized-test
   Google Scholar
• Augur Enterprises, Inc. (2011). MIDSA Clinical Manual. Retrieved July 12, 2017, from http://www.midsa.us/learnmore.php
   Google Scholar
• Borum, R., Bartel, P., & Forth, A. (2006). Manual for the structured assessment for violence risk in youth (SAVRY). Psychological Assessment Resource.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, M. (2019, June 13). Redemption of juveniles adjudicated for sexual offenses. Presentation at the Conference of the Wisconsin Chapter of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers (Wi ATSA), Madison, WI.
   Google Scholar
• California Sex Offender Management Board. (2022, November). Casomb’s Guidelines for Treating and Supervising Youth Who Have Committed a Sexual Offense. https://casomb.org/
   Google Scholar
• Collie, R. M., & Ward, T. (2007). Current empirical assessment methods for adolescents and children who sexually abuse others. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 16(4), 75–99. https://doi.org/10.1300/10911350802081634
   Google Scholar
• Curwen, T. (2011). A framework to assist in evaluating children’s risk to repeat concerning sexual behaviour. In M. Calder (Ed.), Contemporary practice with young people who sexually abuse: Evidence-based developments (pp. 263–291). Russell House Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• de Vries Robbé, M., Geers, M., Stapel, M., Hilterman, E., & de Vogel, V. (2015). SAPROF Youth Version: Guidelines for the assessment of protective factors for violence risk in juveniles. Vander Hoeven Kliniek part of De Forensische Zorgspecialisten.
   Google Scholar
• Epperson, D. L., & Ralston, C. A. (2015). Development and validation of the juvenile sexual offender recidivism risk assessment tool -II. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 27(6), 529–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063213514452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epperson, D. L., Ralston, C. A., Fowers, D., DeWitt, J., & Gore, K. S. (2006). Actuarial risk assessment with juveniles who offend sexually: Development of the juvenile sexual offense recidivism risk assessment tool-II (JSORRAT-II). In D. Prescott (Ed.), Risk assessment of youth who have sexually abused: Theory, controversy, and emerging strategies (pp. 118–169). Barnes.
   Google Scholar
• Fanniff, A. M., & Becker, J. V. (2006). Specialized assessment and treatment of adolescent sex offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11(3), 265–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2005.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanniff, A. M., & Letourneau, E. J. (2012). Another piece of the puzzle: Psychometric properties of the J-SOAP-II. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 24(4), 378–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063211431842
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, D.(2018). Important considerations when selecting a risk assessment tool. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 27(8), 918–935. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2018.1474514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henniker, J., Print, B., & Morrison, T. (2002). An inter-agency assessment framework for young people who sexually abuse: Principles, processes and practicalities. Child Care in Practice, 8(2), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/13575270220148567
   Google Scholar
• Hiscox, S. P., Witt, P. H., & Haran, S. J. (2007). Juvenile risk assessment scale (JRAS): A predictive validity study. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 35(4), 503–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/009318530703500406
   Google Scholar
• Hoge, R. D., & Andrews, D. A. (2002). Youth level of service/case management inventory (YLS/CMI). Multi-Health Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, S., & Thomas, M. L. (2022). A compendium of risk and needs tools for assessing male youths at-risk to and/or who have engaged in sexually abusive behaviors. Sexual Offending: Theory, Research, and Prevention, 17, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.5964/sotrap.8085
   Google Scholar
• Kang Balzarini, T., Lee, A., Betrani, A., & Prentky, R. A. (2022). Tracking dynamic intervention needs as a vehicle for mitigating risk among juveniles with sex offenses. Psychology, Public Policy, and the Law, 29(2), 210–223. Retrievedonline November , 2022 https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, T., Beltrani, A., Manheim, M., Spriggs, S., Nishimura, B., Sinclair, S., Stachniuk, M., Pate, E., Righthand, S., Prentky, R., & Worling, J. (2019). Development of a risk/treatment needs and progress protocol for juveniles with sex offenses. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 5(2), 154–169. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000191
   Google Scholar
• Langton, C. M., Awrey, M. J., & Worling, J. R. (2023). Protective factors in the prediction of criminal outcomes for youth with sexual offenses using tools developed for adults and adolescents: Tests of direct effects and moderation of risk. Psychological Assessment, 35(6), 497–509. Advance online publication: 2023 March 2 https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manetsch, M., Nelson Aguiar, R. J., Hermann, D., van der Put, C., Grisso, T., & Boonmann, C. (2021). Mental health problems in girls who committed sexual offenses: Similarities and differences compared to girls with non-sex offenses and boys with sex offenses. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 721927. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.721927
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, L., Vosz, M., Gatwiri, K., Hitchcock, C., Tucci, J., Mitchell, J., Fernandes, C., & Macnamara, N. (2023). Approaches to assessment and intervention with children and young people who engage in harmful sexual behavior: A scoping review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380231189293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miccio-Fonseca, L. C. (2009). MEGA♪: A new paradigm in protocol assessing sexually abusive children and adolescents. Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma, 2(2), 124–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/19361520902922434
   Google Scholar
• Miccio-Fonseca, L. C. (2010). MEGA♪: An ecological risk assessment tool of risk and protective factors for assessing sexually abusive children and adolescents. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 19(7), 734–756. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2010.515542
   Google Scholar
• Miccio-Fonseca, L. C. (2012). Multiplex empirically guided inventory of ecological aggregates for assessing sexually abusive children and adolescents (ages 19 and under)—MEGA♪.
   Google Scholar
• Miccio-Fonseca, L. C. (2013). MEGA♪: A new paradigm in risk assessment tools for sexually abusive youth. Journal of Family Violence, 28(6), 623–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-013-9527-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miccio-Fonseca, L. C. (2014). Family lovemap, eroticized children and a constellation of sexually related risk variables. Journal of Forensic Practice, 16(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFP-03-2013-0019
   Google Scholar
• Miccio-Fonseca, L. C. (2016). MEGA♪ cross-validation findings on sexually abusive females: Implications for risk assessment and clinical practice. Journal of Family Violence, 31(7), 903–911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-016-9845-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miccio-Fonseca, L. C. (2018). Family lovemap and erotically related protective factors. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse: Special Issue on Risk Assessment of Sexually Abusive Youth, 27(8), 901–917. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2018.1494655
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miccio-Fonseca, L. C. (2019a). Contemporary risk assessment tools: Should we use them for sexually abusive children ages 4 to 12 years? Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma, 13(2), 141–151. Retrievedonline June 18, 2019 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40653-019-00267-z
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miccio-Fonseca, L. C. (2019b). MEGA♪: Empirical findings on the preternatural: Sexually violent and predatory sexually violent youth. Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma, Published, 12(4), 457–467. online 5 December 2018 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40653-018-0242-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miccio-Fonseca, L. C. (2020a). Emerging adults who are sexually abusive: MEGA♪’s investigative findings. Abuse: An International Impact Journal, 1(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.37576/abuse.2020.005
   Google Scholar
• Miccio-Fonseca, L. C. (2020b). MEGA♪ tool: An analysis of “risk/treatment needs and progress protocol” by Kang, Beltrani, Manheim, Spriggs, Nishimura, Sinclair, Stachniuk, Pate, righthand, Prentky, and Worling (2019). Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 29(3), 351–372. Retrievedonline March 5, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2020.1733161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miccio-Fonseca, L. C. (2021). A critical assessment of the youth needs and progress scale. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 30(7), 765–784. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2021.1914260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miccio-Fonseca, L. C. (2022, Fall/Winter). Counterpoint: California sex offender management board guidelines on youth: A failed attempt to be evidence-based. Perspectives: Ccoso’s Quarterly Newsletter, 1, 6–24. California Coalition on Sexual Offending https://ccoso.org/
   Google Scholar
• Miccio-Fonseca, L. C., & Rasmussen, L. A. (2009a). Advancement in risk assessment of sexually abusive youth: Applicability of MEGA♪ to low intellectual functioning youth. Journal of Child and Adolescent Trauma, 2(3), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/19361520903120186
   Google Scholar
• Miccio-Fonseca, L. C., & Rasmussen, L. A. (2009b). New nomenclature for sexually abusive youth: Naming and assessing sexually violent and predatory offenders. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, and Trauma, 18(1), 106–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926770802616431
   Google Scholar
• Miccio-Fonseca, L. C., & Rasmussen, L. A. (2011). Concise review on validated risk assessment tools for sexually abusive youth. Sexual Offender Treatment, 6(2), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Miccio-Fonseca, L. C., & Rasmussen, L. A. (2013). Applicability of MEGA ♪ to sexually abusive youth with low intellectual functioning. Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 6(1), 42–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/19315864.2011.650788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miccio-Fonseca, L. C., & Rasmussen, L. A. (2015). MEGA♪: Empirical support for nomenclature on the anomalies: Sexually violent and predatory youth. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 1–17. Advance online publication. 2 May 2014, https://doi.org/10.1177/030624X14533265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miccio-Fonseca, L. C., & Rasmussen, L. A. (2018). Scientific evolution of clinical and risk assessment of sexually abusive youth: A comprehensive review of empirical tools. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse: Special Issue on Risk Assessment of Sexually Abusive Youth, 27(8), 871–900. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2018.1537337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miccio-Fonseca, L. C., & Rasmussen, L. A. L. (2019). Sexually abusive youth with low intellectual functioning: Contemporary risk assessment findings from MEGA♪ studies. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, & Trauma, 29(8), 1000–1019. Retrievedonline September 20, 2019 https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2019.1660444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miccio-Fonseca, L. C., & Rasmussen, L. A. L. (2021). State of the art measures: Contemporary views on risk assessment of sexually abusive youth. In R. Geffner, J. W. White, L. K. Hamberger, A. Rosenbaum, V. Vaughan-Eden, & V. I. Vieth (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal violence and abuse across the lifespan: A project of the national partnership to end interpersonal violence across the lifespan (NPEIV) (pp. 3–21). Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Miner, M. H. (2019). Civil commitment of youthful offenders: Issues and concerns. In D. S. Bromberg & W. T. O’Donahue (Eds.), Sexually violent predators: A clinical science handbook (pp. 61–72). AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04696-5_5
   Google Scholar
• Parent, G., Piché, M., Laurier, C., Guay, J., & Knight, R. A. (2023). An inclusive typology of youths convicted of sexual or non-sexual crime. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 1–19. Retrievedonline February 20, 2023 https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2023.2179677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powers-Sawyer, A. B., & Miner, M. H. (2009). Actuarial prediction of juvenile recidivism: The static variables of the juvenile sex offender assessment protocol-II (J-SOAP-II). Sexual Offender Treatment, 4(2), from. Retrieved May 6, 2011 http://www.sexual-offendertreatment.org/index.php?id=78&type=123
   Google Scholar
• Prentky, R. Harris, B. Frizzell, K. & Righthand, S.(2000). An actuarial procedure for assessing risk with juvenile sex offenders. Sexual abuse. A Journal of Research and Treatment, 12(2), 71–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320001200201
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prentky, R., & Righthand, S. (2003). Juvenile sex offender assessment protocol II (J-SOAP-II) manual. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/202316.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Prentky, R. A., Righthand, S., Worling, J., & Kang, T. (2020, June). Final report: Development and implementation project for the youth needs and progress scale (YNPS). Office of Sex Offender Sentencing, Management, Assessment, Registration, and Tracking (SMART). Document Number: 254814, Date Received: 6/2020 Award Number:2016-AW-BX-K004.
   Google Scholar
• Ralston, C. A., Epperson, D. L., & Edwards, S. R. (2016). Cross-validation of the JSORRAT-II in Iowa. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 28(6), 534–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063214548074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, L. A. (2013). Young people who sexually abuse: A historical perspective and future directions. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 22(1), 119–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2013.744646
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, L. A. L. (2018). Comparing predictive validity of JSORRAT-II and MEGA♪ with youth who are sexually abusive in long-term residential custody. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(10), 2937–2953. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X17726550
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, L. A. L. (2022). Youth adjudicated for sex offenses, followed into adulthood, and found on a state sex offender registry. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, & Trauma, 31(10), 1359–1378. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2022.2112332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, L. A. L. (in press). Adjudicated adolescents located on a state sex offender registry website as adults: Common denominators. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, X(X), XX–XX. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2023.2280006
   Google Scholar
• Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (2005). Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC area, Cohen’s d, and r. Law and Human Behavior, 29(5), 615–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-6832-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rich, P. (2000-2017). JRAT: Juvenile Risk Assessment Tool: Assessment of Risk for Sexual Reoffense, Version 4.0. http://www.philrich.net/risk-assessment-instruments.html
   Google Scholar
• Rich, P.(2015a). Assessment of risk for sexual reoffense in juveniles who commit sexual offenses. In Sex Offender Management Assessment and Planning Initiative (SOMAPI) Research Brief ( Office of Sex Offender Sentencing, Monitoring, Apprehending, Registering, and Tracking (SMART)), (pp. 1–6). Office of Justice Programs, US Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Rich, P. (2015b). Changing faces in the assessment and treatment of sexually abusive youth. Sexual Offender Treatment, 10(1), 1–12. ISSN 1862-2941. Retrieved from: http://www.sexual-offender-treatment.org/index.php?id=139&type=123
   Google Scholar
• Rich, P.(2017, March). Assessment of risk for sexual reoffense in juveniles who commit sexual offenses. In United States Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs (Ed). Sex Offender Management Assessment and Planning Initiative (SOMAPI) (pp. 269–301). Office of Sex Offender Sentencing, Monitoring, Apprehending, Registering, and Tracking (SMART), Office of Justice Programs, US Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Rich, P. (2017b, November 5). J-RAT: Juvenile Risk Assessment Tool, Version 4. Retrieved November 24, 2022, from http://www.philrich.net/risk-assessment-instruments.html
   Google Scholar
• Rich, P. (2017c, November 5). LA-SAAT: Latency Age-Sexual Adjustment and Assessment Tool, Version 4. Retrieved November 24, 2022, from http://www.philrich.net/risk-assessment-instruments.html
   Google Scholar
• Rich, P. (2019, July 23). ID/J-RAT: Intellectual Disability Juvenile Risk Assessment Tool, version 5. Retrieved November 24, 2022, from http://www.philrich.net/risk-assessment-instruments.html
   Google Scholar
• Viljoen, J. L., Mordell, S., & Beneteau, J. L. (2012). Prediction of adolescent sexual reoffending: A meta-analysis of the J-SOAP-II, ERASOR, J-SORRAT-II, and static-99. Law and Human Behavior, 36(5), 423–438. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093938
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitacco, M. J., Caldwell, M., Ryba, N. L., Melesky, A., & Kurus, S. J. (2009). Assessing risk in adolescent sexual offenders: Recommendations for clinical practice. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 27(6), 929–940. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.909
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, S. C. P., Lewis, K., Stockdale, K., & Gordon, A. (2004-2011). The Violence Risk Scale-Youth Version [ Unpublished manuscript]. University of Saskatchewan.
   Google Scholar
• Worling, J. R. (2004). The estimate of adolescent sexual offense recidivism (ERASOR): Preliminary psychometric data. Sexual abuse. A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16(3), 235–254. https://do.org/1079-0632/04/0700-0235/0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worling, J. R. (2013). PROFESOR: Protective + Risk Observations for Sexual Offense Recidivism: User’s Guide. https://www.profesor.ca/uploads/8/7/7/6/8776493/profesor_user_guide_1.0_2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Worling, J. R. (2017, June 14). PROFESOR: Protective + Risk Observations for Sexual Offense Recidivism. June 19, 2017, from http://wwwprofesor.ca
   Google Scholar
• Worling, J. R., & Curwen, T. (2001, February). The ERASOR: Estimate of risk of adolescent sexual offense recidivism (version 2.0) sexual abuse family education and treatment (SAFE-T) program. Thistletown Regional Center for Children and Adolescents, Ontario Ministry of Community and Social Services.
   Google Scholar
• Worling, J. R., & Langton, C. M. (2015). A prospective investigation of factors that predict desistance from recidivism for adolescents who have sexually offended. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 27(1), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063214549260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, G., Chu, C. M., & Lee, Y. (2015). Assessing protective factors of youth who sexually offended in Singapore: Preliminary evidence on the utility of the DASH-13 and the SAPROF. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 27(1), 91–108. Epub 2014 Dec 18. PMID: 25527632; PMCID: PMC4441883 https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063214561684
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar