Transcranial direct current stimulation combined with cognitive training improves decision making and executive functions in opioid use disorder: a triple-blind sham-controlled pilot study

References

• Martins SS, Sarvet A, Santaella-Tenorio J, Saha T, Grant BF, Hasin DS. Changes in US lifetime heroin use and heroin use disorder: prevalence from the 2001-2002 to 2012-2013 national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017;74(5):445–55. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips J, Ford M, Bonnie RJ. Evidence on strategies for addressing the opioid epidemic. In Richard J. Bonnie, Morgan A. Ford, and Jonathan K. Phillips (Eds): Pain management and the opioid epidemic: balancing societal and individual benefits and risks of prescription opioid use; National Academies Press: Washington, pp. 187–265. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Wakeman SE, Larochelle MR, Ameli O, Chaisson CE, McPheeters JT, Crown WH, Azocar F, Sanghavi DM. Comparative effectiveness of different treatment pathways for opioid use disorder. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(2):e1920622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evren C, Karabulut V, Can Y, Bozkurt M, Umut G, Evren B. Predictors of outcome during a 6-month follow-up among heroin dependent patients receiving buprenorphine/naloxone maintenance treatment. Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bulteni. 2016;24:311–22.
   Google Scholar
• Herlinger K, Lingford-Hughes A. Addressing unmet needs in opioid dependence: supporting detoxification and advances in relapse prevention. BJPsych Adv. 2021;27:362–72.
   Google Scholar
• Verdejo-Garcia A, T-J, Chong T, Stout JC, Yücel M, London ED. Stages of dysfunctional decision-making in addiction. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2018;164:99–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein RZ, Volkow ND. Dysfunction of the prefrontal cortex in addiction: neuroimaging findings and clinical implications. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011;12(11):652–69. doi:10.1038/nrn3119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goudriaan AE, Grekin ER, Sher KJ. Decision making and response inhibition as predictors of heavy alcohol use: a prospective study. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2011;35(6):1050–7. doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01437.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domínguez-Salas S, Díaz-Batanero C, Lozano-Rojas OM, Verdejo-García A. Impact of general cognition and executive function deficits on addiction treatment outcomes: systematic review and discussion of neurocognitive pathways. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;71:772–801. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.09.030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shlosberg D, Amit BH, Zalsman G, Krivoy A, Mell H, Lev-Ran S, Shoval G. Cognitive impairments in abstinent male residents of a therapeutic community for substance-use disorders: a five-year retrospective study. Subst Use Misuse. 2019;54(4):538–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolomeo S, Steele JD, Ekhtiari H, Baldacchino A. Chronic heroin use disorder and the brain: current evidence and future implications. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2021;111:110148. doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2020.110148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldacchino A, Balfour DJK, Passetti F, Humphris G, Matthews K. Neuropsychological consequences of chronic opioid use: a quantitative review and meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012;36(9):2056–68. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.06.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezapour T, Hatami J, Farhoudian A, Noroozi A, Daneshmand R, Sofuoglu M, Baldacchino A, Ekhtiari H. Baseline executive functions and receiving cognitive rehabilitation can predict treatment response in people with opioid use disorder. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021;131:108558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Zhang F, Zhou Y, Zhang M, Wang X, Shen M. Decision-making deficits are still present in heroin abusers after short- to long-term abstinence. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013;130(1-3):61–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemenager T, Richter A, Reinhard I, Gelbke J, Beckmann B, Heinrich M, et al. Impaired decision making in opioid addiction correlates with anxiety and self-directedness but not substance use parameters. J Addict Med. 2011;5:203–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezvanfard M, Noroozi A, Golesorkhi M, Ghassemian E, Eghbali AN, Mokri A, et al. Comparison of response inhibition behavior between methadone maintenance patients and active opioid users. Int J High Risk Behav Addict. 2017;6:e33257.
   Google Scholar
• Feil J, Sheppard D, Fitzgerald PB, Yücel M, Lubman DI, Bradshaw JL. Addiction, compulsive drug seeking, and the role of frontostriatal mechanisms in regulating inhibitory control. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010;35(2):248–75. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.03.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen YW, Li YH, Xiao L, Zhu N, Bechara A, Sui N. Working memory and affective decision-making in addiction: a neurocognitive comparison between heroin addicts, pathological gamblers and healthy controls. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014;134:194–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barahmand U, Tavakolian E, Khazaee A, Mohammadi K. Hot and cold executive functions in pure opioid users undergoing methadone maintenance treatment: effects of methadone dose, treatment duration, and time between last methadone administration and testing. Niger J Clin Pract. 2016;19:603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biernacki K, McLennan SN, Terrett G, Labuschagne I, Rendell PG. Decision-making ability in current and past users of opioid: a meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;71:342–51. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.09.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ersche KD, Fletcher PC, Lewis SJG, Clark L, Stocks-Gee G, London M, Deakin JB, Robbins TW, Sahakian BJ. Abnormal frontal activations related to decision-making in current and former amphetamine and opioid dependent individuals. Psychopharmacology (Berl)). 2005;180(4):612–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan K, Qin W, Dong M, Liu J, Sun J, Liu P, Zhang Y, Wang W, Wang Y, Li Q, et al. Gray matter deficits and resting-state abnormalities in abstinent heroin-dependent individuals. Neurosci Lett. 2010;482(2):101–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fecteau S, Fregni F, Boggio PS, Camprodon JA, Pascual-Leone A. Neuromodulation of decision-making in the addictive brain. Subst Use Misuse. 2010;45(11):1766–86. doi:10.3109/10826084.2010.482434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochat L, Maurage P, Heeren A, Billieux J. Let’s open the decision-making umbrella: a framework for conceptualizing and assessing features of impaired decision making in addiction. Neuropsychol Rev. 2019;29(1):27–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart JL, May AC, Aupperle RL, Bodurka J. Forging neuroimaging targets for recovery in opioid use disorder. Front Psychiatry. 2019;10:117. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerrahoğlu-Şirin T, Aksu S, Kurt A, Karamürsel S, Baykan B. Efficacy and mechanisms of transcranial electrical stimulation in headache disorders. Neurol Sci Neurophysiol. 2019;36:57–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney JJ, Hanlon CA, Marshalek PJ, Rezai AR, Krinke L. Transcranial magnetic stimulation, deep brain stimulation, and other forms of neuromodulation for substance use disorders: review of modalities and implications for treatment. J Neurol Sci. 2020;418:117149. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2020.117149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naish KR, Vedelago L, MacKillop J, Amlung M. Effects of neuromodulation on cognitive performance in individuals exhibiting addictive behaviors: a systematic review. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018;192:338–51. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.08.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eskandari Z, Dadashi M, Mostafavi H, Armani Kia A, Pirzeh R. Comparing the efficacy of anodal, cathodal, and sham transcranial direct current stimulation on brain-derived neurotrophic factor and psychological symptoms in opioid-addicted patients. Basic Clin Neurosci. 2019;10(6):641–50. doi:10.32598/BCN.10.6.1710.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharifi-Fardshad M, Mehraban-Eshtehardi M, Shams-Esfandabad H, Shariatirad S, Molavi N, Hassani-Abharian P. Modulation of drug craving in crystalline-heroin users by transcranial direct current stimulation of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Addict Health. 2018;10(3):173–9. doi:10.22122/ahj.v10i3.613.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taremian F, Nazari S, Moradveisi L, Moloodi R. Transcranial direct current stimulation on opium craving, depression, and anxiety: a preliminary study. J Ect. 2019;35(3):201–6. doi:10.1097/YCT.0000000000000568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Shen Y, Cao X, Shan C, Pan J, He H, Ma Y, Yuan T-F. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the frontal-parietal-temporal area attenuates cue-induced craving for heroin. J Psychiatr Res. 2016;79:1–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadeghi Bimorgh M, Omidi A, Ghoreishi FS, Rezaei Ardani A, Ghaderi A, Banafshe HR. The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on relapse, anxiety, and depression in patients with opioid dependence under methadone maintenance treatment: a Pilot study. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:401. doi:10.3389/fphar.2020.00401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eskandari Z, Mostafavi H, Hosseini M, Mousavi SE, Ramazani S, Dadashi M. A sham-controlled clinical trial to examine the effect of bilateral tDCS on craving, TNF-α and IL-6 expression levels, and impulsivity of males with opioid use disorder. J Addict Dis. 2021;39(3):347–56. doi:10.1080/10550887.2021.1883208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mostafavi H, Dadashi M, Faridi A, Kazemzadeh F, Eskandari Z. Using bilateral tDCS to modulate EEG amplitude and coherence of men With opioid use disorder under methadone therapy: a sham-controlled clinical trial. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2022;53(3):184–95. doi:10.1177/15500594211022100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young JR, Smani SA, Mischel NA, Kritzer MD, Appelbaum LG, Patkar AA. Non-invasive brain stimulation modalities for the treatment and prevention of opioid use disorder: a systematic review of the literature. J Addict Dis. 2020;38(2):186–99. doi:10.1080/10550887.2020.1736756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nardo T, Batchelor J, Berry J, Francis H, Jafar D, Borchard T. Cognitive remediation as an adjunct treatment for substance use disorders: a systematic review. Neuropsychol Rev. 2022;32(1):161–91. doi:10.1007/s11065-021-09506-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampedro-Piquero P, Ladrón de Guevara-Miranda D, Pavón FJ, Serrano A, Suárez J, Rodríguez de Fonseca F, Santín LJ, Castilla-Ortega E. Neuroplastic and cognitive impairment in substance use disorders: a therapeutic potential of cognitive stimulation. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019;106:23–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamito P, Oliveira J, Lopes P, Brito R, Morais D, Caçoete C, Leandro A, Almeida T, Oliveira H. Cognitive training through mhealth for individuals with substance use disorder. Methods Inf Med. 2017;56(2):156–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezapour T, Hatami J, Farhoudian A, Sofuoglu M, Noroozi A, Daneshmand R, Samiei A, Ekhtiari H. Cognitive rehabilitation for individuals with opioid use disorder: a randomized controlled trial. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2019;29(8):1273–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmore CS, Dickmann PJ, Nelson BG, Lamberty GJ, Lim KO. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) paired with a decision-making task reduces risk-taking in a clinically impulsive sample. Brain Stimul. 2018;11:302–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiebener J, Brand M. Decision making under objective risk conditions-a review of cognitive and emotional correlates, strategies, feedback processing, and external influences. Neuropsychol Rev. 2015;25(2):171–98. doi:10.1007/s11065-015-9285-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand M, Roth-Bauer M, Driessen M, Markowitsch HJ. Executive functions and risky decision-making in patients with opioid dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008;97:64–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5 (R)); American Psychiatric Association Publishing: Washington, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Evren C, Gürol DT, Ögel K, Karadağ F. Reliability and validity of the Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS) Revised Version for substance craving in male substance dependent inpatients. Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi. 2011;22:70.
   Google Scholar
• Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961;4:561–71. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck AT, Epstein N, Brown G, Steer RA. An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988;56:893–7.
   Google Scholar
• Bechara A, Damasio AR, Damasio H, Anderson SW. Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition. 1994;50(1-3):7–15. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)90018-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lejuez CW, Read JP, Kahler CW, Richards JB, Ramsey SE, Stuart GL, et al. Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). J Exp Psychol Appl. 2002;8:75–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod CM. Half a century of reseach on the stroop effect: an integrative review. Psychol Bull. 1991;109:163–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartman DE. Wechsler adult intelligence scale IV (WAIS IV): return of the gold standard. Appl Neuropsychol. 2009;16(1):85–7. doi:10.1080/09084280802644466.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fecteau S, Pascual-Leone A, Zald DH, Liguori P, Théoret H, Boggio PS, Fregni F. Activation of prefrontal cortex by transcranial direct current stimulation reduces appetite for risk during ambiguous decision making. J Neurosci. 2007;27(23):6212–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soyata AZ, Aksu S, Woods AJ, İşçen P, Saçar KT, Karamürsel S. Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on decision making and cognitive flexibility in gambling disorder. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2019;269(3):275–284. doi:10.1007/s00406-018-0948-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passetti F, Clark L, Mehta MA, Joyce E, King M. Neuropsychological predictors of clinical outcome in opioid addiction. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008;94(1-3):82–91. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.10.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labudda K, Brand M, Mertens M, Ollech I, Markowitsch HJ, Woermann FG. Decision making under risk condition in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a behavioural and fMRI study. Behav Neurol. 2010;23(3):131–43. doi:10.3233/BEN-2010-0277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bikson M, Rahman A. Origins of specificity during tDCS: anatomical, activity-selective, and input-bias mechanisms. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7, article 688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouerchefani R, Ouerchefani N, Allain P, Ben Rejeb MR, Le Gall D. Relationships between executive function, working memory, and decision-making on the Iowa Gambling Task: evidence from ventromedial patients, dorsolateral patients, and normal subjects. J Neuropsychol. 2019;13(3):432–61. doi:10.1111/jnp.12156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obeso I, Herrero MT, Ligneul R, Rothwell JC, Jahanshahi M. A causal role for the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in avoidance of risky choices and making advantageous selections. Neuroscience. 2021;458:166–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khaleghi A, Pirzad Jahromi G, Zarafshan H, Mostafavi SA, Mohammadi MR. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex on risk-taking behavior. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2020;74(9):455–465. doi:10.1111/pcn.13025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorini A, Lucchiari C, Russell-Edu W, Pravettoni G. Modulation of risky choices in recently abstinent dependent cocaine users: a transcranial direct-current stimulation study. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8, article 661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boggio PS, Campanhã C, Valasek CA, Fecteau S, Pascual-Leone A, Fregni F. Modulation of decision-making in a gambling task in older adults with transcranial direct current stimulation. Eur J Neurosci. 2010;31:593–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boggio PS, Zaghi S, Villani AB, Fecteau S, Pascual-Leone A, Fregni F. Modulation of risk-taking in marijuana users by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010;112(3):220–5. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.06.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel H, Naish K, Soreni N, Amlung M. The effects of a single transcranial direct current stimulation session on impulsivity and risk among a sample of adult recreational cannabis users. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022;16:9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu S, Sun S, Camilleri JA, Eickhoff SB, Yu R. Better the devil you know than the devil you don’t: neural processing of risk and ambiguity. Neuroimage. 2021;236, article 118109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Faria CA, Alves HVD, Charchat-Fichman H. The most frequently used tests for assessing executive functions in aging. Dement Neuropsychol. 2015;9(2):149–155.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brand M, Fujiwara E, Borsutzky S, Kalbe E, Kessler J, Markowitsch HJ. Decision-making deficits of korsakoff patients in a new gambling task with explicit rules: associations with executive functions. Neuropsychology. 2005;19:267–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiebener J, Wegmann E, Pawlikowski M, Brand M. Supporting decisions under risk: explicit advice differentially affects people according to their working memory performance and executive functioning. Neurosci Decision Making. 2013;1:9–18.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn BD, Dalgleish T, Lawrence AD. The somatic marker hypothesis: a critical evaluation. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2006;30(2):239–71. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.07.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand M, Labudda K, Markowitsch HJ. Neuropsychological correlates of decision-making in ambiguous and risky situations. Neural Netw. 2006;19:1266–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand M, Labudda K, Kalbe E, Hilker R, Emmans D, Fuchs G, et al. Decision-making impairments in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Behav Neurol. 2004;15:77–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overman WH, Frassrand K, Ansel S, Trawalter S, Bies B, Redmond A. Performance on the IOWA card task by adolescents and adults. Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(13):1838–51. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.03.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teti Mayer J, Chopard G, Nicolier M, Gabriel D, Masse C, Giustiniani J, et al. Can transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) improve impulsivity in healthy and psychiatric adult populations? A systematic review. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2020;98, article 109814.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun DL, Chen ZJ, Ma N, Zhang XC, Fu XM, Zhang DR. Decision-making and prepotent response inhibition functions in excessive internet users. CNS Spectr. 2009;14(2):75–81. doi:10.1017/s1092852900000225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güngör B, Budak E, Taymur I, Zorlu N, Ucgun B, Akgul A, et al. The comparison of risky and ambiguity decision making and cool executive functions between patients with obsessive compulsive disorder and healthy controls. Arch Clin Psychiatry. 2018;45:112–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noël X, Bechara A, Dan B, Hanak C, Verbanck P. Response inhibition deficit is involved in poor decision making under risk in nonamnesic individuals with alcoholism. Neuropsychology. 2007;21(6):778–86. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.21.6.778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franken IH, Kroon LY, Wiers RW, Jansen A. Selective cognitive processing of drug cues in heroin dependence. J Psychopharmacol. 2000;14(4):395–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang L, Zhang J, Zhao X. Implicit processing of heroin and emotional cues in abstinent heroin users: early and late event-related potential effects. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2015;41(3):237–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friehs MA, Brauner L, Frings C. Dual-tDCS over the right prefrontal cortex does not modulate stop-signal task performance. Exp Brain Res. 2021; 239:811–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stramaccia DF, Penolazzi B, Sartori G, Braga M, Mondini S, Galfano G. Assessing the effects of tDCS over a delayed response inhibition task by targeting the right inferior frontal gyrus and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Exp Brain Res. 2015; 233:2283–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schluter RS, van Holst RJ, Goudriaan AE. Effects of ten sessions of high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (HF-rTMS) add-on treatment on impulsivity in alcohol use disorder. Front Neurosci. 2019;13, article 1257.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schroeder PA, Schwippel T, Wolz I, Svaldi J. Meta-analysis of the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on inhibitory control. Brain Stimul. 2020;13(5):1159–1167. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2020.05.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar