Toward Rhetorically Infused Methods for Relational Network Modeling: The Visualization of Agency in Seismic Risk Visuals

References

• Alexander, D. E. (2014). Communicating earth-quake risk to the public: The trial of the “L’aquila Seven. Natural Hazards, 72(2), 1159–1173. doi:10.1007/s11069-014-1062-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alhadad, S. S. J. (2018). Visualizing data to support judgment, inference, and decision making in learning analytics: Insights from cognitive psychology and visualization science. Journal of Learning Analytics, 5(2), 60–85. doi:10.18608/jla.2018.52.5
   Google Scholar
• Althusser, L. (1971). Lenin and philosophy and other essays. In B. Brewer ( Trans.), New York: Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amidon, T. R., Nielsen, A. C., Pflugfelder, E. H., Richards, D. P., & Stephens, S. H. (2020). Visual risk literacy in “flatten the curve” COVID-19 visualizations. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 35(1), 101–109. doi:10.1177/1050651920963439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Boschi, E. (2013). L’aquila’s aftershocks shake scientists. Science, 341(6153), 1451–1452. doi:10.1126/science.341.6153.1451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brander, R. W., Drozdzewski, D., & Dominey-Howes, D. (2014). “Dye in the water”: A visual approach to communicating the rip current hazard. Science Communication, 36(6), 802–810. doi:10.1177/1075547014543026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherven, K. (2015). Mastering Gephi network visualization. Birmingham, UK: Packt.
   Google Scholar
• Cicero. (1939). In Brutus Orator. (Vol. V). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Condit, C. M., Gronnvoll, M., Landau, J., Shen, L., Wright, L., & Harris, T. M. (2009). Believing in both genetic determinism and behavioral action: A materialist framework and implications. Public Understanding of Science, 18(6), 730–746. doi:10.1177/0963662508094098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coole, D., & Frost, S. (2010). New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1988). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Camden: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• DeLuca, K. M. (1999). Image politics: The new rhetoric of environmental activism. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Civil Protection. (2007). The Civil Protection Handbook for Families. www.protezionecivile.it
   Google Scholar
• DeVasto, D., Graham, S. S., & Zamparutti, L. (2016). Stasis and matters of concern: The conviction of the L’Aquila Seven. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 30(2), 131–164. doi:10.1177/1050651915620364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dighton, D. (2020). Arranging a rhetorical feminist methodology: The visualization of anti-gentrification rhetoric on Twitter. Kairos, 25(1), Retrieved from. http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/25.1/topoi/dighton/index.html
   Google Scholar
• D’Ignazio, C., & Klein, L. (2020). Data Feminism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dobos, A. R., Orthia, L. A., & Lamberts, R. (2015). Does a picture tell a thousand words? The uses of digitally produced, multimodal pictures for communicating information about Alzheimer’s disease. Public Understanding of Science, 24(6), 712–730. doi:10.1177/0963662514533623
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobrin, S., & Morey, S. (2009). Ecosee: Image, rhetoric, and Nature. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Earthquake Hazards Program. (2019). Earthquake hazards 101 - the basics. https://www.usgs.gov/programs/earthquake-hazards/science/earthquake-hazards-101-basics
   Google Scholar
• Eppler, M. J., & Aeschimann, M. (2008). Envisioning risk: A systematic framework for risk visualization in risk management and communication. University of Lugano. http://www.knowledge-communication.org/pdf/envisioning-risk.pdf
   Google Scholar
• FEMA. (2015). Earthquake information for public policy makers and planners. https://www.fema.gov/earthquake-information-public-policy-makers-and-planners
   Google Scholar
• Freelon, D. G. (2010). ReCal: Intercoder reliability calculation as a web service. International Journal of Internet Science, 5(1), 20–33.
   Google Scholar
• Gaonkar, D. P. (1993). The idea of rhetoric in the rhetoric of science. The Southern Communication Journal, 58(4), 258–295.
   Google Scholar
• Geisler, C. (2005). Teaching the post‐modern rhetor continuing the conversation on rhetorical agency. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 35(4), 107–113.
   Google Scholar
• Gephi. (2022). Tutorial Layouts. https://gephi.org/users/tutorial-layouts/
   Google Scholar
• Grabill, J. T., & Pigg, S. (2012). Messy rhetoric: Identity performance as rhetorical agency in online public forums. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 42(2), 99–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S. S. (2009). Agency and the rhetoric of medicine: Biomedical brain scans and the ontology of Fibromyalgia. Technical Communication Quarterly, 18(4), 37–41.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. S. (2015). The Politics of Pain Medicine. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. S. (2017). Conflict metrics. http://conflictmetrics.com
   Google Scholar
• Gries, L. (2015). Still life with rhetoric: A new materialist approach for visual rhetorics. Denver, CO: University Press of Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Gries, L. (2017). Mapping Obama hope: A data visualization project for visual rhetorics. Kairos, 20(1), Retrieved from. http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/21.2/topoi/gries
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. (1997). Modest_witness@second Millennium. FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse: Feminism and technoscience. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hariman, R., & Lucaites, J. L. (2007). No caption needed: Iconic photographs, public culture, and liberal democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1(1), 77–89.
   Google Scholar
• Herndl, C. G., & Licona, A. C. (2007). Shifting agency: Agency, kairos, and the possibilities of social action. In M. Zachry & C. Thralls, Communicative practices in workplaces and the professions (pp. 133–153). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, R., Visschers, V. H., Siegrist, M., & Keller, C. (2011). How do people perceive graphical risk communication? The role of subjective numeracy. Journal of Risk Research, 14(1), 47–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Federation of the Red Cross. (2011). Public awareness and public education for disaster risk reduction: A guide. http://www.ifrc.org/Global/Publications/disasters/reducing_risks/302200-Public-awareness-DDR-guide-EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, N. R. (2017, March 24). Co-citation patterns in Rhetoric Society Quarterly and Quarterly Journal of Speech. http://nathanjohnson.us/2017/03/24/co-citation-patterns-in-rhetoric-society-quarterly-and-quarterly-journal-of-speech
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. A., & Johnson, N. R. (2018). Can objects be moral agents? Post human praxis in public transportation. In K. R. Moore & D. P. Richards (Eds.), Posthuman praxis in technical communication (pp. 121–140). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, N. R., & Johnson, M. A. (2016). Glitch as infrastructural monster. Enculturation, 22. https://www.enculturation.net/glitch-as-infrastructural-monster
   Google Scholar
• Keränen, L. (2007). ‘Cause someday we all die’: Rhetoric, agency, and the case of the ‘patient’ preferences worksheet. The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 93(2), 179–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler, M. M. (2016). Wearing an ostomy pouch and becoming an ostomate: A kairological approach to wearability. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 46(3), 236–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler, M. M., & Graham, S. S. (2018). Terminal node problems: ANT 2.0 and prescription drug labels. Technical Communication Quarterly, 27(2), 121–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khokhar, D. (2015). Gephi cookbook. Birmingham, UK: Packt.
   Google Scholar
• Kinsella, W. J. (2005). Rhetoric, action, and agency in institutionalized science and technology. Technical Communication Quarterly, 14(3), 303–310.
   Google Scholar
• Koerber, A. (2006). Rhetorical agency, resistance, and the disciplinary rhetorics of breastfeeding. Technical Communication Quarterly, 15(1), 87–101.
   Google Scholar
• Kostelnick, C. (1996). Supra-textual design: The visual rhetoric of whole documents. Technical Communication Quarterly, 5(1), 9–33.
   Google Scholar
• Kostelnick, J. C., McDermott, D., Rowley, R. J., & Bunnyfield, N. (2013). A cartographic framework for visualizing risk. Cartographica, 48(3), 200–224.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lundberg, C., & Gunn, J. (2005). ‘Ouija board, are there any communications?’ Agency, ontotheology, and the death of the humanist subject, or, continuing the ARS conversation. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 35(4), 83–105.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. R. (2007). What can automation tell us about agency? Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 37(2), 137–157.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. R., Walsh, L., Wynn, J., Kelly, A. R., & Walker, K. C. (2016). The great chain of being: Manifesto on the problem of agency in science communication. POROI, 12(1), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Mucciarelli, M. (2014). Some comments on the first degree sentence of the “L’aquila trial. In M. Wyss & S. Peppoloni (Eds.), Geo-ethics: Ethical challenges and case studies in Earth Sciences (pp. 206–210). Waltham, MA: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Nigg, J. M. (1982). Communication under conditions of uncertainty: Understanding earthquake forecasting. Journal of Communication, 32(1), 27–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olman, L., & DeVasto, D. (2020). Hybrid collectivity: Hacking environmental risk visualization for the Anthropocene. Communication Design Quarterly, 8(4), 15–28.
   Google Scholar
• Omizo, R., & Hart-Davidson, W. (2016). Finding genre signals in academic writing. Journal of Writing Research, 17(3), 485–509.
   Google Scholar
• Pastore, M., Lionetti, F., & Altoè, G. (2017). When one shape does not fit all: A commentary essay on the use of graphs in psychological research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(1666),1–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petersen, M. D., Mueller, C. S., Moschetti, M. P., Hoover, S. M., Llenos, A. L., Ellsworth, W.L., and Rukstales, K. S. (2016). US Geological Survey. https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/ofr20161035
   Google Scholar
• Pietrucci, P., & Ceccarelli, L. (2019). Scientist citizens: Rhetoric and responsibility in L’Aquila. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 22(1), 95–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potts, L. (2014). Social media in disaster response. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Potts, L., & Jones, D. (2011). Contextualizing experiences: Tracing the relationships between people and technologies in the social web. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 25(3), 338–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Processoaquila. (2014, November 10). Ultima udienza del processo di Appello: dichiarazioni di Giulio Selvaggi. Blog post. https://processoaquila.wordpress.com/2014/11/10/ultima-udienza-del-processo-di-appello-dichiarazioni-di-giulio-selvaggi
   Google Scholar
• Rawlins, J. D., & Wilson, G. D. (2014). Agency and interactive data displays: Internet graphics as co-created rhetorical spaces. Technical Communication Quarterly, 23(4), 303–322.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, D. P. (2015). Testing the waters: Local users, sea level rise, and the productive usability of interactive geovisualizations. Communication Design Quarterly, 3(3), 25–29.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, B., & Walsh, L. (2019). The politics of zoom: Problems with downscaling climate visualizations. Geo: Geography and Environment, 6(1), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, S. H., DeLorme, D. E., & Hagen, S. C. (2015). Evaluating the utility of communicative effectiveness of an interactive sea-level rise viewer through stakeholder engagement. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 29(3), 314–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, S., & Richards, D. (2020). Story mapping and sea level rise: Listening to global risks at street lelvel. Communication Design Quarterly Review, 8(1), 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Swedberg, R. (2016). Can you visualize theory? On the use of visual thinking in theory pictures, theorizing diagrams, and visual sketches. Sociological Theory, 34(3), 250–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Geological Survey. (2007). Putting Down Roots in Earthquake Country. https://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/2005/15
   Google Scholar
• Ventura, V., Frisio, D. G., Ferrazzi, G., & Siletti, E. (2016). How scary! An analysis of visual communication concerning genetically modified organisms in Italy. Public Understanding of Science, 26(5), 547–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, L. (2013). Scientists as prophets: A rhetorical geneology. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, L. (2014). Tricks,’hockey sticks, and the myth of natural inscription: How the visual rhetoric of climate gate conflated climate with character. In B. Schneider & T. Nocke (Eds.), Image politics of climate change: Visualizations, imaginations, documentations (pp. 81–104). Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Weisenfeld, G. S. (2012). Imaging disaster: Tokyo and the visual culture of Japan’s great earthquake of 1923. Oakland: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winsor, D. (2006). Using writing to structure agency: An examination of engineers’ practice. Technical Communication Quarterly, 15(4), 411–430.
   Google Scholar
• Wysocki, A. F. (2004). The multiple media of texts: How onscreen and paper texts incorporate words, images, and other media. In C. Bazerman & P. Prior (Eds.), What writing does and how it does it (pp. 123–164). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Yeo, M. (2014). Fault lines at the interface of science and policy: Interpretative responses to the trial of scientists in L’Aquila. Earth-Science Reviews, 139, 406–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar