Self-Esteem as a Moderator of the Message Congeniality Effect

References

• Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Aronson, E. (1992). The return of the repressed: Dissonance theory makes a comeback. Psychological Inquiry, 3(4), 303–311. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0304_1
   Google Scholar
• Arpan, L. M., Lee, Y. S., & Wang, Z. (2017). Integrating self-affirmation with health risk messages: Effects on message evaluation and response. Health Communication, 32(2), 189–199. doi:10.1080/10410236.2015.1113483
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boney-McCoy, S., Gibbons, F. X., & Gerrard, M. (1999). Self-esteem, compensatory self-enhancement, and the consideration of health risk. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(8), 954–965. doi:10.1177/01461672992511004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boster, F. J., Carpenter, C. J., Shulman, H., Deangelis, B., Shaw, A. S., & Manata, B. (2010, November). In search of the elusive boomerang effect. Paper presented at the National Communication Association Convention, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, C. J. (2019a). An assessment of the measurement validity of the value-relevant involvement scale. Western Journal of Communication, 83(3), 345–364. doi:10.1080/10570314.2018.1475680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, C. J. (2019b). Cognitive dissonance, ego-involvement, and motivated reasoning. Annals of the International Communication Association, 43(1), 1–23. doi:10.1080/23808985.2018.1564881
   Google Scholar
• Cathcart, R. S. (1955). An experimental study of the relative effectiveness of four methods of presenting evidence. Speech Monographs, 22(3), 227–233. doi:10.1080/03637755509375146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditto, P. H., Liu, B. S., Clark, C. J., Wojcik, S. P., Chen, E. E., Grady, R. H., … Zinger, J. F. (2019). At least bias is bipartisan: A meta-analytic comparison of partisan bias in liberals and conservatives. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 14(2), 273–291. doi:10.1177/174569161774679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., Doherty, D., & Dowling, C. M. (2012). Personality and the strength and direction of partisan identification. Political Behavior, 34(4), 653–688. doi:10.1007/s11109-011-9178-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntington, H. E. (2020). Partisan cues and internet memes: Early evidence for motivated skepticism in audience message processing of spreadable political media. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 28(3), 194–208. doi:10.1080/15456870.2019.1614589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M. (2010). Fixing the communications failure. Nature, 463(21), 296–297. doi:10.1038/463296a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M. (2013). Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(4), 407–424. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2182588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M., Jenkins-Smith, H., & Braman, D. (2011). Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research, 14(2), 147–174. doi:10.1080/13669877.2010.511246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La France, B. H., & Boster, F. J. (2001). To match or mismatch? That is only one important question. Communication Monographs, 68(3), 211–234. doi:10.1080/03637750128063a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, S. K., Ahearne, M., Hu, Y., & Schillewaert, N. (2010). Resistance to brand switching when a radically new brand is introduced: A social identity theory perspective. Journal of Marketing, 74(6), 128–146. doi:10.1509/jmkg.74.6.128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky, S., & Oberauer, K. (2016). Motivated rejection of science. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(4), 217–222. doi:10.1177/0963721416654436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(11), 2098–2109. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüdecke, D. (2018). sjPlot: Data visualization for statistics in social science. R package version 2.4.1.9000, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=sjPlot.
   Google Scholar
• McEwan, B., Carpenter, C. J., & Hopke, J. E. (2018a). Mediated skewed diffusion of issues information: A theory. Social Media + Society, 4(3). doi:10.1177/2056305118800319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEwan, B., Carpenter, C. J., & Westerman, D. (2018b). On replication in communication science. Communication Studies, 69(3), 235–241. doi:10.1080/10510974.2018.1464938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., MacDonald, G., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1998). Through the looking glass darkly? When self-doubts turn into relationship insecurities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(6), 1459–1480. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.6.1459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherif, M., & Cantril, H. (1947). The psychology of ego-involvements. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, M. L., Whitehead, P. S., Sinnott-Armstrong, W., & Seli, P. (2020). Exposure to opposing reasons reduces negative impressions of ideological opponents. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 91, 1–16. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabor, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tetlock, P. E. (1989). Structure and function in political belief systems. In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 129–151). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• van ‘t Riet, J., & Ruiter, R. A. C. (2013). Defensive reactions to health-promoting information: An overview and implications for future research. Health Psychology Review, 7(S1), S104–S136. doi:10.1080/17437199.2011.606782
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. R., Aleman, C. G., & Leatham, G. B. (1998). Identity implications of influence goals: A revised analysis of face-threatening acts and applications to seeking compliance with same-sex friends. Human Communication Research, 25(1), 64–96. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1998.tb00437.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimbardo, P. G. (1968). Cognitive dissonance and the control of human motivation. In R. P. Abelson, E. Aronson, W. J. McGuire, T. M. Newcomb, M. J. Rosenberg, & P. H. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook (pp. 439–447). Skokie, IL: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar