Gender, Politeness, and the 2020 Democratic Presidential Primary Debates

References

• Anderson, K. V. (2017). Presidential pioneer or campaign queen?: Hillary Clinton and the first-timer/Frontrunner double bind. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 20(3), 525–538. doi:10.14321/rhetpublaffa.20.3.0525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axelrod, T. (2019). Klobuchar raises more than $1M in online donations since debate. The Hill. https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/475566-klobuchar-raises-800000-in-online-donations-since-debate
   Google Scholar
• Azari, J. (2019). What we know about the impact of primary debates: And what that could mean for 2020. FiveThirtyEight. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-we-know-about-the-impact-of-primary-debates/
   Google Scholar
• Banwart, M. C., & McKinney, M. S. (2005). A gendered influence in campaign debates? Analysis of mixed-gender United States Senate and gubernatorial debates. Communication Studies, 56(4), 353–373. doi:10.1080/10510970500319443
   Google Scholar
• Beauchamp, Z. (2019). Marianne Williamson isn’t funny. She’s scary. Vox. https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/7/31/20748594/marianne-williamson-debate-democratic-july-2019-depression
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L., McKinney, M. S., & Stephenson, M. T. (2002). Effects of watching primary debates in the 2000 U.S. presidential campaign. Journal of Communication, 52(2), 316–331. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02547.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, S. J., & Hubbard, C. (1999). Maximizing “minimal effects”: The impact of early primary season debates on voter preferences. American Politics Quarterly, 27(4), 450–467. doi:10.1177/1532673X99027004004
   Google Scholar
• Blackhart, G. C., Nelson, B. C., Knowles, M. L., & Baumeister, R. F. (2009). Rejection elicits emotional reactions but neither causes immediate distress nor lowers self-esteem: A meta-analytic review of 192 studies on social exclusion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(4), 269–309. doi:10.1177/1088868309346065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borchers, T., & Miller, J. L. (2014). Bain and political capital in the 2012 GOP primary debates. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(4), 574–590. doi:10.1177/0002764213506218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, P., Levinson, S. C., & Gumperz, J. J. (1987). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511813085
   Google Scholar
• Bushman, B. J., & Huesmann, L. R. (2010). Aggression. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, 5th ed., pp. 833–863). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bystrom, D., & Dimitrova, D. V. (2014). Migraines, marriage, and mascara: Media coverage of Michele Bachmann in the 2012 republican presidential campaign. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(9), 1169–1182. doi:10.1177/0002764213506221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, K. K., & Jerry, E. C. (1988). Woman and speaker: A conflict in roles. In S. Brehm (Ed.), Seeing female: Social roles and personal lives (pp. 123–133). New York: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carlin, D. B. (1992). Presidential debates as focal points for campaign arguments. Political Communication, 9(4), 251–265. doi:10.1080/10584609.1992.9962949
   Google Scholar
• Carlin, D. B., & Winfrey, K. L. (2009). Have you come a long way, baby? Hillary Clinton, Sarah Palin, and sexism in 2008 campaign coverage. Communication Studies, 60(4), 326–343. doi:10.1080/10510970903109904
   Google Scholar
• Collingwood, L., Barreto, M. A., & Donovan, B. T. (2012). Early primaries, viability and changing preferences for presidential candidates. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 42(2), 231–255. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5705.2012.03964.x
   Google Scholar
• Conroy, M., Oliver, S., Breckenridge-Jackson, I., & Heldman, C. (2015). From Ferraro to Palin: Sexism in coverage of vice presidential candidates in old and new media. Politics, Groups & Identities, 3(4), 573–591. doi:10.1080/21565503.2015.1050412
   Google Scholar
• Dailey, W. O., Hinck, E. A., & Hinck, S. S. (2005). Audience perceptions of politeness and advocacy skills in the 2000 and 2004 presidential debates. Argumentation & Advocacy, 41(4), 196–210. doi:10.1080/00028533.2005.11821630
   Google Scholar
• Dailey, W. O., Hinck, E. A., & Hinck, S. S. (2008). Politeness in presidential debates: Shaping face in campaign debates from 1960-2004. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Downey, G., Mougios, V., Ayduk, O., London, B. E., & Shoda, Y. (2004). Rejection sensitivity and the defensive motivational system: Insights from the startle response to rejection cues. Psychological Science, 15(10), 668–673. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00738.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dow, B. J., & Tonn, M. B. (1993). “Feminine style” and political judgment in the rhetoric of Ann Richards. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 79(3), 286–302. doi:10.1080/00335639309384036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, R. J. (2019). Biden retains lead in Iowa poll, but Warren and Buttigieg gain. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/08/us/politics/iowa-poll-2020-democrats.html
   Google Scholar
• Erikson, R. S., & Wlezien, C. (2014). The 2012 campaign and the timeline of presidential elections. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, E. (2010). Women for president: Media bias in nine campaigns. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Fracchiolla, B. (2011). Politeness as a strategy of attack in a gendered political debate—The Royal–Sarkozy debate. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(10), 2480–2488. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2011.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Grebelsky-Lichtman, T., & Katz, R. (2019). When a man debates a woman: Trump vs. Clinton in the first mixed gender presidential debates. Journal of Gender Studies, 28(6), 699–719. doi:10.1080/09589236.2019.1566890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, M. M., & Coker, C. R. (2016). The political is personal: Analyzing the presidential and primary debate performances of Hillary Clinton and Michele Bachmann. Argumentation & Advocacy, 52(3), 165–180. doi:10.1080/00028533.2016.11821868
   Google Scholar
• Hatfield, J. D., & Weider-Hatfield, D. (1978). The comparative utility of three types of behavioral units for interaction analysis. Communication Monographs, 45(1), 44–50. doi:10.1080/03637757809375950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinck, E. A. (1993). Enacting the presidency: Political argument, presidential debates, and presidential character. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Hinck, E. A., & Hinck, S. S. (2002). Politeness strategies in the 1992 vice presidential and presidential debates. Argumentation & Advocacy, 38(4), 234–251. doi:10.1080/00028533.2002.11821570
   Google Scholar
• Hinck, S. S., Hinck, R. S., Dailey, W. O., & Hinck, E. A. (2013). Thou shalt not speak ill of any fellow Republicans? Politeness theory in the 2012 Republican primary debates. Argumentation & Advocacy, 49(4), 259–274. doi:10.1080/00028533.2013.11821801
   Google Scholar
• Hinck, S. S., Hinck, E. A., Dailey, W. O., Hinck, R. S., Hansen, E., & Madsen, B. (2018). A tale of two parties: Comparing the intensity of face threats in the Democratic and Republican primary debates of 2012 and 2016. Argumentation & Advocacy, 54(1–2), 104–121. doi:10.1080/00028533.2018.1446865
   Google Scholar
• Hinck, R. S., Hinck, E. A., Hinck, S. S., Dailey, W. O., & Melton, B. (2021). The 2020 democratic presidential primary debates: Exploring politeness strategies for facing an aggressive incumbent. Argumentation & Advocacy, 57(3–4), 181–199. doi:10.1080/10511431.2021.1949554
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, J. (1995). Women, men and politeness. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, J., & Schnurr, S. (2005). Politeness, humor, and gender in the workplace: Negotiating norms and identifying contestation. Journal of Politeness Research, 1(1), 121–149. doi:10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.121
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, K. H. (1995). Beyond the double bind: Women and leadership. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, K. H., & Bridsell, D. S. (1988). Presidential debates: The challenge of creating an informed electorate. New York: Oxford University.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. I. (2005). Feminine style in presidential debate discourse 1960-2000. Communication Quarterly, 53(1), 3–20. doi:10.1080/01463370500055814
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, K. F. (1996). The political consequences of being a woman: How stereotypes influence the conduct and consequences of political campaigns. New York: Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, A. J. (2020). NBC News’ Democratic primary debate was most-watched ever. TVNewser. https://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/nbc-news-democratic-primary-debate-was-most-watched-ever/430865/
   Google Scholar
• Kline, S. (1984). Social cognitive determinants of face support in persuasive messages () [ Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois]. Proquest.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, R. T. (2005). The politics of nice. Journal of Politeness Research, 1(2), 173–191. doi:10.1515/jplr.2005.1.2.173
   Google Scholar
• Lanoue, D. J., & Schrott, P. R. (1989). The effects of primary season debates on public opinion. Political Behavior, 11(3), 289–306. doi:10.1007/BF00992301
   Google Scholar
• Lemert, J. B., Elliott, W. R., Nestvold, K. J., & Rarick, G. R. (1983). Effects of viewing a presidential primary debate. Communication Research, 10(2), 155–173. doi:10.1177/009365083010002001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masket, S., & Azari, J. (2016). How the parties took over the primary debates. Vox. https://www.vox.com/mischiefs-of-faction/2016/8/30/12679346/parties-took-over-debates
   Google Scholar
• McKinney, M. S., & Carlin, D. B. (2004). Political campaign debates. In L. L. Kaid (Ed.), Handbook of political communication research (pp. 203–234). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• McKinney, M., Davis, C. B., & Delbert, J. (2009). The first—and last—woman standing: Hillary Rodham Clinton’s presidential primary debate performance. In T. F. Scheckels (Ed.), Cracked but not shattered: Hillary Rodham Clinton’s unsuccessful campaign for the presidency (pp. 125–148). Lanham, MD: Lexington.
   Google Scholar
• McKinney, M. S., Kaid, L. L., & Robertson, T. A. (2001). The front-runner, contenders, and also-rans. American Behavioral Scientist, 44(12), 2232–2251. doi:10.1177/00027640121958294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinney, M. S., & Warner, B. R. (2013). Do presidential debates matter? Examining a decade of campaign debate effects. Argumentation & Advocacy, 49(4), 238–258. doi:10.1080/00028533.2013.11821800
   Google Scholar
• Meeks, L. (2012). Is she “man enough”? Women candidates, executive political offices, and news coverage. Journal of Communication, 62(1), 175–193. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01621.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyner, S. (2014). Do the speeches of Japanese female politicians feature Japanese women’s language? Political language from a gender perspective () [ Thesis, Gothenburg University]. Open. https://gupea.ub.gu.se/handle/2077/35327
   Google Scholar
• Millhiser, I. (2019). Elizabeth Warren is now leading the 2020 polls. Vox. https://www.vox.com/2019/10/8/20905274/elizabeth-warren-frontrunner-democratic-nomination-2020
   Google Scholar
• Mills, S. (2003). Gender and politeness. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Montez, D. J., & Brubaker, P. J. (2019). Making debate great again: U.S. presidential candidates’ use of aggressive communication for winning presidential debates. Argumentation & Advocacy, 55(4), 282–302. doi:10.1080/10511431.2019.1672033
   Google Scholar
• Nkechika, C. (2019). Analysis of the politeness strategies of the Nigerian female legislators in the Nigerian Parliament. African Journal of Social Issues, 2(1), 12–24.
   Google Scholar
• Okimoto, T. G., & Brescoll, V. L. (2010). The price of power: Power seeking and backlash against female politicians. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(7), 923–936. doi:10.1177/0146167210371949
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oleś, K. (2016). Gender differences in the use of selected politeness and impoliteness strategies observed in the debates of the House of Commons [ Thesis, Jagiellonian University]. Jagieloonian University Repository.
   Google Scholar
• Pfau, M. (1987). The influence of intraparty political debates on candidate preference. Communication Research, 14(6), 687–697. doi:10.1177/009365087014006004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfau, M. (1988). Intra-party political debates and issue learning. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 16(2), 99–112. doi:10.1080/00909888809365276
   Google Scholar
• The Racine Group. (2002). White paper on televised campaign debates. Argumentation & Advocacy, 38(4), 199–298. doi:10.1080/00028533.2002.11821568
   Google Scholar
• Santa Barbara, C. A.: Praeger Winfrey, K. L., & Schnoebelen, J. M. (2019). Running as a woman (or man): A review of research on political communicators and gender stereotypes. Review of Communication Research, 7, 111–138. doi:10.12840/ISSN.2255-4165.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnoebelen, J. M., Carlin, D. B., & Warner, B. R. (2009). Hillary, you can’t go home again: The entrapment of the first lady role. In T. F. Scheckels (Ed.), Cracked but not shattered: Hillary Rodham Clinton’s unsuccessful campaign for the presidency (pp. 45–68). Lanham, MD: Lexington.
   Google Scholar
• Schouten, F. (2019). Kamala Harris shines in commanding Democratic debate performance. CNN. https://www.cnn.com/2019/06/27/politics/kamala-harris-democratic-debate-performance/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Scott, D. K., Chanslor, M., & Dixon, J. (2021). U.S. presidential debates 1948-2020: An issue of formality and respect. Argumentation & Advocacy, 57(3–4), 157–180. doi:10.1080/10511431.2021.1949542
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, M. (2019). Kamala Harris surges in 3 polls after strong debate performance. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/02/us/politics/kamala-harris-polls.html
   Google Scholar
• Stieb, M. (2019). Marianne Williamson’s weirdest, most wonderful debate moments. New Yorker Magazine. https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/06/marianne-williamsons-weirdest-debate-moments.html
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, P. A. (1989). The 1984 vice-presidential debate: A case study of female and male framing in political campaigns. Communication Quarterly, 37(4), 329–343. doi:10.1080/01463378909385554
   Google Scholar
• Trifiro, B. M., Paik, S., Fang, Z., & Zhang, L. (2021). Politics and politeness: Analysis of incivility on Twitter during the 2020 Democratic presidential primary. Social Media Society, 7(3), 1–13. doi:10.1177/20563051211036939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, B. R., Bramlet, J. C., Hoeun, S., Manik, D. I., & Bolton, J. P. (2018). Presidential primary debates compared: Timing of debate and size of candidate field as moderator of debate effects. Argumentation & Advocacy, 54(1–2), 122–138. doi:10.1080/00028533.2018.1446868
   Google Scholar
• Warner, B. R., McKinney, M. S., Bramlett, J. C., Jennings, F. J., & Funk, M. E. (2020). Reconsidering partisanship as a constraint on the persuasive effects of debates. Communication Monographs, 87(2), 137–157. doi:10.1080/03637751.2019.1641731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weger, H., Hinck, E. A., & Sieter, J. S. (2019). Joe Biden’s nonverbal ridicule as a case of strategic maneuvering in the 2012 vice presidential debate. In E. A. Hinck (Ed.), Televised presidential debates in a changing media environment (Vol. 1, pp. 143–162). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger
   Google Scholar
• Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2010). Gender. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, 5th ed., pp. 629–667). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Yawn, M., Ellsworth, K., Beatty, R., & Khan, K. F. (1998). How a presidential primary debate changed attitudes of audience members. Political Behavior, 20(2), 155–181. doi:10.1023/A:1024832830083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar